Monday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
How Are Corporations Paying No Taxes?
deWz-mRHWK3zUqNWdlnxLpYiXOjcX6nuAKk_3zhYSaOEhZAghM5deyvLpBylKQNpx2fNLhY8h4Zvhx3e0hVvKt_B-O1cl2tx7qKXKsg7xMYTPavTTjtQqrGoJe8far-7iqFCOb2APBbqQXG7CYe9c6P8CeDBbyNHCryCHHQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Brian Mark Weber  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Here Is The Most Important Sentence 
In The Entire dirty cop-Mueller Report
EtMaluW5HaEPyWgPaR0L2wJRR19GSRLNRGwrl7StL3EDGH67iDfUkV230zU-nivSAymCXqL-aP8kXCzr5PdZzN4vN6Jv-3hoCDN1vKyntjd2a8-06AmOWciuR0mvH1CCjIFT_TfRG_n4HQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by spoliticsandnews.com:  The long-awaited “dirty cop-Mueller Report” on the investigation into Russiagate has finally been released. The bottom line... is that candidate Donald Trump and his campaign did not collude with the Russian government to undermine the 2016 election. We’ll now be subjected to weeks of unfounded media speculation. Hack reporter Jonathan Karl on ABC News insists that there is evidence of Russian collusion in the dirty cop-Mueller Report – it’s just that only Jonathan can see it! The evidence must be like those infamous racism dog whistles that only liberals can hear. The dirty cop-Mueller Report will be picked apart and analyzed for years, but there is only one sentence in the 448-page document that matters. It’s an innocuous little sentence written in order to bore readers to tears and pass over it. However, it’s an incredibly important sentence dealing with Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page. Here it is: “The investigation did not establish that Carter Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.” That’s a boring smoke-and-mirrors method of saying: The drity cop-Mueller investigation found that the allegations in the Russian dossier – paid for by the scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC – were completely, utterly false...
.
Jewish Community Reacts 
to San Diego Synagogue Shooting
QcAN5PJFc6dUkJ3ODUtaAAx2041mhI0RFXTwE695Fku6Jd0-tE1ATHQu8Bns_Pl3SAljWgq8YQ-pWbFaiz4DVFIU7K24QYx0Yzigh5wf9dJF1qyQ_tDQA5TyQk9Mgw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Aaron Bandler
jewishjournal.com } ~ The Jewish community has responded to the April 27 shooting at Chabad of Poway in the San Diego area with grief and outrage... One woman was killed and three others injured, including the Chabad Rabbi Yisroel Goldstein. The alleged shooter — a 19-year-old white male — has been arrested. Authorities are treating the shooting as a hate crime. Anti-Defamation League (ADL) CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement the ADL is “devastated” by the shooting. “It’s truly heartbreaking to see yet another tragedy on Shabbat but also on a day when we celebrate the end of the Passover festival,” Greenblatt said. “It also the six month anniversary of the shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, the most violent anti-Semitic incident in American history.” He added that the shooting highlights the scourge of anti-Semitism. “Jewish people and those of all faiths should not have to live in fear of going to their house of worship. From Charleston to Pittsburgh to Oak Creek and from Christchurch to Sri Lanka, and now Poway, we need to say ‘enough is enough,’” Greenblatt said. “People in position of authorities, from elected officials to tech CEOs, need to stand united against hate and address it, not only after it happens, but by enforcing norms and standing for our shared values long before such a crime takes place.”...
.
Charles Barkley sneaked into 
White House by Jared Kushner for meeting
