Saturday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Kavanaugh Threatens the Left's Right to Cheat 
by Ann Coulter
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
FBI ignored hacking of liar-Hillary's emails by 'foreign entity'
by ART MOORE 

{ wnd.com } ~ At the contentious hearing Thursday with FBI agent Peter Strzok, Rep. Louis Gohmert, R-Texas, revealed the FBI didn’t follow up on a government watchdog’s finding... that nearly all of former Secretary of State liar-Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity. Gohmert, a member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, said the Intelligence Community Inspector General found an “anomaly on liar-Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list.” “It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” Gohmert said. Strzok received the information from ICIG investigator Frank Rucker but didn’t act on it, the Republican lawmaker said. The FBI agent told Gohmert he remembered meeting with Rucker but didn’t recall the “specific content.”....
Strzok Strikes Out
B3DOC9xVddtJ3MFWPeTlnFv0nL4SUOV707XbATY1rPuamnme-o2pY9qIO-OaYyYP85Usgcme4zsj-KVD97ukuAjlqmJG_ashIPZvx8FpXwIGLAxtYnoI9BKXb7UaHw-naWH5GTTupLwvSAzTQR_fGERdxbouUhSrhGSh8vHS6Y6qq4xjkzZ0QmAy3NrRmhaXw33l1upneKugfQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300by Lloyd Billingsley
{ frontpagemag.com } ~ “I have the utmost respect for Congress’s oversight role, but I truly believe that today’s hearing is just another victory notch in Putin’s belt... and another milestone in our enemies’ campaign to tear America apart. As someone who loves this country and cherishes its ideals, it is profoundly painful to watch and even worse to play a part in.” That was FBI counterintelligence boss Peter Strzok, the key player in the investigation of liar-Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, in his opening statement Thursday to a joint session of the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees. This was the same man who said in texts to his FBI girlfriend Lisa Page: “Fuck Trump,” “Trump is a disaster,” “I could SMELL the Trump support,” and that Trump supporters were “ignorant hillbillies.” For Peter Strzok, liar-Hillary Clinton would win “100 million to zero” and when Page raised the possibility of a Trump win, Strzok responded, “No, no he’s not. We’ll stop it.” The FBI man also alluded to an “insurance policy,” in the event that candidate Trump did prevail. The man who said all that, and much more, told the committee Thursday: “Let me be clear, unequivocally and under oath, not once in my 26 years of defending my nation did my personal opinions impact any official action I took.” And agent Strzok was dead certain it was Russian election interference was “sowing discord in our nation and shaking faith in our institutions.” dummycrats-Democrats loved it, and Rep. Steve Cohen, Tennessee dummycrats-Democrat, wanted to recommend Strzok for a Purple Heart. For their part, Republicans weren’t buying it...    https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/270730/strzok-strikes-out-lloyd-billingsley
.
California orders online gun registration, then lets website fail
nhuq09mhXnc1SB_PnerRrKIftsdOwcu9bgmpuS5_cUFBKiBgxxHPgB8UctPVI9zwqsbhWOcjDqIGbTfN1hPyihE8Nr6bKJRzjKrC_Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by BOB UNRUH
{ wnd.com } ~ The state of California is being sued for “refusing” to provide a way for gun owners burdened by a new registration requirement to comply with the law... ultimately forcing them to “face becoming criminals because they couldn’t do what the law requires.” The lawsuit was filed by the Second Amendment Foundation, which named California’s Department of Justice and Attorney General Xavier Becerra as defendants in its request for an injunction against the agency “for failing and refusing to establish a properly functioning internet-based firearms registration system.” Joining SAF in the legal action are the Calguns Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, Firearms Policy Foundation and three private citizens. The lawsuit was filed in Shasta County Superior Court. “We’re suing because California DOJ’s Firearms Application Reporting System (CFARS) broke down during the deadline week for people to register their firearms in accordance with new state laws,” said SAF Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb...
.
The Old versus the New Left
oOE8-07qrcncCG-lAreJQ06H855EPJpyYQtr60PSW_OydyLUQQ-8R2CaTi10BUF-FfgqDAf568e9mfgcT_d2zGHxLHKcsBdIquELuFTKoRt157dbQMnEQlLy=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Robert Weissberg
