Saturday AM ! thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Syria Should Prompt the Return of Mattis
wHCZBlG80QJPfFoiz-VH7kzALt5Av_ZsLtkeCNUzaY6oHkOC5VqlUoMrFacWJ7fnr-dpfujeAHiEfwFEqafMSb5Fulyt5H6ytoqPNYEojWcYfN-mqlDrX5h9yl8CcWv6K4dHNwfUzPn472_43SB6gOkzNQ84MbAcF1jKoXI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Harold Hutchison  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
scumbag[Cummings demands ex-Fox News 
reporter share information on 
Stormy Daniels payments
e5bIbdUbGaxdYvVmGGuUQYiqkmIYLMP2MfCWQfYN3NMBRm1J9rJYDnDEHN8UMbwBjaEnN7fo4P07VF5djtXeb6k9k4gIBZUHA_fqNmzeZbiVPo_IGx8iIluenjDXUTkmjBWMERaKyn_UW-gvyPl3QZgYiVS6dvIK39xrS4Gc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by John Bowden
{thehill.com} ~ The chairman of the House Oversight and Reform Committee said Thursday that he will request information from a former Fox News reporter... who was reportedly working on a story that her network killed about President Trump's payments to Stormy Daniels and other women. Rep. scumbag-Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) wrote to former Fox reporter Diana Falzone requesting information regarding “debts and payments to silence women alleging extramarital affairs with him prior to the 2016 presidential election," according to a copy of the letter emailed to The Hill.The letter refers to the payments made through Trump's lawyer at the time, Michael Cohen, and requests any information that Falzone may have uncovered about potential violations of campaign finance law during her reporting. "All documents in your or your agent's custody, control, or possession referring or relating to women alleging extramarital affairs with Donald Trump, payments by the President or anyone on his behalf to silence them, or any other potential campaign finance violation" would be subject to the the chairman's request, the letter states. The Oversight committee has also requested an in-person interview with Falzone, who has said that she reached a settlement with Fox News that prevents her from speaking about the story. Fox News did not immediately reply to a request for comment from The Hill... they still don't get it and won't Trump didn't break any laws.  https://thehill.com/homenews/house/434215-cummings-demands-former-fox-news-reporter-share-stormy-daniels-hush-money 

