On the State of Mind

4063485092?profile=originalFormer Green Jobs Czar Van Jones, Obama’s bosom pal, could not be human. He congratulates Occupy Wall Street for saving the nation.  No human would think that. Birds of a feather flock together.

But leave the God you think you know out of it. Understand first that the state of mind is not a place. It is boundless.  Understand that man is in a place, and therefore cannot create a state of mind.  It follows that Van Jones and a state of mind cannot be compatible.  Van Jones, and his kind, lesser forms of life, advocate force, if you understand a state of mind, forcing us all to accept the communist way—or else, as it were.

If you are a communist, you refuse to accept the state of mind as fact. You accept that a state of mind can be socially engineered—do as I say or off comes your head. It’s very effective.  If you accept one of the many religious faiths, you are being socially engineered; you refuse to accept the state of mind. The state of mind is nothing more, nor less, than consciousness, which is boundless.  Substitute boundless consciousness for God. You have one and the same.  But with religious faiths, you don’t reason. You have a supernatural god, the creation of various religions.   It is a very dangerous thing to hold to a faith that does not hold to reason.  It leaves the door wide open to wolves in sheep’s clothing and hypocrites.

If you want to know how something works, you take it apart and examine the parts.  Quantum physics has taken apart the universe and has found a state of infinite possibility. A Greek priest and leading thinker of his day reasoned that an idea, having no form by itself, but giving figure and form to shapeless matter, becomes the manifestation.   The priest’s name who thought this was Plutarch (40-120 AD)

Another ancient Greek, Aristotle, in his Ethics, ethics being the substance of law, the concept of “natural justice,” “Of political justice,” he wrote, “part is natural, part legal—natural, that which everywhere has the same force and does not exist by people’s thinking this and that; legal, that which is originally indifferent.” I read this in The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law, which was written by law professor Edward S. Corwin, and published in 1925, the year of my birth and the year Congress ignored the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution when it authorized the IRS to examine personal records for income tax purposes.  It was done, ostensibly, for the good of all.  It is always for the good of all that government does anything.  As is often the case, it was putting the chicken before the egg—putting the law before the Constitution.  Mark the year of my birth as the year Congress launched out of control government taxing and spending.  My birth was an omen of what was to come.

In 1975, I wasn’t going to take it anymore.  Income tax personally affected me, to the extent that I was at a jumping off place.  I read in the law that if I had a personal stake in the outcome, which I surely did, I had the constitutional right, under the Fifth Amendment, to demand that I be heard in a meaningful way in a meaningful place. The makers and keepers of the law did not agree with me. The taxpayers did not agree with me. I was a nutcake tax protester.  But those who came before me clearly did agree with me.  This left me with a bigger than life calling. It was me and voices of the past against the above named.  In other words, it was going from “a mind” to “the mind.”  My advice to the Tea Party: When the IRS challenges, forget “a mind.”  Go to “the mind” for your answers.  It worked for me.

Looking at me as “a mind,” the makers and keepers of the law had it their way. The mastermind—the collective mind—the Van Jones mind—force—allowed  the IRS to make a lot of mistakes against me, to show me that the mastermind had all of the control, and “a mind,” a feeble mind, a lousy tax protester trying to get out of paying his fair share of the tax, had zero control. Keep in mind  that, ostensibly, it was for the good of all. According to many, Hitler was for the good of all.  The question comes to mind: what made the mastermind admit that it was mistaken on everything it did?

The mastermind left me a record, which I took to The Palm Beach Post. The Post made an investigation.  The mastermind, fearing public exposure of the fact that the income tax has turned into the biggest fraud of all times, admitted that from the first it was mistaken. We don’t know the power of “the mind.”  Know that “a mind” can be in contact with “the mind.”

This all comes to me from my ten year mind search.  It began with law professor Corwin’s essay on the law.  Referring to Aristotle, law professor Corwin, “That is to say, the essential ingredient of the justice which is enforced by the state is not the state’s own contrivance; it is a discovery from nature and a transcript of its constancy.”

Is it socialism or the animal desire to control? Aristotle to America’s mastermind: “To invest the law then with authority is, it seems, to invest God and reason only; to invest a man is to introduce a beast, as desire is something bestial, and even the best of men in authority are liable to be corrupted by passion.  We may conclude then that the law is reason without passion and it is therefore preferable to any individual.”

To the world’s many orthodoxies, say I, the Bible begins with God saying, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion”…in summary saying, “And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”  The soul and the mind are indistinguishable.  To the world’s orthodoxies, who but voices of all times said this, and to whom were they speaking?  

Jesus said, “No man can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one, and love the other…”  Jesus said, “But seek ye first the kingdom of God…”  Where is the kingdom of god? To you the various orthodoxies of the world, say I: You have failed to tell us. For shame!

I tell you, the orthodoxies of the world, that God is internal, and in each and every one of us.  I tell you, the orthodoxies of the world, that you are not speaking of the kingdom of God, but of the various kingdoms of man.  You are guilty of the same errors the Pharisees, Sadducees, and the Herodians made in Jesus’s time. You are planting your own guilt in your flocks.  “The kingdom of God comes not with outward show” (Luke 17:20).  So join my team.

It is written in the stars. I tell you, the masterminds of this world, that it is not the collective voices of your particular fiefdoms, but the collective voices of all times that always wins.  Were this not so, I could not say all of my dreams have come true. I tell you that Jesus speaks through me;  Jesus can speak through you.  You have “a mind,” which can connect with “the collective mind.”   It is your choice. You cannot and will not control what is to be.  I tell you to learn this or lose it all.

 

 

 

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • Hi Joey,  in my humble opinion when (Jesus said, “No man can serve two masters, seek thee first the Kingdom of God)I think it was merely you shall worship none before me restatement. He wanted us to keep this in forefront of mind, for any other thing of this earth or worshipped would surely pull you away or be against this all important commandment.  

This reply was deleted.