~ Featuring ~
Six Potential Targets 
of Trump's Supreme Court  
by Jordan Candler
ICE Director Homan Sets dummucrats-Dems 
Straight on His Last Day on The Job
{ } ~ In an interview on his last day on the job as Acting ICE Director, Tom Homan was vocal in his defense of the agency... and the men and women who defend our borders. He’s asked for his reaction to the threats by politicians, actors and other leftist propagandists against his agency. Homan says, “They need to educate themselves,” citing as a glaring example the fact that ICE doesn’t work on the border and isn’t “separating families” there, that it is the Border Patrol, so they’re obviously don’t even understand the basics of what is going on. He says the Border Patrol is doing the right thing, pointing out that the same thing happens to US citizens every day all across this country. “When you arrest a parent, and you put them in jail, many times that child has to go to child protective services because there’s no one there to protect them. So what these open borders people want, they want better rules for illegal alien families than we have for US citizen families.”...
John Brennan, the Revolutionary Who Never Grew Up
{ } ~ The media talks endlessly about “norms,” then lionizes leftists who shatter them. John Brennan is a beneficiary of this gross hypocrisy... The more he engages in monstrously abnormal and irresponsible behavior for a former CIA director, the more the media builds him up. Imagine a former CIA director under a dummycrats-Democratic president calling for members of the executive branch to defy his lawful directives, blithely spreading grave charges against him without evidence, and calling on the “country” to “defeat” him. The media would treat that figure as a dangerous weirdo. But Brennan has done all of that and more, and it has only enhanced his appeal in the eyes of the media. “A Spymaster Steps Out of the Shadows”—that’s the New York Times’s idea of a hard-hitting take on a former CIA director who is calling in effect for insurrection. In the first paragraph of this essentially friendly, punch-pulling profile, we learn that Brennan refuses to recognize Trump as a duly elected president...
Rosenstein Gets 7 Days To Come Clean to House;
Faces Impeachment, Contempt if He Fails 
{ } ~ Various committees of the House of Representatives have gone round and round with the leadership of the FBI and Department of Justice... specifically Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, over a perceived deliberate lack of compliance with repeated requests for the production of certain documents related to particular investigations. Many  conservative lawmakers have accused Rosenstein of being a “deep state” swamp creature hack that is purposefully hiding or withholding those documents in order to cover up criminal misdeeds or embarrassing examples of political bias or incompetence at the DOJ and FBI. Of course, Rosenstein has denied that he is hiding or withholding anything without valid reason — such as the need to keep sensitive information relevant to ongoing investigations, sealed indictments, subpoenas and warrants under wraps for the time being — and has vowed to cooperate with all Congressional requests to the best of his ability...
California dummycrats-Democrat Arrested For Death
 Threats Toward FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and His Family

by sundance
{ } ~ A California man was arrested today in Los Angeles on charges of threatening to kill the family of Ajit Pai... Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, for Pai’s role in repealing regulations relating to net neutrality. According to court documents, on or about Dec. 19 and 20, 2017, Markara Man, 33, of Norwalk, allegedly sent three emails to Chairman Pai’s email accounts. The first email accused Chairman Pai of being responsible for a child who allegedly had committed suicide because of the repeal of net neutrality regulations. The second email listed three locations in or around Arlington, and threatened to kill the Chairman’s family members. The third email had no message in its body, but included an image depicting Chairman Pai and, in the foreground and slightly out of focus, a framed photograph of Chairman Pai and his family. The FBI traced the emails to Man’s residence in Norwalk, California, and when initially confronted in May 2018, Man admitted to the FBI that he sent the email threatening Chairman Pai’s family because he was “angry” about the repeal of the net neutrality regulations and wanted to “scare” Chairman Pai...
The Left's Overreaction to Justice Kennedy's Retirement | LevinTV

{ } ~ The Left hates the Constitution and demands that the President nominate a new Supreme Court justice who hates it too.

Six Potential Targets of Trump's Supreme Court  

by Jordan Candler:  In a piece devoted to Justice Anthony Kennedy’s departure, National Review’s David French lays out the case for why the “the consequences of Kennedy’s retirement — both legal and political — are immense.” Justice Kennedy is universally regarded as a swing jurist. French observes that “he wrote or joined a number of solid opinions that protected and reaffirmed core constitutional liberties, including liberties protected by the First and Second Amendments.” But Kennedy also “served as the primary judicial guardian of abortion rights and was more responsible than any other justice for the relentless legal march of the sexual revolution.” Therefore, the addition of another originalist will be unquestionably influential.

             The Washington Examiner editorial board highlights six pivotal cases that could be overturned without Justice Kennedy: Roe v. Wade, which “struck down all state abortion restrictions in 1973” (Kennedy himself voted in support of Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992 — a case that would have overturned Roe v. Wade); Kelo v. New London, which in 2005 “re-established that private property can be taken from owners through eminent domain for nonpublic uses”; Obergefell v. Hodges, which “established in 2015 that all states are constitutionally mandated to recognize marriages between two people of any sex”; Massachusetts v. EPA (2007), which mandates that “the Environmental Protection Agency must regulate carbon dioxide”; U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (1995), which stipulates that “individual states … may not set rules for would-be members of Congress that are more restrictive than what’s outlined in the U.S. Constitution”; and Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008), which “blocked the expansion of the death penalty for violent crimes where the victim did not die and was not intended to be killed.
               Kennedy’s departure doesn’t mean all of these will be overturned in the near future. Some (most?) may not be overturned at all. However, another originalist at least denotes that all of these cases face the possibility of being reversed. French ends his op-ed with a cautionary tone: “We’ve been here before. We’ve had opportunities to remake the Court. President Reagan and the first President Bush together appointed a majority of the Supreme Court. Yet Roe endured, and the Court even moved left on key issues.” True enough. However, many of the people on Trump’s Supreme Court list are exceptional, bona fide conservative candidates. It’s certainly not unrealistic to envision an A-team-caliber Supreme Court majority whose decisions will result in a defense of life (literally), Liberty and justice unforeseen in our modern day.   

~The Patriot Post

Views: 28


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on July 2, 2018 at 7:45am


It really become sad to think this country will go to being a socialist country. but I give it a big doubt for I do know that the older people know better than to being a country of liberty and will be out to vote them out. some younger ones will also vote them out. God will help us out.

Comment by Bonnie Somer on July 2, 2018 at 3:25am

the more we keep voting back in the same people the less we can complain

SCOTUS right now is important and the left won't stop

their lies well they do not care truth be damned to them




Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

( – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service