Thurs/Med PM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
'scumbag/liar-Schiff Show' Roundup: 
Perjury, Nine Witnesses
xKwxhePdtvbeLa01QORA5afIIw36HpciBn7N249sDx3CJnO8l140Sxq6uSgOfEkwpA7X-sFfk6scky62dk9nsMSAcuIgWQuQKgIM5H-WJ0jJKwsgAchi2JqpEnxoAJTRpUibahSALP6LPtQBsd1asv5qfQIo8zpNe5D-0aI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Fiona Hill Calls Ukrainian 2016 Election 
Interference ‘Fictional Narrative’ 
in Opening Statement
O0bqeGHwggYnuTfvXBs_9bVGPHt_MTeB0ooQhWBOM4j8Zn-WkE6F-wn9zTE1nEv7n1lYNJpTHpyV8VRrjqDxej_tVocLJwEPyGmQTgFQKGR1c43HdeeUAOMD4ooVb-5QkhW0HsZlwwB_-Tw35My89gSsWGyV2qz3iGb_XA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By TOBIAS HOONHOUT
{ nationalreview.com } ~ Former National Security Council staffer Fiona Hill will call Ukrainian 2016 election interference “a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves”... in her testimony Wednesday, according to a pre-released copy of her opening statement. “The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in 2016,” Hill’s statement reads. “This is the public conclusion of our intelligence agencies, confirmed in bipartisan Congressional reports. It is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details must remain classified. “The impact of the successful 2016 Russian campaign remains evident today. Our nation is being torn apart. Truth is questioned. Our highly professional and expert career foreign service is being undermined,” the statement continues. House Republicans have routinely touted Ukrainian election interference as proof that President Trump’s skepticism in handing over aid to the new Ukrainian regime under Volodymyr Zelensky was justified. During his opening statement on Tuesday, House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R., Calif.) accused the media of being “puppets of the Democratic Party” and pointed to the questioning of independent journalist John Solomon, who has reported extensively on Ukrainian influence in U.S. domestic politics. “Since the Democrats switched from Russia to Ukraine for their impeachment crusade, Solomon’s reporting on Burisma, Hunter Biden, and Ukrainian election meddling has become inconvenient for the Democratic narrative, and so the media is furiously smearing and libeling Solomon,” Nunes said. Republicans have also repeatedly cited a January 2017 article from Politico titled “Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire,” which cites examples of Ukrainian officials attempting to sabotage the Trump campaign...
.
Turner, Jordan, Ratcliffe and Stefanik 
Question Ambassador Sondland
xpwQ69N2LqjLz58Irrc4bVDIIWoUwh30KO6OCDu81Z1B1U1dHQa_TuOxFZg0_8ybZJ9h537yl1_wP2hm0D-DLwX89S0Cn3l1Bhn4IMpViI6vx2nJFOKRQWYBWU9FvUV4lM89KsYWer-VG3Y_BcM-hVJFDLLQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Representatives Michael Turner, Jim Jordan, John Ratcliffe and Elise Stefanik question the multitude of contradictions present in the testimony of Ambassador Gordon Sondland... Michael Turner called Sondland’s testimony “somewhat circular,” and questioned the ambassador’s assertion that “everyone was in the loop.”  Additionally, Rep. Jim Jordan questioned Gordon Sondland about his testimony there was a “quid pro quo” in which U.S. aid and a White House meeting were contingent on Ukraine agreeing to investigate the 2016 elections and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma. Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, questioned Gordon Sondland. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., questioned Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, on Nov. 20, in a public hearing as part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
.
scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff Just Issued Another Impeachment Threat Against President Trump
IiKG2FKjyJ7xQDOneCLPLj9SGC0OCiH_XZzCf11stu0b-XCmFiaqTMXigVnlWIJFc1Z1U37ppae-23DEEavQXlOBJxYWM53KZ8seQXiibHu_38sqmkP_o1kM0X_PoVDHMJeJwXzGWP3qWu-PFAJa=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Katie Pavlich
{ townhall.com } ~ During the fourth public impeachment inquiry hearing Wednesday morning on Capitol Hill, House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff issued another impeachment threat... against President Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. "We can see why Secretary Pompeo and President Trump have made such a concerted and across the board effort to obstruct this investigation and this impeachment inquiry and I will just say this, they do so at their own peril. I remind the President that Article III of the impeachment articles drafted against President Nixon was his refusal to obey the subpoenas of Congress," scumbag/liar-Schiff said. "The statement from scumbag/liar-Schiff came after Ambassador Sondland accused the State Department of withholding documents requested by his attorneys. During a break in Wednesday's testimony, scumbag/liar-Schiff ran to the cameras to reiterate President Trump committed bribery and is obstructing Congress. It's clear he will be filing official articles of impeachment once the "inquiry" is done.   https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2019/11/20/adam-schiff-issues-a-threat-against-president-trump-during-fourth-public-hearing-n2556764?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=&bcid=7220442bc3498cb5e2d68f3cb4d11680&recip=18305623  
