The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
liar-Hillary and liar-Bill Houdini
by Cal Thomas
GOP Plodding Forward on Tax Reform
by Political Editors:  As the GOP stumbles forward on building some form of tax reform bill, one of the latest proposals to be bandied about is repealing the liar-nObamaCare mandate. Citing Congressional Budget Office numbers, House Republicans estimate that ending the mandate would save the government some $338 billion over the next decade, helping to offset the predicted lost revenue from tax cuts. However, it’s clear that not all House Republicans are on board with the plan as several publicly expressed their misgivings, while Democrats have trotted out their usual objections that the plan favors the rich.

          Meanwhile, Senate Republicans released some key components of their desired tax plan, including a proposal that President Donald Trump’s heavily touted corporate tax cut be delayed until 2019. Both House and Senate versions would enact a corporate tax rate of 20%, down from the current 35%, though the House version would put it in place next year. Both the House and Senate plans share the same standard deduction and increase in the child tax credit.
          The biggest difference between the House and Senate versions may be the issue of reform itself. While the House has advanced a plan with significant changes to the tax code that would fundamentally reform taxes, Senate has opted for more of a tweaking approach choosing to maintain much of the current structure while making minor adjustments to the existing code. Secondly, the House plan would seeking to make its changes take effect much sooner than the Senate, which seeks to put off some of the more costly changes for at least a year.
          The overarching issue is this: The perception among the electorate is that Republicans are failing to lead and are on their way to another massive failure similar to that of repealing liar-nObamaCare. If Republicans can’t get their act together and pass meaningful comprehensive tax reform legislation, then there’s a good chance they will find themselves in the minority come 2018. Hopefully, Republicans will take heed from the recent election results from Virginia and progress on meaningful tax legislation.  ~The Patriot Pos

Longtime Trump Bodyguard Schiller 
Blasts Holes In Fake Dossier, Prostitute Claims
{} ~ President Trump’s longtime bodyguard, Keith Schiller, who had been with the Trump organization for roughly 18 years, retired in September... He was back guarding the President again on Tuesday, after being called to testify in the Russia witch hunt by the House Intelligence Committee. Schiller had nothing but positive things to say about the President’s conduct while they were in Moscow in 2013 for the Miss Universe Pageant. He noted that after a business meeting, one of those involved offered to “send five women” to Donald Trump’s hotel room. Schiller told the Congressman he replied on behalf of Mr. Trump by saying, “We don’t do that type of stuff.” The two sources leaking the details of the closed door session to NBC News stated that his statements were made in the context of his resolute insistence that the allegations contained in the Fusion GPS dossier regarding prostitutes coming to Mr. Trump’s room were completely false. Schiller’s response was a colorful, “Oh my God, that’s bulls**t.”...
If Trump is Investigated On Russia, 
liar-Hillary Must be Investigated Too
by Onan Coca
{} ~ A pair of strong arguments that liar-Hillary Clinton must face Congressional investigation for her relationship with Russia, was made earlier this week... from both the left and the right. On the left, law professor Jonathan Turley chastised his fellow liberals for demanding an investigation into Trump’s Russia ties, but not calling for the same against liar-Clinton. What is curious is that now that liar-Hillary Clinton and her campaign happened to be accused of very similar types of conduct in some respects, many of these same experts are retreating to the narrowness of the criminal code and saying you can’t extend the code that far, and there’s really no need to investigate...
Kristallnacht 79 Years Ago; 
The Democratic Party Today?
by Jeff Dunetz
{} ~ Kristallnacht also known as Night of Broken Glass was an anti-Jewish pogrom in Nazi Germany on November 9th-10th 1938... In actuality, it was much more than just a pogrom. Kristallnacht was the day Hitler’s final solution “came out of the closet.” In recent years, the Democratic Party here in the United States has become the anti-Semitic party. Thankfully they aren’t anywhere near the Antisemitism of 1938 Germany, not even on the same planet. But left unchecked who knows what may happen. Kristallnacht is viewed by many historians as the beginning of the Jewish genocide of the Holocaust. In a coordinated attack on Jewish people and their property, 99 Jews were murdered and 25,000 to 30,000 were arrested and placed in concentration camps, 267 synagogues were destroyed and thousands of homes and businesses were ransacked. The attacks were carried out by Hitler Youth, the Gestapo, and the SS... http://
Now It’s The Democrats 
Who Have A ‘Russian Problem’
{} ~ Suddenly it’s the Democrats who have a serious Russia problem. Democratic fingerprints are all over a growing number of Russia-related scandals... including payments to Fusion GPS for its Russian-sourced Trump dossier, lobbying on behalf of Russia’s largest bank to lift economic sanctions, former President Barack liar-nObama’s administration’s approval of the sale of Uranium One to Russia, and giving twenty percent of America’s uranium reserves to Moscow.  Republican Senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Chuck Grassley of Iowa have called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to look into the mounting scandals tying Democrats to Russia...
TUCKER: Campaign Finance Atty: DOJ, FEC Should Probe Clinton after Brazile Revelations

Constitutional law attorney Jonathan Turley: Legal standards lowered to target President Trump

Ben Shapiro Rips Left For Slamming "Thoughts And Prayers"
Steve Bannon Calls on Senator Mitch McConnell to Resign

President Trump tells North Korea: "This is a very different administration — do not try us"
liar-Hillary and liar-Bill Houdini
by Cal Thomas

{} ~ How do they do it? I am not the first to compare the liar-Clintons to Harry Houdini, the great magician and escape artist, but liar-Bill and liar-Hillary make him look like a rank amateur.

