The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Trump/Putin Collusion: What Did
They Know and When Did They Know It?
by Mark Alexander
.
Angry Lou Dobbs – Get Rid Of Rosenstein,
Mueller, liar-nObama Leftovers – It’s Past Time
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs is losing his patience with the criminal circus in DC with “a few thought on the important, profound questions the Congressional committees, intelligence agencies and the left-wing national media... should be asking but refuse to do so as they ignore the real corruption, the real collusion of the DC swamp.”‘ Dobbs asks, “Why didn’t, for example, ‘president’ liar-nObama do more to stop the Russian intervention once he learned of the Russian hacking of DNC servers last year? Why didn’t the DNC allow federal investigators access to those servers? And how in the hell, in a matter of national security, could they be allowed to get away with refusing them access?” Dobbs wants to know, “Who unmasked the names of Trump transition officials and why, oh why, haven’t our intelligence agencies themselves acted to hold liar-nObama officials accountable? What about the liar-Clinton corruption, the liar-Clinton ties to Russia, the payoffs to the liar-Clintons? What about Attorney General Loretta Lynch, instructing then-FBI Director James Comey to call the liar-Clinton investigation a matter? And the Bill liar-Clinton – Lynch tarmac meeting, and the list goes on.”...http://rickwells.us/angry-lou-dobbs-get-rid-rosenstein-mueller-obama-leftovers-past-time/
.
Mueller CONFLICTS Everywhere – LEAKS
From Inside His Team – Where’s CONGRESS?
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich notes that the Mueller Investigation has so many conflicts of interest it’s almost an absurdity... He tells Sean Hannity, “The law firm he comes from gave 99.81% of its donations to liar-Hillary Clinton last year. “That’s right,” he says, “.19% went to Donald Trump. The people that he’s been hiring are all anti-Trump lawyers. Several of them have very bad records of hiding information from the defense, in one case was rebuked by the Supreme Court on a 9-0 vote.” Gingrich points out, “It’s hard to understand why he would assemble such a team unless it was a deliberate effort to go after the President and the President’s team. I don’t understand why the House and Senate Judiciary Committees aren’t investigating a lot of this stuff.”...http://rickwells.us/gingrich-mueller-conflicts-everywhere-leaks-inside-team-congress/
.
Cartel Gun Runner Eric Holder Lectures
Trump On Integrity – Submit To Mueller Lynch Mob
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ The last person in the world who should be presenting himself as an expert on the topic of integrity is disgraced former Attorney General Eric “Fast and Furious Withholder” Holder... Having the distinction of being the only sitting cabinet official in the history of the United States to be held in contempt of Congress is a strong indicator of his distant relationship and lack of familiarity with the entire concept of integrity. Just in case we needed more proof, Holder opened his big, arrogant, anti-American trap, chiming in on the nothing-special prosecutor, Robert Mueller. Holder defended Mueller, tweeting on Thursday, “There is NO basis to question the integrity of Mueller or those serving with him in the special counsel’s office...http://rickwells.us/cartel-gun-runner-eric-holder-lectures-trump-integrity-submit-mueller-lynch-mob/.
Protect Rice And liar-nObama Deep State –
Sen Burr, Intel Committee’s Job In Hearings
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Many Americans have been wondering why the Senate Intelligence Committee hearings, such as the one in which they treated James Comey like a rock star rather than a scheming, leaking, deep state threat to the nation... There are likely mulitple of reasons for every committee member, most of them linked to money and power. There’s the partisan differences and the less visible loyalties to the establishment and globalists versus the rare public servant and patriot that plays a significant role as well. Some of those committee members reveal themselves in their comments when they don’t intend to. That was the case with Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman and supposed Republican, who is no friend to this administration, Richard Burr (R-NC). He made a statement following their supposed interrogation of Susan Rice behind closed doors. That session was most likely another of the series of pointless theatrical presentations, minus a public presentation, we have come to expect. Burr did expose his duplicity a bit in his comments, though...http://rickwells.us/protect-rice-obama-deep-state-sen-burr-intel-committees-job-hearings/.