.
FBI Attempting To Interview 
Ukraine Call Whistleblower
vY9U9Vw2RHbO1-3FcDI97lGXpn59Xj8n6EeoKCQaOb4VbtC_BR1aB9e8kRVl72mbaSz9I8I4B9qwVnPnBVJrq_PNrYjcp0B3OXwY78C9OC_6-Rhfg2gx-qsVaLPdUlxs_CH7UtX1ICs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Jack Davis 
{ westernjournal.com } ~ The FBI wants to hear from the whistleblower who first triggered the controversy over President Donald Trump’s July 25 phone call with the president of Ukraine... according to two reports. Citing unnamed sources, Yahoo News reported that an FBI field agent has made contact with a lawyer representing the whistleblower. However, an interview has not yet taken place, Yahoo News said. NBC News  later reported that an unnamed source had largely confirmed the account from Yahoo News. Neither the FBI nor Mark Zaid, an attorney for the whistleblower, would comment on the matter to Yahoo. Yahoo News reported the range of questions to be asked was not clear, though the outlet said the threats that have allegedly been made against the whistleblower are believed to be outside the scope of the proposed interview. The initial complaint concerning the July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was reviewed by the Justice Department in September, according to The Washington Post. The Justice Department review focused upon whether the conversation violated campaign finance laws. Kerri Kupec, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said in a statement that “there was no campaign finance violation and that no further action was warranted.” “All relevant components of the Department agreed with his legal conclusion, and the Department has concluded the matter,” she said. In its reporting, NBC said Justice Department officials “have never explained why they did not consider questions of bribery, extortion or other possible crimes.” However, during Tuesday’s House Intelligence Committee hearing, Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York zeroed in on those issues in her questioning of Tim Morrison, a former top National Security Council official who listened in on the July 25 call...   https://www.westernjournal.com/report-fbi-attempting-interview-ukraine-call-whistleblower/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-WJ&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=western-journal
.
Signaling 3rd elections, Liberman accuses
 Gantz and Netanyahu of thwarting unity
RizQJk_svfIWhI9I3rM_Jv3-331jBE6Dcc8Gtc092AsRbC1ZEmby5l4mkLxkyFiSfY7cHgzeKgzrRVsSGvwU0r_498K1SkrHLFxnSuq3MCKqYgQQZgfjfAX6EFcz8SwHQi7B=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By RAOUL WOOTLIFF
{ timesofisrael.com } ~ In a dramatic announcement Wednesday just hours before Blue and White chief Benny Gantz’s mandate to form a government ends,.. Yisrael Beytenu chair Avigdor Liberman announced that he would not support either a minority government headed by Gantz or a right-wing government headed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He also castigated the ultra-Orthodox parties as “increasingly anti-Zionist,” linking them in this regard with the largely Arab Joint List, which he again called a “fifth column.” And he implied that a prominent ultra-Orthodox sage was engaged in money laundering. “There is no chance. We will not join either a limited right- or left-wing government or a minority government. Whatever sort of government that would be, it would not survive and would not be able to function to do what is needed for the country,” Liberman told the packed Yisrael Beytenu faction room in the Knesset, apparently setting Israel up for third elections in under a year. Should Gantz fail to form a coalition by Wednesday at midnight, Knesset members have a further 21 days to choose another MK to be given the mandate to form a government, or decide to head back to elections. “I have left no stone unturned in order to get to a liberal national unity government as we promised in the election. We made every of effort both in front of the cameras and behind the scenes. I received innumerable offers including everything from a rotation as prime minister for a year — half the kingdom plus 10 percent. But we will not sell our values for seats, even if it’s the best upholstered chair there is,” Liberman declared. The Yisrael Beteynu chief added, “Liberal unity was very close. The only thing we had to overcome was a personal rift — one side wasn’t willing to accept the president’s plan, the other wouldn’t give up on his messianic, ultra-Orthodox bloc.” President Reuven Rivlin has suggested a power-sharing agreement whereby, he indicated, Netanyahu would take a leave of absence if he is indicted in the three corruption cases pending against him. “Who is to blame?” Liberman continued. “Both Gantz and Netanyahu. Neither was willing to make dramatic decisions. Both played a double game. So in my opinion, both are to blame.”...   https://www.timesofisrael.com/signaling-3rd-elections-liberman-accuses-gantz-and-netanyahu-of-thwarting-unity/?utm_source=The+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=daily-edition-2019-11-20&utm_medium=email   
