Saturday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

hIN8-LixPp40uzlYYPVBNPiGIUZt6E9IrtByOnlFeW1-wDHugoEddioZ4s6vzZ4SpnySKldXXOzeOhOWaUExrbDpSZe5mp0_BTJsgsAitxs4jeDT5civZrwRtsTkYh0N3r_sEAcw866uL-dPjJH_6wjzQ31ELdivZbUvNSEuRBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
More liar-Hillary Chronicles
by Judge Andrew Napolitano
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=125
.
Solomon and Carter – GOVT Officials
AFRAID Of Uranium One Informant, SESSIONS DOJ Lying
PGnL2z6ZpblhxFEoS6X0KhRU_zIGzB5YkMieqFYeIRvF9_KpN6b47rJQ4u4aIXJQUgLESaBFCPJDFPAdpLMqGUVP_YVqRtRHSAgkEblNFLfoj2j0KSYZCqcJn0U7GGdKQGseGT9R7516BrbbNBamZLY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=500
{rickwells.us} ~ John Solomon and Sara Carter join Sean Hannity with some new revelations about corruption inside the DOJ and Democrat involvement... and the cover ups to keep the American people in the dark. Hannity says he’s troubled that the name of the informant was released by the Sessions Department of Justice and even more so by other leaks stating that the informant doesn’t have any information “when I know that’s a lie.” Solomon agrees, saying, “We have seen the Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, try to say there’s no connection between Uranium One and the Russian bribery case. We’ve seen the Deputy Attorney General say that, and now we saw two anonymous officials in a Reuters story saying that.”... https://rickwells.us/solomon-carter-govt-uranium-one/
.
How The Supreme Court 
Helped Bob Menendez Escape Conviction
hnQ2Ju1vrWzXZ2acA_4-SsRmD8K_wlMdkDoRzhMBkDtBSB8Qcqgo-Sar0Q8V1XBbc0ke0ebdeD6gjD7RXQ86HZ4b7nq4UcpUsQlazJ3pMoDTfQl36zc5mVXHx2eww-2MwxKJsfU8blm0Ly3RyJ8UZRnvvMSrEpEAraXT762rdq1G6wNiJnk3xg2F1Ql8x1T2AoYMGCwn0K6wV46NxBYpEZc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=500
by KEVIN DALEY
{dailycaller.com} ~ New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez didn’t thank the U.S. Supreme Court when he addressed reporters Thursday after escaping conviction on federal corruption charges... though he is very much in their debt. The embattled Democrat faced a lengthy indictment featuring 18 charges for bribery, honest services fraud, conspiracy, traveling over state lines to carry out bribery, and making false statements on federally-mandated financial disclosures forms. The charges emanate from his relationship with a donor named Dr. Salomon Melgen, a wealthy Florida physician who lavished the senator with gifts, vacations, and campaign contributions. In turn, Menendez intervened with federal agencies on Melgen’s behalf over several years, sure evidence, prosecutors claimed, that the pair had forged a “corrupt pact” to secure their mutual advancement...  http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/17/how-the-supreme-court-helped-bob-menendez-escape-conviction/?utm_medium=email
.
13 reasons Fox viewers want Shep Smith fired
R6qSCljlNrZab4It_CQWd0Wsa38hCjPtmHP0Wxr1eOnUaDQLsPtpLDdLjP5kPdW48kahsXM_djwr25PgMZABV8XtjPGsuS_Z0p3MXseIdoYi13g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
{wnd.com} ~ Two House committees announced plans last month to investigate the Uranium One deal... But Shep Smith, the chief news anchor for Fox News, offered up a six-minute monologue on Nov. 14 that CNN called “a powerful rebuttal” to the claims of impropriety surrounding liar-Clinton’s involvement in the Uranium One deal. That led many Fox viewers to openly muse whether Smith is employed by the wrong media giant. Wouldn’t he make a better fit for CNN? According to Breitbart “Fox News Viewers Demand Shep Smith be Fired After Error-Filled Uranium One Report: ‘Send Him to CNN.'”...  http://www.wnd.com/2017/11/13-reasons-fox-viewers-want-shep-smith-fired/
.
liar-Clinton Nightmare: Uranium One
Informant Has Video of “Briefcases Full of Cash”
by BENJAMIN ARIE
 
{conservativetribune.com} ~ The liar-Clintons may be finally on their way out of politics, but a growing scandal could drag them back into the public spotlight… or behind bars. New evidence against them in the “Uranium One” corruption case could make the Watergate scandal look like a picnic. Did liar-Bill and liar-Hillary Clinton accept bribes and kickbacks from Russia in order to fast-track a uranium deal? Several well-respected investigative journalists say “yes,” and now there may be shocking video proof of the corruption...  https://conservativetribune.com/uranium-one-briefcases-cash/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=CTBreaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=2017-11-17
.
bJ-uMonNklIUba3k-3uA9RWVGM01Rlht442p3fze5pmye8SJeIEN0i22r2FsU1mkpjZti1Q7RrgcCwwxDA0pV5fKRMfDSqiEGLCf7yI4uDJa_9YT53XSJ4MpZ3GcrE5S_2qW1CJjcMhQHkzdqkRrLKUhwDRjL8ItGxrEPc8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=VIDEOS
Senator Hatch (R-Ut) Gives Hell To Sen Brown (D-Oh) Over Tax Plan
.
liar-Hillary Questions the Legitimacy of the Election (This Woman Needs Help)
.
AG Sessions Makes Sure The Dems Are OK With Him Giving This Speech
.
A Tale of Democratic Hypocrisy
.
Judge Moore’s Wife: My Husband WONT Be Stepping Down
.
ACU Chairman Matt Schlapp Franken Case Is Scaring Many In Congress
.
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=125
.
More liar-Hillary Chronicles
ftNiosmge4RYSnfojc9GcLdndd0BU0LcTCf2d78cSM64JPJzHtOBCGm5k9WwfPqZcurAiygj8ePOFJBAAnpJmufm4Of32y-NjAW3mHXLZrRXeQCmCpAtKGWG-jOU7TBqsZOGJZQ1i2PZ6iR2Er3tJzYg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Judge Andrew Napolitano
{townhall.com} ~ The Department of Justice will soon commence an investigation to determine whether there should be an investigation you read that nonsense correctly of a scandal involving the liar-Clinton Foundation and a company called Uranium One. It appears that FBI decisions made during the time that liar-Hillary Clinton was being investigated for espionage will also be investigated to see whether there should be an investigation to determine whether she was properly investigated. Again, you read that nonsense correctly.