Leading Dems Slow Ethics Probe to
Delay Investigation Into liar-nObama Leaks
by Hannah Mayer
{truthrevolt.org} ~ Democratic leaders on the House Ethics Committee seem to be purposefully protracting the current probe into whether liar-nObama administration officials leaked classified intelligence... reports in order to tarnish Trump and his associates. Intelligence Committee Chair, Republican Devin Nunes, was interviewed by the Free Beacon and says he was sidelined from his leading role in the investigation months ago: Democrats are said to be blocking efforts to advance the Nunes case in an effort to discredit the top Republican and keep him sidelined from the sensitive Russia probe, which Democrats have increasingly used to score political points against Trump and boost their own political profiles... http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/report-leading-dems-slow-ethics-probe-delay-investigation-obama-leaks.
.
Trump/Putin Collusion: What Did
They Know and When Did They Know It?
by Mark Alexander
{patriotpost.us} ~ In 1974, former Sen. Howard Baker (R-TN) was the ranking minority member of the Senate committee investigating the Watergate cover-up conspiracy. The Senate endeavored to determine if Republican President Richard Nixon, who won his 1972 re-election bid by the fourth-largest margin (23.15%) in history, had concealed after-the-fact knowledge of a break-in at the Democrat National Committee headquarters by Republican operatives. Now, apparently, breaking into the DNC or the secret email server of a Democrat presidential candidate is much easier done by computer.
At a critical juncture in that investigation, Baker who later served as Ronald Reagan’s chief of staff in 1987 posited, “What did the president know and when did he know it?” He and his then-young understudy and chief counsel, Fred Thompson, went on to aggressively pursue the truth regarding their party’s president. Baker said, “I’ll dig for the facts, and I’ll follow wherever they lead,” and indeed, they did.
Those were the glory days of The Washington Post, whose journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein are credited with uncovering information about the break-in, including involvement by the Justice Department, FBI, CIA and the White House — leading to Nixon.
Facing the certainty of impeachment in the Democrat-controlled House and conviction by the Democrat-controlled Senate, Nixon at least had the integrity to resign his office on August 9, 1974, rather than drag the nation through an impeachment proceeding. As you recall, Bill liar-Clinton possessed no such integrity when he was impeached by the House in 1998 on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. He was ultimately acquitted of those charges by the Senate a year later in a 50-50 vote.
Fast forward to the present Trump/Putin collusion conspiracy “breaking news” propagated daily by the MSM.
Regarding this fake news fabrication, nobody is asking, “What did they know and when did they know it?”
However, in this instance, the question should not be directed at President Donald Trump, but at The Washington Post and The New York Times — the primary Leftmedia outlets in collusion with the Democrat Party that form the Demo/MSM propaganda machine.
Let me explain why they should answer this question — but won’t.
Earlier this week, Julie Pace, the liberal Washington bureau chief for the Associated Press, observed quizzically, “Every time [the Trump administration] finds [its] footing, every time they feel like they’ve had a positive message, something on the Russia investigation emerges.”
Apparently, one of the AP’s ranking journalists believes this correlation is complete coincidence.
Hmmm. Well, Julie, could it be that the Leftmedia is holding back its Russia cards and playing them as needed every time the Trump administration “finds its footing” or has a “positive message”?
There was a time when the collusion between the Democrat Party and mainstream media dezinformatsiya outlets could rely solely on Donald Trump to singlehandedly undermine his success by issuing stupid social media posts.
But a week before Trump’s inaugural, former FBI Director James Comey added a powerful propaganda weapon to the Leftmedia’s arsenal in its relentless effort to undermine Trump’s agenda.
He gave Barack liar-nObama a copy of the completely debunked Trump/Russia dossier. The fact that the FBI was investigating that fake dossier was then leaked to the press — most likely by Comey, who in May acknowledged that he had leaked other memos to the press in hopes that a special counsel would be appointed to investigate Trump. Comey’s treachery paid off when his old friend, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, was appointed as special counsel.
That Russia fabrication and leak was, and remains, the source for the Demos’ “Trump/Putin” conspiracy theories. In fact, now there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Democrat operatives were behind the dossier, but neither The Washington Post nor The New York Times are concerned with facts, having become masters in the art of the BIG lie.
Again, as the AP’s Julie Pace noted, every time Trump achieves favorable reviews, predictably another Trump/Putin story emerges, which almost always originate with the Times or the Post.