Guilt by Miscommunication
On Trump’s Impeachment Accusers
1FtQEM1GPoZyyL2fYqObtkW-fO_R2XJ_8ddjjwh3E_kx2vvFmPy318di2xrFmeRoYzhoM_yv9fEixfQacIikcVS-p6zCFWTdbAohiynIpcpPpgbZw6bP9EtEOsHwivxpqwhRZTy3nVjzE_opmtIXsJLbrW-bFbXjUJPZSg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by MARC BERMAN
{ spectator.org } ~ It’s not like I’ve ever met or even spoken with liar-Nancy Pelosi, scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler, or scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff. But I can say with supreme confidence that these pols are conducting their  impeachment inquiry in bad faith... They realize that President Trump hasn’t committed an impeachable offense. How do I know what is in the minds of these congressional Democrats? Well, like the Democrats’ initial star witness William Taylor, I have gray hair I went gray at 25 and a sonorous voice my mom told me so. Moreover, like the Dems’ next marquee idol witness, George Kent, I wear a bow tie when I want other people to think that I’m a Mensa member. Both these personal traits prove beyond any reasonable doubt that I know what other people are thinking — even better than they do. Even if I have never met them. Or even spoken with them. Witness how Taylor and Kent ascribed bad motives to the president despite the fact that neither has ever met Trump or even spoken with him on the phone. Same goes for Democratic witnesses Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and vice-presidential adviser Jennifer Williams, who are testifying as I write this. But the real clincher that proves that I’m right about the Dems’ perfidy is that a friend of mine whose identity I can’t disclose who sometimes visits a relative of his who lives in Virginia, just maybe 75 miles from D.C., told me that he was unambiguously informed by an acquaintance who works at the Department of the Interior, who knows a park ranger who works on the National Mall, and who was on duty 37 feet away from an administrative assistant who works in liar-Pelosi’s office and who told a homeless man that he would be better off panhandling in San Francisco because there was no chance of him ever getting arrested there and that anyhow foot traffic would be down on the Mall because her boss, scumbag liar-Nadler, scumbag/liar-Schiff, and worthless-Jim Acosta understood that their case against Trump was chicken poop and were busy trying to locate someone in the White House preferably an employee, though a tourist would do who was willing to testify that he or she or any gender combination thereof heard Trump say something to the First Lady, Ivanka, or Jared Kushner that would, if translated into Esperanto, then into French, then into Ukrainian, and finally back into English, and after all prepositions were removed, advocate violating some federal statute, really any one, even 6 USC Section 551 and 36 CFR Section 261.16(c), which make it a crime to wash a fish at a faucet that is not an official fish-washing faucet, provided that the soon to be ex-president also uttered any of the names “loose lips liar-Biden,” “Hunter,” “loose lips liar-Joe,” or “Sleepy” within 540 words of advocating the statutory violation. Could the Democratic cabal’s bad faith be any clearer? Admittedly, my friend further told me that he heard from his relative that the Dems nearly had the commander in chief dead to rights last week. Apparently, the president complained about a “disgusting” salmon fillet served at a working lunch. He then asked Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney to go to the kitchen and wash it off. Unfortunately for Madame Speaker and company, the law in question only criminalizes illicit fish washing in a “national forest.” Democrats may protest that my “friend’s” tale is rank hearsay that would never be considered by any court of law outside North Korea, China, or Cuba. To which any fair-minded observer’s response should be, “Exactly.”...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
'scumbag/liar-Schiff Show' Roundup: 
Perjury, Nine Witnesses
xKwxhePdtvbeLa01QORA5afIIw36HpciBn7N249sDx3CJnO8l140Sxq6uSgOfEkwpA7X-sFfk6scky62dk9nsMSAcuIgWQuQKgIM5H-WJ0jJKwsgAchi2JqpEnxoAJTRpUibahSALP6LPtQBsd1asv5qfQIo8zpNe5D-0aI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson:  Just when you thought Democrats had moved on to nailing President Donald Trump on Ukraine, they go back to the “Russia collusion” well. The Wall Street Journal reports, “The top lawyer for the Democratic-led House said impeachment investigators were examining whether President Trump lied in statements to former special counsel Robert Mueller.”
 

