TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Our reaction to the North Korea summit depends on our predisposition about Trump
by DAVID LIMBAUGH
.
Giuliani - End Mueller Witch Hunt Today,
Comey and Strzok in Jail Next Week
https://rickwells.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/1246-rudy-giuliani-mueller-witch-hunt-940x400.jpg" width="421" height="179" />by rickwells.us
{ rickwells.us } ~ The interview begins with Rudy Giuliani stating that with the release of the IG report on the liar-Clinton sham investigation... the Russia hoax Trump witch hunt led by Mueller, Rosenstein and, from underneath his desk, AG Sessions, should immediately be halted. Giuliani said, “The IG report basically tells you that both prongs of the Mueller investigation are either corrupt or answered. The second one, the obstruction of justice, I mean this report is a complete and absolute explanation of why Comey had to be fired. So how could it be obstruction of justice? Every reason for firing him is laid out here.” He lists the many reasons why Comey deserved to be fired, including the acceptance of gifts by upper tier agents and officials, saying, “That’s called bribery.” He says, “This thing has to change from an investigation of the Trump administration for collusion, which is a made up charge by Peter Strzok, who said, ‘I’m going to get Trump, I’m gonna stop him. I’m going to get him out of the White House.'”... Guess Which FBI Agent is Getting Subpoenaed?
https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/aanews/media/picture/5a73/3ca4/6970/2d3b/4b78/1700/Slideshow_1024px-Capitol_Building_Full_View.jpg?1517501647" width="395" height="158" />Israel Moves To Thwart Growing Hamas Maritime Threat
https://images.jpost.com/image/upload/f_auto,fl_lossy/t_Article2016_ControlFaceDetect/426853" width="378" height="264" />by Ari Lieberman
{ frontpagemag.com } ~ When it comes to military firsts, Israel can probably take credit for the lion’s share... Israel was the first nation to capture an intact Soviet MiG-21, the first to capture a complete intact Soviet P-12 radar station, the first to employ militarized drones in the context of a large-scale, Wild Weasel, anti-SAM operation, and the first to destroy not one but two atom bomb facilities. On June 2, 2018 the Israel Defense Forces executed another operational first. The Israeli Air Force bombed and destroyed a Hamas underwater terror tunnel. The tunnel, which was located approximately three kilometers from the Israeli border, was constructed for the purpose of concealing Hamas movements and allowing Hamas frogmen to enter the sea from an adjacent Hamas naval base undetected. Hamas has been trying to improve its militarized maritime program and has invested substantial resources into improving and expanding its sea assault capabilities. On July 8, 2014 a cell of five heavily armed Hamas frogmen infiltrated Israel from the sea at Zikim Beach, which is located just north of the Gaza Strip. They were quickly detected and Israeli ground and naval units were dispatched to confront them. After a running battle, all five were liquidated. An IDF soldier was lightly wounded in the exchange...Lindsey Graham Doesn't 'Give
a S**t' What CNN and Critics Think - On Aire-
https://rickwells.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/1246-lindsey-graham-940x400.jpg" width="401" height="170" />by rickwells.us
{ rickwells.us } ~ Lindsey Graham took to the CNN airwaves for a little trash talking of his own in the place that has become notorious as it devolved into a dispensary of foul-mouthed liberal hysteria and lies... With the potty-mouthed Don Lemon headlining their less-than-impressive talent roster, CNN’s use of four letter words in their propagandizing has become commonplace, and Sen Lindsey Graham made himself at home. The bobble-head he was chatting with is the same brainwashed blonde millennial that attempted to paint Rep Jim Jordan as a hypocrite for being a Christian who believes in border security. She actually asks a legitimate question, about the relationship between Graham and President Trump, as it is hard at times to figure out which side Graham is rooting for. His efforts in support of Robert Mueller, more than his words to the contrary, indicate he’s still an anti-Trump RINO and working for the enemy. But Graham wants to have it both ways and he’s more effective for the opposition if he appears to be operating within the President’s circle. So he does what he has to do, as all of the sellouts in the DC swamp will do, as their masters in the establishment direct, pretending to have gotten over his differences with President Trump while not supporting him in any meaningful way... https://rickwells.us/lindsey-graham-give-cnn/IG Report: FBI Lawyer #1 Tashina Gauhar
and The Huma/Weiner Laptop Issues
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ One of the information issues with the IG report is that it’s written entirely from an insiders perspective... Therefore without an understanding of how divisions within Main Justice related to the discussed activity within FBI main DC offices it can be very confusing to understand. The ‘insider narration’ makes it difficult to see what happened with the Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner laptop; and how the liar-Clinton emails were discovered. However, because the issue is so important the IG report spends three chapters on this time-frame between September 28th and October 29th, 2016; and ultimately the next day, Oct. 30th, when a search warrant was executed for the laptop content. IG Horowitz takes this aspect of the investigation into granularity and nuance (Chapters 8, 9 and 10). At the heart of the activity during this critical period is FBI lawyer #1 Tashina “Tash” Gauhar who was on a video conference call with the FBI New York Field Office (NYFO) as the discoveries of hundreds of thousands of liar-Clinton emails were relayed internally to the Mid-Year-Event (MYE) team in DC on September 29th, 2016....