151ht3LAWPXbj5FSJaH-6CfeednW0IUwYcuTjN4-U8QZrdt_Lg169JG7TcdF9bb_1N8PXE6IB7Ao93DMmtCCBnvOkfme6GTu36JDmHQvyBK2qXvpfHXpQaTWNuWKa1bQvtYzQwIqc4JlYb9QnPtnHIMY6_Nr63x1FXXmCIocsfBBUvWTGKi3VXkIJlOUL1ZmTgNHwsgaR_Pa8Q9HVSrxC8_l7W8Y2jTXmtOoVdnrHGlsoavT1E-bQ6tLSgCe0-BQmIk4OiaQVQ6OhvV1ELagVRfpNs63RgUZ222fFm5Uaj9-aOVcJCcdrV3XkfHmQdERb8dxWjcGbxDrNZLqugMzZZp2FA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Steven Nelson
washingtonexaminer.com } ~ Professional basketball legend Charles Barkley says President Trump's son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner sneaked him into the White House to discuss vocational education policy... The prominent retired player, who in the past flirted with running for office in Alabama as a Democrat, said he did not want to meet with Trump or be spotted by the press. "Kushner calls me, and I said, 'Listen, Jared. No. 1, I don't want to be on camera, I don't want to see your father-in-law, but I'll come to the White House if you're serious,'" Barkley said on the podcast "Jemele Hill Is Unbothered." The two had exchanged contact information at the annual Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference, which they both attended in 2017. Barkley is passionate about expanding vocational education, and has donated $1 million to encouraging the teaching of trade skills. Trump speaks often about encouraging such education. "He snuck me in," Barkley said. "We had a great conversation, and hopefully it will go further ... I'm on my mission, and hopefully, he can help me with my mission." Barkley did not say when exactly the meeting with Kushner happened. Trump  ended an scumbag/liar-nObama-era policy of releasing partial White House visitor logs, easing the privacy of such visits. To evade reporters, guests must simply walk briskly into the West Wing from a parking lot partially visible to journalists...   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/charles-barkley-sneaked-into-white-house-by-jared-kushner-for-meeting?utm_source=breaking_push&utm_medium=app&utm_campaign=push_notifications&utm_source=WEX_News%20Brief_04/27/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News%20Brief&rid=5261  
.
Annihilation of Christian Life and People: 
Where is the Outrage in the West?
8jbgfMXXTxSmQKFqwrdXFaDt4K-G_2PuwMPJMXN6xaqEhTW9DA-83pjKEyzeDAY3c3oRUFM6nnLWR87R476pdjvwmQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Giulio Meotti
gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ "Where is the solidarity for the Sri Lanka's Christians?"  asked the British scholar Rakib Ehsan, a Muslim... "The differences in tone and nature between the condemnations of the Christchurch and Sri Lanka terrorist attacks are striking. After Christchurch, there was no hesitation about stating the religious backgrounds of the victims and directing emotion and affection towards Muslim communities. Politicians took no issue with categorising the events in Christchurch as terrorism. "In contrast, the words 'terrorism' and 'Christianity', along with their associated terms, have so far failed to feature in much of the reaction to the attacks in Sri Lanka. "What is evident is not only a clear reluctance to specify the religious background of Christians who were killed in Sri Lanka, but also an absence of heartfelt solidarity with Christian communities across the world, which continue to suffer grave forms of persecution on the grounds of their faith." Rakib Ehsan asked the right question. But it might be rewritten as: Where is the Western solidarity for the Sri Lanka's murdered Christians? This is a drama in three acts. The first act consists of the Christians and other non-Muslim indigenous peoples being violated and murdered. The second act consists of Muslim extremists who create this genocide. And the third act consists of the indifferent West, which looks everywhere else...
.
Real Leverage on Illegal Immigration
by Mike Raza

