Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Refugees From Socialism Give a Needed Warning
SUO431yG-gkbnExQPp8qM3Cw9B_0MqMZSMBA7_usRiy6tWktGn882FweqFyP5FPdd1yMfTdpnYjOECtOsVPF6GJ2cuCxvXLIc1RurkkEfCEAqeSgY8EOEdTjRwMbGJqluZ7tLmxLUjrDoxFoI5ZQP7bZN8zR68U8szxZ524=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Robin Smith
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Ukraine Whistleblower Overheard Discussing 
How To ‘Take Out’ Trump In 2017, Report Says
Y5DhT7XR9k8S4JnBYsGuGvds9kem7iGKY_VSoWx_pCGzYjn32bKa0TcLBTjnyHJXAtckjPlvFu_6LTh9eaOmOedjIxt2WecKD9Gx2jk1xL82a1rmgk0wxjhvZlK8lkyzMNTSSUNqhZtLVhZC7LHbgtMkTWlV22HMF1QEJP7upA6EZb5jdBoGIApWt5R4Rkghv-KD2EY7bBMEr6cROD7ZZmsLDGGS=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By  Amanda Prestigiacomo
{ dailywire.com } ~ The man suspected to be the whistleblower who sparked the impeachment of President Donald Trump over a phone call with the president of Ukraine... reportedly openly discussed how to “take out” Trump not even two weeks after Trump took office, well before the call took place. RealClearInvestigations  reported Wednesday that sources overheard the CIA analyst and alleged whistleblower discussing how to remove Trump from office with fellow scumbag/liar-nObama holdover Sean Misko, who reportedly offered “guidance” to the alleged whistleblower during the impeachment process under Democratic Rep. scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff (CA). As noted by the outlet, there is “strong evidence” that the man identified in the report is the whistleblower, though he has not been officially named as such.“Sources told RealClearInvestigations the staffer with whom the alleged whistleblower was speaking was Sean Misko. Both were scumbag/liar-nObama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House on foreign policy and national security issues,” RealClearInvestigations reported Wednesday. “And both expressed anger over Trump’s new ‘America First’ foreign policy, a sea change from President scumbag/liar-nObama’s approach to international affairs.” “Just days after he was sworn in they were already talking about trying to get rid of him,” a White House colleague who allegedly overheard the conversation told RealClearInvestigations.“They weren’t just bent on subverting his agenda,” the source added. “They were plotting to actually have him removed from office.” Another source said the alleged whistleblower and Misko “didn’t like” Trump’s “policies,” adding, “They had a political vendetta against him from Day One.”...
.
Senate sets impeachment trial 
rules that postpone vote on witnesses
1urheDenmCOId-VHE2hIYrjPF2S2OfdjFcS6CX5A3Ys1vrM24xjZd18hHJbi5hRwS_Q_aXDSZuP71FGlXOpUhgXPP-KansN-huKQKU2xN0QxQdkzL1xTl6JvIAc1iunoOYKKznGjz9xZIWJzd7z7eb1JGtm0d3ALOHVyI6TQVjaodMM0tXZKwDpq8VtOfPvvy8-bOHuRHkUkAjUl8L9YZIiho__qHm-GA4QKq9j8MFdB88oG4ek8bHPSdMMNhsCUli91V6EmZBDhH0Vy5LVsVbBnIIo6F5nGCay2mJvKm3tCHFHiPEEV0Zc7ok71NiPM1X4yjDEMVjjKiRv_cg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Susan Ferrechio
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ The Senate passed rules governing President Trump’s impeachment trial that exclude immediate consideration of new witnesses or evidence... Republicans early Wednesday voted without any defections to provide a majority needed to pass the resolution. It followed a daylong debate over the rules of a trial that could last for weeks. While the rule dodges a witness fight for now, key Republicans have signaled they may vote for witnesses later in the trial. Among them is Sen. rino-Susan Collins of Maine, who put out a statement Tuesday indicating she is “likely” to vote to subpoena additional witness testimony. The vote to pass the resolution followed an extended effort by Democrats to force changes to the rules to require witnesses and new evidence upfront. Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag-Schumer, a New York Democrat, introduced several amendments to subpoena documents and require witness testimony. All of scumbag-Schumer’s amendments failed along party lines. The rules of the trial will generally follow those set during the 1999 impeachment trial of President scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton in that senators won’t vote on whether to summon new witnesses or to subpoena additional documents until after both the impeachment managers and Trump’s defense team present their arguments. The trial terms provide each side three days to present arguments. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell earlier Tuesday altered the rules to appeal to Senate moderates who balked at the two-day time limit McConnell initially hoped set. McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, also changed a rule that would have required the Senate to approve of the admission of evidence the House acquired during a weekslong impeachment investigation. The rule now allows the House impeachment managers to submit all of their evidence unless the Senate objects...   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate-sets-impeachment-trial-rules-that-postpone-vote-on-witnesses?utm_source=breaking_push&utm_medium=app&utm_campaign=push_notifications&utm_source=WEX_News%20Brief_01/22/2020&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News%20Brief&rid=5261   
