The Front Page Cover
The Events of the Week -- Featuring:
Turnout Time
by Thomas Sowell
.
Collusion Between McAuliffe, liar-Clinton and the FBI?
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe is a longtime henchman of the liar-Clintons who has a history of, among a myriad of other things, arranging nefarious campaign finance deals. He is currently under investigation by FBI and Justice Department officials for accepting campaign funds from Chinese businessman Wang Wenliang — a possible breach of finance rules. Incidentally, a new report implicates McAuliffe in the recently concluded investigation of liar-Hillary Clinton and her use of an unsecure server that was led by ... the FBI.
According to The Wall Street Journal, "The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary liar-Clinton, gave nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. liar-Clinton's email use."
The report continues: "Campaign finance records show Mr. McAuliffe's political-action committee donated $467,500 to the 2015 state Senate campaign of Dr. Jill McCabe, who is married to Andrew McCabe, now the deputy director of the FBI. The Virginia Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts considerable control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of support to Dr. McCabe's campaign in the form of mailers, according to the records. That adds up to slightly more than $675,000 to her candidacy from entities either directly under Mr. McAuliffe's control or strongly influenced by him."
The McAuliffe administration claims, "Any insinuation that his support was tied to anything other than his desire to elect candidates who would help pass his agenda is ridiculous." But is it really? As National Review's Jim Geraghty observes, "Andrew McCabe might be the straightest arrow in the entire quiver of the Bureau, and Mrs. McCabe might have never even discussed the liar-Clinton prosecution with him. But if your spouse is going to be involved in politics, you should not oversee criminal investigations of political figures. It will always present the appearance of a conflict of interest."
Indeed. As we noted back in May, when news of the FBI and DOJ investigation into campaign finance fraud broke, "The connection McAuliffe has with the liar-Clinton machine cannot be overstated. Before he was governor, the man worked as the director for the liar-Clinton Foundation for free." In other words, his murky dealings with Wenliang may only be part of the story. Did McAuliffe's illegal actions include colluding with FBI officials like Director James Comey and Andrew McCabe in a backroom deal that led to liar-Hillary's escaping prosecution? Perhaps not coincidentally, that's for the FBI and DOJ to determine. And if the answer is yes, the question becomes whether McAuliffe gets to walk too. Talk about coming full circle.
On the other hand, there is a revolt brewing at the FBI and DOJ among career officials who were left flabbergasted at liar-Hillary's Great Escape. They will be even more livid to know that collusion possibly extends to every level of government. In the end, Comey, McCabe and McAuliffe may have painted themselves into a corner. At least we can hope. ~The Patriot Post
.
liar-Hillary's Hypocrisy Knows No Bounds
Project Veritas Action released a third undercover video exposing the fact that liar-Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC colluded with the leftist non-profit organization Americans United for Change to disrupt Donald Trump's campaign rallies with someone dressed up as Donald Duck. Beyond the purely obnoxious nature of these fomented protests, these videos directly implicate liar-Clinton in FEC violations, revealing yet another instance not only of liar-Hillary's willful lawlessness but of her hypocrisy. liar-Clinton has campaigned often and hard against the Supreme Court's decision on Citizens United, which lifted some unconstitutional restrictions on First Amendment rights in the political realm, promising that she would nominate justices who would overturn that ruling. Yet here she is flouting campaign finance law to coordinate with allies.
Like every Democrat for decades, liar-Clinton has enjoyed the Leftmedia's support through what amount to in-kind campaign contributions — hardly distinguishable from the large amounts of cash and political campaigning from unions. The reason Democrats like liar-Hillary hate the Citizens United ruling is for the simple fact that it levels the political playing field.
One of the most discouraging things this current election cycle has revealed more so than any other in recent memory is the level of compromise and downright corruption in the federal government. Even with the release of these videos, it seems unlikely that there will be any serious investigation or consequences. It is this unjust double standard that frustrates so many Americans. Those in government take it upon themselves to continually create new increasingly burdensome laws, taxes and regulations that are forced upon the American citizenry but to which these same corruptocrats excuse themselves from having the obligation to follow. liar-Hillary Clinton is the embodiment of this governing hypocrisy. ~The Patriot Post.
.
Christ's Burial Place Exposed
for First Time in Centuries
by Kristin Romey
The shrine that houses the traditional burial place of Jesus Christ
is undergoing restoration inside the Church of
the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem.
{nationalgeographic.com} ~ For the first time in centuries, scientists have exposed the original surface of what is traditionally considered the tomb of Jesus Christ. Located in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in the Old City of Jerusalem... the tomb has been covered by marble cladding since at least 1555 A.D., and most likely centuries earlier. "The marble covering of the tomb has been pulled back, and we were surprised by the amount of fill material beneath it,” said Fredrik Hiebert, archaeologist-in-residence at the National Geographic Society, a partner in the restoration project. “It will be a long scientific analysis, but we will finally be able to see the original rock surface on which, according to tradition, the body of Christ was laid."... http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/10/jesus-tomb-opened-church-holy-sepulchre/
.