Trump Vetoes Congressional Resolution Condemning National Emergency
evzjhEfMdcnTuAWpAkicmgS2NGfDpmLFU1Osbj02IpYMv7HOEKTMUDNdpj93l_EWn5yNrgpqD_6hnIGuLngpTHO195FzZm-IC4vMI1fVilPJyOVbFiqXNLSp-c_7o3xgB8MIyDGKnrgCBb9GE_bqRQRDqwZUYU8VMXw7YxNq_mooXmI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby JACK CROWE
{nationalreview.com} ~ President Trump on Friday issued the first veto of his presidency, blocking a Congressional resolution that would have prematurely terminated the national emergency he declared in February... in an attempt to unilaterally fund the construction of his long-promised wall on the southern border. “Today I am vetoing this resolution. Congress has the freedom to pass this resolution and I have the duty to veto it,” Trump said while flanked by an “angel mom” in the Oval Office. Trump railed against Congress during the Oval Office signing ceremony, calling the resolution “reckless” and repeatedly asserting that the influx of illegal immigration at the southern border qualifies as an emergency. Attorney general William Barr joined Trump in the Oval Office, making a rare public appearance to confirm Trump’s reading of the national emergencies statute. The resolution passed the Senate Thursday 59-41 with the support of twelve Republicans, who split with the president and much of the GOP establishment in condemning the national emergency declaration as an abuse of executive power. Congress, lacking a veto-proof majority, will be unable to terminate the national emergency — but the declaration must still survive numerous legal challenges before Trump can unilaterally re-appropriate the $3.6 billion in military funding for the construction of his border-wall...
Israel Strikes Hamas After Rockets 
Fired From Gaza Hit Tel Aviv
YnFjXvNDndkXziE5egqZr36CKsbQ7A_w4hS9C34T0bsPWzqOVFH1Gtx1Ym9GlJeL37Dq2UpLERQRQaAPtJIe_BvHogISQEu6UqWdcqiSkYn7BAqPvLZrkcz3zqbGQMAtGOHctGOb6UnHedWT9qL0JHs2iZAdsc2fW5KMZTReHAbzpc7L=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Ari Lieberman
{frontpagemag.com} ~ Sirens echoed throughout Tel Aviv and its suburbs on Thursday as two rockets, Identified as Fajr-5 missiles, were fired from Gaza at Israel’s second largest city... causing no injuries or damage. Five people were treated for shock. The rockets fell in open spaces. Iron Dome, Israel’s point-defense missile system, which calculates the rocket’s trajectory and pre-determines its flight path, did not launch to intercept. It was the first time a rocket was fired at Tel Aviv since 2014. It’s difficult to say which Gazan group fired the rockets. Hamas, the terror group that governs Gaza immediately denied responsibility and said it would find and punish those responsible. A smaller terrorist group known as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) also denied responsibility. A PIJ spokesman called reports blaming its group for the attack as “baseless lies and claims.” The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine denied involvement of any of its operatives. There are also rogue Salafist and Islamist splinter groups that operate in Gaza and the possibility of their involvement cannot be discounted. Last month, the PIJ showcased part of its rocket arsenal with boasts that its rockets are capable of reaching Tel Aviv and beyond. The PIJ stated that the rockets were manufactured with technical assistance from Iran. Regardless of which terror gang fired the rockets, it is Hamas that controls what goes on in Gaza and the Israeli government’s policy is to hold Hamas accountable for belligerent actions originating from Gaza. Israel has applied the same doctrine to Syria’s warlord Bashar Assad, holding his regime responsible for any hostile fire emanating from Syria. It is a sound doctrine and one that deters governing hostile entities from using proxies to attack Israel while simultaneously and disingenuously denying responsibility. Fearing an imminent Israeli response to the rocket provocation, an Egyptian delegation in Gaza for talks with Hamas, quickly departed. Ironically, the Egyptians were reportedly in town for the purpose of seeking a reduction in tensions with Israel...
.
States Abusing Federal Provision 
to Block Critical Projects
aipLvlCbGEpTJl3-WIUZkcAADxT1v6QQTGnPcjg2OS0pKXcskRqb19Wh2M7SLpA0DfnVL4AQeGI8Y0bFpmAUUUoUwhEQ6NFoE7V4kcYZ5_77L-wWK-noHCyN9sV6XTllZYgGiR_YSBBl0fwhcJYndbBRXGE-JWYLh5mzdh4L0hnowe_G7fm3c8ha7HE_0EBY2iO2-6pGpg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=by Daren Bakst
{cnsnews.com} ~ There are seemingly endless regulatory obstacles for critical infrastructure projects... One of these obstacles is starting to get some much-needed attention: abuse of Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The Congressional  Research Service has explained that Section 401 “requires that an applicant for a federal license or permit provide a certification that any discharges from the facility will comply with the act, including state-established water quality standard requirements.” This provision is a good example of the cooperative federalism that characterizes the Clean Water Act. Under this federal statute, states can use the Section 401 certification process to ensure that state water quality will not be harmed through federally permitted activities. But some states may be abusing this important power. Last year, during a hearing that addressed Section 401 abuse and considered a potential legislative remedy, Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., pointed out that some states have abused the Section 401 certification process...  https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/daren-bakst/states-abusing-federal-provision-block-critical-projects?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiT0dRNE1EQXpaV1U1TXpRdyIsInQiOiJcL2JTRllCMTV4Rm5adnZRbHlrKzE5WXlINnNxcFZuZ0hpcklwOWY3UXlWaTVMXC9lY0J2ZFpodVhmcHBwdFA3SDh2N3NOb1FWdW03TEtycmVZeVl1eWRKbTZEMmdOXC9yYTZkNitxNlNpYjgyUk5pMmdLcnVqeVdDSkk1WHpTV1hnbyJ9
.
Maine K-12 Indoctrination Sparks 
Populist Push Back
4Ffc_dcrII68fgFtpF84Eh4WEiF-cS3nceGGB2QXQzQWQZmIHY8p8iMFqgmu2zTTTCeYk-bnu578CbMSNM50fz8ANet9d4CLRUiqYSrJ-B_ysc8qH_KIuiVi_7citzchNgzQ0xWx6FUCP0U8gkHy3BgHaJk2p6yBqZk8fBa-51_EV60xxo8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Lawrence Lockman
{frontpagemag.com} ~ If there were ever any doubt that many teachers in Maine’s K-12 public schools are using their classrooms to indoctrinate students in Leftist politics and ideology... those doubts were blown away during a public hearing at the Statehouse a few weeks ago. I had long suspected that Leftist indoctrination was fairly common, but the evidence was for the most part sketchy and anecdotal. The accounts of classroom bias were often second- or third-hand reports accusing self-styled “progressive” teachers of taking cheap shots at President Trump or GOP members of Congress. A news report three years ago seemed to confirm my worst suspicions, and started me down the path to sponsoring legislation earlier this year to impose a Code of Ethics on K-12 teachers. In December of 2015, an assistant principal at Camden Hills Regional High School in Rockport posted a racist, anti-Christian comment on his Facebook page. Get a load of this:  “The only terrorists we need to fear are domestic white ‘Christian’ men with easy access to guns. Vote commie-Bernie. That is all. Enjoy your day.” At the time, I wondered if that sort of Leftist hate speech ever spilled over from the faculty lounge into the classroom. After all, if this guy posted that kind of crap in a public forum on Facebook, what’s going on behind closed doors in the classroom? He deleted his hateful post after the school was deluged with phone calls and emails. Administrators then circled the wagons around the perpetrator, so he was able to hang onto his job, despite his trifecta of racist, sexist, Christo-phobic hate mongering. Not to mention his overt hostility to the 2nd  Amendment...
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Syria Should Prompt the Return of Mattis
wHCZBlG80QJPfFoiz-VH7kzALt5Av_ZsLtkeCNUzaY6oHkOC5VqlUoMrFacWJ7fnr-dpfujeAHiEfwFEqafMSb5Fulyt5H6ytoqPNYEojWcYfN-mqlDrX5h9yl8CcWv6K4dHNwfUzPn472_43SB6gOkzNQ84MbAcF1jKoXI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Harold Hutchison:  The resignation last December of James Mattis as secretary of defense was a loss for the country. Mattis was more than instant credibility for President Donald Trump on military affairs; he was also an immensely motivational presence for certain countries. Well, to be more precise, their leaders.