Pace was referencing the most recent case in point…
After Trump’s widely applauded NATO address in Poland and his G-20 summit 10 days ago, that success was derailed in short order by the latest revelation regarding the Russian collusion delusion — that in June 2016, Donald Trump Jr. spent a few minutes with a Russian lawyer, in a meeting set up by a third party who claimed she might have some useful (read: damaging) info on liar-Hillary Clinton. In political and corporate parlance, that is called “opposition research” or “competitor intelligence,” but never mind that it amounted to nothing.
What an amazing coincidence — that on the heels of Trump’s successful week abroad, yet another Russian collusion story emerged.
For the record, in my considered opinion, The New York Times and The Washington Post have been, and still are, holding Trump/Putin cards, and they’re timing the play of those cards to undercut any Trump agenda momentum.
Thus, this is the question every Beltway and New York media “journalist” should be asking: “Beyond what the Post and Times knew about the Trump Jr. meeting, when did they know it?” Memo to Bob Woodward…
Did the Times or Post have this information for weeks or months prior to making headlines with it, and if so, why did they not release it sooner?
Of course, there are few genuine journalists remaining in either of those markets to ask such an important question — especially one that would challenge such Leftmedia Goliaths.
So, why is this question so important?
Because the most dangerous “collusion” threatening American Liberty today is that between Democrats and their mainstream media partisans. They now brazenly use their media outlets for obstruction and sabotage in order to block Trump’s agenda, primarily with fake Trump/Putin news. Clearly, Trump’s conservative agenda is wholly antithetical to their own.
This mass media malpractice constitutes a perilous betrayal of the First Amendment.
As I have noted since that fake Russian dossier first emerged, the endless loop of the Demo/MSM’s Trump/Putin collusion conspiracy coverage is utterly baseless. It’s nothing more than a political diversion and obfuscation tactic to destabilize Trump’s agenda — and, by extension, that of the Republican Congress. And it’s working!
Contemplate this — if Vladimir Putin’s goal is to weaken the American people’s confidence in their political system, then the Democrat/MSM collusion is certainly accomplishing his objective.
Undermining Trump’s presidency sows discord among Republicans in the House and Senate ahead of the 2018 midterm election and ensures the failure of critical initiatives such as the effort to repeal and replace the so-called “Affordable Care Act” this week.
Every card-carrying member of the Demo/MSM consortium knows the Trump/Putin collusion fabrication is a political charade — unless their brains have been totally consumed with Potomac fever.
Notably, however, many younger Leftmedia activists aren’t biting, and in fact are becoming more outspoken in their objection to the Russia ruse.
Left-wing protagonist Max Blumenthal, senior editor of AlterNet, offered this assessment this week: “As someone on the left who has protested against Trump, I didn’t expect this hysteria to completely take over. … The Democrats are pushing Russia scandalmongering nonstop. It’s subsumed all of the progressive grassroots movements and it’s basically burning the left. … People who are progressive, who are falling into it, I need to know what the long-term consequences of this cynical narrative are. … There is definitely a political class in Washington that sees Russia scandalmongering as the silver bullet to take out Trump. … The Democrat establishment … can’t agree on a big economic message … so this [collusion conspiracy is convenient because it gives them a way of opposing Trump without having to do anything remotely progressive.”
Blumenthal calls the Demo/MSM “the boot-licking press.” He adds, “There’s never any clear sourcing, never any sources on the record.”
When asked by political commentator Tucker Carlson “what kind of response have you received” from the Leftmedia and liberals since registering your objections to the Russia charade, Blumenthal responded, “I’ll probably get called a Putin puppet.”
And while the fictional Trump/Putin collusion conspiracy is this summer’s blockbuster hit inside the Beltway, Americans across the country are increasingly tuning out the Leftmedia. And notably, those who supported Trump in 2016 are now overwhelmingly unimpressed with the collusion conspiracy claptrap. Turns out that outside the Beltway swamp political and media echo chambers, Americans are more concerned about the economy — which, Demo-gogues Nancy Pulosi and Chuck clown-Schumer might recall, is why Trump won!
That notwithstanding, some of the more hysterical Democrats are now calling for Trump’s impeachment, including liar-Hillary Clinton’s kooky 2016 running mate, Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine: “We’re now beyond obstruction of justice in terms of what’s being investigated. This is moving into perjury, false statements and even potentially treason.”
Political analyst Michael Barone notes that this ludicrous overreach by “Democratic politicians who haven’t given up on dreams of somehow ousting Trump from office and who are eager as always to delegitimize his presidency” might backfire.