President Trump Interview
with Maria Bartiromo
ojgIRv3p1TUIN-NGCthd7Q_b2qmwoaIFBIg6Xj-4pAHIate2qr6_ZA1j1PPzcOfcuLiYENDm137BSLH8Ps0oR6CqHu9oGk34YiqzhdZ1X9UoNghQyt52BmTblK_Rav-mRDbz0Jb76pJeXhTrOwDqfFY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Earlier today, while attending Davos, President Trump sat down for a lengthy interview with Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo... The primary topic was trade and economics with additional insight around the impeachment fiasco and some current events. Unfortunately Ms. Bartiromo did not ask if President Trump remembered there were documents he was going to declassify.
.
Nasty scumbag liar-Nadler 
Gets Lambasted by Justice Roberts
E9Jgb6aELHmfz1TM4kvfPx_ty-gos8vlTAD7FIpplTP1n7P3BK-N_8donW-GZ8FQIHNTuhC3huNj-trsZtGOR3SRtIJd628ydmOy4C1xh7daX2B41-RwySd_dyWRe4aed6XOEkCXBtqPpM27GRfb193U8j6uDar43NQDo43QEXZFPD9ddl9Aai765qVEo6BegkBXZzZilF3N2Z8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by thegreggjarrett.com ~ Democratic impeachment manager scumbag liar-Jerry “Nasty” Nadler, and the President’s counsels, were given a scolding after an exchange between them pushed the limit of what Chief Justice John Roberts would allow in the Senate... Day 1 of the Senate impeachment trial merely consisted of Democrats mudslinging and presenting gossip as evidence.  The President’s legal counsel had enough of Rep. scumbag liar-Nadler and his cohorts’ accusations against Republican Senate members, the President, and even the legal counsel members themselves, and called Rep. scumbag liar-Nadler out on his persistent personal attacks. Rep scumbag liar-Nadler started the heated exchange by stating, “It’s embarrassing. The President is on trial in the Senate, but the Senate is on trial in the eyes of the American people. Will you vote to allow all the relevant evidence to be presented here? Or will you betray your pledge to be an impartial juror? … Will you bring Ambassador Bolton here? Will you permit us to present you with the entire record of the president’s misconduct? Or will you instead choose to be complicit in the president’s coverup? So far I’m sad to say I see a lot of senators voting for a coverup, voting to deny witnesses, an absolutely indefensible vote, obviously a treacherous vote.”White House counsel Pat Cipollone responded by telling Rep. scumbag liar-Nadler, “we’ve been respectful of the Senate. We’ve made our arguments to you. And you don’t deserve, and we don’t deserve, what just happened. Mr. scumbag liar-Nadler came up here and made false allegations against our team. He made false allegations against all of you; he accused you of a cover-up. He’s been making false allegations against the president. The only one who should be embarrassed, Mr. scumbag liar-Nadler is you, for the way you’ve addressed the United States Senate. This is the United States Senate. You’re not in charge here. … It’s about time we bring this power trip in for a landing.” Then, White House counsel Jay Sekulow doubled down on scumbag liar-Nadler’s nasty accusations by stating, “At about 12:10 a.m., January 22, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, in this body, on the floor of this Senate, said ‘executive privilege and other nonsense.’ Now think about that for a moment. ‘Executive privilege and other nonsense.’ Mr. scumbag liar-Nadler, it is not ‘nonsense.’ These are privileges recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States. And to shred the Constitution, on the floor of the Senate. To serve what purpose? The Senate is not on trial. The Constitution doesn’t allow what just took place. Look what we’ve dealt with for the last, now 13 hours. And we hopefully are closing the proceedings, but not on a very high note.”...  https://thegreggjarrett.com/nasty-nadler-gets-lambasted-by-justice-roberts/   
Joe diGenova Reacts To First Day 
Of Trump Impeachment Trial
AezBJBjju5bTzRPqxrShIP1E_WvMXJ6uf_BoDtRR25_Q5D9iAGU9Q9akoeMFZWJdxKTOqdIlgdw8gD59GMVAto0fZoeu2-H5UzGFvAu9e_rPljLZ4l7QhCAcF8FiQdZ9aE7GJ0J8AS4FUo-ZlFY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by STEPHANIE HAMILL
