Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Why the commie-Ocasio-Cortez 
Media Overload?
HFPMdVsFk_NllZ4phEv5lrtrLFXX6YFFLPjEONhIQtX2S7GOEaGBC4C_uv8edTQ12nxdve9nJHr-9FFoW5EhovnxYmqwe-7F8sK9DZrOn7nOY7jgrXvPod_FWAOchRqNtVIFKdnNiouFDja4UMvA57fdTZohwaCBMVAvTmo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Thomas Gallatin  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Are Democrats Beginning 
To Turn On dirty cop-Mueller?  
6rbZmPBZBjsKUdcJBRv29gSDNG-0KgDPSw_ypdqvmHIsDry5O950KdIE9Sk-kZ5JemAvgEnPtDpBjfVfHpp-EpJSHQWlbMYHjHaxj1ZW8BRF1HTETrLG4MPAW-z2jvRA7YxCM6ORaANsNurTZJaYn41zJ0GfFABQzoYrM9hjMwCujZFCFrk5Ok8LYex_gsnqmZ6NGtXy8r6_CbYQxCTV7DcC-cZ0GoJNwQ8FQGjiHAz1UmeV69G999jzq347rR8LV4Oh3KC5ILDY-PeFZXtTk4BumUMs7qYlqOks9FZDikZBRB3nPN1oMA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Joe Simonson
{dailycaller.com} ~ Some congressional Democrats appear concerned that special counsel dirty cop-Robert S. Mueller isn’t being thorough enough in his investigation into President Donald Trump... Democratic Rep. scumbag-Adam B. Schiff, dirty cop-Mueller’s No. 1 defender on Capitol Hill, believes dirty cop-Mueller could decline an investigation into the president’s businesses, he told the Los Angeles Times  editorial board. One issue of particular interest to Democrats, scumbag-Schiff said Monday, was the ongoing negotiations between Trump’s allies and representatives from the Russian government over a skyscraper in Moscow during the 2016 election. “Anyone who engaged in anything like that, anything remotely like that, would never get a security clearance, but this is the president of the United States,” scumbag-Schiff told the LA Times. “If the financial entanglement goes beyond that, and includes money laundering and criminal activity that the Russians could expose at a time and place of their choosing, that’scompromising.”...scumbag-Schiff is wishing that would be true but its not.
.
Is It loose lips-Biden Time?
nOchNElHRzsHQ9YlKgm5QrjSnWWyR0UAmzViuSCOuvbfiBkLoA704OM5TqO16ZhtLIv3AU4uZW2McxX8PmFo4aoRvNWO1w-5xrAmXXVDyBfrIVgKgzgctthXzhsxK9evmi29K3O31j58ykBASPZZ125_LMUSfEuU1Eo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby GEORGE NEUMAYR
{spectator.org} ~ In the first year or so of Trump’s presidency, loose lips-Joe Biden hit the talk-show circuit, musing on his own wonderfulness... “I have regret that I am not president,” he said to one host. “Because I think there’s so much opportunity. I think America is incredibly well-positioned.” These days he is mulling a presidential run, telling fellow Democrats that he is the only electable candidate against Trump in 2020. But liberals are already throwing a wet blanket over his assumed candidacy. According to the New York Times, “He is viewed favorably by the vast majority of Democrats, but some surveys indicate Democrats want fresh faces and new leadership.” They may even want an old face, just not his. commie-Bernie Sanders would appear to command a far more fervent following than loose lips-Biden’s. Even within the circle of potential senior citizen candidates on the Democratic side, loose lips-Biden feels stale. Will the same egotism that led to his previous disastrous presidential runs lead to another? It would appear so. loose lips-Biden has convinced himself that he is the only candidate man enough to take on Trump. He spent the Christmas holidays in the Virgin Islands, reports the Times, calling potential donors and telling them that no other candidate is up to the task: In one of his calls over the holidays, Mr. loose lips-Biden repeated a variation of a line he has used publicly: “If you can persuade me there is somebody better who can win, I’m happy not to do it,” he said, according to the Democrat he spoke to, who shared the conversation on condition of anonymity to discuss a private talk. But then Mr. loose lips-Biden said something he has not stated so bluntly in public: “But I don’t see the candidate who can clearly do what has to be done to win.”