thenationalpatriot.com

The Craziest Democrat Strategy Yet


By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

According to Neil Sroka, a liberal activist and spokesmouth for “Democracy for America,” which sounds suspiciously like “Organizing for America,” the 2018 strategy for his party’s midterm success should include the impeachment of President Trump.

Here’s exactly what he said…

“Democrats should run on an inclusive, populist agenda of free college and paid family leave, but shouldn’t shy away from supporting impeachment.”

Oh…please make that the foremost plank in the liberal/socialist party strategy.

PLEASE!!!

To understand exactly what Sroka is saying, one must dig out their liberal super, double top secret decoder ring and give it a spin. Luckily, I keep mine right handy, so allow me to decipher his blather for you.

“Inclusive” in liberal speak means…inclusive of all socialist, big government, entitlement and anti-American thinkers, and EXCLUSIVE of anyone who believes in our Constitution, limited government and individual rights or self-reliance.

“Populist agenda,” in liberal speak means…mob rule that intimidates and suppresses those who, because of their belief in Capitalism, have actually made something of themselves, and have done so without reliance on the federal government.

“Free college and paid family leave,” in liberal speak means entitlement based on cradle to grave nannism and reliance on other people’s money.

See…socialism.

But…according to Sroka, and my super, double top secret liberal decoder ring…because all of that other crap failed them in 2016, based on its attempted fundamental transformation implementation over the previous 8 years…just impeach Trump.

That, in a nutshell, is what liberals are considering pinning all their hopes and dreams of a socialistic America on as we steam towards the 2018 midterm elections.

Can you say…desperation?

First of all…liberals would need to take 24 seats in the House and 2 in the Senate away from Republicans this November to hold a majority of Congress, and without that majority, they couldn’t impeach a dog catcher in Squatsville Kansas…much less a sitting President of these getting great again United States.

To be honest, I don’t even know if there IS a Squatsville in Kansas, or if they have a dog catcher…but you get my drift.

Naturally, the political party that can’t come to grips with the fact that there are but two genders, seems to now believe that impeaching President Trump would get them Hillary as their President…and as liberals are most certainly Constitutionally challenged…let me clear this up for them.

They’d succeed in only two things…first, they’d get President Mike Pence, who would pick a Republican as HIS Vice President…and they would only manage to eliminate the one thing that beats the liberal media matrix…Trump’s Twitter account, which he uses to bypass said media to deliver his own messages directly to the people.

All of this is in response to liberals having been butt-hurt over Hillary’s loss to President Trump in 2016, which they still, to this day, see as the theft of the White House from their anointed dear socialist leader, so let’s have a quick look at the numbers…

Trump won 304 Electoral College votes to Hillary’s 227. Given that it takes 270 to win the White House…well…there ya go.

Trump won 30 states to Hillary’s 20…and Trump was the winner in 2,623 counties across this nation of ours while Hillary only won in 489 counties.

This is exactly why we have an Electoral College…which I’m reasonable sure the socialists would want to be free if they didn’t want it gone altogether…to prevent only the votes in heavily populated specific regions from controlling our election process.

If we went only with the majority of the popular vote, the U.S. would be a democracy…in other words…run by mob rule…but we’re a Constitutional Republic, which means we protect the rights of the minority.

The fact of the matter is…the Electoral College makes a lot more sense that whatever it is that’s used to determine who gets to play for the national championship in college football, and quite frankly, I’m a bit surprised that liberals didn’t label last Monday’s game racist since it was between two teams from the deep south, and the fans cheered when President Trump walked onto the field before the game to sing the National Anthem…but, I digress…

Let’s get back to the liberal’s 2018 midterm election strategy, shall we?

That, of course, being the impeachment of President Trump.

To impeach a sitting President, one would have to prove that said sitting President is guilty of high crimes or misdemeanors…which liberals are just sure President Trump has done…based on their belief that Trump committed collusion with the Russians leading up to the 2016 election, and that he obstructing justice when he fired James Comey from the FBI.

There are, however, distinct problems with these liberal beliefs.

First, the investigation now being headed up by Robert Mueller has found absolutely no evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians…quite the opposite in fact…as the investigation has brought to light collusion with the Russians on behalf of Hillary Clinton.

Second, since most of the liberal belief in collusion between Trump and the Russians is based on a fake dossier that was manufactured for liberal political purposes…the firing of Comey is more than justified, as it was Comey’s FBI, and arguably Comey himself that helped pay for that manufactured dossier…and oh yeah…Hillary chipped in to help pay for it too. And let’s not forget that Comey exonerated Hillary well before that particular investigation was over, and well before the FBI even interviewed Hillary herself.

The deeper Mueller digs, the more liberal sludge is brought to the light of day.

In fact…so far…Mueller has managed, despite his liberal directive…to uncover more than enough direct evidence to have impeached Hillary Clinton had SHE actually won the 2016 election, and not an iota of evidence to impeach President Trump.

This is why liberals, like Sroka, are so anxious to bring impeachment proceeding against President Trump before Mueller finishes his dirty, bias laden investigation. Once that investigation is over, liberal support in congress for a Trump impeachment is going to lower than a snake’s ass in a trench.

Truth be told, Hillary, Bill, Comey and an assortment of supposedly non-biased, yet heavily biased FBI agents, Loretta Lynch and an assortment of DOJ officials from the Obama regime…and possibly Obama himself SHOULD be facing charges right now.

Liberal logic, however, has all the earmarks of basing their 2018 strategy on Impeaching President Trump, which comes as no great surprise to those of us with a super, double top secret liberal decoder ring, as it is the same logic that leads liberals, who claim the sole right to stand for gay rights, to defend…as a “religion of peace” an ideology that premeditates the murder of 50 gay people in Orlando, but draws the line at a baker refusing to make a cake for a gay wedding…because of the baker’s Christian religion.

Impeachment takes a simple majority of the House to vote for it, but a 2/3 majority of the Senate, so even if liberals take both the House AND the Senate in the 2018 midterms, which, based on the economic and foreign policy wins being racked up by Trump over the last year seems highly unlikely, liberals won’t have anywhere near the 2/3 of the Senate they would need to turn Vice President Pence, into President Pence.

But here again, liberal logic buries its head even deeper in its own keester. We’re talking about the same liberal logic that lead Billy Boy Clinton to question what the meaning of “is” is. Here’s what Neil Sroka had to say regarding the 2/3 of the Senate needed for impeachment…

“We’ll see what two-thirds looks like.”

Liberal common core math aside…2/3 of the senate equates to 67 votes…and of the 34 Senate seats up for election in the 2018 midterm election this coming November…26 are currently held by liberals. That means, again sans common core math…that only 8 are currently Republican seats, and so, even if the liberals manage to take all 8…they STILL won’t have 67 seats…67 votes or the 2/3 they need to impeach President Trump.

This is for liberals only…49 seats, plus 8 seats, equals 57 seats…10 short of what you need for your 2018 midterm strategy to work.

But, if an impeachRelated imagement of President Trump strategy is really what you liberals think is your best bet leading into the November elections, don’t let me stop you.

By all means…PLEASE carry on…but…take my advice…

Order your bottles of bubbles, your Crayons and coloring books, and your therapy puppies now…because come November…trust me…you’re gonna need them.

Copyright © 2018 Craig Andresen / thenationalpatriot.com

As Diane Sori, my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTSpartner is once again in FB jail, and unable to post…I ask that you take the time to read her most recent Op-Ed regarding the uproar of Oprah by CLICKING HERE!!!

http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history 

One thought on “The Craziest Democrat Strategy Yet

Views: 18

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service