{ dailycaller.com } ~ Joe diGenova, former U.S. district attorney for D.C., discusses what stood out to him on the first day of the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump... “They’re making the argument that they need all this information that they didn’t get when they conducted their own impeachment inquiry and returned it prematurely,” said diGenova. “They’re essentially conceding that their impeachment investigation was incomplete.” He went on to explain why Republicans  should ask for Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden to testify to learn more about his controversial business dealings in the Ukraine.
.
Democrat scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler Rejects 
Calling the loose lips liar-Bidens 
for Impeachment Trial
by restoreamericanglory.com ~ Last week, Sen. Ted Cruz came up with a brilliant proposition. If Democrats were so desperate to call all-new witnesses for the impeachment trial, then perhaps they could be accommodated by a “witness reciprocity” deal... For every witness Democrats call, Republicans get one of their own. In other words, if Democrats want to call John Bolton, that’s fine. Republicans will call Hunter Biden. If they want to call Mick Mulvaney, so be it. Republicans will call loose lips liar-Joe Biden. In an impeachment process that has been characterized by partisan nonsense, this was one of the fairest propositions we’ve heard. Naturally, Rep. scumbag liar-Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), one of the House’s impeachment managers, has rejected the deal out of hand. “Is there any circumstance in which Democrats would consider, for reciprocity, having Hunter Biden come and testify?” asked CBS Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan. “You know, the question of witnesses in any trial, in any trial, all relevant witnesses must be heard,” scumbag liar-Nadler replied. “Whether if- if you’re accused of robbing a bank, testimony that I saw him rob the bank or he was somewhere else, he couldn’t have robbed the bank, is admissible. It’s not negotiable whether you have witnesses. And this whole controversy about whether there should be witnesses is really a question of does the Senate want to have a fair trial or are they part of the cover up of the president? Any Republican senator who says there should be no witnesses or even that witnesses should be negotiated is part of the cover up.”Pause the tape for a second. Focus on the way Democrats want this trial both ways. On the one hand, they argue that there’s no constitutional reason for them to accuse President Donald Trump of a crime. Okay, fine. But you can’t fail to meet that minimal bar and simultaneously pretend that this is a criminal trial. What possible sense does that make? The articles of impeachment are wholly partisan, and the House impeachment process was wholly partisan. But now that it’s in the Senate, House Democrats want to flip the script and start doing things by the book. scumbag liar-Jerry, no one is falling for this. “So, you’re saying no way would Hunter Biden ever be called to testify?” Brennan asked. “Well, I’m saying that Hunter Biden has no knowledge of the accusations against the president,” scumbag liar-Nadler said. “Did the president, as we said- as the evidence shows that he did, betray his country by conspiring with a foreign country to- to try to rig the election? Hunter Biden has nothing to say about that.” This is the kind of weaselly reply that is technically correct while also far afield from the point. If Hunter Biden and his father are guilty of wrongdoing, then Trump did not betray his country. He protected his country by refusing to give military aid to a nation that is rife with corruption. Indeed, that IS what he did, irrespective of whether or not the loose lips liar-Bidens are actually guilty of anything sinister. But the testimony of Hunter Biden could certainly help clarify it for even the dumbest people in the Senate. Bafflingly, scumbag liar-Nadler, liar-Pelosi, and scumbag/liar-Schiff have yet to realize that they aren’t running this trial. They could have called any witness they wanted back when this process was still in the House. Instead, they chose to rush to a vote. Now they want to go back and do it all over again on Mitch McConnell’s time? Sorry, guys, it doesn’t work that way.   http://www.restoreamericanglory.com/breaking-news/democrat-jerry-nadler-rejects-calling-the-bidens-for-impeachment-trial/  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Refugees From Socialism Give a Needed Warning
SUO431yG-gkbnExQPp8qM3Cw9B_0MqMZSMBA7_usRiy6tWktGn882FweqFyP5FPdd1yMfTdpnYjOECtOsVPF6GJ2cuCxvXLIc1RurkkEfCEAqeSgY8EOEdTjRwMbGJqluZ7tLmxLUjrDoxFoI5ZQP7bZN8zR68U8szxZ524=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Robin Smith:  Presidential candidate and self-avowed socialist commie-Bernie Sanders was recently introduced by actor John Cusack with the declaration, “We have a 10- to 12-year window to radically transform our energy systems, or climate change, predatory capitalism, and endless war economies will rob us of the right to any future at all.”