But the Demo/MSM demolition derby shows no signs of letting up — and it won’t, because it’s underwritten in large measure by socialist Hungarian billionaire George Soros and others, like socialist American billionaire Tom Steyer.
So I ask again: “Beyond what the Post and Times knew about the Trump Jr. meeting, when did they know it?”
{patriotpost.us} ~ In 1974, former Sen. Howard Baker (R-TN) was the ranking minority member of the Senate committee investigating the Watergate cover-up conspiracy. The Senate endeavored to determine if Republican President Richard Nixon, who won his 1972 re-election bid by the fourth-largest margin (23.15%) in history, had concealed after-the-fact knowledge of a break-in at the Democrat National Committee headquarters by Republican operatives. Now, apparently, breaking into the DNC or the secret email server of a Democrat presidential candidate is much easier done by computer.
At a critical juncture in that investigation, Baker who later served as Ronald Reagan’s chief of staff in 1987 posited, “What did the president know and when did he know it?” He and his then-young understudy and chief counsel, Fred Thompson, went on to aggressively pursue the truth regarding their party’s president. Baker said, “I’ll dig for the facts, and I’ll follow wherever they lead,” and indeed, they did.
Those were the glory days of The Washington Post, whose journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein are credited with uncovering information about the break-in, including involvement by the Justice Department, FBI, CIA and the White House — leading to Nixon.
Facing the certainty of impeachment in the Democrat-controlled House and conviction by the Democrat-controlled Senate, Nixon at least had the integrity to resign his office on August 9, 1974, rather than drag the nation through an impeachment proceeding. As you recall, Bill liar-Clinton possessed no such integrity when he was impeached by the House in 1998 on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. He was ultimately acquitted of those charges by the Senate a year later in a 50-50 vote.
Fast forward to the present Trump/Putin collusion conspiracy “breaking news” propagated daily by the MSM.
Regarding this fake news fabrication, nobody is asking, “What did they know and when did they know it?”
However, in this instance, the question should not be directed at President Donald Trump, but at The Washington Post and The New York Times — the primary Leftmedia outlets in collusion with the Democrat Party that form the Demo/MSM propaganda machine.
Let me explain why they should answer this question — but won’t.
Earlier this week, Julie Pace, the liberal Washington bureau chief for the Associated Press, observed quizzically, “Every time [the Trump administration] finds [its] footing, every time they feel like they’ve had a positive message, something on the Russia investigation emerges.”
Apparently, one of the AP’s ranking journalists believes this correlation is complete coincidence.
Hmmm. Well, Julie, could it be that the Leftmedia is holding back its Russia cards and playing them as needed every time the Trump administration “finds its footing” or has a “positive message”?
There was a time when the collusion between the Democrat Party and mainstream media dezinformatsiya outlets could rely solely on Donald Trump to singlehandedly undermine his success by issuing stupid social media posts.
But a week before Trump’s inaugural, former FBI Director James Comey added a powerful propaganda weapon to the Leftmedia’s arsenal in its relentless effort to undermine Trump’s agenda.
He gave Barack liar-nObama a copy of the completely debunked Trump/Russia dossier. The fact that the FBI was investigating that fake dossier was then leaked to the press — most likely by Comey, who in May acknowledged that he had leaked other memos to the press in hopes that a special counsel would be appointed to investigate Trump. Comey’s treachery paid off when his old friend, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, was appointed as special counsel.
That Russia fabrication and leak was, and remains, the source for the Demos’ “Trump/Putin” conspiracy theories. In fact, now there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Democrat operatives were behind the dossier, but neither The Washington Post nor The New York Times are concerned with facts, having become masters in the art of the BIG lie.
Again, as the AP’s Julie Pace noted, every time Trump achieves favorable reviews, predictably another Trump/Putin story emerges, which almost always originate with the Times or the Post.
Pace was referencing the most recent case in point…
After Trump’s widely applauded NATO address in Poland and his G-20 summit 10 days ago, that success was derailed in short order by the latest revelation regarding the Russian collusion delusion — that in June 2016, Donald Trump Jr. spent a few minutes with a Russian lawyer, in a meeting set up by a third party who claimed she might have some useful (read: damaging) info on liar-Hillary Clinton. In political and corporate parlance, that is called “opposition research” or “competitor intelligence,” but never mind that it amounted to nothing.