americanthinker.com } ` The main reason it is so difficult to deal with illegal immigration is that there is an unwritten but not secret alliance between RINOs who want cheap labor and leftists who want new voters...
 It is not clear whether either side of that bargain really gets what it wants, but it endures. Meanwhile, conservatives want a secure border and the rule of law. Keeping criminals and drugs out is a high priority and only a wall or other barriers will do, The RINOs and leftists are willing to tolerate the criminals and drugs in return for their other goals. What do conservatives want? Of course, no list will be agreed to by all but here are the main desired reforms:

Build a border wall or other barriers.
Mandate E-verify.
End chain migration
End the visa lottery.
End “catch and release”.
Tighten rules for asylum seekers and only admit them after they prove their case.
End sanctuary cities, states, or other jurisdictions.
Add citizenship question to 2020 census. Redistrict based on only U.S. citizens.

Liberals want none of the above; they want open borders. President Trump is dealing with two distinct adversaries. The first is the Democrats, of course. They are truly shameful, showing no empathy for the Americans who are harmed by unsecured borders but demanding special treatment for the illegal invaders. The only logical explanation is their expectation that these illegals and their children will eventually vote, and those votes will help realize the Democrat dream of one-party dominance for them. Perhaps more cynical are the RINOs who are willing to risk the future of their country in return for short term cheap labor. There laws on the books which could be invoked to raise the stakes for the progressives and RINOs so high that they would have to back down. I am speaking first of the laws prohibiting the employment of illegal aliens, aka “undocumented workers”. Second, there are laws prohibiting the harboring of or abetting illegal aliens...
.
.AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
How Are Corporations Paying No Taxes?
deWz-mRHWK3zUqNWdlnxLpYiXOjcX6nuAKk_3zhYSaOEhZAghM5deyvLpBylKQNpx2fNLhY8h4Zvhx3e0hVvKt_B-O1cl2tx7qKXKsg7xMYTPavTTjtQqrGoJe8far-7iqFCOb2APBbqQXG7CYe9c6P8CeDBbyNHCryCHHQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Brian Mark Weber:  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was supposed to restore a sense of fairness and simplicity to the tax system for both individuals and companies. Sure, many working Americans had less taxes taken out of their paychecks in 2018, and there are other aspects of the act that improved the tax code overall, but the act failed to address tax loopholes that enabled the largest companies to avoid taxes. In fact, some of these loopholes were expanded.

For example, in 2018 there were 60 American corporations that paid $0 in federal taxes, despite earnings in the billions. According to a report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, these federal free riders included IBM, Amazon, Netflix, Molson Coors, Whirlpool, JetBlue Airways, and General Motors.

It gets worse.

As Megan Henney writes at Fox Business, “Instead of paying $16.4 billion in taxes at the 21 percent corporate rate, the companies received a corporate tax rebate of $4.3 billion.” Henney adds, “Netflix, for instance, raked in $856 million in profit but paid no federal taxes because of tax credits, according to ITEP. IBM, meanwhile, earned $500 million but received a rebate worth $342 million, although it’s unclear specifically how the company did so. The company said it used "domestic incentives” to reduce its income tax by about $110 million in 2018.“

How do they get away with it?

The loopholes that these large companies use to reduce or eliminate their tax burdens include accelerated depreciation — which allows them to write off their capital investments — and a range of tax credits for what they call "research and development.” Still others took advantage of alternative-energy tax subsidies or stock options.

Until Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission get serious about closing some of these loopholes, corporations will continue to take advantage. After all, what they’re doing isn’t illegal. But in the end, the public’s confidence in our elected officials will continue to erode as the perception of government favoritism toward big business is reinforced. Not surprisingly, polls show that most Americans want these loopholes closed.

But let’s be clear: First, corporations don’t pay taxes — consumers do. So this isn’t about raising corporate taxes, punishing successful companies, or eroding their positive effects on our economy. Instead, the issue is fairness, as so many small businesses and working individuals struggle to keep their accounts in the black each month and contribute a much higher percentage to the government at tax time. That’s because small-business owners often file taxes as individuals — and thus pay the much higher individual rate.

Meanwhile, video-game companies like Activision, entertainment companies such as Netflix, and gargantuans like Amazon reap the benefits of a flawed system that enables them to not only avoid taxes, but to actually receive tax windfalls.

Brock Blake writes at Forbes, “While there’s potential for this tax law to have a positive impact for small business owners in the long run, most entrepreneurs feel that the government looks out for corporations’ interests over small businesses. According to a recent survey, 79 percent of startup entrepreneurs say they had no support from government to launch their companies, and 60 percent believe that government doesn’t care about businesses like theirs. Ouch.”

Our approach to this problem will test our commitment to free-market principles. We shouldn’t embrace policies that limit the expansion of job opportunities, the innovativeness and competitiveness of American companies, or the overall growth of the U.S. economy.

The Republican reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% was a good and much-needed move, but large companies shouldn’t be exempt — again, especially when so many small businesses who compete with them are Sub S corporations paying the taxes at the highest personal rate. Moving forward, conservatives should enable a business climate that supports the creation and expansion of small businesses. We’re all for limited taxation and pro-growth economic policies, but if mom-and-pop grocery stores fork over hefty taxes to the federal government every year, then large corporations should bear some of the burden too.

Finally, despite what many conservative economists predicted, the largest tax-avoiding companies don’t always reinvest their savings into the American economy. Some shelter their tax windfalls overseas, for example. Clearly, we need a tax system that incentivizes reinvestment while steering clear of the Left’s failed formula of higher taxes and increased government regulation.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/62627?mailing_id=4233&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4233&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center