.
Former Muslim warns that if Islam
continues as is, the West will not
by LT. COLONEL JAMES G. ZUMWALT, USMC (RET)
by LT. COLONEL JAMES G. ZUMWALT, USMC (RET)
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ Why then, seeking to understand Islam, do we accept what our non-Muslim leaders tell us about the religion being peaceful... ignoring what we are told by real duty experts-those once-practicing Muslims more intimately knowledgeable about it? President Barack liar-nObama has supposedly read the Koran. He assures us, although not a Muslim himself, the religion is peaceful. Having grown up in Muslim countries, he may have played the role of a Muslim but he was not one. Thus, his repeated pronouncements Islam is peaceful should carry no more weight than a diagnosis of a real illness by an actor playing a doctor on television... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/former-muslim-warns-that-if-islam-continues-as-is-the-west-will-not?f=must_reads
.
What Happened to the FBI?
It's Been Corrupted By Obama and His Team
by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
{foxnews.com} ~ When FBI Director James Comey announced on July 5 that the Department of Justice would not seek the indictment of liar-Hillary Clinton for failure to safeguard state secrets related to her email use while she was secretary of state... he both jumped the gun and set in motion a series of events that surely he did not intend. Was his hand forced by the behavior of FBI agents who wouldn’t take no for an answer? Did he let the FBI become a political tool? The FBI began investigating the liar-Clinton email scandal in the spring of 2015, when The New York Times revealed liar-Clinton’s use of a private email address for her official governmental work and the fact that she did not preserve the emails on State Department servers, contrary to federal law. After an initial collection of evidence and a round of interviews, agents and senior managers gathered in the summer of 2015 to discuss how to proceed. It was obvious to all that a prima-facie case could be made for espionage, theft of government property and obstruction of justice charges. The consensus was to proceed with a formal criminal investigation...
.
WikiLeaks Releases
Batch #20 of John Podesta Emails…
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ Today WikiLeaks released another batch of emails from the account of liar-Clinton family fixer John Podesta.
Read the Released Email: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult
.
Palestinians: Jihadi-Style Child Abuse
by Khaled Abu Toameh
by Khaled Abu Toameh
The Islamic Jihad Movement in Gaza recently held a rally in which
children appeared in camouflage military outfits, some carrying real
and fake automatic rifles.
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Children have long become an integral part of "military" parades held in the Gaza Strip by various Palestinian groups. But this form of child abuse does not seem to bother human rights organizations or the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)... whose declared goal is to "work for a world in which every child has a fair chance in life and a right to survive, thrive and fulfill their potential -- to the benefit of a better world." It seems that UNICEF does not believe that its mandate extends to Palestinian children, who are exploited to serve the interests of Islamist groups. In the Gaza Strip, children are taught not only to hate Israel, but also to prepare themselves for jihad (holy war) against the "Zionist enemy." Hamas, the Islamic Jihad Movement, and other radical groups see children as future "soldiers" in the war to eliminate Israel. They raise children to regard suicide bombers and jihadis as role models...
.
.
Turnout Time
by Thomas Sowell
{townhall.com} ~ If we sit home in disgust on election day, we forfeit the right -- and the duty -- to elect a Congress that can keep either of these dangerous people from doing permanent damage to this country and to the future of this generation -- and generations yet unborn.
Control of Congress has probably never mattered more than in this election, simply because of two out-of-control people, one of whom is going to become President of the United States.
We need a Congress that can block dangerous legislative proposals coming from the White House, and block dangerous nominees to the federal courts, including especially the Supreme Court. More than that, we need a Congress that can remove a dangerous President who ignores the law and commits impeachable offenses. Any Congress theoretically can do so, since the House of Representatives has the power to impeach and the Senate then votes on whether to remove the President from office.
However, as we have seen over the past seven years, that theoretical power means nothing, if neither House of Congress has the incentives and the guts to use the power they have.
Barack liar-nObama has repeatedly exceeded the powers of his office, disregarding laws passed by Congress, and making in effect a unilateral treaty with Iran, exempting it from American sanctions for building nuclear bombs.
Just by not calling it a treaty, liar-nObama has ignored the Constitution's requirement that all treaties be made only with Senate approval. Yet there has never been a treaty with more far-reaching -- and potentially fatal -- consequences than this unilateral presidential agreement with a foreign country.
Yet who was going to impeach "the first black President," with the media ready to go ballistic if they tried?