The race is on: Which will happen first — the end of the world due to manmade climate change or the destruction of capitalism?

While Democrats are on message for their base, their steadfast hatred of the Liberty that created the greatest economy in the world should put every American on high alert. It’s America’s economic engine that provides opportunities for individuals to be self-reliant, own private property, work, and use those private earnings for their growth, their family, and their futures. Yet the entire Democrat Party is running on policies that erode the very foundation of Liberty.

Among the leading Democrat candidates, Sanders finds his appeal among the 18- to 44-year-olds. But what if the contrasting message hailing the virtues and values of capitalism and consumerism was carried by Millennials from a nation destroyed by socialism, rather than by hated Republicans?

Meet Jorge Galicia, who traveled to the U.S. in October 2018, and Andrés Guilarte, who arrived in January 2019. Both 20-somethings are asylum seekers born and raised in Venezuela, and they now speak to American college students about their firsthand experience with socialism’s destructive power. The college-educated gents are convinced that today’s indoctrinated intellectuals either simply don’t know what’s happening in Venezuela or need to be confronted with what they will lose.

Addressing their peers on college campuses in the Fund for American Studies program, Guilarte stressed, “We are eyewitnesses of the falling of the country. … We used to have rights like you have here. You can go to the supermarket, buy everything. You can have money for the month. … We used to be just like everybody else.”

Galicia chimes in, “Who in the world wouldn’t want to have free healthcare, free college tuition, free whatever? The thing is those kinds of offers are not sustainable in the longterm.” Then came the warning: “I know it is tempting, but do not fall into that trap. You need to learn from other people’s experience. Keep your Liberty protected, because what you have — it’s a beautiful country.” By contrast, with socialism in Venezuela “you started to see the scarcity of medicine, food supplies,” and other staples.

What Galicia cited as unsustainable offers that come at the expense of Liberty are all the enticing bait of the 2020 Democrat Party. They will, according to the survivor of socialism, yield “a horrible future for America.”

The pair’s warning about socialism in Venezuela reminds us about the Soviet Union. Democrats fear “Russian influence” but embrace the failed economic policies that Nobel laureate Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn warned of after surviving as a political prisoner in the Soviet Gulag for eight years. Seeing the blood of millions slaughtered by totalitarianism, Solzhenitsyn wrote of “an atmosphere of moral mediocrity, paralyzing man’s noblest impulses,” and a “tilt of freedom in the direction of evil … evidently born primarily out of a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which there is no evil inherent in human nature.”

Americans can listen and learn from Galicia and Guilarte — and the late Solzhenitsyn before them — or we’ll learn firsthand that socialism destroys the Liberty that makes us unique and great.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/68022?mailing_id=4813&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4813&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center