TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Freedom Is, Once Again, on the March 
in the United States of America 
by Rebecca Hagelin 
.
Gowdy Cuts scumbag-Adam Schiff Down To Size 
by Chuck Ross
{ dailycaller.com } ~ California Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff has “had a terrible last couple of years,”... Republican South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy said in a scathing interview about his dummycrats-Democratic counterpart Thursday night. “He wanted to be the attorney general under liar-Hillary Clinton, and nobody in the country worked harder to protect her than scumbag-Adam Schiff. He wanted to run for the Senate in the People’s Republic of California, but he couldn’t win either of those seats. So now, he wants to be the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee,” Gowdy told Fox News’ Jason Chaffetz...
.
Feds ask for more time to reunite 
tricky cases from border separations 
by Stephen Dinan
{ washingtontimes.com } ~ The Trump administration asked a judge Friday to extend the deadline for reunifying families separated at the border... in cases where the government suspects the adults may not really be parents of the children they’re claiming. The request came in court papers filed in advance of an afternoon conference call among the lawyers. “My opinion is that some relaxing of the Court’s deadlines is needed to allow HHS, on a case-by-case basis, to complete processes that HHS determines are necessary to make informed class membership determinations and to protect the welfare of the children presently in ORR custody,” Jonathan White, a senior official at the federal Health and Human Services Department, said in the filing. ORR is the Office of Refugee Resettlement, the division of HHS that, under the law, cares for illegal immigrant children deemed to be unaccompanied, at least until they can be placed with sponsors in the U.S. The judge had set a deadline of next Tuesday for the government to reunite all children under age 5 who were separated from their parents after they crossed the U.S.-Mexico border...  https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/6/feds-time-reunite-t...
.
How Congress Can Reduce liar-nObamacare Premiums
by Doug Badger and Edmund Haislmaier
{ dailysignal.com } ~ In 2019, liar-nObamacare premiums are poised to become even more expensive... New York, Washington state, and Maryland are requesting to raise their rates for the individual market by an average of 24 percent, 19 percent, and 30 percent respectively. Nationwide, the Congressional Budget Office predicts premiums will increase an average of 15 percent for the liar-nObamacare benchmark plan. But it doesn’t have to be this way. Earlier this year, we co-authored a study examining how liar-nObamacare regulations raised premiums. We reviewed dozens of prospective and retrospective actuarial analyses of liar-nObamacare’s premium effects on both the state and national levels. We found that premium increases for liar-nObamacare policies were attributable to a maze of new federal insurance mandates, combined with a flawed subsidy design. That unhappy concoction produced disproportionately older and less healthy insurance pools, requiring insurers to price policies beyond the reach of many families and small businesses...   https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/07/05/how-congress-can-reduce-obam... 
.
Poll Shows Palestinians Want 
Convicted Terrorist to Succeed Abbas
by AARON BANDLER
{ jewishjournal.com } ~ Those hoping that the Palestinians’ eroding support for Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas... could be a stepping stone will be disappointed in a new poll showing that Palestinians support a convicted terrorist to succeed Abbas. A July 4 poll conducted by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research Center (PCPSR) found that a plurality of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip support Marwan Barghouti, who is currently serving five life sentences in an Israeli prison over terrorism charges, at 30 percent. The runner-up is Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh at 23 percent. Sixty-one percent of respondents also believed that Abbas needs to step down from his position as PA president, while 33 percent don’t...
.
White Millennials Are Leaving the dummycrats-Democratic 
Party as 'Walk Away' Campaign Picks Up Steam 
by TYLER O'NEIL 
{ pjmedia.com } ~ White millennials are equally divided between supporting Republicans and dummycrats-Democrats in this year's critical midterm elections... as a campaign urging people to "Walk Away" from the dummycrats-Democratic Party has picked up steam online. Young people do not like President Donald Trump, but whites between the ages of 18 and 34 said they are equally likely to vote for a Republican as for a dummycrats-Democrat in the elections for Congress this November. A full 39 percent said that "if the election for U.S. Congress were held today," they would vote for the Republican in the district where they live. Another 39 percent said they would vote for the dummycrats-Democrat. This represented a nine-point shift away from dummycrats-Democrats since 2016. That year, only 33 percent of young white voters said they would elect a Republican to Congress, while 47 percent said they would choose a dummycrats-Democrat...  https://pjmedia.com/election/white-millennials-are-leaving-the-demo...
.
‘Army Discharging Immigrants’ Story May 
Not Be The Outrage It’s Cracked Up To Be
by Virginia Kruta
{ dailycaller.com } ~ On Thursday, The Associated Press published a story with a headline that read, “US Army quietly discharging immigrant recruits.”... That headline was quickly met with outrage — but the story itself isn’t anything new. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush called the move “disappointing.” Film producer Adam Best claimed that the recruits were being discharged because they were immigrants. But as retired Army Col. Kurt Schlicter predicted, there was more to the story. NPR’s Tim Mak offered a little more context, pointing out the fact that the real question — whether or not recruits are being discharged because they are immigrants — is never answered in the article...   http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/06/army-discharging-immigrants-outra...
.
.