The reason Trump’s gambit on North Korea worked so well in the first two years was because of Mattis. We got hostages out. The North Koreans didn’t launch as many missiles. Kim Jong-un even made concessions. Why? Because every leader in the Pacific Rim — including Kim — knew that if Kim misbehaved badly enough, “Mad Dog” Mattis would get angry. And Kim wouldn’t like it when “Mad Dog” Mattis got angry.

When President Trump announced plans to pull American troops from Syria, Mattis resigned. It was the honorable way to handle that sort of disagreement. But that also meant the motivational presence for keeping Kim to an acceptable level of misbehavior was also lost. Hence, Trump had to walk away from the summit in Vietnam.

But the disagreement occurred because of George W. Bush’s early mistakes in the War on Terror. We focused — rightly — on knocking out al-Qaida and the Taliban (both are still around, by the way). But what wasn’t done left Trump feeling he had been pushed into a choice of either continuing a pattern of overextending the military with deployments in the Middle East (and compromising our ability to deter Russia and China), preparing it to deter action by Russia and China, but at the cost of abandoning the Kurds and American allies in the region.

Now, we can only speculate as to whether the disagreement between Trump and Mattis was on which of the either/or options — or even if Mattis didn’t accept the notion that it was an either/or choice. The sad fact of the matter is that Bush’s mistakes — followed by Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s reckless timetable-based strategy — placed America in a tough spot.

Now, there are some genuine differences of opinion on the Right regarding how Syria fits into the War on Terror. That includes debate on just how far we go in taking out radical Islamic jihadists, and even which groups should constantly be sweating the possibility that they will be tracked down and get an up-close look at a Joint Direct Attack Munitions (and other bombs) as the last thing they ever see in this life. Well, okay, there may also be the options of SEALs, Delta Force, or Hellfire missiles…

There is one major point to keep in mind. When it comes to the War on Terror, we need to remember that al-Qaida was responsible for 9/11, and the Taliban was complicit, both in providing al-Qaida a safe haven to plan that attack and then refusing to hand over the terrorists responsible. What they did warrants something on the level of a blood feud. The fact that al-Qaida developed spinoffs, which include ISIS, as well as al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, among others, means we simply have more targets.

The decision to keep American troops in Syria, though, now means President Trump can try to reconcile with Secretary Mattis. While it might be hard for a man who has no shortage of belief in himself, this time, for the good of the country, if Trump can swallow his pride and work things out with Mattis and get him to agree to return to the Pentagon, America will be much better off.  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/61743?mailing_id=4133&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4133&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • bonnie

    I do believe we are lost but not all are. and for those who are not lost...God bless you.

  • I HAVE BEEN SAYING THAT THE BIGGEST THREAT IS THE LEFT NOT TEACHING OUR

    KIDS.  THEY NEED TO KNOW ABT AMERICA AND GOD AND WHY WE CAN CARRY A 

    GUN AND THAT IT MATTERS WHO YOU ARE AND CAPITALISM IS GREAT THEYT TEACH THEM NONE OF THIS NOT A THING THEY DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING BUT WHITE PRIVILEGE OR CLIMATE CHANGE THEY ARE BEING MADE TO BE MARXISTS AND STUPID.  

    TIME WE DID OUR JOB AS PARENTS AND TAUGHT OUR KIDS NOW.   OR WE ARE LOST

This reply was deleted.