Think there is no way that Obama will serve a third term? Think again.
Let’s start with what this administration has already done. Rumors of FEMA Camps have been proven true. The U.S. Army has a manual lately leaked called FM3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations. A portion of the manual describes how internees will be “re-educated” for an appreciation of “ U.S. Policies. The Posse Comitatus Act has been bypassed and the military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval. But how can we expect Congress to fight when they have let this administration rule by executive order and his “phone and pen”.
And what of the U.N. Multinational troops training for in this country. Why is the UN taking over the enforcement of orders by a Treasonous thug that is the President of this country? How do we know this? There is a job opening for the United Nations for a disarmament and demobilization position Job # 14-SEI-DPKO-34627-R-New York. And Obama has gotten rid of the generals and those in command who would not do as he commands.
There are plans now being promulgated in the U.S. Army manual under the title of “confiscation of Firearms and Supplies” and “Civil Disturbance Operations” including up to and including the killing of Americans on U.S. Soil if there should be civil unrest. It is based on the Department of Defense training manual of a “domestic extremist”. Who are these people who are such a threat” According to the manual they are described as :
Americans who are reverent of individual liberty, suspicious of centralized federal authority would be considered as “extreme right wing terrorists. People who embrace “individual liberties, and honor states rights.
There are a few more unconstitutional aspects of what Obama will get done in the time he has left. The repeal of the 2nd Amendment is first and foremost for the progressives. The childish sit in of a week ago showed nothing but the progressives ignorance of the rule of law. Take our guns, and this administraton will run roughshod over all its citizens.
The ignorance of the progressives is there to see in such symbolic idiocy as Democrat Rep. Jose Serrano of New York proposing a bill to repeal the 22nd Amendment so the Muslim in Chief we have now will be able to finish the job he has started of turning the United States into a banana republic. This is the same 12 term Congressman who applauded Hugo Chavez as a Truly Revolutionary leader.

It is a combination of what this administration has done to the country, the decisions being made by a global elites, and charlatans like Soros and his paid activists like Black lives Matter that are pushing harder than ever before to destroy the foundations that this country are founded on. The next step they plan is a racial war this summer centered around the political conventions. Obama has already planted the seeds, and I would almost bet the UN Forces will assist in fomenting violence this summer. Along with Government agencies arming themselves including the Post Office and Social Security have purchased millio0ns of rounds of ammunition including armor piercing ammunition not available to the ordinary citizenry. Why would government agencies stockpile such great amounts?
Perhaps the answer lies in Executive Order 13603 signed by Obama is March 2012. According to this Order, the President or the head of any federal agency that he designates can conscript “any person of outstanding experience and ability without compensation”. This is translated to the fact that Obama or any fellow communist he designates and seize any resource, property or person at any time for any reason. That person will be compelled to perform the duties required of him without any payment.
Portions of EO13603 makes no mention of keeping families together, and requires acceptance of contracts other than contracts of employment, making any and all citizens subject to the whims of the State. The Executive Order signed by Obama is intentionally vague, and covers all government agencies. In essence it gives these agencies unlimited power and control in a Broad definition of “national emergency”. It gives the administration total control over all resources and commodities, all forms of energy, all forms of transportation, health resources and military conscription. If you are storing food for a national emergency, that food will now belong to the government, if you have a well, that water will no longer be yours. You will be dependent upon the federal government for everything. Your children will be taken from school to force you to comply.
In the body of the executive order is alist of what the Federal Government will control:
“All commodities and products that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or Animals”
“All forms of energy”
“All forms of civil transportation”
“All usable water from all sources”
“All health resources-drugs, biological products, medical devices, facilities, health supplies, services and equipment.”
Forced labor- induction and regulations to allocate resources (meaning people)
So if Obama was to create the atmosphere of chaos in this country that he has been working toward with the help of globalists like George Soros, and declare a “national emergency.” Executive Order 13603 informs the country that there will be no elections and King Barak would rule.

Is it any wonder why there are U.N. troops arriving in the country, and why they are being spread throughout the United States. Jade Helm 15 and the upcoming Jade Helm 18 are training for those who will have to do what our military will not. If it ever comes to this there will be a civil war. Lock and load patriots.

Views: 13

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service