SLOVAKIA: Prime Minister says, “We will not tolerate mass Muslim immigration and building of mosques”

THIS IS WHAT WE MUST DO BEFORE IT'S TO LATE!

PRINCIPLES FOR A FREE SOCIETY



Share
By BareNakedIslam • Posted in EnemyWithin-foreign


SLOVAKIA: Prime Minister says, “We will not tolerate mass Muslim im...


robertfico“When it comes to the fight against Islamic terrorism, countries should be passing laws that enable police to do surveillance on persons who are considered a potential threat to the country,” says Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico (photo above).

Gates Of Vienna  “Given that Slovakia is a country where the Catholic Church dominates, followed by the Lutheran Church, we cannot tolerate an influx of 300 – 400,000 Muslim immigrants who would start building mosques all over the place and endeavoring to change the nature, culture, and values of the state,” explained Fico.

de9a474abe02de62159350e76987d4e9

The prime minister pointed out that some countries in the world are passing special laws concerning the fight against Islamic terrorism which give more leeway to police. “Maybe the world or events would (eventually) press on us to set different rules for certain groups when it comes to privacy, telephones or bank accounts,” said Fico.

Concerning Muslim terrorist attacks in Europe he said that Slovakia cannot act as if this problem is not also our concern. This is why, nowadays certain persons or ethnic groups are monitored much more carefully.

EU Muslim Population

“Most of the people in these groups are foreign born, but there also could be persons who are citizens of our country, acting in a way to raise suspicion that in the future they might do something harmful to the country (as we’ve seen in Western Europe) and we must be prepared.

slovakian-muslim-sex-slave-in-UK-11.10.2013

Nowadays, the Slovak intelligence service focuses much more on effective international cooperation and information exchange.

Fico agrees with Miroslav Lajčák, the Slovak foreign minister, that the project of multiculturalism has failed. He claims that even though every decent person is welcomed in Slovakia, he must respect the environment, values and rules, which are dominant in Slovakia.

"I AM SLOVAKIA"

“I AM SLOVAKIA”


Views: 376

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service