The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
ARGUING WITH LIBERALS
by Burt Prelutsky
.
Assange Says Trump Has Nothing To Do 
With Russia, liar-Clintons Have Mega Millions
{rickwells.us} ~ The attached video of an interview in August of last year with Julian Assange, gives us some insight into what he might have to say if he were allowed to exchange his freedom... for what he can prove happened with regards to liar-Hillary Clinton and Russia. Current events and knowledge are starting to catch up to what Peter Schweizer was writing about and what Assange has been embroiled in, but certainly there’s a lot more that needs to come out. Assange tells the interviewer, “liar-Hillary Clinton has done quite well, strategically, to try and draw a connection between Trump and Russia, because she has so many connections of her own.” He continues, “My analysis of Trump and Russia is that there is no substantial connection. Why do I say that? Well, because Trump was trying to invest in Russia, before Putin in the 1990s, after Putin and in fact nearly all the way up to the present moment.”... https://rickwells.us/assange-trump-russia-clinton/
.
What Do China And North Korea 
Think About One Another? It’s Not Good
by RYAN PICKRELL
{dailycaller.com} ~ Chinese and North Korean forces once fought side by side on the battlefield, but ties have since frayed, possibly beyond repair... China has a complicated relationship with North Korea, which simultaneously serves as both a strategic asset and a liability. However, it has become more the latter than the former in recent years. North Korea’s frequent provocations frustrate Beijing, and China’s decisions to pressure North Korea in concert with the U.S. greatly angers Pyongyang. China and North Korea’s top leaders absolutely despise one another, according to individuals close to the respective governments. When Chinese President Xi Jinping took power five years ago, he presented a grand vision for China known as the “Chinese Dream,” an ambitious plan to restore China’s great power status and make the country a responsible and respected global leader. Since North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un took control following the death of his father, the young ruler has advanced the country’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs at an accelerated rate, creating instability on China’s doorstep with frequent tests, drills, and intentionally aggressive and hostile provocations...  http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/22/what-do-china-and-north-korea-thi...
.
Trump Signs EO Permitting Recall of 
1K Retired USAF Pilots; Leftist heads  explode
by Fuzzy Slippers
{legalinsurrection.com} ~ When he left office, liar-nObama, having made the world much less stable and far less safe during his tenure, was well on his way to his goal of depleting our military to pre-World War II levels... President Trump campaigned on rebuilding our military and refocusing its mission on military matters rather than on political correctness and voracious down-sizing. He also campaigned on destroying ISIS and radical Islamic terrorism. In aid of these twin campaign promises and goals, Trump signed an  Executive Order (EO) permitting the United States Air Force to recall up to one thousand retired pilots. The cap lift applies to all branches of the military. The left’s response was an epic meltdown...  https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/10/trump-signs-eo-permitting-rec...
.
Informant claims right to 
reveal secrets of true Russian collusion
by GREG COROMBOS
{wnd.com} ~ The lawyer for a former FBI informant who gathered evidence of a massive Russian bribery scheme to influence U.S. nuclear policy during the liar-nObama administration says... it is illegal for the government to prevent her client from speaking to Congress about what he knows. She also says her client’s revelations went largely ignored by the FBI for political reasons and that he was threatened with criminal prosecution by the Justice Department under former Attorney General Loretta Lynch if he ever spoke publicly about the case. Victoria Toensing has been representing the unnamed informant for the past several weeks. Toensing is a former deputy assistant attorney general and a former federal prosecutor. She is now a partner in the Washington law firm of diGenova & Toensing. She says this whole saga began more than eight years ago...  http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/informant-claims-right-to-reveal-secrets...
.
 VIDEOS
 
President Trump Shows Gratitude for Gold Star Families
.
Veteran Died As Nurse’s Aide Too Busy Playing Video Games
.
Rachel Maddow’s An IDIOT! She Blames Niger Ambush On Trump’s Travel Ban
.
Gen. Jack Keane ISIS’ Losing Territory In Syria But Iran Wants To Take It Over
.
Assassination Threat? Mad-Maxine Waters Threatens To “Take Out Trump”
.
Tom Fitton: DOJ & FBI Knew of Clinton/Russia Deal for Uranium Stockpiles
.

