Joe Biden claimed tonight that he worked with Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping on the Paris Climate Accord.
Except the current Chinese President is Xi Jinping.
Deng Xiapoing left office in 1992 and has been dead for 23 years.
Obama is the Manifestation of a Multi-Generational Soviet Plot to Destroy America! (Part 3)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On May 20, 2014:
Note: What follows is a series of five articles and/or blogs from 2005 that do a meticulous job of exposing the Socialist/United Nation’s goals to take over and destroy the United States of America with the help of the Pentagon and State Department, along with the main-stream media, which I believe relate to and/or further support Part 1 regarding this extremely disturbing issue-You Decide:
I remember the protests that took place near the lawns of the White House. From the late 1960s into the 1980s, shrill voices filled Washington, DC with anti-American rhetoric wrapped in blame-America-first rampages. It made me wonder why those speaking and those attending didn’t just pack up and move to different pastures—places where they could build something instead of trying to tear down the nation that gave them so much freedom.
It was not a pretty time in the history of America, but it wasn’t just the young people who were to blame. Many had only a marginal knowledge of the real issues and some didn’t even know why they were there. Those protestors didn’t know that the hate-America diatribes were well orchestrated, their roots deeply buried in a series of masterfully crafted plans concocted by those against whom they protested.
It took years for me to realize that what preceded the “hippie revolution” was almost a century old and was far more insidious and dangerous to our sovereignty than youths protesting. Behind our backs, and with the usual media assistance, Americans were sold a passel of lies that only the best charlatans in the political world could have conjured up—with or without evil incantations.
I knew the plan from both the humanist viewpoint and eventually studied Biblical prophecies. Those plans are now coming to fruition as God said they would, which makes living at this point in history (or His Story) rather incredible. Still, I was intrigued by a little book I stumbled upon at a local thrift store—a book that documented some rather evil, behind-the-scenes plotting on the part of our government. It’s the stuff that often warms the hearts and minds of those who subscribe to one conspiracy theory or another; and it was a bit ironic that the book was amidst a collection of Christian literature and Bible studies—a most appropriate place for truth to reside. What did I have to lose other than the meager purchase price?
As the face of the author stared back at me, the title and table of contents convinced me that answers to lingering questions about ongoing plans to destroy the United States would be found within. I bought and read the book, then became determined to revive the author’s story four decades after it was published. I don’t know if he’s still alive, and I don’t care how right wing he was. His story should be told if, for no other reason, to prove that our government has had a long-standing desire to sacrifice our national sovereignty on the altar of a one-world government ruled by those with money and power.
Maj. Arch E. Roberts AUS (Ret), an 18-year veteran, didn’t mince words in his efforts to stop the caustic, anti-American agenda of the ‘liberal establishment’ in the 1950s and ‘60s. In his book, Victory Denied . . . Why Your Son Faces Death in “NO-WIN WARS,”(Chas. Hallberg & Company, 1966). Maj. Roberts did more to expose the real goals of the United Nations and those in the Pentagon and State Department who were driven to destroy the United States. There are some things we already know are true and some we suspected were true. What’s astonishing was the ordeal Maj. Roberts went through for telling his fellow citizens the truth and how little the American people really knew about his plight then or know about it now.
After reading a few intro pages, I came to an editorial from The September 4, 1965, edition of the Chicago Tribune. Written by J. Howard Wood, Publisher, and W. D. Maxwell, Editor, titled “One Man’s Battle,” it told the story of the government’s removal of Maj. Roberts from active duty status. Maj. Roberts made a speech before the Daughters of the American Revolution that “offended army censorship and government officials.” He was in danger of losing his position in the army as well as his military pension for speaking the truth about the socialist/United Nation’s takeover of our government.
Maj. Roberts didn’t take it lying down. A court decision in his favor returned him to full duty with all the attending benefits to which he had previously been entitled. He demonstrated incredible courage against those who wanted to keep him and others like him silent—a sinister enemy that sought to silence American military men. His was a “war” against the real enemies of free speech.
The “rule” that silenced Maj. Roberts and others was instituted during the administration of John F. Kennedy. It emerged from the noted “Fulbright memorandum” that Sen. J. William Fulbright (D-AR) sent to the president in 1961. At the time, the senator was chairman of the foreign relations committee and was concerned that members of the military were discussing the dangers of communism with such intensity and frequency that they could only be viewed as suffering from right-wing radicalism. The danger was far greater if men, such as Maj. Roberts, told the public what he knew.