Freedom Is, Once Again, on the March in the United States of America 

by Rebecca Hagelin:  This time around, the procession is led by a brazen, no-nonsense man not unlike the bold leaders who signed the Declaration of Independence 242 years ago.

             Although he has retaken much ground lost to liberal tyranny in recent decades, President Trump cannot restore all of our freedoms alone.
               America’s Founders may as well have signed their own death warrants when they declared independence from the most powerful nation on the face of the earth. The risk was so great that they understood they must stand together in spite of their differences, or else they would hang together. Worse still, their failure to unify would cause the dream of freedom, shared by the people they represented, to be obliterated by a tyrannical government that viewed them as subjects instead of individuals with inherent rights. This understanding compelled these men to mutually pledge to each other “our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor.
               To those early great leaders who risked everything for the sentiments they expressed in the Declaration, freedom of speech and freedom of religion were paramount. So they enshrined them in the very first of the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution.
               The Founders knew that when people do not have the freedom to speak openly, and the freedom to allow our faith to be reflected in our activities, we eventually become enslaved in every other area of our lives too. The radical “progressive” liberals understand this fully too — way more so than the average American who doesn’t care much for politics.
               The liberal activists know that when you have the power to suppress the speech and faith-based actions of those you disagree with, then your power is absolute. That is why modern liberals so viciously attack cake bakers and florists who do not bend to the demands of others. It’s why they insist that pro-life crisis pregnancy services advertise abortion. It’s why they compel workers to pay unions for representation the workers do not want. And it’s why the lovers of tyranny will not sit idly by and watch the president appoint, and the Senate confirm, another strict constructionist as the newest Supreme Court justice.
               In recent decades, this great land of liberty has become less so because judicial activism and runaway government have caused freedom to stumble.
               I wonder: Are the United States senators who lean toward liberty willing to put their differences aside in order to champion freedom’s continued march?
               They proved that they can rise to such an occasion when they pulled together to confirm Neil Gorsuch to the High Court. Conservatives and “establishment” Republicans stopped squabbling long enough to support our very independent-thinking, brash president in a shared commitment to liberty. They understood that Neil Gorsuch would be a stalwart promoter of the one thing that is required for men and women in these United States to live freely: the restoration of fundamental constitutional rights. So they made it happen.
               And Justice Gorsuch has delivered in spades with the several 5-4 decisions handed down in recent days, which reestablish First Amendment rights. When the Court restored the religious and speech rights of the cake baker, the pro-life ministries and the union workers, every American and the Constitution emerged victorious.
               Perhaps it is an act of Divine Providence that, just as we celebrate Independence Day, the Republican Party has the opportunity to add rocket fuel to freedom’s march. If the High Court welcomes another jurist committed to original intent and the liberties guaranteed to all Americans by the Constitution, then freedom will win the day for years to come.
               In the midst of the current upheaval, bickering and nonsense rampant throughout the Republican Party, a rare opportunity to unify and change the course of history has emerged. Senate Republicans must seize this moment, and in so doing, restore liberty for every American. May they resolve to emulate the commitment of those who brought us our first Independence Day.

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/opinion/56908?mailing_id=3605&utm_medium...

Views: 13

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service