... If he runs he will lose.  https://spectator.org/is-it-biden-time/?utm_source=Daily+Afternoon+Email&utm_campaign=8038dd2377-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_01_08_06_09&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d65fc4e11e-8038dd2377-104762253 
socialist-O’Rourke Rising? Trip Planned, 
“Draft  socialist-Beto” Movement Starts
0X51Fvciqsw69OX4cKVP7FQqaOZf8XX5Htay7z6refWN2wFFQyRptvaxQPEe8oiC8XEKlbCSQQ6a6kgO52--BnQo7e_H1MI1aRJy1Ags1Iu8AZCyceSnvzst_riSR8_fRnpvOAIkTCBNEcx1hQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby R. Cort Kirkwood
{thenewamerican.com} ~ Democrat wunderkind Robert Francis “socialist-Beto” O’Rourke is a man to watch as the race to become the Democratic contender in 2020 begins... He is planning a “solo” road trip to find out if he has the support among Democrats to mount a credible run, and a “Draft socialist-Beto” movement has begun in two states. Many Democrats view socialist-O’Rourke, who affects a Kennedy-like mien, as the most electable star in the leftist firmament, even calling him the next Barack Hussein scumbag/liar-nObama. And they believe that despite — or perhaps because of — his loss to incumbent Senator Ted Cruz in November. The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that socialist-O’Rourke “is asking aides to create an itinerary for him to take a solo road trip outside of Texas where he would “‘pop into places’ such as community college campuses.” socialist-O’Rourke will strike out from home in El Paso, the newspaper reported, detour around Iowa and other states with early caucuses and primaries, and won’t take staffers or any adoring media. He might write about the trip on social media. socialist-O’Rourke is wildly popular among Democrats and their media allies, who practically drooled over the former congressmen when he ran against Cruz. socialist-O’Rourke raised more than $80 million to finance the losing effort... He will still lose.
Kavanaugh authors first majority 
opinion for Supreme Court
b0LRIhhe2FwOqpACYHn5HvHKqySJ6oxxECo4ILbMP0I9-y21_ueHIvVn3h-d21b_1of90MKkHIP8Rwco_KQoahAH5eOjdr9Sla1jqASsx0_ruDSWCaANbHLnlXqo76R_7_Rs3gjJsWerwUnAvopLiTrk5TpFNbUP9MNI-3vxYnEXPbNtpSFQEDEhN1_rBLwQJKqbgkg5f_g68t6eajz_-3zmSQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by foxnews.com  
{foxnews.com} ~ Brett Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court’s newest justice, has authored his first majority opinion in an arbitration dispute case... Kavanaugh, who replaced Justice Anthony Kennedy, was sworn in to the Supreme Court in October after a rancorous confirmation battle. Typically, the newest justice’s first ruling is on a lower-profile appeal. The case is Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer and White Sales, Inc. Kavanaugh's eight-page opinion Tuesday resolves a narrow question in a dispute between two businesses in a soured relationship involving dental equipment. The case involved whether the dispute would head to arbitration or a lawsuit, and who would decide which path. The court is not answering those questions, but it is rejecting a lower-court ruling in favor of a lawsuit. Kavanaugh says courts must stick to the text of the Federal Arbitration Act and "are not at liberty to rewrite the statute passed by Congress and signed by the President." Kavanaugh's is the first opinion to be issued from the two-week session of the court that began in late October.
.
