Monday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The Iran Protests
xF6U7Hdynv1xqPcQI4yil-eeKVMrtTA-QfFQVlY1f48qDR8_LnkSnt_X3km5-xy5A7CDYv5GsXg-R1UktVs2cg2rDztfi2wSgmtavA23wE8_7T2q3T1EeRdihgQv8xwSFYEzRYB7Ddj9Kg4UnEmdSf7Vucl6NmA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=  Cal Thomas
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Virginia State Officials Preparing For Big Gun 
Rights Rally On Jan 20th And If Any Violence 
Breaks Out It Will Be Their Fault
1DsvCrn3lZ67ZdyaBRwAk4uBFjpbLs2s2LqeDt2xyQL7-vjo8DFZtBrZYWrA6f6uJT7LL7VY3Oco4eQvOkIqcoLUIlPfb_z4IjInpfvAzae-6GyU07MV5dp1UJiY1zataq-lEztFGw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Jon Dougherty
{ rightwingtribune.com } ~ For years, Second Amendment advocates in Virginia have trekked to the state capitol grounds armed and carrying firearms openly as they were lawfully permitted to do... in order to lobby for their God-given constitutional right of self-defense. And for each of those years, lobby day has gone off without a hitch: No shootings, no violence, no arrests, no problems of any kind. But something happened in November that has changed the dynamics for this year’s lobbying effort: Anti-gun Democrats managed to eke out enough victories to take control of the state legislature. And with one of their own in the governor’s mansion, scumbag-Ralph “Coonman” Northam, they immediately began pledging to introduce and pass a bevy of new gun control laws that aren’t necessary, are not stronger than the current law against murder, and will do nothing but deprive Virginians of a right that “shall not be infringed.” And for no other reason than because they can. In the lead-up to Monday’s lobby day, the vast majority of Virginia’s jurisdictions — towns, cities, counties — have passed so-called “gun sanctuary” ordinances, in which local authorities have pledged not to assist the state in enforcing new gun laws they believe are unconstitutional. Naturally, because they are a party of abject hypocrisy, scumbag-Northam’s Democrat attorney general, Mark Herring, decreed those ordinances to be unlawful and improper — all while ignoring the sanctuary cities in his state who refuse to assist federal authorities in the enforcement of immigration law. So now, thanks to Democrats, Virginia stands on the precipice of crisis and chaos when there was no reason for it to be this way other than the Garbage Party’s hatred and disrespect of the Constitution...
.
FBI Interview Notes With Page 
And Papadopoulos Are Released
HlWrnXcVugxxUO-IJ6suVj0inNxFgCs90NwreIYzfejri3uCU-X7_3y9Y_l8UalXr_4NV4l0CWBUoG58u2bBWq_0b5xgdRfzsXsOPPP5lStuBjaeG9I_LCrXk42CoiETFXmkQbH9tQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Chuck Ross
{ dailycallernewsfoundation.org } ~ The Justice Department released its fourth batch of documents from the special counsel’s probe Friday, including notes of FBI interviews with former Trump campaign advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos... The documents include the FBI’s interviews conducted in 2017 with Papadopoulos and with Page, as well as interviews with Russian associates of Page. The records were provided to BuzzFeed News and CNN in response to Freedom of Information Act lawsuits for FBI notes, known as 302s, that were used in the Trump-Russia probe. Papadopoulos and Page were two of the four original targets of Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign. The probe was opened on July 31, 2016 and melded into the special counsel’s investigation on May 17, 2017, when the Justice Department appointed Robert Mueller as special counsel. A report of the investigation ultimately concluded that there was no evidence the Trump campaign or any associates conspired with the Russian government to influence the 2016 election. The report also said there was no evidence that any Trump aides worked as Russian agents. FBI agents first interviewed Papadopoulos on Jan. 27, 2017 and conducted follow-up interviews in February 2017. He was interviewed multiple times following his arrest on July 27, 2017 on charges of making false statements in his initial FBI interview. In that first interview, Papadopoulos told agents about contacts he had in 2016 with Joseph Mifsud, a London-based academic. Papadopoulos said that Mifsud told him during a meeting in London on April 26, 2016 that he had learned from Russian sources that Russia had “dirt” on former Secretary of State scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton in the form of “thousands” of her emails. The FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane based on a tip from Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, who met Papadopoulos in London on May 10, 2017. Downer said in a memo that was given to the FBI that Papadopoulos said Russia might help the Trump campaign close to the election. The FBI agents who interviewed Papadopoulos did not mention the Downer tip. The notes indicate that FBI agents sought Papadopoulos’s cooperation in obtaining more information from Mifsud. Notes from a Feb. 1, 2017 interview say that FBI agents said they were “seeking out PAPADOULOS’ cooperation specifically in an attempt to obtain further information about his London-based contact, JOSEPH MIFSUD.” Papadopoulos told Congress on Oct. 25, 2018 that the FBI offered to pay him to travel to London to meet with Mifsud while wearing a wire. The notes do not refer to a request that Papadopoulos wear a wire, but they are heavily redacted. Papadopoulos insisted in subsequent interviews that he did not tell anyone on the Trump campaign that Russia might have scumbag/liar-Clinton’s emails. Papadopoulos pleaded guilty on Oct. 5, 2017 to false statements charges. Papadopoulos acknowledged in the plea that he falsely stated he met Mifsud before joining the Trump campaign...