Fulbright also claimed that right-wingers believed that social legislation was the by-product of socialism, which was another name for communism. If members of the military were allowed to speak openly against communism, voters wouldn’t support the new administration’s social programs and foreign policies, all of which were socialistic in nature.
A mentor to Bill Clinton, Fulbright was an anti-anti-Communist; and anyone who knows the rules of positive and negative integers understands that an anti-anti-communist is a communist. He strongly believed in peace through education, although the content of his educational programs might prove to be more in keeping with socialist indoctrination. The September 4, 1965, Chicago Tribune editorial didn’t let the senator off the hook. It claimed his goal was to “embark the [Kennedy] administration on a campaign to suppress any statements by military men which might be offensive to the Kremlin” because they were starting to “‘mellow’” and were “moving toward ‘convergence’ with the United States and the west.”
This led to the total cessation of all “seminars and troop indoctrination programs relating to the real nature of communism.” Whether such indoctrination was in the form of military propaganda or honest education may only be relevant in relation to the Domino Theory expounded upon by government officials—the belief that if one nation fell to communism, other surrounding nations would fall as well.
Most Americans were told that our government was trying to find a peaceful solution to the Cold War, but convergence means to have a union with, something they would have rejected from the outset. Americans would have demanded to know why the United States government would want to converge with a communist dictatorship. Silencing our military and keeping them in the dark regarding the dangers of communism to any free nation was only part of the solution to prevent a disgruntled electorate. Further, this was right before the Cuban Missile Crisis when American’s saw how evil the Soviet Union really was.
At the time, Maj. Roberts was an information officer at the time. He was stationed with the American 24th division in West Germany where he was creating a program to train the troops about the goals and dangers of communism. That assignment ended shortly after the highly decorated commander of his division, Maj. Gen. Edwin A. Walker, was warned by his superiors because of his vocal belief that some politicians were sympathetic to communism and that required the election of pro-American conservatives. Walker had already been reassigned in November 1961 for putting John Birch Society literature in the hands of US troops stationed in West Germany. He was relieved of his command by Elvis J. Stahr, Secretary of the Army, because of his outspoken anti-Communist activities. According to the web site of the society named for Walker, “in the John F. Kennedy administration, anti-Communism was an unpardonable ‘crime’” (www.eoffshore.com, Par. 1).
Walker’s affiliation with the infamous John Birch Society did not bode well for him. Such membership made him a right-wing radical in the eyes of more moderate Americans. The fact that Maj. Arch E. Roberts served under Walker’s command and his willingness to speak before organizations steeped in American patriotism made him another target in Kennedy administration’s efforts to silence hard-line-anti-Communists.
As the September 4, 1965, Chicago Tribune editorial stated: “The Roberts case is unlikely even to provide a footnote in the history books, but it nevertheless provides an interesting reflection of the fantasies cherished in Washington these last few years. Chief of these is that the way to deal with communism is to give it assurance that the United States entertains only the kindest thoughts about it and in no circumstances will speak ill of it.” (This was certainly a long held policy until President Reagan decided it was time for diplomacy and tact to take a back seat and for true leadership to take control of the situation.)
But in the early 1960s, the left was bent on pacifying America’s enemies. Unfortunately, pacification and appeasement are often bought with a price—in this case the sovereignty of the United States. Further, any assumption that the left viewed communism as a threat was probably untrue. More than likely, they viewed it as way a to become the powerful SuperParent of the masses and the great provider of social services (also called goodies) from the national treasury. Who could defeat them down the road if they were willing to care for each citizen the way Sen. Huey P. Long (D-LA) suggested—“from cradle to grave?”
According to Roberts, however, those concepts were not new. Washington had decided long before the election of John F. Kennedy that America’s sovereignty was temporary at best and a world government, ruled by elites, would become the “caretaker” of the world.
In the preface to his book, Maj. Roberts stated that his work was “motivated by the Korean betrayal and the war in Vietnam constitutes the urgent reason for its publication.” Also revealed was that elected and non-elected officials in government allowed the United States to become nothing more than a puppet of the United Nations.
Maj. Roberts relied on public speeches he presented from 1962 through 1965, along with intelligence gathered by private investigators he employed while trying to expose the civilian newspaper, Overseas Weekly, which American troops received through the US Army. He also relied on public records from various Senate and House of Representatives committees, and Pentagon and State Department documents. His findings paint a startling picture of our government’s betrayal of the citizens it swore to protect and the Constitution it swore to uphold.
