The President submitted his 2013 budget.

Does it cut:

-Funding of grants and loans to alternative energy sources? This should be pursued by the private sector and the free market should determine its success if it is affordable.

-Does begin the elimination of the Department of Education? State and local school boards, university systems and parents should work together on education.

-Does eliminate federal grants? Why is money taken from citizens and states and then only given back in a grant if you follow ridiculous rules and regulations on how to spend it?

-Does it eliminate Obama Care and all federal mandates on what insurance must do?

-Does it give tax breaks to companies and corporations for providing health care plans to their employees?

-Does it reduce the size and scope of the EPA, Department of Energy, and include an across the board 10% cut in spending for every other federal cabinet department.

-Are we cutting foreign aid that was a total of $52.7B in 2010? Why are we giving $693M to the Westbank/Gaza? $1.7B to Egypt, a country now apparently an enemy? $505M to Russia? How many children in poverty could we help in our own country?

-Are we cutting every federal program that can be accomplished by the private sector?

-Does it cut taxes for the middle class?

-Are we going to have a flat tax, reducing rates for all citizens and companies?

 

 

Probably not

Views: 26

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service