Thurs/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
 
Stop Muslim Terror by
Stopping Muslim Immigration
by Daniel Greenfield
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Showdown in Bloody Chicago 
OjGzpaWXbx2OtfGtfDZtt1mySGde5iVhKJTlLmpOGO6-cnnIbkjppFK5C-W8J08luQojCICSARfXovdRkO0mzBQX0Ml1qSUSHiRCvMxk33X1zTq5MJap_-X9xsbuIg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By James Shott: Unless you live on another planet, you have heard of the dangerous conditions in Chicago, where the level of violence is and has been at a crisis level for years. Chicago, like other major cities, has rampant crime and one of the higher murder and shooting rates, despite (or is it because of?) having some of the strictest gun laws in the country.
          On a per capita basis, Chicago does not attract much attention because of its large population. Based on the U.S. Census Bureau's last count in 2010, the estimated population in 2016 was 2.7 million, so its murder rate per 100,000 residents isn't that large. But Chicago still wins a dubious prize for its total number of homicides and shootings.
          Data compiled by the Chicago Tribune staff shows that in 2016 there were 4,368 shooting victims in the city and 762 homicides. Things don't look much better for 2017: As of Jan. 28, there were already 268 shooting victims, which is a little lower than Jan. 2016. But last January was the third-lowest month for shootings in 2016, so things could easily worsen.
          At least 39 people were shot across Chicago over the Martin Luther King Jr. Day holiday weekend, leaving 10 dead. Six people were shot while attending a memorial service for a shooting victim last week.
          Greg Zanis, a retired carpenter, creates wooden crosses for each person killed by gang violence in Chicago and places them in a grassy lot in the city's Englewood neighborhood. Last year was the deadliest year in 20 years — 762 homicides, up from 496 in 2015 — so Zanis was busy.
          Some shooting deaths result from action by police officers, but most shootings do not involve police and are attributed primarily to gang violence. Yet the deaths involving police officers attract much more attention than the far greater number of shootings and murders that do not involve the police. Data taken from the Independent Police Review Authority shows that in 2016 police were involved in only 11 of the 762 total shooting deaths. Police also wounded 14 people. The chance of being killed by a Chicago police officer is only 1.4%.
          However, in the high-crime minority communities, there is an almost automatic reaction to blame the police in shooting deaths when they are involved, despite the fact that in the vast majority of cases the victim either initiated the incident or resisted or fought against a proper action by police.
          These knee-jerk reactions arise before details are known and are based upon emotions and prejudice, ginned up by people whose political agenda is to blame police rather than face up to the reality that the victims have brought their fate on themselves through criminal behavior.
          This false narrative continues even after police are exonerated and is responsible for protest demonstrations and hatred and mistrust of police. The effect too often makes police reluctant to patrol in neighborhoods where these confrontations have occurred and are most likely to recur, but where police presence is most needed, which, of course, makes matters worse.
          Street violence has increased in the administration of Democrat Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who served as the previous president's chief of staff from 2008 to 2010 and was elected mayor in 2011. In addition to failing to control the crime-ridden city, Emanuel opened Chicago to illegal aliens, proclaiming, "Chicago has in the past been a sanctuary city. ... It always will be a sanctuary city." He also celebrated when liar-nObama scapegoated Chicago's police as he exited the White House earlier this month.
          President Donald Trump, a vocal critic of urban violence, threatens to "send in the feds." With rampant speculation as to what exactly will occur, he has many constitutional options available, the first being Senate confirmation of his attorney general nominee, Sen. Jeff Sessions.
          Citing former New York Mayor Rudy Gulliani's actions while in office, National Review's Andrew McCarthy suggests that approach would also work in Chicago, noting that the "U.S. penal code is better equipped to deal with street crime today than three decades ago." McCarthy, however, acknowledges that the feds cannot totally solve Chicago's problems.
          "In Chicago, federal law enforcement could make a difference by using and building on task-force arrangements with the CPD and state police," he wrote. "High-crime areas could be targeted over a sustained period for investigations of narcotics trafficking, firearms offenses, violent crimes in aid of racketeering (racketeering can include street-gang violence and drug conspiracies), and extortionate interference with commerce by violence or threats. A healthy percentage of the cases developed … could then be indicted in federal court, where the penalties are stiffer and surer."
          Emanuel has failed to reduce crime in his city but is amenable to receiving assistance. Let's pray that Trump's focus on big city crime pays off.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=>
.
Trump Should Rescind liar-nObama’s
Transgender Agenda and Protect Religious Liberty
by Ryan T. Anderson  
AWd7wRCLgkGM8yxQ7T2nNEQj0W8DNX_x4tXllk9Ms5ojO5lKBXdJg4BpOviWBnhTkTrZJ6z2UOfLKNiYcnlwslYOU5ESjpbQDdHGTVc3J8IEs_0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{dailysignal.com} ~ The media was abuzz yesterday with rumors that President Donald Trump was preparing an executive order that would protect religious liberty in the aftermath of the redefinition of marriage... Trump should issue such an executive order, and he should rescind former President Barack liar-nObama’s executive actions on sexual orientation and gender identity that created many of these problems in the first place. While a candidate, Trump promised to sign the First Amendment Defense Act into law. He needn’t simply wait for Congress. While legislation provides the best long-term protections, Trump can lawfully enact many of those protections through an executive order right now...  http://dailysignal.com/2017/01/31/trump-should-rescind-obamas-transgender-agenda-and-protect-religious-liberty/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CapitolBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWlRVM04ySmtaV1JsTmpFeCIsInQiOiI3bXBLWUtZMnJad3BMY1dZS05RTVFLNGR4TjZ1UTRmWEtOaGRRbzRkQUtqRzZNY045eUR1TGxJaXBFS3dCeUM5Q1JvZEFzUCtMQVdQd0xYMHQrRmpLZmxRSnh2UFwvNnNoalRwMURBaWR1SGowZ1gxUG9YdTdjWlA2MEFpN0dKbEUifQ%3D%3D
 