His story starts with a quote from the September 12, 1954, New York Sunday News. “The U.S. (upon admission of Red China to the United Nations) will push for approval of a joint U.S.-Philippine plan to weld the military forces of all sixty member nations into a workable international army.” That the newspaper blatantly wrote a piece that announced the creation of an international army had to frighten Americans who had experienced the ravages of World War II, the Korean War, and were soon to be knee-deep in the Vietnam War.
According to Maj. Roberts, millions of Americans knew that such political pressures under the guise of International Peace and Security would undermine the US Constitution. Those who studied the United Nations and its Charter knew full well that the greatest threat to the sovereignty of the United States could be found in the push to give the Security Council of the United Nations total control over world military power.
Lest you think it was only Democrats who backed the plan, guess again. Maj. Roberts noted the headline of a story from the June 20, 1965, edition of the Denver Post, which read, “Six House GOP’s Seek Backing on U.S. Force for U.N.” He called the public relations campaign “astounding” because it glorified the achievement of world security through the creation of an International Peace Force, manned and financed by Americans.
Again, millions of Americans knew better and were convinced that such a military build-up under the control of a world body would create a totalitarian, one-world government. They weren’t wrong to believe as they did. The conditions under which our military fought in the Korean and Vietnam Wars were largely hidden from appropriate scrutiny, although the press stirred up a phony controversy to gin up anti-war sentiment. However, the conditions under which American soldiers now fight in Iraq, where the slightest “slip” produces a court-martial, should alert all Americans that our military is answering to someone or something other than the President of the United States—the supposed Commander in Chief of the American military.
Maj. Roberts’ claim that the United Nations has power over American military personnel was validated in the UN Charter. Article 24 states, “In order to ensure prompt and effective action by the United Nations, its Members confer on the Security Council primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security.” Some say the extent of that responsibility was open to interpretation. However, Article 42 stated that the organization could engage in military action “by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary, to maintain or restore international peace and security . . .” That fiat included the power to authorize the use of force for purposes of self-defense and other purposes. It’s the “other purposes” that confers upon the UN far more power than any sovereign nation should allow it to have.
That the left regularly insists on UN intervention as a means to settle disputes without war is almost laughable in light of the military power and authority that was handed over to the organization almost six decades ago. Clearly, the left isn’t looking for an alternative; it just wants to keep the power where the UN Charter says it should be kept.
Even more astounding is the source of weaponry and manpower when the Security Council votes to engage in a military action. Maj. Roberts was all too aware that the United States had no debate or veto power regarding who would serve, where the military equipment would come from because most would come largely from this nation. National sovereignty wasn’t subject to debate or veto, either. If the Security Council voted to go into a particular nation with military force, it could do so without hesitation.
This put the UN in a power position above the United States government, its Constitution, and its laws. To soften the idea that the UN would intervene in the domestic tranquility of any nation, Article 2, paragraph 7 prevented intervention in matters normally handled by a member state within its own borders.
However, any limit on UN jurisdiction was deliberately camouflaged by another public relations campaign that painted the organization as a world body of great benevolence that must secure the approval of its members. It is unclear if our World Heritage Sites, which put American land in the hands of and under the control of the United Nations, are example of such benevolence. As far as Maj. Roberts was concerned, whether the goals of the UN were good or evil, carefully constructed public relations campaigns obscured the dangers and power inherent in a world body having such extensive powers. It was this belief that led him on a campaign to alert the American people. By delving into the internationalist agenda and identifying who controlled the UN military forces, Maj. Roberts unearthed the most vile and deadly plan to destroy the United States from within, thereby destroying what little remained of its sovereignty.
Part 2 of this series will examine what Maj. Roberts called “The Strange Case of General Vasiliev.” The imminent rise of world government may still seem astounding, even when the word globalism is bandied about like confetti to test the will of the American people. Even more alarming is the extent to which Soviet and other foreign nationals controlled the United States military and how American soldiers have been serving under the UN banner for decades.
Not long after Part 1 of this series was posted on NewsWithViews, I received e-mail from many concerned, intelligent and insightful readers. One was from a gentleman who shared what it was like to return to the United States after WW II. Somehow that e-mail and several others were lost in the folds of my mail server. Lloyd’s surfaced a few days before the total crash of my computer. It deserves mentioning.