No law seems to touch them. No regulation seems to control them. No prosecutor wants to take the risk of holding either liar-Clinton accountable for anything. OK, liar-Bill was impeached by a Republican House, but not convicted in the Senate.

The latest escape for liar-Hillary involves former FBI Director James Comey and the law governing classified materials. The Hill newspaper's John Solomon has obtained an early draft of Comey's statement about liar-Hillary's mishandling of classified documents on her email account.

Initially, Comey was going to charge her with being "grossly negligent," a violation of the law which subjects one to prison and fines. In his public statement that sounded like an indictment, Comey changed his description of her actions to "extremely careless," a distinction without a difference, but which he said was not an indictable offense because she didn't intend to violate the law.

About Comey's rationale for changing the words in his draft memo, the public does not yet know, but Comey testified before a Senate committee that it made him "mildly nauseous" when he considered the FBI's impact on the election.

Gregg Jarrett, an attorney who frequently offers legal opinions on the Fox News Channel, has been keeping track of liar-Hillary Clinton's skirting of the laws and escapes from its penalties.

Here is his account of only a few recent examples of what might be a twist on the song "I Fought the Law And the Law Won." In her case, liar-Hillary fought the law and bested it.

Speaking about a deal that allegedly allowed for the sale of some U.S. uranium to the Russians via a Canadian, who heavily contributed to liar-Bill Clinton and the liar-Clinton Foundation, then receiving $500,000 for a speech in Moscow a sale some other commentators say didn't occur, Jarrett says, "'s a crime to use a public office to confer a benefit to a foreign government in exchange for money ... it can be prosecuted under a variety of anti-corruption laws passed by Congress, including the federal bribery statute (18 USC 201-b), the federal gratuity statute (18 USC 201-c), the mail fraud statute (18 USC 1341), the wire fraud statute (18 USC 1343), the program bribery statute (18 USC 666) and the Travel Act (18 USC 1952)."

As for the anti-Trump Russian dossier, which Democrats, including those associated with the liar-Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for, Jarrett says it's a violation of federal law to pay foreign nationals to impact a U.S. political campaign (52 USC 30121), and it's also a violation to file a false or misleading campaign report (52 USC 30101).

"I've been hearing Democrats say, 'Oh, those are just civil penalties,'" says Jarrett. "They are not. The government produces a book -- it's 319 pages -- outlining the federal election laws and all those who have been criminally prosecuted and ended up in prison."

How does liar-Hillary Clinton get away with it? Jarrett says: "The liar-Clintons are escape artists that would make Houdini proud. Whenever they are caught dangling their feet over the edge of illegality, they usually dummy up."

He pointed out that when liar-Hillary Clinton spoke with FBI investigators about her private email server last year, she said, "I cannot recall" 39 times.

If the Justice Department refuses to appoint a special counsel to hold liar-Hillary accountable under the laws the rest of us can't escape, and if Robert Mueller won't do it, then Congress should continue with its own investigations.

We often hear "no one is above the law." That has never applied to the liar-Clintons.

Views: 11


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center




Rush Limbaugh Explains How Robert Mueller
Will Attempt To Financially Destroy President Trump

 Special Counsel Robert Mueller has crossed President Trump’s “red line” after issuing a subpoena for documents related to the Trump Organization’s business dealings with Russia.

New York Times reports:

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia, according to two people briefed on the matter. The order is the first known time that the special counsel demanded documents directly related to President Trump’s businesses, bringing the investigation closer to the president. […] The Trump Organization has said that it never had real estate holdings in Russia, but witnesses recently interviewed by Mr. Mueller have been asked about a possible real estate deal in Moscow. In 2015, a longtime business associate of Mr. Trump’s emailed Mr. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen at his Trump Organization account claiming he had ties to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and said that building a Trump Tower in Moscow would help Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign.

Radio host Rush Limbaugh theorized on his program Friday that one of Mueller’s true objectives is to financially destroy President Trump.

Partial transcript via Breitbart News:

And these requests, the subpoena for documents from the Trump Organization, I ask you again, what has that to do with the campaign and with collusion and with the Russians? They’ve already been looking into Trump business in Russia with the Miss, what is it, USA, whatever his pageant is.

Do you all remember during the early days of the campaign there was news that Trump, in a tax return something like 20 years ago, took a $900 million deduction that was granted and survived an audit by the IRS? Now, I forget the details. It had to do with losses that he had incurred in that year in building things. It was around 900 or $920 million deduction. I’ll never forget when it was reported because most people will never come close to ever having that in a lifetime, and to have a guy personally write that much off?

Anyway, I think Mueller wants that $920 million back. I think Mueller wants to prove that that was a faulty deduction. I think that they want to go back, they want to get Trump’s tax returns because they want to nullify that $900 million deduction, and then they want to collect 20 years of interest and penalties and wipe Trump out.

In the meantime, President Trump’s lawyers are in the process of negotiating with special counsel Robert Mueller to bring the Russia probe to an end, reports Rebecca Ballhaus and Peter Nicholas of the Wall Street Journal.

Mueller’s tentacles continue to reach further and further.

CNN reported that investigators are attempting to determine whether former Blackwater chief Erik Prince misled the  House Intelligence Committee about a meeting he had in Seychelles in January of 2017.

Prince is accused of using the meeting as an opportunity to establish a secret back channel with Russia.

Fox News’ Catherine Herridge spoke with one of President Trump’s personal lawyers about the new subpoena request by Special Counsel Mueller.

According to Herridge, Trump’s lawyer was unaware of the subpoena and said it may be a ‘wrap up’ subpoena or ‘clean up’ subpoena which may signal the end of the investigation.


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service