.
Important Muslims Come Out
in Support of Trump’s Immigration Order
by Onan Coca
PQvOUb1gVcFUu5iyE9mXjE2lH9dbz8JbsdkhP8-CNhs-Zq6QXB9IIX5_WUHnnxyTHt6Xx0vBYmT8DANEY57FrB2R4DF4C8B9Uh11PTgnWR4crppvPALlGvMkkD9L7KAccYNsqwT6-SBJrWwy_eziVllFG1ogWk2FPS2KlVwqlmUj=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{constitution.com} ~ I wonder if this will get the liberal wingnuts to shut their yappers and stop complaining about President Trump’s immigration orders? Probably not… On Monday’s episode of Fox & Friends co-founder of “The Muslim Reform Movement,” Asra Nomani, spoke out in defense of President Donald Trump and his recent executive order pressing pause on immigration from certain Muslim majority countries. “I’ve been a journalist for 30 years and I’m really disappointed that the media has unfortunately gone along with this meme #MuslimBan. It’s a propaganda campaign. In communications there is a term called agitprop, it means agitation propaganda. What we see right now is agitation propaganda from a very partisan political movement that lost the election. What I am really disturbed by is when I did a search last night of how many outlets have #MuslimBan in their headlines, they go everywhere from the New York Times to Slate magazine. It’s a disturbing trend where we are inciting fear and doing it very irresponsibly…  http://constitution.com/important-muslims-come-support-trumps-immigration-order/
.
Judge Napolitano On Yates Defiance –
Reprehensible That DOJ Could Be Rogue
by Rick Wells
UylbTKcyumQYtGW-8EnWrcfSpcSA2l_zX65IUVzF39K9jr63MqHRsQxvFjr0PBsAFyhPMa8tay9xM4xzqOHcs6NxmarYH5xg04R28pVjXQhk7IzjDOmgxcfpYwK5AAPcEOM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Judge Andrew Napolitano describes his feelings regarding the firing of Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, saying, “It is reprehensible that the Justice Department could be rogue... Because, who is the chief federal law enforcement officer of the land? The President of the United States, not the Attorney General. For the Justice Department to be run by a rogue Attorney General, who won’t take direction from the President is simply unacceptable.” Napolitano says, “Donald Trump is 100% correct. Chuck Schumer’s delaying tactics, along with the other Democrats in the Senate, have deprived him of the tools that the Constitution gives him to enforce the federal law and that is an Attorney General who will run the Justice Department consistent with the President.” “I’m beginning to think,” says Napolitano, “that all of these orders that were obtained over the weekend, staying various parts of the President’s executive order, orders obtained by judges who sat on Saturday night and Sunday morning, we done with nobody in the courtroom representing the government.”...  http://rickwells.us/judge-napolitano-yates-defiance-reprehensible-doj-rogue/
.
Congressman Trey Gowdy Issues Support
for Trump’s Migrant Restrictions
by Walter White