He said my column took him back to the signing of the UN Treaty in San Francisco on June 26, 1945. Our returning soldiers were thinking about living a decent life “with no threats of war or governance by tyrants.” Instead they saw “many nations forming a coalition that would force us into a One World Government.” While he knew political leaders were involved in the deception, he didn’t believe it could happen without the corporate takeover of America, which he said would lead to the “Communization of America.”
His viewpoint makes sense if we understand Hitler’s Third Way—a hybrid of communism and capitalism that commercializes the government and allows its coffers to be filled with tax revenues even though it produces nothing. The government maintains control over what appear to be privately owned companies (and even non-profits), places their people in charge of them, continues to provide government grants and corporate welfare, which allows CEOs to earn prohibitive salaries and bonuses. And guess who’s footing the bill? But I digress.
For decades Lloyd watched the erosion of the America of our Founders. At some point, he was in contact with Maj. Roberts’ program, which came into being “so the people of this nation could have the Constitution returned to them.” He said the effort was good but it “requires the will of many people [for it to happen]. That’s the hard part.”
He’s right. It is hard to fight multi-layered factions of the powerful and greedy who believe they have been chosen to create utopia—one that fits only their beliefs and worldview. It’s hard to fight the agenda of the secularists, the globalists, the fascists, and the communists. How do you fight those who believe there is no God, no heaven, no hell, and all religions should be abolished in favor of an agreed-upon world religion that’s based on fables, fairytales, and even the diabolical? How do you reckon with those who claim national boundaries should be obliterated and ethnic identities denied in order to eliminate world poverty (as if that would really happen)? What that mankind would understand that his machinations are for naught and all is not so well in his rebellious little corners of the world.
This, in part, was what Maj. Arch E. Roberts understood when he revealed the plans of government leaders and internationalists who wanted nothing less than to rule a world government with its own currency, military, laws, and religion. The government’s efforts to silence military men from speaking out against communism were of prime importance if our military was to serve (unbeknownst to most Americans) under the new supra-national government. Even the mechanisms for making it happen were well concealed so the “Nimrodites” could continue their quest to build another Tower of Babel complete with their own Nimrod. Look at the facts . . .
The Strange Case of Dr. Vasiliev
Maj. Roberts wrote about what he called “The Strange Case of General Vasiliev” because he believed it was an excellent example of “international deceit.” Most of us never heard of the man, but who he was and the position he held in the early UN told volumes about the intent of that organization. This also validates that our own government was knee-deep in the global quagmire long before “global” became a household word.
“Planning for Peace” and the United Nations Takeover of the United States
After five or so decades of foreign plunder of the America I knew and loved as a child, I now believe it’s possible for this nation to be destroyed without a single shot being fired. I also know that too many were caught up in complacent living to take a stand against the political and legal evils that befell us. Yes, I’ve said the word that makes folks cringe—evil. But it’s not just a word; it’s a condition of the heart that allows men and women to kill, lie, manipulate, destroy, and steal to gain power. It’s what pushes them to betray others, even those close to them.
Of course, I know it’s difficult to confront those who believe that rule by elites is better than representative republican rule, but I’d like to believe we have the power to stop the destruction of the government the Founders gave us and prevent the imposition of one that’s akin to the twin cities destroyed by God’s hand. Untangling the most daunting knot doesn’t have to be rocket science, so perhaps there are some who would be willing to sacrifice everything, as did those who fought for liberty from Great Britain. Does it all sound farfetched? Just look at the facts . . .
“Planning for Peace” is a 1965 public document that contains the senate hearings on world socialist legislation. Why our senate was even discussing the topic is ample evidence that something deceptive was afoot. According to Maj. Roberts, hearings were held on Resolution 32 before the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, May 11-12, 1965. Testimony contained in the document “represents largely the views held by one-worlders, collectivists, and socialists who are government financed and/or supported by tax-exempt foundations.”
Any opposition found in the document was “sprinkled in from citizen backed organizations.” Maj. Roberts said the “opposition” was a smokescreen to create the illusion of national consensus,” something the enemies of the US are very good at manufacturing out of whole cloth. The “Planning for Peace” records provide a smorgasbord of anti-American comments from those present at the Senate hearings. Maj. Roberts cited several examples, which he “deliberately organized in the order of the five principles presented in Resolution 32.”