Our reaction to the North Korea summit depends on our predisposition about Trump
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/limbaugh_0927-705x392.jpg" width="406" height="225" />{ conservativeinstitute.org } ~ It goes without saying that Democrats would view President Trump’s North Korean negotiations quite differently than Republicans, but I was honestly surprised by the strong negative reaction of Trump critics on the right.
Don’t get me wrong; some Trump critics on the right reflexively oppose everything he does or says, but my gut reaction when first learning of the summit was that even they would grudgingly acknowledge this as a positive development.
But their reaction was viscerally negative, harsh, cynical, pessimistic and absolute. Either I overestimated their capacity for some fairness concerning Trump or I am radically wrong in how I interpret the summit results.
I have witnessed an ontological certitude — both intellectual and moral — from a certain type of conservative Trump critic.
These critics not only are sure of their beliefs but seem equally sure that conservative Trump supporters must have an ulterior motive because they couldn’t possibly retain their principles and support him.
I believe they are way off base — their judgment clouded by their bias against Trump — but I don’t doubt that they believe they are doing what is right. However, they won’t extend us the reciprocal benefit of the doubt.
They often smear conservative Trump supporters as cultists — saying we would abandon our principles, even our commitment to national security, to support Trump or cover up his missteps or tweets.
There may be some Trump supporters who appear that way, but rarely is this a cultish phenomenon, any more than is the loyalty of supporters of other strong political figures, such as Presidents liar-nObama and Reagan.
I think the attraction to Trump is grounded in an abiding patriotism. His supporters are deeply concerned about the leftist assault on America as founded and the left’s dedication to completing its fundamental transformation of this nation.
I can’t deny there’s a charisma factor, but if Trump had preached anything but a singularly pro-American message, his campaign wouldn’t have gotten off the ground.
Now, concerning North Korea: Yes, Trump exaggerated when he tweeted that North Korea is no longer a nuclear threat, but it didn’t unsettle me, because I know he didn’t mean it literally.
We know from everything else he said that he is approaching this soberly and has the long view in mind.
A national security hawk, he is aware of the traps and North Korea’s history of deceit. He will insist on verification. And he has surrounded himself with very serious and brilliant foreign policy advisers devoted to America’s national security.
I’ve never done this, but let me share some of my tweets on why I am very upbeat about Trump’s negotiations with Kim Jong Un so far.
“I’m not sure, but it seems to me that the different reactions to Trump’s NK negotiations this week, especially among those on the right, are largely attributable to people’s predispositions about Trump personally — significantly more so even than other issues & it’s fascinating.”
“I think there’s a major difference between Trump rejoicing at NK’s promises & liar-Clinton or liar-nObama doing so. Whatever else you think about Trump, he is a patriot & is committed to America’s security & those priorities transcend his desire to just make a deal, unlike liar-nObama & liar-Clinton.”
“It was as if liar-nObama was so obsessed with making a deal that he’d virtually sell us out to do so — not virtually, he actually did in some respects. No way I believe Trump would do that, on inspections or anything else. I am sure many Trump skeptics will scoff at this assessment.”
“People who are savaging Trump because nothing concrete is done yet are spitting in the wind. It’s impossible that anything concrete could be done yet. Those criticizing any deal because of difficulties in verifiability are also just naysayers. Of course there will be difficulties.”
“How is it legitimate to criticize Trump’s outline of a plan on verifiability concerns when those steps have yet to be specified? Just calm down and let the process unfold. If Trump doesn’t ensure verifiability then or is lax about it, go after him by all means. I think he will.”
“I also think there is a real chance that Kim believes Trump might take military action if Kim betrays us and goes forward. There is little chance he or his predecessors would have feared that with Democrat appeasement presidents.”
“In the end, what are the critics kvetching about? Seems to me their criticism is way more premature than Trump’s celebration. It is inconceivable that much more could have been done substantively than was done in the first meeting and Trump said much work remains.”
“Is there even one leftist critic who would oppose a Democrat president trying to work toward denuclearization? They didn’t complain when liar-nObama’s Iran deal was completely done and he’d given away the farm. Trump’s deal is just in outline form & he’s given away nothing — not yet.”
“I understand people freaking out over Trump’s tweet on this, but do you REALLY believe this means he won’t do everything he can to follow up — and ensure adequate security measures are implemented, or no deal? Because I do, so his optimistic tweet is just that & nothing more.”
“If Trump didn’t give a da– about America’s national security I’d be very skeptical. But I am convinced America’s security is his foremost priority here. That is why I’m not worried — like I would be big time with liar-nObama. And I’m right. Yep, I’m right on this.”
“It seems that some conservative Trump critics fear that conservative Trump supporters would compromise their priorities — like national security — to support Trump even if he were jeopardizing it. No way. We support him, among other reasons, precisely because he’s a security hawk.”
“We are in the beginning stages of a process that has started off with great promise. Nothing more; nothing less.”
Comments