.
A normal court would reject a dishonest 
prosecutor like scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff
2lQKRFAllPhkY4WqXKO6ix9kDHUz4OBe7XbjDGPnRAjL5wTtr0gvQVHuZAR2qSyuL0qYBF1PYNj9bd3G_NWK9LAG1ItTzJ6b8GF65wRrF9SRCY4A-79iqfZ1eJnmRr82S17MjQkuILl-xyJXWcEDwxmF7d69Mv4MPVDz-16WTuIwF5nRPmB2IjZ8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by nypost.com ~ Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi named the seven House impeachment managers who will prosecute the case in the Senate. But one of the two lead prosecutors would be kicked out of any normal court for repeated lies... Intelligence Chairman scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff has been lying to the world for years in his nonstop campaign to smear President Trump. Back in March 2017, he insisted that he’d seen “more than circumstantial evidence” that Trump had colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election — a claim exposed as false by the Mueller report. Months later, he insisted that Rep. Duncan Nunes was flat-out wrong to say that the FBI’s Russia investigation relied heavily on the absurd Steele Dossier to get warrants to surveil Carter Page; the recent inspector-general report shows that Nunes was right — and scumbag/liar-Schiff had to know it. Last fall, scumbag/liar-Schiff even concealed his office’s contacts with the Ukraine “whistleblower” — and he still hasn’t detailed his involvement in framing the case against Trump before the “official impeachment inquiry” even began. Next to that, the other lead manager, New York’s own Rep. scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler, seems a paragon: He’s just a guy who won the Judiciary Committee chairmanship a year ago by claiming he’d be best to “lead a potential impeachment” of Trump.   https://nypost.com/2020/01/15/a-normal-court-would-reject-a-dishonest-prosecutor-like-adam-schiff/   
Alan Dershowitz -vs- George Stephanopoulos
P6hfY9SsOc0Mh05agZAxzoDV02PzZgwJ5RwexTGPhJslS43oQhGmLwwDc4aBnnAG_2JOyF9nYCYyubsAAXjMi-qVP61PGPUbsuP2CDMlR4Fev_5EQgpHXbBGDJVPoMhE0RL9myaM-pP2g1mwBYbuiY0uTM5aVQDcF3uxOUvvbeDrzWs_wkb8eQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz is a member of the white house legal team from the perspective of constitutional law... In this interview George Stephanopoulos was in his old familiar role as a political narrative engineer, trying to get Dershowitz to say he did not agree with the President. The engineering objective was “Trump Lawyer says President Guilty”.
.
Earth's Climate History: What the Doomsayers 
Don't Want Voters to Know
kwA84lj7uLZU28rxPqes6af97BAUwIrOEmpYgBhN1rxSFaShAND2nCfgRMVZes08t220WgJdVo52geTHqNPTd4d3AaCuhCIIcVnCuuGSUymLXNjF0byZ6sPtj0nntEm2toAOe56eTjCxTE5xcJ3dBRi2lhsrIZALZ36vuvm6fNXrEVtG8dZws2A6T0_MrUqI1DeT7CzWwSRwE6HjhHBp=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By John Eidson
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Absent historical context, extreme weather can be overhyped in ways that lead uninformed voters to conclude that acts of God such as severe droughts and floods never happened before humans began using fossil fuels... In fact, extreme weather has occurred with monotonous regularity for millions of years. Below is an infinitesimal sampling of the endless multitude of catastrophic weather events in Earth’s past, many of which occurred long before the Industrial Revolution. The Great Hurricane of 1780 killed 30,000 people in the Caribbean. Epic dust storms in the 1930s caused catastrophic ecological damage to the Central Plains of the U.S. and Canada. Massive flooding that hit Tokyo, Japan, in 1910 destroyed more than 400,000 homes.  Consecutive years of extreme weather took the lives of one-third of the population during the Russian Famine of 1601-1603. In 1927, weeks of heavy rains in Mississippi caused flooding that covered 27,000 square miles, leaving entire towns and surrounding countryside submerged up to a depth of 30 feet. A catastrophic hurricane that hit sparsely populated Sea Island, Georgia in 1893 killed 2,000 people.  