Adrian Fisher, Deputy Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (a telling title), wanted the creation of the right type of organization to “‘monitor a comprehensive test ban treaty, a freeze on the numbers and characteristics of strategic bombers and missiles, major arms reduction measures and comprehensive disarmament.’” Fisher also said: “‘these steps would clearly require considerable change in the existing practices and attitudes of nations.’” He was right. Remember, a citizenry that can bear arms can also protect itself from his kind of tyranny. That’s a hard practice and attitude to change . . . may their efforts bear no fruit for them.
Professor Emile Benoit, from Americans for Democratic Action, said the issues “‘underlying disarmament’” involve substitution. Okay, let’s try it. Let’s get rid of national defense establishments and replace them with a “‘supra-national inspection and defense establishment.’” Then we can get rid of national defense forces and replace them with “‘supra-national security guarantees.’” Benoit’s substitution plan was solid proof that all nations, including the US, were to be denied the right to defend themselves. Instead, national defense, if there was still a reason to have it, would be placed in the arbitrary and all-too-capricious hands of a global military that could be summoned to discipline or destroy any nation (or region) at the whim of the UN.
The words that should have shocked all Americans decades earlier were brought to light at the Mut Zur Ethic “Courage to Take a Moral Stand” Conference in Switzerland on November 26, 2001. Author Theresa Dunford (The United Nations) quoted John McManus’ The UN, the EU, and America in her reference to a speech given on November 26, 2001 at that conference. The words that follow come from the transcript of that speech.
“I can recall as a boy hearing General Dwight Eisenhower’s voice telling the American people that the war in Europe had ended. It was in May 1945 when he stated that ‘the forces of the United Nations are victorious’ at a time when the United Nations organization hadn’t even been founded.”
Dunford also cited Eustace Mullins’ “The World Order: Our Secret Rulers” (1992) to expose the UN. Mullins wrote, “….the Rockefellers donated the most expensive parcel of real estate in Manhattan for its world headquarters. It was against this background that the Governor of New York, Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, addressed a meeting at the Sheraton Park Hotel on July 26, 1968, in which he called for the creation of ‘a new world order’.” The Rockefellers run one of the primary international banking corporations.
Evidently treason has always been a bi-partisan effort. There’s just no other way to define the duplicitous actions of government leaders. There’s been ample opportunity and mega-support from Americans to stop paying for the UN to exist and to remove us from that disgraceful organization . . . and it never happens. Bring up even the idea of a global government or a new world order with a politician and s/he’ll tell you it’s all just a conspiracy theory that has no merit. Baloney!
Now, try to imagine how Maj. Arch E. Roberts felt when he saw the American flag waving next to the UN flag at Pusan Headquarters, the Supreme UN Command in Korea. How did he feel when he realized that American soldiers were buried in a UN cemetery under the flag of a diabolical world government? And why was there a UN command in Korea in the first place? Were they Monday-morning quarterbacks or on-the-field refs? If they wanted a Soviet style world government, why were we were there fighting the Communists—or were we?
Maj. Roberts knew the war was finagled by the UN and State Department to assert worldwide UN military authority. It was the world’s greatest power grab based on the lie of eternal world peace. To Maj. Roberts, the UN was a direct threat to American principles that generations of US citizens “dedicated their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor” to defend and preserve. He was right. Strong interference with his pro-American educational training program for the troops in Germany resulted in its shut down because of UN, State Department, and Pentagon policies.
HOW COMMUNISM AND THE U.N. SET OUT TO DESTROY AMERICA (Part 5)-Posted on NewsWithViews.com-By Jill Cohen Walker, J.D.-On May 1, 2005:
The Commanders of America’s Military Forces
I’ve heard politicians debate “winning the war” vs. “winning the peace.” Conservatives prefer a combination while liberals want to dialogue us into “peaceful” concessions with everyone. (Maybe they should start dialoguing with unborn babies—their most ardent enemies, considered good only for spare body parts.) Sorry . . . truthful digression . . .
Winning the war first is not exactly rocket science, but something bugged me about both positions. A little research proved that dialoguing and the “win the war, then the peace” methods are used by the UN to secure world domination through alleged “wars of liberation.” First they allegedly liberated everyone from Communism, even though they’re all Communists, and now they’re on a campaign to liberate humanity from Judeo-Christianity and God. Thanks, but no thanks. Check this out . . .
According to Maj. Roberts, the Hon. John T. Wood of Idaho spoke before the US Flag Committee in New York (October 10, 1951). Regarding the UN Charter, he said, “. . . a perusal of articles 43 to 51, inclusive, will reveal the fact that it was designed as an instrument of force.” He was right. The UN is not a playground for peaceniks. It’s a not-so-new-age world body that destroys individual liberty and vanquishes national sovereignty by force.
