Saturday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
No More Crosses? 
by Caroline C. Lewis
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
DiGenova – Fire Lying Dirty Cop McCabe, 
Put liar-nObama DOJ On Wanted Posters 
lkTIL0hTHK_3NX9IBKtGMx51tOCRmu-ew7YWEGVxXVGZqNuUqgd9z8-qnFHfC3FnmmCXJ9Bg4VEHa0idRLD0ebsUYlV8s93pFq_2KTO-Izl8RW63Y5u3HyYH75rBGChsqc8Tzw4hZQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
{ /rickwells.us } ~ Tucker Carlson notes that the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility has recommended... that form Comey deputy director Andrew McCabe be fired for “serious misconduct” which they specified included lying to the FBI. Carlson says the recommendation comes from McCabe “authorizing the disclosure of sensitive information to reporters, leaking illegally, and then lying to investigators when they asked.” Carlson reminds his audience that McCabe has already announced his retirement and is trying to sneak out the back door with it intact, by making it through until Sunday without having been fired. Carlson asks Joe diGenova for his opinion, saying he’s been watching some crazy woman in the afternoons at MSNBC screaming about how it is immoral to deprive McCabe of his pension days before he qualifies. “Has he done something worth punishment, do you think?”... https://rickwells.us/digenova-mccabe-throw-book/.
Former liar-nObama Advisor is Outed as the White House Leaker 
bcMa18plLc0jj7x3UBZGApmMONy1bwM4uk-24S_U6N4nXBhEQXybKaBXV9cPGLIiIvqDulIzD7AILnQuPadYk9X78Mjv_iewiFEhO9tt1hlfsAAKzJszHWeZ1G-PGctUtFVkdrG0FDro5w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{ patrioticviralnews.com } ~ Ever since Donald Trump took office, his Presidency has been plagued by leaks within the White House... feeding information to liberal news sources who were chomping at the bit to get their hands on it and twist it to fit their narrative. Sometimes this information has been factual, sometimes it has been half-true, and other times it has been a flat-out lie. In all cases, though, it was information that never should have been leaked. Finally, we have learned who is responsible for at least a portion of this leaked information – James Clapper, a holdover from the liar-nObama administration that Trump decided to keep in the White House. The information that Clapper leaked to CNN created a media firestorm and helped build the foundation for the Trump-Russia collusion narrative that the mainstream media has covered nonstop ever since. In other words, the constant, pointless coverage of Trump’s supposed collusion with Russia is in no small part the fault of Clapper and the skewed information that he leaked...  http://patrioticviralnews.com/articles/former-obama-advisor-is-outed-as-the-white-house-leaker/.
Affiliated Russian Businessman Comes 
Forward as US Spy at Hollywood Nightclub
EzKTfFQo7t3GTxOMc3ZRsHEOnQzvHrYdxO9vr1oDj6P_zLnriRhBWWENCK1XJtoSIFSSSZBy1i5xuKNjprvs7I-KQttu4wAVHpTW8AImK6Od4WuAb_uNzxHBGRzsZKU2p-oli6S73zQ5dJRlQ4ppaQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Davis Richardson
{ observer.com } ~ A Russian-born businessman affiliated with the Trump Organization is claiming to be a spy for the United States government... adding yet another bizarre twist to the investigation into President Donald Trump’s ties to Moscow. Frequently cited as an actor by intelligence agencies, Felix Sater told Buzzfeed News that he first started cooperating with the CIA in the late ’90s. After serving a year in prison for assaulting a man during a bar fight, and subsequently losing his stockbroker’s license for defrauding Wall Street investors out of nearly $40 million, Sater was approached by a defense contractor claiming to represent the U.S. government. Leveraging his contacts in Russia, Sater reportedly provided the U.S. with intelligence on Osama Bin Laden, a North Korean military operative, a possible assassination threat against former President George W. Bush and the location of anti-stinger missiles the CIA had given the mujahideen to deter Soviet aggression during the Cold War.  