XFZXA2_shSU1dPF2n97_WSfVTRPljF0MGglmzgEMmFpo5fvpc0d3qPPb7qsVDK1U5mnE1yZ3AXJFk0pMXYKJ5_7OlmbmNE3D-BzOPVSXe1Qy4M8Vg_E_xMYDhzxa_M_KviaWacIB_QSjmz6X=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{thepoliticalinsider.com} ~ Over the weekend, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order temporarily limiting immigration and travel from terror-prone nations... Predictably, Democrats and their allies in the media have called the Executive Order a “Muslim ban,” but The Political Insider has exposed this liberal lie and helped to explain what the president’s Executive Order actually covers. Now, conservative hero Congressman Trey Gowdy of South Carolina has just released a statement voicing his support for President Trump’s Executive Order. Liberals are going to hate this! Here’s a copy of Gowdy’s statement courtesy of the Congressman’s office: “Our nation has a long and rich history of welcoming those fleeing persecution. We also have a long and rich history of liberating those suffering under oppression. We are the most welcoming and generous country in the world, and we are a country of immigrants...  http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/trey-gowdy-trump-executive-order-immigrant-restrictions/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=TPI-Newsletter-2-1-17&utm_campaign=TPI_020117_Newsletter&source=CI
.
How Senate Republicans Can
Break a Supreme Court Filibuster
by James Wallner
ttSp43bioXvGlURrLj91TCig8T7yn5e2UIIxfDC8Y5MgEr9X9dNGmnq0HF8zYhqI0Q1UVQDaf7nIm-KKbKMUIzrIPwUYfsoVBg5i6dSS7xPFxqc7lLzsdN0unRrH=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{dailysignal.com} ~ President Donald Trump’s nominee to fill the open seat on the Supreme Court—whoever it may be—can expect rough treatment from Senate Democrats... Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., has pledged to filibuster any nominee he disapproves of, even if it means leaving the nation’s highest court short-handed for years. Doubtless, some Republicans will call for Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to exercise the “nuclear option”: eliminating the filibuster so the nominee can be confirmed by a simple majority. After all, Senate Democrats went nuclear in 2013 to thwart Republican plans to filibuster some of President Barack liar-nObama’s nominations...We all know who the nominee is.  http://dailysignal.com/2017/01/31/how-senate-republicans-can-break-a-supreme-court-filibuster/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTURBMVpXTTRNV0ZoTVdSbCIsInQiOiJ5MW1nNlI2bDBzaGZVVk56SVJpakZoRjdzb2VISEtxSEptRlwvV2tRajBYelVBSVdta0NPamlmdUZcL0FIUjFZNVlSbzZ0clRaMjRwY0VTRG9EMzhNRVh5S2N4UzRqRjVkcDBvcFowWUMwR0QwRXZtWjdodW5QRCtqYnQ5a2p6UVpvIn0%3D
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Stop Muslim Terror by
Stopping Muslim Immigration
by Daniel Greenfield
DtJD8dm-gvpsx9JHhtKEx8nZ58Z0Oa4PGd_CpbeaY8QuinBdn1YtVag4qoh2mJ1q8aElAISwZav30uuDgoGFelwlT8v7Fsb9Lxh8xDqYmGVw56bHQs8JiOBWcx_ScBJxKkODq1OyqBhDsuTH1vWjtUn73w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{aim.org} ~ Lone wolf terrorism is the biggest trend in Islamic terrorism. Unlike classic Islamic terrorism, it requires no cells stretching across countries the way that 9/11 did. The perpetrators don’t even need to enter the country under false pretenses the way that the World Trade Center bombers did.

