Does anyone that is not a full blown progressive/socialist believe that their Democratic Party does not have a deep and visceral hatred of anyone who disagrees with them? Can they be so self delusional to think that the American people want the President and indeed our government to be run by such people who can not prove any of their point, and incoherent in the message they spout, rambling on and on about situations that have no basis in fact? There is no way they will be able to destroy the patriots in this country.

Declaring your viewpoint the only viable one, and declaring those who hold an opposing view as deniers, racists, homophobes, and other demeaning terms do not make you right. It is always so simple to just spout your views and leave declaring victory without discussing it with those with opposing views is not the way this country should be run. You can’t limit those with opposing views , and if you feel an opposing view is too much of an attack on you and your safe space, get over it.

Since Trumps inauguration, there has been a blizzard of lies, distracting innuendo, and loud attacks on our President to resist the very policies that the American people are seeking. Jobs, Healthcare, Tax Reform are all more important to the American people that a supposed collusion attack against the President that has no basis in fact. After all these months of investigation, lies from such sources as the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the alphabet cable liberals have still found no evidence. The special council does nothing more than assure the Democrats, progressive/ socialist all, will have talking points still without any basis in fact for the 2018 elections. They are counting on this, along with the violence which they still call for along with the media to attempt to change the American outlook. Even some Republicans, most in name only, have started to back away from our President.

To understand what these progressive/socialists really intend let’s take a look at one who is being called a “rockstar” by the media. Congresswoman Maxine Waters. “Auntie Maxie” , as she is being called by the media and supposedly millennials (although I have yet to meet one who even knows who she is), is front and center in the resistance, she combats hate by hating those that disagree with her and is a main point in what she calls the “counterinsurgency” as shown to the American people by groups like antifa and BlackBloc.

Maxine Waters have served 37 years in office, and just what has she accomplished? Her promises for her constituents to improve South Central Los Angeles have basically ignored those same constituents  and as head of the Congressional Black Caucus ignored the unemployment and gang violence that runs rife in the district she purports to serve. She earned the respect of her constituents by declaring the Los Angeles of 25 years ago a “rebellion” and allowing Bloods, Crips and other gang members to be blameless because they were misunderstood and not able to express themselves in any other way. This was the flashpoint for the violence and damage we see being done now and still the supports of the progressive/socialists suck as Congresswoman Waters. Her  “Maxine Waters Employment Preparation Center”, named of course after her was a money eating disaster which consumed tons of federal funded taxpayer funds.

 Perhaps this is how she can afford her mansion in Hancock Park, which is miles outside the district she supposedly represents. Or perhaps it was her meddling in the multiple ethics case of One United Bank, a minority owned bank in which her husband was invested. It was Waters who personally intervened and lobbied the Treasury Department to give One United Bank $12 million even though another government agency stated that the bank operated “without effective underwriting standards” and “speculative investment practices”.

 

Her husband even secured the ambassadorship to the Bahamas because he went there on vacation once.

Is it any wonder the Congressman Waters has been designated by a left wing organization, the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington  “Most Corrupt member of Congress” in 2005,2006,2009,2011, and now 2017. According to the Investment Watch Blog, Maxine Waters has only passed three bills. One, a Haiti Relief Bill, the second, to rename a Post Office and the third a modification of the Flood Relief bill. None of these has done anything for her district. What has moved forward is the millions in revenue that her family has made from her government connections.

Maxine Waters is the shrieking point person for the progressive/socialists. She has stated proudly that Trump is not her President. She does not respect this President, she doesn’t trust this President, and claims Trump is not working for the interests of the American people. She started this rant after the inauguration, and refuse to answer how she can say the President isn’t working for the American people the day after he takes office.  And she has the audacity to call Trump a Liar?

This is the same woman who paid her own daughter a total of over $600,000 from the Waters campaign since 2006. I suppose Maxine wanted to be sure she has a good neighbor in Hancock Park.

But it not’s just Trump that Congresswoman Waters if attempting to smear,  Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz has come under her unintelligible ramblings. Her thinking is so convoluted that she now claims that Chaffetz announced his retirement and will not seek re-election in 2018 because of what Waters calls “improper links to the Russian government. At least, in this instance, Waters admitted she has no evidence to support this theory, but felt the lie was such a good story that she just had to offer it. She even attempted to tie it to Flynn, saying Chaffetz is talking about Flynn, so that it will raise him above the connections that Chaffetz has with the Kremlin. She stated we, need to keep an eye on him. Without any evidence, Waters spouts this out, and then follows it up by sayig , she doesn’t really know and can’t say, but Chaffetz is conducting himself in a way the Waters finds strange. This is what the progressive/socialist takes as evidence to demean those who disagree with the globalist socialist world government they are working toward.

Another step toward the government the progressive/socialists want is the imposition of Sharia Law. Congresswoman Waters has been a big proponent of the imposition of Sharia on the American government, going so far to state “people are exploiting fear and trying to convince state legislatures that the state adoption of Sharia tenents is a strategy that extremists are using to transform America.

Congresswoman Waters a long member of the communist radical Workers World Party describes herself as a “rabble-rouser”

Next, the ties between Maxine Waters, and her Russian linked investment.

Views: 16

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service