Rep. Jame Raskin (D-MD) explains, “It’s a crime to lie to federal prosecutors in the course of a federal proceeding. That’s perjury. It was also the basis for the GOP-controlled House’s impeachment of scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton for lying under oath, for committing perjury. So it’s a very serious offense — and it’s obviously something that we take seriously.”

So, along with shifting to “bribery” instead of “quid pro quo,” Democrats have latched onto a second word — “perjury” — to bolster their impeachment case. Constitutional and legal terms tested better than Latin in focus groups. Democrats may also be baiting Trump into testifying on his own behalf. He says he would “strongly consider” it.

But given how poorly the Mueller report panned out for Democrats the first time, we’re going to go out on a limb and say the sequel won’t be any better.

Nine people are set to testify this week. The so-called whistleblower is not among them.

As Mark Alexander argues, “We have assumed the Demos would spread their net to catch Trump on something beyond Ukraine — the same model Mueller used to catch Trump associates like Paul Manafort on charges completely unrelated to the Russia investigation — but with the two Justice Department reports coming up, some Demos may get caught in their own net. Again, it’s concern about getting caught in their own net that accounts for scumbag/liar-Schiff’s reversing himself by not allowing testimony from the CIA deep-stater/ whistleblower, which could very likely end up landing at his own feet.”

The four people on tap Tuesday are Jennifer Williams, Vice President Mike Pence’s special adviser on Europe and Russia; Alexander Vindman, director of European affairs at the National Security Council; Kurt Volker, former special envoy to Ukraine; and Timothy Morrison, deputy assistant to the president and the National Security Council’s senior director for Europe and Russia. (Williams’s opening statement. And Vindman’s opening statement.)

Another Wall Street Journal report notes that Vindman and Williams “told impeachment investigators that they were concerned by the political nature of the president’s request.” According to Vindman’s prepared remarks, “It is improper for the President of the United States to demand a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen and political opponent.” That is the case Democrats hope to parlay into an impeachment vote.  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66867?mailing_id=4670&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4670&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center