Only the government can relate nonsense with a straight face. Here is the back story.

When President Donald Trump fired FBI Director Jim Comey last spring, the attorney general's stated purpose for recommending the firing was Comey's dropping the ball in the investigation of liar-Clinton's email when she was secretary of state. After a year of investigating her use of her own computer servers to transmit and store classified materials instead of using a government server to do so -- and notwithstanding a mountain of evidence of her grossly negligent exposure of secret and top-secret materials, which constitutes the crime of espionage -- the FBI director decided that because no reasonable prosecutor would take the case, it should be dropped. Weeks later, the DOJ ratified Comey's decision.

At the same time that liar-Clinton was failing to safeguard state secrets, she was granting official State Department favors to donors to her family's charitable foundation. There are dozens of examples of this so-called "pay to play," the most egregious of which is the Uranium One case. This involved a Canadian businessman and friend of former President liar-Bill Clinton's, Frank Giustra, who bundled donations from various sources that totaled $148 million, all of which Giustra gave to the liar-Clinton Foundation.

At the same time that Giustra made this extraordinary donation, he was representing a client that needed federal permission to purchase a 51 percent stake in Uranium One, which then controlled about 20 percent of America's licensed uranium mining capacity. Secretary liar-Clinton freely gave Giustra's client the State Department's approval, and it soon acquired the remaining approvals to make the purchase. Giustra's client is a Russian corporation controlled by the Kremlin.

When the FBI got wind of the Giustra donation and Secretary liar-Clinton's approval and the Kremlin involvement, it commenced an investigation of whether liar-Clinton had been bribed. At some point during former President Barack liar-nObama's second term, that investigation was terminated. We do not know whether the investigating FBI agents learned that the liar-Clinton Foundation was not even registered as a charity by the states in which it was doing business or authorized by them to receive tax-free donations.

At the same time that the FBI was looking into Uranium One, American and British intelligence agents were surveilling Donald Trump. The belated stated purpose of that surveillance was to ascertain whether the future president or his colleagues were engaged in any unlawful activity by accepting campaign favors from foreign nationals or were improperly assisting foreign intelligence agents to interfere with the presidential election.

One of the foreign nationals whose communications were captured during that surveillance was Sergey Kislyak, then the Russian ambassador to the United States. He spoke with Michael Flynn, then the national security adviser to President-elect Trump. Mysteriously, portions of a transcript of those intercepted communications were published in The Washington Post.

Another foreign national who caught the FBI's attention is a former British intelligence agent named Christopher Steele. Steele had compiled a dossier about, among other things, alleged inappropriate behavior by Trump in a Moscow hotel room years earlier. After offering Steele $50,000 to corroborate his dossier, the FBI backed down.

After being confronted by irate Republican members of the House and Senate judiciary committees, who demanded to know why the investigations of these matters had been terminated, Attorney General Jeff Sessions revealed that he has asked career DOJ lawyers to commence an investigation of all of the above to determine whether an independent counsel should be appointed to investigate all of the above.

This is the investigation to determine whether there should be an investigation. This is also the DOJ's reluctance to do its job.

Can the government investigate itself? The short answer is yes, and it has done so in the past. But it hardly needs an investigation to determine whether there should be an investigation. The job of the DOJ is to investigate probable violations of federal law. Sessions should not shy away from this and should not push it off to another independent counsel.

We have one independent counsel already because his target -- let's be candid -- is the president of the United States. That is a potato too hot for the DOJ. But liar-Hillary and liar-Bill Clinton, the FBI's tampering with the political process, and the use of intelligence-captured communications for political purposes are not. It is profoundly the duty of the DOJ -- using its investigatory arm, the FBI -- to investigate all this.

Whatever Comey's motive for not prosecuting liar-Hillary Clinton and the DOJ's ratification of it, the current DOJ is not bound by these erroneous decisions. The evidence in the public domain of liar-Clinton's espionage and bribery is more than enough to be presented to a grand jury. The same cannot be said about FBI involvements with the Steele dossier or the use of intelligence data for political purposes because we don't yet know who did it, so we need aggressive investigation.

But none of this presents the type of conflict that exists when the president is a target, and none of this requires an independent counsel. All of this simply requires the DOJ to get to work.

That is unless the lawyers in the leadership of this DOJ are fearful of investigating their predecessors for fear that their successors might investigate them. Whoever harbors those fears has no place in government.
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center