Excerpts via Muslim Non-Assimilation, at HUMAN EVENTS.
America’s greatness has been enhanced for 235 years by immigrants possessing a good work ethic only in need of alevel playing field to be nurtured. Embracing what their new countrystands for, they have ultimately assimilated, coming to understandsuccess for all is based on equality for all.
Assimilation is the process by which one group takes on cultural and other traits of a larger group “to becomepart of something greater.” It is a process that has served America wellin maintaining the core values to which our Constitution is anchored.But, it is a process anathema to Islam.
During a visit to Cologne, Germany, in 2008, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan spoke to a group of 20,000 Turks living in Europe. He told them, “I understand very well that you are against assimilation. One cannot expect you to assimilate. Assimilation is a crime against humanity.”
It is Muslim opposition to assimilation, coupled with Muslim populations growing at faster rates than native hostpopulations, that raises concerns over the “Islamization” of WesternEurope. Non-assimilation has generated “no-go” zones in someEuropean cities—areas local law enforcement refuse to go because Muslimresidents do not tolerate entry by non-believers.
Denmark dropped its very liberal immigration policy once the government recognized the dangers of failedMuslim assimilation within its borders. Comprising 5% of the population, Danish Muslims settled in no-go zones, while consuming 40% of welfare benefits.
What many people fail to understand about Islam and Muslims’ failure to assimilate “to become part of somethinggreater” is that Muslims are embracing “reverse assimilation.”This is the process by which the influence of the host population iseventually marginalized due to the disproportionately high growth of animmigrant population which then seeks to impose its beliefs on thehost. Simply put, it is the guest who comes to a host’s home, grows hisfamily until it outnumbers the host’s family and then takes over thathome.
What we fail to understand is that, to Muslims, becoming “part of something greater” means the nativessurrender their individual identity and way of life to Muslims.
In 1948, the world community unanimously agreed to a UN declaration that human rights are universal. In 1981,Muslim countries distanced themselves from this, claiming Sharia lawwas controlling, thus limiting such rights primarily to Muslim men.That same Sharia law is now being applied in host countries—including the U.S.—under pressure from growing unassimilated Muslim populations.
Muslim supporters of the Ground Zero mosque raise the Constitution with one hand to claim religious freedomprotects its construction. But, hidden in the other hand, is Sharialaw—with its standard of human inequality—which they seek to impose,trumping the same Constitution they use against non-supporters. Mosquesupporters need to understand they cannot have it both ways. We need tounderstand that as well.
Comments