In many cases, they are already citizens. Some were even born in their target country.

Classic counterterrorism is directed at organizations. It’s inadequate for stopping individual Muslim terrorists like Omar Mateen who was able to murder 49 people at a nightclub in Orlando or closely related duos like the Tsarnaev brothers in Boston or the husband and wife team who carried out the San Bernardino terrorist attack which took the lives of 14 people.

Even the standard technique of planting informants into mosques, deeply opposed by the Islamic lobby in the United States, fails when individuals decide to act alone or only trust their wives or brothers to be in on the plot with them. If an individual Islamic terrorist fails to let his plans slip, either online or to an FBI informant, stopping him can be extremely difficult if not entirely impossible without a stroke of luck.

And Islamic terrorists only need to be lucky once. We have to be lucky every time.

Every absurd Islamic terror plot broken up by law enforcement, the type of thing dismissed by the media and ridiculed by commentators, launching rockets at planes, underwear bombs and blowing up trains, contained the seed of a horrific terrorist attack just like Orlando, Boston or Nice.

When you turn on the evening news and see a running death toll, it’s because one of those absurd and ridiculous terror plots actually succeeded. And it’s happening more and more often.

The reason is simple. Unlike classic Islamic terrorism which required organization and infrastructure, the new brand of Islamic terror only needs one thing… Muslims.

Lone wolf terrorism operates entirely off the existing Muslim population in a particular country. The bigger the Muslim population, the bigger the risk. Any Muslim or Muslims who have settled in a particular non-Muslim country can answer the call of Jihad at any given time without warning.

There is no way that the FBI or other law enforcement agencies could begin to monitor even a fraction of the Islamic settler population sympathetic to terror. The FBI alone has almost 1,000 active ISIS cases it was investigating last year in all 50 states. It does not have nearly the resources it needs to handle them.

As the Muslim settler population in the country increases, the number of cases will grow. No matter how much law enforcement expands the scope of its operations, it will not be able to keep up with the high natural birth rates of the Muslim settler population whose terrorists don’t need a fraction of the training or skills that trained law enforcement figures do. The more the Muslim population grows, the more terror attacks like Orlando, Boston and Nice will get past law enforcement.

Any technological or logistical solutions to this crisis on the law enforcement end will only be band aids.

The source of the problem is Islamic immigration. That is the only possible solution. The only way to reduce the growth of the lone wolf Islamic terrorism problem is to reduce or end Muslim migration.

If this is how bad it is when Muslims are only 1% of the population, what happens when the Muslim settler population doubles and then doubles again? Accompanying these rising population numbers will be rising influence by the Islamic lobby. Islamic groups such as CAIR with a history of terror ties and opposition to counterterrorism will have even more power to stymie law enforcement investigations. The end result will be far more successful Muslim terrorist massacres taking place on a constant basis.

Muslim immigrants are already inherently privileged when it comes to their ability to enter this country ahead of far more peaceful and far more deserving groups. For example, the vast majority of Syrian refugees admitted to this country are the Muslims who perpetrated and are perpetuating their religious war in the region rather than their Christian and Yazidi victims who face slavery and genocide at their hands.

This Islamic immigration privilege must be withdrawn. Muslim immigration must at the very least be scaled back to a level that law enforcement can cope with. At best it must end entirely until the Muslim world manages to stabilize its way of life to the extent that it can peacefully co-exist with non-Muslims.

There will be endless arguments over what percentage of Muslims support terrorism, but our own experience of recent attacks shows that many of them came from attackers who overtly appeared to be “moderate” and “ordinary”. For every Islamist activist dressed in Salafist fashion and tweeting praise of ISIS, there is at least one, if not many more, whom you would pass on the street without a second look.

Before the Boston Marathon bombing, the Tsarnaevs did not seem like Jihadists. They would have been classed with the general category of “moderate” Muslims. And then they struck.

That is how it is.

The internet has decentralized terrorist training camps. Any Muslim can acquire the skills and equipment he needs to kill a few or a dozen or even a hundred if he chooses to follow his religion.

Not every Muslim will shoot up a nightclub or bomb a marathon, but we have no foolproof way of telling them apart. And even many Muslims who would not shoot up an office party in San Bernardino will still sympathize with the perpetrators. And even those Muslims who don’t will often continue supporting the Muslim lobby of organizations like CAIR that stymie law enforcement investigations of Islamic terrorism.

Muslim immigration makes Muslim terrorism worse.

Once we understand this inconvenient truth, then everything else naturally flows from it. The type of terrorism that we are dealing now won’t be beaten by breaking up organizations or droning terrorist leaders in training camps in Yemen or Pakistan. The enemy is right here. He speaks our language. He walks down our streets. He looks at us with hate in his Halal heart and he plots to kill us.

He may pledge allegiance to ISIS or Al Qaeda, but he is part of the larger organization of Islam. It is this organization, more than any of its Jihadist factional subdivisions, that represents the true threat.

Lone wolf terrorism is a viral threat that is spread by Islamic migration. We can only end it by closing the door. As long as the door to the Muslim migrant stays open, we will live under the threat that our neighbor or co-worker will be the one to kill us tomorrow or the day after that.
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center