The Blizzard of 1888 was so extreme that snow and ice covered the entire northeastern U.S., from Maine to the Chesapeake Bay. On Sept. 8, 1900, a Cat-4 hurricane obliterated the island of Galveston, Texas, killing an estimated 10,000 residents. In 1889, heavy rains that lasted for days caused massive flooding in Jamestown, PA, killing 2,200. Caused by a protracted drought, the Bengal Famine of 1770 killed 10 million people in South Asia. And, for those who believe in the Bible, Genesis 7:12 reports that rain fell upon the earth for 40 days and 40 nights, an extreme weather event by any definition. What you’ve just read is a tiny slice of Earth’s turbulent climate history that global warming doomsayers hope voters will never know. And, because there’s an agenda behind climate hysteria that has nothing to do with “saving the planet” - there’s not much they won’t do to truck voters to believe that global warming is causing the environment to fall apart at the seams. They even changed the name of the alleged threat. Switching gears: Why “global warming” came to be called “climate change”. When the accelerated warming trend that began in the 1980s ran out of steam in 1997, what would become an extended leveling-off period set in. Instead of acknowledging their dire predictions of unstoppable rising temperatures were embarrassingly wrong, climate doomsayers came up with a new tag for the alleged threat. What was once referred to almost exclusively as “global warming” was quietly given an alter ego: “climate change.” Since global temperatures were in a virtual flatline, claims of cataclysmic warming were no longer believable. Rather than admitting they were wrong and looking for another way to destroy capitalism, the doomsayers simply switched gears, and invented a clever new trick to frighten voters with terrifying scenarios of imminent environmental calamity. Since runaway warming wasn’t happening, they concocted the specious narrative that extreme weather events, every one of them, are caused by, you guessed it: climate change. Almost overnight, climate change was made the scapegoat for every severe hurricane, drought, flood, heat wave and blizzard that appeared, as if such unpleasant things had never before occurred. Following is a prime example...
.
Indoctrination Education: Public Schools 
Are Now Programming Facilities
By John Klar
{ americanthinker.com } ~ When I was in eighth grade, a teacher announced we were going to study capital punishment. The methodology for this process was that the class was divided randomly in half, and each side was assigned the task of writing an essay: one half pro, one half con... After we had completed our essays, the students engaged in open debate about this complex issue. Perhaps this sort of objective process of critical thinking is still practiced in some American schools, but it surely seems scarce. In its place, secular liberalism, and "progressivism," have become the Church of the American State, administered through public schools. When Roe v. Wade was decided, the schools may have taught that abortion was legal, but they did not instruct children that it was moral — that was left to parents in the home. By the time marriage was redefined so two men could claim it together as a constitutional liberty, the landscape had clearly changed — not only are children being instructed that homosexuality is the moral equivalent of heterosexuality in conflict with numerous faith and cultural traditions, but they are being taught that they can select their gender orientation  and gender "identity." In Vermont, young children are offered transgender hormone treatment in preparation for transgender surgeries — and if the parents disagree, a court order can bypass them. Today's children are being institutionally indoctrinated to be unreflective, uncritical automatons of the liberal cause — on immigration, climate change, abortion, and whatever the progressive cause du jour demands. Preying on children is not just for predators anymore. For instance, school walk-outs to ban firearms are not balanced with school walk-outs to uphold the vital Second Amendment and its protections against tyranny. Those who label Donald Trump a tyrant do not teach children to study both sides and consider the importance of an armed citizenry when society is threatened with a tyrant. The "climate justice warriors" have now taken America's schoolchildren hostage in their battle to impose their tyrannical carbon tax on the citizenry.  They encourage children to block traffic, lie in the streets, skip school — because "the world will end in 11 years!"  They are not studying both sides of the anthropogenic climate change debate, let alone critically assessing effective responses. Even if the climate is changing from human activity, and even if the world will implode in 11 years, the carbon tax is an ineffective, patently regressive, and inegalitarian measure. This would make a good two-sided essay assignment for critical young minds to weigh...  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/01/indoctrination_education_public_schools_are_now_programming_facilities.html   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Iran Protests
xF6U7Hdynv1xqPcQI4yil-eeKVMrtTA-QfFQVlY1f48qDR8_LnkSnt_X3km5-xy5A7CDYv5GsXg-R1UktVs2cg2rDztfi2wSgmtavA23wE8_7T2q3T1EeRdihgQv8xwSFYEzRYB7Ddj9Kg4UnEmdSf7Vucl6NmA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=  Cal Thomas
 