What an amazing coincidence — that on the heels of Trump’s successful week abroad, yet another Russian collusion story emerged.
For the record, in my considered opinion, The New York Times and The Washington Post have been, and still are, holding Trump/Putin cards, and they’re timing the play of those cards to undercut any Trump agenda momentum.
Thus, this is the question every Beltway and New York media “journalist” should be asking: “Beyond what the Post and Times knew about the Trump Jr. meeting, when did they know it?” Memo to Bob Woodward…
Did the Times or Post have this information for weeks or months prior to making headlines with it, and if so, why did they not release it sooner?
Of course, there are few genuine journalists remaining in either of those markets to ask such an important question — especially one that would challenge such Leftmedia Goliaths.
So, why is this question so important?
Because the most dangerous “collusion” threatening American Liberty today is that between Democrats and their mainstream media partisans. They now brazenly use their media outlets for obstruction and sabotage in order to block Trump’s agenda, primarily with fake Trump/Putin news. Clearly, Trump’s conservative agenda is wholly antithetical to their own.
This mass media malpractice constitutes a perilous betrayal of the First Amendment.
As I have noted since that fake Russian dossier first emerged, the endless loop of the Demo/MSM’s Trump/Putin collusion conspiracy coverage is utterly baseless. It’s nothing more than a political diversion and obfuscation tactic to destabilize Trump’s agenda — and, by extension, that of the Republican Congress. And it’s working!
Contemplate this — if Vladimir Putin’s goal is to weaken the American people’s confidence in their political system, then the Democrat/MSM collusion is certainly accomplishing his objective.
Undermining Trump’s presidency sows discord among Republicans in the House and Senate ahead of the 2018 midterm election and ensures the failure of critical initiatives such as the effort to repeal and replace the so-called “Affordable Care Act” this week.
Every card-carrying member of the Demo/MSM consortium knows the Trump/Putin collusion fabrication is a political charade — unless their brains have been totally consumed with Potomac fever.
Notably, however, many younger Leftmedia activists aren’t biting, and in fact are becoming more outspoken in their objection to the Russia ruse.
Left-wing protagonist Max Blumenthal, senior editor of AlterNet, offered this assessment this week: “As someone on the left who has protested against Trump, I didn’t expect this hysteria to completely take over. … The Democrats are pushing Russia scandalmongering nonstop. It’s subsumed all of the progressive grassroots movements and it’s basically burning the left. … People who are progressive, who are falling into it, I need to know what the long-term consequences of this cynical narrative are. … There is definitely a political class in Washington that sees Russia scandalmongering as the silver bullet to take out Trump. … The Democrat establishment … can’t agree on a big economic message … so this [collusion conspiracy is convenient because it gives them a way of opposing Trump without having to do anything remotely progressive.”
Blumenthal calls the Demo/MSM “the boot-licking press.” He adds, “There’s never any clear sourcing, never any sources on the record.”
When asked by political commentator Tucker Carlson “what kind of response have you received” from the Leftmedia and liberals since registering your objections to the Russia charade, Blumenthal responded, “I’ll probably get called a Putin puppet.”
And while the fictional Trump/Putin collusion conspiracy is this summer’s blockbuster hit inside the Beltway, Americans across the country are increasingly tuning out the Leftmedia. And notably, those who supported Trump in 2016 are now overwhelmingly unimpressed with the collusion conspiracy claptrap. Turns out that outside the Beltway swamp political and media echo chambers, Americans are more concerned about the economy — which, Demo-gogues Nancy Pulosi and Chuck clown-Schumer might recall, is why Trump won!
That notwithstanding, some of the more hysterical Democrats are now calling for Trump’s impeachment, including liar-Hillary Clinton’s kooky 2016 running mate, Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine: “We’re now beyond obstruction of justice in terms of what’s being investigated. This is moving into perjury, false statements and even potentially treason.”
Political analyst Michael Barone notes that this ludicrous overreach by “Democratic politicians who haven’t given up on dreams of somehow ousting Trump from office and who are eager as always to delegitimize his presidency” might backfire.
But the Demo/MSM demolition derby shows no signs of letting up — and it won’t, because it’s underwritten in large measure by socialist Hungarian billionaire George Soros and others, like socialist American billionaire Tom Steyer.
So I ask again: “Beyond what the Post and Times knew about the Trump Jr. meeting, when did they know it?”
Comments