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Politics often evolves in strange, unpredictable ways. For example... what white Southern dummycrats-Democrat in 1960 would have foreseen that within forty years, the South would be solidly Republican?  And that black voters would help elect a black dummycrats-Democrat as president? An even more extreme transformation has been the American left. In a nutshell, if a leftist from the 1930s were transported to the present via a time machine, he would not only fail to recognize today's left, but would denounce it as a fraud, the antithesis of its historic mission and a traitor to the working class. If this time-traveler were to return to the 1930s and recount what he had observed, nobody would believe him. Surely, he would be told, the left could not have evolved into such a perversion of its historic mission, and this ludicrous time machine tale is just a cover-up for a week of binge-drinking. To understand the left's bizarre transformation, begin with Marxism's central principle: the centrality of class – namely, the idea that the division between those owning the means of production the capitalists and all others explains everything from politics to art and science. Moreover, it is the responsibility of the left i.e., the Communist Party to keep class central and thus advance interests of workers sometimes called the proletariat. To be sure, political necessity periodically counsels promoting a non-class agenda recall the U.S. Communist Party's foray into the 1931 racially charged Scottsboro Boys case, but these are temporary tactics and are always ultimately subordinated to advancing class interests. Promoting policies based on religion, ethnicity, sex, geography, race, and all else thus makes for counterproductive distractions...
.
Time for the dummycrats-Democratic Party 
to Recognize its Antisemitism Problem
ioT8LJbukmbTb8gK-5zvKaHKqyi8u1hC2lxj6uM8OkZHJ9jIYhlOWQllumSJ0-33nbuyNEsH5xlw3qYQrxNnQkoWMSsLyrZ0L3XRdoduzTYxAjLr9P37yV3AykxRCA6GFR809FWlR3ctxQg4ONqdXhBCBYPooqfnMhNibeVvDYnR6dQbpfxjyt-DBpW1PE_XYvfaeE7cKxxZW-Rbn0qVDX_k-typQeS5JBvmhS0F2Ty0p9bA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300by Ari Lieberman
{ frontpagemag.com } ~ In early May 2017, Britain’s Labour Party suffered humiliating reversals in local elections and failed in their bid to wrest control of the council of Barnet from conservatives... Labour candidates campaigning in areas with substantial Jewish constituencies were handed stinging defeats. In West Hendon, which is an area of Barnet, all three candidates fielded by the Labour Party lost. West Hendon was thought to be a safe Labour bastion. The Party had retained these seats for nearly 40 years. The reason for Labour’s defeat was obvious. Jewish constituents who had previously been loyal to Labour to a fault, defected en masse to conservatives, and Labour’s leader, Jeremy Corbyn gave them virtually no choice. Corbyn has referred to Hezbollah as his “friends,” and has spoken of Hamas in glowing terms. He defended a rabidly anti-Semitic mural depicting Jewish bankers counting money and playing monopoly on the backs of people with dark complexions. He joined Facebook groups dedicated to propagating anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and was dismissive of claims that members of his own party engaged in Holocaust revisionism. Britain’s Labour Party membership, taking cue from Corbyn, is rife with antisemitism and this deleterious trend shows no sign of abating. If anything, it is intensifying. Labour MP Naz Shah, who previously espoused anti-Semitic memes and complained on social media about “Jews” skewing online polls, was recently appointed Labour’s shadow equalities minister. Even more disquieting is the fact that the Labour Party recently adopted a very watered down definition of antisemitism which omits critical defining elements of Jew-hatred. There are worrying signs that America’s dummycrats- Democratic Party is following in the footsteps of its Labour Party cousin across the Atlantic. Radical elements within the Party are increasingly pulling dummycrats-Democrats farther to the Left. They are calling for open borders, the dismantling of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement bureau, an end to free enterprise and single payer healthcare. Radical Intersectionalists have also latched themselves on to the Palestinians, viewing them as victims of Israeli and Jewish aggression, colonialism and imperialism...   https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/270728/time-democratic-party-recognize-its-antisemitism-ari-lieberman
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.