Video: Obama’s Other Communist Mentor!-Posted on Western Journalism-By JOEL VALENZUELA-On August 6, 2012:
Video: Trevor Louden: An Urgent Message for America!-Posted on YouTube.com-By keywiki-On October 18, 2012:
Communism & Islam!-Posted on PopModal.com-By Honest American-On September 18, 2011:
Media Blackout: CIA director accused of links to Communist spy contact—scandal ignored!-Posted on RenewAmerica-ByWes Vernon-On June 13, 2011:
COMMUNIST DISINFORMATION, AMERICAN-STYLE: ‘Shocking revolutionary roots not just of Obama, but top advisers Jarrett and Axelrod too!’-Posted on WND.com-By Paul Kengor-On September 29, 2012:
With Friends Like These!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By Mark Tapson-On October 25, 2012:
HAGEL ENDORSED BY COMMUNIST PARTY USA!-Posted on WND.com-By AARON KLEIN-On February 5, 2013:
Audio: Do You Know Who The “Enemies Within” Are? Ask Trevor Loudon!-Posted on Southern Sense Talk Radio-On August 19, 2014:
GERMAN GENERAL TO COMMAND U.S. TROOPS!-Posted on NewsWithViews.com- By Daniel New-On September 12, 2014:
ATTACK OF THE NON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS – NGOs!-Posted on NewsWithViews.com-By Tom DeWeese-On September 23, 2014:
RAND PAUL: ‘CONSTITUTION REQUIRES’ CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR OBAMA TO ATTACK ISIS!-Posted on Big Peace-By MATTHEW BOYLE-On September 23, 2014:
Communist Party USA Uses Picture of Obama to Promote Voter Turnout; Uses Exact Democrat Party Rhetoric!-Posted on TPNN.com-By Matthew Burke-On September 24, 2014:
Videos: The UN Threat to America and OUR Freedom!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Karol Hancock-On September 26, 2014:
COMMUNIST ‘RECIPE’ FOR U.S. REVEALED: ‘Former baker stirs up secrets corrupting America from within’!-Posted on WND.com-By GINA LOUDON-On September 28, 2014:
The Outrageous Way Obama Became President!-Posted on The D.C. Clothesline-By Dave Hodges-On January 18, 2015:
Audio: Author Trevor Loudon reveals the connections that are driving Obama to destroy America!-Posted on Andrea Shea King Radio Show-On February 20, 2015:
Giuliani: Obama influenced by communists since youth!-Posted on The New York Post-By Carl Campanile and Geoff Earle-On February 21, 2015:
EPIC! 12-Year Old Georgia Boy Blasts Obama for Not Loving America!-Posted on YouTube.com-By CJ Pearson-On February 21, 2015:
Giuliani: I’m Getting Death Threats for My Obama Remarks!-Posted on Newsmax.com-By Sandy Fitzgerald-On February 21, 2015:
David Axelrod busted on lie about his father’s Communist Party membership!-Posted on American Thinker-By Thomas Lifson-On February 22, 2015:
The Mysterious “Frank” Returns!-Posted on TrevorLoudon.com-By Terresa Monroe-Hamilton-On February 23, 2015:
Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 13, 2015:
Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Articles of Impeachment and Impeachment Proceedings)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On August 12, 2014:
The Military Pays the Price for Obama’s Agenda!
Is Obama Employing the Cloward-Piven Strategy to Destroy America?
New EPA Land Grab, Complete Control Over All Private Land in America! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 11, 2014:
Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 21, 2014:
Vice President Biden Calls for a New World Order!
New World Order By Executive Order!
Are 9 Dead Bankers A Sign Of Pending Economic Collapse and War? (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 27, 2014:
The Midterm Elections and the Communist Manifesto!
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
When A U.S. President IS Muslim Brotherhood! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On August 17, 2014
Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (re: Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On July 13, 2014:
Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall (re: Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On July 12, 2014:
Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (re: Petition for Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 29, 2014:
Letter to our NM Governor Martinez regarding a “Petition for Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 29, 2014:
Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:
Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!
A Republic, If You Can Keep It!
The Fightin Side of Me!
When Injustice Becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty!
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy website link and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide:
“Food For Thought”
Hello: When Are Americans Going To Wake Up & Take a Stand?-God Bless America!