The latest protests in Iran by people angry over the Iranian military’s missile launch that “unintentionally” downed a Ukrainian jetliner killing many Iranians, Canadians and others, is different from past protests over rigged elections, rising gas prices, and what Americans like to call “voter suppression.”

This time, the protests are over a much wider area of the country. This time, there were no “death to America” or “death to Israel” chants. Video showed demonstrators refusing to walk on U.S. and Israeli flags. This time, anger was directed at the theocratic regime’s handling of the missile strike. This time, a president of the United States tweeted his support for the protesters in English and in Farsi and warned “the world is watching.” That’s something President scumbag/liar-nObama failed to do when demonstrations over a rigged election broke out in the summer of 2009 and the regime began killing and imprisoning protesters. scumbag/liar-nObama, opting at first for a wait-and-see approach, once violence reached its zenith, was finally forced to declare, “The United States and the international community have been appalled and outraged by the threats, beatings and imprisonments of the last few days,” and strongly condemned “these unjust actions.” Of course, his statement was too late to have much, if any, effect on the regime’s actions.

Democrats were nearly silent about the latest protests. Democrats once boldly voiced opposition to totalitarian regimes. When Democrats do comment it is often without substance or meaning.

Interviewed on ABC’s “This Week” last Sunday, House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi appeared to minimize the significance of the demonstrations. Host George Stephanopoulos asked her if she supported the demonstrations and whether it would be good for the regime to collapse. She replied: “The protesters are protesting — as I understand it, this brand of protesters — about the fact that that plane went down. And many students were on that plane and these are largely students in the street.”

Come again?

The lunatic left, which increasingly dominates the Democratic Party, predictably took Iran’s side against their own country. Actress Rose McGowan tweeted: “Dear #Iran. The USA has disrespected your country, your flag, your people. 52 percent of us humbly apologize. We want peace with your nation. We are being held hostage by a terrorist regime. We do not know how to escape. Please do not kill us. #Soleimani.”

A.J. Caschetta responded to McGowan and many others on the far left in National Review magazine: “While it may be tempting to dismiss McGowan’s attempts at wit, her line of reasoning, however faulty, is echoed by nearly all the Democrats on the campaign trail and by virtually every Middle East specialist in the media and in academia. Her apologetic plea for peace and her moral equivalency between Trump’s "terrorist regime” and “#Soleimani” differ from tweets of her erudite allies only in the number of polysyllabic words and historical references. Otherwise they are quite similar, in some cases practically identical.“

Why aren’t the Democratic presidential candidates asked if they share such views? Perhaps it is because those asking the questions don’t want to do anything that would harm the chances of one of the Democrat presidential candidates beating President Trump in the November election. Does that sound too harsh? Consider that 92 percent of media coverage of the president has been negative, according to a study by the Media Research Center, a politically conservative content analysis group based in Reston, Virginia.

Could the protests in Iran follow the pattern of other freedom movements, like Solidarity in Poland, or demonstrations that led to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union? Or, could they end in a stalemate with increasingly brutal repression, as in Venezuela?

It’s too early to say, but the least that should be expected is that people who enjoy the blessings of liberty, including the right to say very foolish things, support the efforts of others who want to free themselves from totalitarian oppression. If they won’t, perhaps they should pick what they think is a better country and live there.   

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/67934?mailing_id=4805&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4805&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body 

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center