Kavanaugh Threatens the Left's Right to Cheat 

cjGKfIY-3IeEF7pXNNtHuZuEVk7PhGlZZvRFdXRfgPYbM6hEYyUHH1FMMEti4TdEUxMM7khFh3ZN6j-RWIAxvvqfY93jdtCCA5TtQZjtVTpCILBVoXLnhjAg0cKWeQneY3m80oqL18mj2JAUaUsGIgCWscZm22EduDrDNafepz0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Ann Coulter:  The fact that the media responded to the nomination of a Supreme Court justice by obsessively covering Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, Russia and NATO proves that Trump has checkmated them with Brett Kavanaugh.

             Liberals know they can’t stop Kavanaugh’s confirmation, so they’d just as soon not hear any news about it at all. Please cheer us up with stories about Paul Manafort’s solitary confinement!
               But there was one very peculiar reaction to the nomination. The nut wing of the dummycrats-Democratic Party instantly denounced Kavanaugh by claiming that his elevation to the High Court would threaten all sorts of “rights.”
               Sen. scumbag-Cory Booker (D-NJ) tweeted: “Our next justice should be a champion for protecting & advancing rights, not rolling them back — but Kavanaugh has a long history of demonstrating hostility toward defending the rights of everyday Americans.”
               Sen. commie-Bernie Sanders (I-VT) tweeted: “If Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed to the Supreme Court it will have a profoundly negative effect on workers’ rights, women’s rights and voting rights for decades to come. We must do everything we can to stop this nomination.
               If only these guys could get themselves elected to some sort of legislative body, they could pass laws protecting these rights!
               Wait, I’m sorry. These are elected United States senators. Of all people, why are they carrying on about “rights”? If senators can’t protect these alleged “rights,” it can only be because most Americans do not agree that they should be “rights.”
               That’s exactly why the Left is so hysterical about the Supreme Court. It runs to the courts to win its most unpopular policy ideas, gift-wrapped and handed to it as “constitutional rights.
               What liberals call “rights” are legislative proposals that they can’t pass through normal democratic processes — at least outside of the states they’ve already flipped with immigration, like California.
               Realizing how widely reviled its ideas are, several decades ago the Left figured out a procedural scam to give it whatever it wanted without ever having to pass a law. Hey! You can’t review a Supreme Court decision!
               Instead of persuading a majority of its fellow citizens, it would need to persuade only five justices to invent any rights it pleased. It didn’t have to ask twice. Apparently, justices find it much funner to be all-powerful despots than boring technocrats interpreting written law.
               Soon the Court was creating “rights” promoting all the Left’s favorite causes — abortion, criminals, busing, pornography, stamping out religion, forcing military academies to admit girls and so on.
               There was nothing America could do about it. OK, liberals, you cheated and got all your demented policy ideas declared “constitutional rights.” But it’s very strange having elected legislators act as if they are helpless serfs, with no capacity to protect “rights.
               It’s stranger still for politicians to pretend that these putative “rights” are supported by a majority of Americans. By definition, the majority does not support them. Otherwise, they’d already be protected by law and not by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s latest newsletter.
               On MSNBC, Sen. Elizabeth dinky-Warren (D-MA) said people storming into the streets and making their voices heard about Kavanaugh is “the remarkable part about a democracy.
               Actually, that isn’t democracy at all. Liberals don’t do well at democracy. Why don’t politicians run for office promising to ban the death penalty, spring criminals from prison or enshrine late-term abortion? Hmmm … I wonder why those “I (heart) partial-birth abortion!” T-shirts aren’t selling?
               Unless the Constitution forbids it — and there are very few things proscribed by the Constitution — democracy entails persuading a majority of your fellow Americans or state citizens to support something, and then either putting it on the ballot or electing representatives who will write it into law — perhaps even a constitutional amendment.
               Otherwise, these “rights” whereof you speak are no more real than the Beastie Boys’ assertion of THE RIGHT TO PARTEEEEEEEE!
               Gay marriage, for example, was foisted on the country not through ballot initiatives, persuasion, public acceptance, lobbying or politicians winning elections by promising to legalize it. No, what happened was, in 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court suddenly discovered a right to gay marriage lurking in the state’s 223-year-old Constitution — written by the very religious John Adams. (Surprise!)
               After that, the people rose up and banned gay marriage in state after state, even in liberal bastions like Oregon and California. The year after the Massachusetts court’s remarkable discovery, gay marriage lost in all 11 states where it was on the ballot.
               Everywhere gay marriage was submitted to a popular vote, it lost. (Only one state’s voters briefly seemed to approve of gay marriage — Arizona, in 2006 — but that was evidently a problem with the wording of the initiative, because two years later, the voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional ban on gay marriage.)
               Inasmuch as allowing people to vote resulted in a resounding “NO!” on gay marriage, liberals ran back to the courts. Still, the public rebelled. The year after the Iowa Supreme Court concocted a right to gay marriage, voters recalled three of the court’s seven justices.
               A handful of blue state legislatures passed gay marriage laws, but even in the Soviet Republic of New York, a gay marriage bill failed in 2009.
               And then the U.S. Supreme Court decided that was quite enough democracy on the question of gay marriage! It turned out that — just like the Massachusetts Constitution — a gay marriage clause had been hiding in our Constitution all along!
               Conservatives could never dream of victories like this from the judiciary. Even nine Antonin Scalias on the Supreme Court are never going to discover a “constitutional right” to a border wall, mass deportations, a flat tax, publicly funded churches and gun ranges, the “right” to smoke or to consume 24-ounce sugary sodas.
               These are “constitutional rights” every bit as much as the alleged “constitutional rights” to abortion, pornography, gay marriage, transgender bathrooms, the exclusionary rule and on and on and on.
               The only rights conservatives ever seek under the Constitution are the ones that are written in black and white, such as the freedom of speech and the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Mostly, we sit trembling, waiting to see what new nonexistent rights the Court will impose on us, contravening everything we believe.
               So when you hear liberals carrying on about all the “rights” threatened by Kavanaugh, remember that by “rights,” they mean “policy ideas so unpopular that we can’t pass a law creating such rights.”

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/opinion/57060?mailing_id=3624&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.3624&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center