The Democratic Party: A Study in Terminal Lucidity
G8-upDdGDfA7M6slkziV0dCxSONY7ZnB6RrayC8wM68G6uTFup097Ofwi3DnpPaMTZu4hr2EnC-BBlsOtbOk4FAQUAGGyQp1Q3bxKLeyP1rB0AV-vAqnmd2NzJ8YZmeAF6T0wKKh8b8EUOzkOVboT5vCjPiRDRGZ7Xs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby DAVID CATRON
{spectator.org} ~ The Democratic Party exhibits all the symptoms of terminal lucidity. Sometimes called “the end-of-life rally,” this phenomenon involves temporary bursts of physical and mental activity in terminally ill patients immediately prior to death... It can cruelly mislead family members, who unrealistically take the apparent improvement as a sign that there is hope after all. This is how the left has responded to Democratic gains in the recent midterms. But such episodes rarely indicate any real change in the patient’s underlying condition, and the Democratic Party remains infected by fatal strains of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), utopian socialist fantasies, and identity politics. The party’s TDS infection was on display over the weekend in a column published by USA Today titled, “Now is the time to begin impeachment proceedings against President Trump.” That this loony effusion was written by a congresswoman who has been a member of the House for one week, and appeared in a national “news” outlet indicates that many Democrats and members of the media are hopelessly out of touch with the voters. Articles of impeachment were introduced in the House last week by a Democrat to much fanfare in the media, yet the left-leaning Brookings Institution just published a summary of recent surveys and concludes that this isn’t what the voters want from their representatives: Memo to Democrats: unless Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller’s investigation delivers a smoking gun, don’t rush to impeach President Trump.… Of 21 possible priorities for the new Congress, impeaching the president was tied for last, with only 38 percent of Americans deeming it “extremely important.” Republicans are united against it; no surprise there. But tellingly, it receives less support among Independents than does any other option, and Democrats rank it only 14th on their priority list. And yet the USA Today column, which was written by Rashida “impeach the motherf***er” Tlaib, explicitly states that her party need not — and should not — wait for dirty cop-Mueller to finish...
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Why the commie-Ocasio-Cortez Media Overload?
HFPMdVsFk_NllZ4phEv5lrtrLFXX6YFFLPjEONhIQtX2S7GOEaGBC4C_uv8edTQ12nxdve9nJHr-9FFoW5EhovnxYmqwe-7F8sK9DZrOn7nOY7jgrXvPod_FWAOchRqNtVIFKdnNiouFDja4UMvA57fdTZohwaCBMVAvTmo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Thomas Gallatin:  Freshmen Democrat Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY) appeared on CBS’s “60 Minutes” Sunday, where the rising Millennial political star sought to promote her “Green New Deal” and other pie-in-the-sky socialist programs such as health care for all, “free” college, and universal income. These extreme socialist programs have an astronomically high cost, and commie-Ocasio-Cortez’s assertions are so grossly inaccurate that even The Washington Post recently called her out with Four Pinocchios and then chastised her for “very bad defense of her falsehoods” in Sunday’s interview.

             Anderson Cooper asked commie-Ocasio-Cortez about being called out for presenting false “facts,” to which she offered this little gem: “If people really want to blow up one figure here or one word there, I would argue they’re missing the forest for the trees. I think there’s a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.” So proposing legislation that would fundamentally and radically change the U.S. both economically and socially and then promoting it as a good idea by using grossly inaccurate claims is okay because you believe that your cause is moral?
               The truth is that being concerned about morality includes being factually correct. Peddling misinformation in the name of morality is in fact immoral.
               But the bigger question here is why the Leftmedia and Democrats are so eager and willing to give commie-Ocasio-Cortez this much publicity and airtime when she is so obviously and repeatedly inaccurate and flat-out wrong about the facts. The key here for Democrat leadership is less commie-Ocasio-Cortez’s messaging than what she brings to the table: Millennial voters.
               Dems are willing to put up with her outlandish, naive, and extremist anti-capitalist political ideals so long as they can use her as a political mascot for “woke” Millennials. In other words, she’s good for attracting the votes of those who “think” with their feelings and equate feelings with morality.
               commie-Ocasio-Cortez claims socialism is moral when in reality it is a system predicated upon the false assumption that any inequity is fundamentally immoral and therefore justifies forced wealth redistribution, irrespective of how legitimately an individual may have acquired wealth. Socialism promotes a lie.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/60400?mailing_id=4000&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4000&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center