After Trump won the presidency, Sater attempted to use his connections to broker a meeting with the president’s transition’s team,  but rather than striking an agreement, the businessman entered the crosshairs of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and has since been forced to testify before numerous parties... http://observer.com/2018/03/felix-sater-trump-affiliated-russian-businessman-us-spy/?utm_campaign=national-politics&utm_content=2018-16-03-12560577&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=channel-national-politics-distribution 
.
.
Pulosi – Civilized Societies Don’t Build 
Obnoxious Walls – What’s In It For Dems? 
LMYaPtqwbonCNftr4VSFwEqEauSpDRsB_TDlcJspV36hI5Ln4tgeFyvBVi97v_vkEIoODszpigsSR04yL5gNF5eAxlfJCViKfsfL1W6A-wtS0TyzRaXhMNYlzO2SjUTQoHcm=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
{ rickwells.us } ~ Nancy Pulosi once again irrefutably displays her globalist, open borders views in addressing the media... and discussing President Trump’s efforts to construct a wall along our southern border. She’s asked, “Should Democrats give border wall funding, for example, right now when there isn’t a hard deadline on the table like there was last month?” Pulosi replies condescendingly, “What do you think? I mean, should we give a border wall for nothing?” In essence she’s stating that they’re going to hold American security hostage to their communist agenda. The America first answer would be that you’re not getting nothing, She’s getting a safer and better nation in exchange. Democrats, just as every other American will receive with a completed wall, not only greatly improved border security, but reduced social expenditures and increased job opportunities and a higher standard of living out of the deal. A real second class could reemerge. Of course she doesn’t care about those things. She doesn’t consider herself an American. She’s a globalist, who just happens to have infested America...  https://rickwells.us/pelosi-civilized-societies-walls/
.
New Proof She’s Lying To America
hJbzoozLfzGICp_VgIlLryyuphddi9eYc6QxpKo-o1606QYPJxZR_lM8xlh4YWSnlb4l4oR6aE1TwPRk-VPEJrkgoSjsgMvcXXVUub5GnwAy-OcIyuIjtC4t_M7lj0GlF6l5=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Jeff Dunetz
{ lidblog.com } ~ This will make some people so angry they could just spit but Fauxahontas, Senator Elizabeth dinky-Warren won’t be one of them—well, if she spits... it won’t be into one of those DNA kits. On Wednesday evening Tucker Carlson interviewed Cherokee genealogist Twila Barnes, who proved that Elizabeth dinky-Warren has as much Cherokee blood in her as does Kim Jung Un and my Russian grandparents. Ms. Barnes told Carlson that dinky-Warren is not of Cherokee heritage and is “not enrolled” with the tribe. She also said that the “sob story” about her parents having to elope because of her father’s parents objections to her mother’s Cherokee background or for any other reason is most likely baloney also. Of her claims of Cherokee ancestry, the genealogist said what was already known, “She’s not enrolled, she has no family on the rolls. She has no indication of Indian ancestry anywhere in her lineage.” Barnes gave provides details into of dinky-Warren’s genealogy on her website, Polly’s Granddaughter... https://lidblog.com/elizabeth-warren-new-proof/.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.

