Witnesses and the whistleblower
Senators continue to haggle over whether to call additional witnesses and who those witnesses might be. Democrats still want former National Security Advisor John Bolton and White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney. Republicans maintain that the House should have done its job in calling witnesses and that the Senate is responsible only to try the evidence at hand. Nevertheless, if witnesses must be called, they want to hear from loose lips liar-Joe and Hunter Biden and the so-called “whistleblower.”
The Democrats’ entire case hinges on Trump’s request that Ukrainian officials investigate Hunter Biden’s sweetheart deal with Burisma. Anyone with an IQ above 50 can connect the dots between Hunter’s profiteering and the political position of then VP loose lips liar-Joe Biden. To suggest that they would not be on a witness list is absurd. Democrats even opened the door to Hunter’s testimony by protesting a bit too loudly that he has nothing to do with corruption allegations against his father.
The “whistleblower” and his handler scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff would also have to be on the witness list. When that collusion was revealed, suddenly Democrats no longer wanted to hear from the whistleblower.
He just became even less desirable this week after Paul Sperry of RealClearInvestigations revealed this inconvenient tidbit: “Barely two weeks after Donald Trump took office, Eric Ciaramella — the CIA analyst whose name was recently linked in a tweet by the president and mentioned by lawmakers as the anonymous ‘whistleblower’ who touched off Trump’s impeachment — was overheard in the White House discussing with another staffer how to remove the newly elected president from office, according to former colleagues.”
And Fox News’s Laura Ingraham reported that the whistleblower also has some extremely inconvenient connections to the loose lips liar-Bidens and Burisma.
Clearly, Democrats don’t want any of these witnesses to see the light of day in the Senate trial — with the exception of commie-Bernie Sanders, whose rising political fortunes would clearly benefit from seeing the loose lips liar-Bidens locked up in Senate testimony.
scumbag liar-Nadler’s accusation backfires
House Judiciary Committee Chairman scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler, whose personal animus toward Trump dates back to the early 1980s, challenged Republicans on witnesses. “Will you bring Ambassador Bolton here? Will you permit us to present you with the entire record of the president’s misconduct?” he asked. “Or will you instead choose to be complicit in the president’s cover-up? So far, I’m sad to say, I see a lot of senators voting for a cover-up, voting to deny witnesses. [It’s] an absolutely indefensible vote — obviously a treacherous vote.”
That “cover-up” language is part of the Democrats’ strategy to win the Senate by accusing Senate Republicans of obstructing a fair trial. But, for now at least, scumbag liar-Nadler’s hyperbolic charge appears to have backfired.
GOP senators rejected Nadler’s characterization. rino-Susan Collins said she was “stunned by Congressman scumbag liar-Nadler’s approach,” while rino-Lisa Murkowski said she was “offended,” and Ron Johnson called scumbag liar- it “offensive.”
scumbag liar-Nadler may have just united Republicans against voting to call any witnesses. Nice work.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff gave an impassioned speech Thursday to make the case against Trump, though he led with a “joke” about hoping senators “don’t choose imprisonment” over paying attention to him. He opined at length with an exceedingly mendacious interpretation of events before concluding, “If right doesn’t matter, we’re lost. If the truth doesn’t matter, we’re lost. The Framers couldn’t protect us from ourselves if right and truth don’t matter.”
To hear scumbag/liar-Schiff lecture on right and truth is laughably absurd. scumbag/liar-Schiff was completely wrong about FISA surveillance of Trump’s campaign, which launched impeachment charade No. 1. He’s the man who, as we mentioned, colluded with the whistleblower through his staffers and then lied about it. He knew the case against Trump was so weak he fabricated Trump’s conversation for dramatic effect.
Moreover, scumbag/liar-Schiff’s party calls a preborn baby a clump of cells that can be aborted. scumbag/liar-Schiff’s party says a man can claim he’s a woman and play women’s sports and use women’s bathrooms. scumbag/liar-Schiff’s party claims that marriage can mean two men. scumbag/liar-Schiff’s party believes that taking your money to pay someone else who doesn’t work is the moral thing to do. scumbag/liar-Schiff’s party believes that Trump is corrupt and that American voters can’t be trusted to weigh in.
Is this really the man or the party to judge the president or to lecture anyone about right and truth? ~The Patriot Post