With no credible threat of impeachment, neither of this year's candidates for President will have any deterrent to indulging their already demonstrated headstrong disregard of anything other than their own interests and their own egos.
Not only does this mean that we have a duty to vote for Congress, even if we don't have the stomach to vote for either presidential candidate, it also means that we need to decide what kind of Congress we want, in light of the high stakes.
We need to ask which of our local candidates for the House of Representatives, and which of our statewide candidates for the Senate, is someone with the character and the guts to remove a President from office.
Don't try to hide behind the lame excuse that "They're all the same."
Let's not forget that President Richard Nixon resigned for a reason. That reason was that Senator Barry Goldwater led a delegation of Republican Senators to the White House to inform Republican President Nixon that they would not support him in the Senate if the House of Representatives impeached him.
We know it can be done, because it already has been done.
The real question now is: What kind of voters are we? Those who ask "What can I do, I am only one little person?" are just copping out.
"We the People" are not only the first three words of the Constitution, it is where the Constitution put the ultimate power to make or break any politician. What can you do? Everything.
If you can't be bothered, then be honest enough to say, "I can't be bothered." But don't cop out with a lame excuse. Too many other people's fate depends on whether you do your duty.
Painful as it may be to realize that we are reduced to considering the impeachability of a presidential candidate, that is a reality that will not go away, just because we don't like it.
How impeachable is liar-Hillary Clinton? Since she would be "the first woman President," any criticism of her, much less any impeachment, would bring loud howls from the media across the country that ugly sexist bias was behind any opposition to anything she did -- no matter how awful. liar-Hillary in the White House would have a blank check, and she would not hesitate to use it.
Donald Trump has no such exemption. Neither the media nor Congressional Republicans would automatically spring to his defense if he overstepped the line. His impeachability may be his most important asset in a year of painful choices.
Control of Congress has probably never mattered more than in this election, simply because of two out-of-control people, one of whom is going to become President of the United States.
We need a Congress that can block dangerous legislative proposals coming from the White House, and block dangerous nominees to the federal courts, including especially the Supreme Court. More than that, we need a Congress that can remove a dangerous President who ignores the law and commits impeachable offenses. Any Congress theoretically can do so, since the House of Representatives has the power to impeach and the Senate then votes on whether to remove the President from office.
However, as we have seen over the past seven years, that theoretical power means nothing, if neither House of Congress has the incentives and the guts to use the power they have.
Barack liar-nObama has repeatedly exceeded the powers of his office, disregarding laws passed by Congress, and making in effect a unilateral treaty with Iran, exempting it from American sanctions for building nuclear bombs.
Just by not calling it a treaty, liar-nObama has ignored the Constitution's requirement that all treaties be made only with Senate approval. Yet there has never been a treaty with more far-reaching -- and potentially fatal -- consequences than this unilateral presidential agreement with a foreign country.
Yet who was going to impeach "the first black President," with the media ready to go ballistic if they tried?
With no credible threat of impeachment, neither of this year's candidates for President will have any deterrent to indulging their already demonstrated headstrong disregard of anything other than their own interests and their own egos.
Not only does this mean that we have a duty to vote for Congress, even if we don't have the stomach to vote for either presidential candidate, it also means that we need to decide what kind of Congress we want, in light of the high stakes.
We need to ask which of our local candidates for the House of Representatives, and which of our statewide candidates for the Senate, is someone with the character and the guts to remove a President from office.
Don't try to hide behind the lame excuse that "They're all the same."
Let's not forget that President Richard Nixon resigned for a reason. That reason was that Senator Barry Goldwater led a delegation of Republican Senators to the White House to inform Republican President Nixon that they would not support him in the Senate if the House of Representatives impeached him.
We know it can be done, because it already has been done.
The real question now is: What kind of voters are we? Those who ask "What can I do, I am only one little person?" are just copping out.
"We the People" are not only the first three words of the Constitution, it is where the Constitution put the ultimate power to make or break any politician. What can you do? Everything.
If you can't be bothered, then be honest enough to say, "I can't be bothered." But don't cop out with a lame excuse. Too many other people's fate depends on whether you do your duty.
Painful as it may be to realize that we are reduced to considering the impeachability of a presidential candidate, that is a reality that will not go away, just because we don't like it.
How impeachable is liar-Hillary Clinton? Since she would be "the first woman President," any criticism of her, much less any impeachment, would bring loud howls from the media across the country that ugly sexist bias was behind any opposition to anything she did -- no matter how awful. liar-Hillary in the White House would have a blank check, and she would not hesitate to use it.
Donald Trump has no such exemption. Neither the media nor Congressional Republicans would automatically spring to his defense if he overstepped the line. His impeachability may be his most important asset in a year of painful choices.
Comments