No More Crosses? 

Lwmu4mkTm2S1DX1CdkgEYw8FOLUNBr3oFv-4ylwXfWVLHBkNqMhlxp1Vn3HRfyRBzpEPDQrUkb4DZjuhrM3Mm56MJUAnGdKlZhQnUmT3LSvzmADBtThHMwkqGvfEZ_I=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Caroline C. Lewis:  Imagine Arlington Cemetery with no crosses. Imagine the word “God” sandblasted from the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. Imagine Biblical verses removed from the U.S. Capitol. This is the world the radical atheists want. This is the world they almost have.

               First Liberty Institute, the nation’s largest legal organization dedicated exclusively to defending religious freedom, is currently appealing a case to the Supreme Court so this doesn’t happen.
               Here’s how it began. In 1925, Gold Star families and the American Legion (the largest veterans service organization in the U.S.) built the 40-foot-tall Bladensburg Veteran’s Memorial, also known as the “Peace Cross,” in memory of the 49 men of Prince George’s County, Maryland, who died in World War I. The names of the 49 deceased veterans and the words “Courage,” “Valor,” “Endurance” and “Devotion” appear on the monument.
               The cross stood as a peaceful memorial to the fallen veterans until February 2014, when the American Humanist Association (AHA) claimed that the monument unconstitutionally violated the Establishment Clause because of its public ownership and demanded that it be demolished, altered or removed. The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland ruled in favor of the monument’s constitutionality citing the cross as a military symbol for sacrifice, courage and remembrance. However, in December 2015, the AHA appealed the decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that the memorial was unconstitutional. On March 1, 2018, the Fourth Circuit denied the en banc rehearing, leaving an appeal to the Supreme Court as the final option.
               Hiram Sasser, chief counsel for First Liberty, notes, “If [the Fourth Circuit] decision stands, other memorials, including those in nearby Arlington Cemetery, will be targeted for destruction as well.” If the decision from the Fourth Circuit stands, and the Supreme Court refuses to hear the appeal case, it would mean that all crosses on public property are “unconstitutional.
               The case rests on whether the Establishment Clause — the first sentence of the First Amendment, which states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” — prohibits the public display of crosses.
               The establishment of a religion means having an official, government-sponsored religion. Some have also interpreted the Establishment Clause as meaning government “neutrality.” According to the American Humanist Association’s website, the Establishment Clause also prohibits the government from “entangling itself in religious matters without a religiously neutral reason.” Government ought to be “neutral” toward religion and not favor one over the other. But a big difference exists between “neutrality” and “hostility.”
               While the AHA claims “Good Without A God,” as its motto, is it fair or tolerant to force that belief on everyone else? Radical atheism does not say, “I believe in nothing, and you can believe in God if you want.” Rather, it says, “I believe in nothing and it is my right to not see, hear or experience anything about God anywhere.” Whether it is “No, you can’t pray,” or “No, you can’t put a Bible verse there,” or “No, I don’t want to see a cross” — even if it’s in the middle of the desert — the radical atheists do not seek to live in mutual tolerance. They cannot rest until they have converted all of society into a religiously sterile culture. Our legal system should not bow down to this dogmatic, anti-tolerant behavior as the “neutral” option. Rather, radical atheists should practice the tolerance they demand from others.
               Following their Fourth Circuit win, AHA Senior Counsel Monica Miller, who argued the case, stated, “This is a big win not only for separation of church and state, but for all non-Christian veterans who are excluded from an enormous Christian cross war memorial.”
               But how many of the fallen men were actually atheists? The families of the fallen soldiers decided on that particular shape to remember their fallen sons, brothers and husbands. Would it not dishonor their choice to remove or destroy it? If, in fact, the non-Christian veterans feel excluded, why do they not build their own non-cross memorial?
               Further, while the AHA argues that the cross represents a sectarian, exclusionary religious symbol, the cross also represents military heroism. Some of the highest military honors include crosses such as the Distinguished Service Cross, the Air Force Cross, the Navy Cross, and others granted for exemplary military service. The cross also stands as an internationally recognized symbol of bravery and sacrifice as exemplified in the Victoria Cross in England and the Croix de Guerre (Cross of War) in France.
               The cross also represents a memorial. These men lost their lives in a foreign war on foreign soil. While some of their bodies were later repatriated, many were buried overseas. For several families, the “Peace Cross” stood as the only place where grieving families could pay honor to their loved ones.
               Michael Carvin, lead counsel for The American Legion and partner at Jones Day, notes, “This memorial has stood in honor of local veterans for almost 100 years and is lawful under the First Amendment. To remove it would be a tremendous dishonor to the local men who gave their lives during the Great War.”
               The case also has bipartisan support. Eight Republican and Democrat members of Congress joined in support of the memorial by filing an amicus brief with the Fourth Circuit Court.
               Kelly Shackelford, president and CEO of First Liberty, states, “Memorials are living reminders of our country’s history and the cost of war. How will we remember the fallen or teach the next generation about service and sacrifice if we start bulldozing veterans memorials and cemeteries across America? We will continue our work to overturn this decision and defend the memory of those who preserved freedom.”   

~The Patriot Post
Learn more and sign the petition: DontTearMeDown.com
https://patriotpost.us/articles/54747-no-more-crosses

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center