.
ARGUING WITH LIBERALS
by Burt Prelutsky


I don’t have much opportunity to debate with those on the Left. Partly, that’s because there are very few in my personal life and the others don’t tend to read me. There is one exception. He is a former agent of mine, going back to the days when I actually had or needed an agent. In fact, to this day, he will refer to himself as the only agent I ever liked. And it’s true. He even subscribes to my articles.

Recently, he had occasion to let me know that he disagreed with a line I had recently written. It began with his writing: “When you say: ‘Blacks have an exorbitant illegitimacy rate,’ that’s a fact. I don’t debate or question it, because it’s documented. But when you say: ‘Liberals think black and Hispanic thugs should be armed,’ that’s not in any way quantifiable, and I’m going to call you on that.”

I replied: “Frank, I love you like a brother, but you have a couple of annoying habits. One, the only time you have anything good to say about my work is in a short preamble to whatever you’re complaining about. Two, when I lodge a defense of whatever it is you’re calling me out about which almost invariably is that I’ve generalized about liberals, you drop off the earth and do not respond to let me know if I’ve convinced you, or perhaps given you pause to re-consider your complaint or that you remain stubbornly unconvinced.”

He replied: “I will try to point out more of your statements I agree with. But it is hard for me to say something when you present as a fact something that is unsubstantiated, such as, ‘liar-nObama is gay.’”

I replied: “Apparently, you don’t place much stock in circumstantial evidence, although in criminal trials, it is often considered more persuasive than eye witness testimony, which is often found to be worthless.

“Regarding liar-nObama: did it not strike you as odd that no woman ever came forward to cash in on the fame and fortune awaiting any woman who could share her experiences dating liar-nObama in high school, college, law school or in the years before he met and married Michelle at age 29 or 30?

“And didn’t it strike you as odd when, as a newly elected president, he traveled to Hawaii and then took off to meet an unnamed buddy at the guy’s home instead of having him come to where he was staying? The guy was never identified and we were never told anything about him. You didn’t find that suspicious?

“Even liar-nObama’s marriage was always suspect because black people hate homosexuals which is why Prop 8, the same-sex marriage proposition, went down in flames here in California: the white vote was 50-50, but the black vote was 60-40 against; and liar-nObama knew that once he set his eye on political office in Chicago, he had to get married, lest the rumors begin.

“It may not convince you because you liked liar-nObama, but if he were a conservative, I believe you’d be persuaded.”

He replied: “You still haven’t defended your statement that liberals favor black and Hispanic gangbangers being armed.”

I replied: “If liberals felt otherwise, 500 people wouldn’t have already been murdered this year in Chicago. All you hear from Democrats is that more laws need to be passed making it more difficult for white people to buy guns. Nobody, after all, imagines for a second that the thugs register their guns, and nobody tries to arrest them for possessing the weapons. Instead, Democrats make the NRA the big bad boogeyman, although none of the group’s four million members has murdered anyone.

“So why do liberals keep yammering for more gun control laws? After all, Chicago, Detroit and Baltimore, already have the toughest laws on the books. What good are more of them when the criminals ignore the laws that already exist? They’re criminals, after all; they earn their livelihood by breaking the law. It’s their way of life.”

“I am a liberal,” Frank replied. “But I don’t believe ANYONE needs or should have an automatic weapon, unless they’re serving in the military.”

“Machine guns have been outlawed since 1934. So far as I can recall, until Vegas, the bump stocks haven’t played a role in any of the previous mass-killings. The Democrats are constantly tossing out these red herrings, and you should not be repeating the silly crap spewed forth by the likes of clown-Schumer and Pulosi.”

“Finally,” he said in summation, “my ‘dropping off the earth’ generally means I’d rather not debate Burt further. Neither of us will convince the other of his point of view.”

“The difference,” I pointed out, “is that I can and will defend my point of view. But if you feel that way, please don’t send me your complaints because I respect you enough to feel a response is called for. The truth is, I already know the leftist’s attitude towards guns and, well, everything else.”

What I didn’t point out to Frank is that liberals are always at a disadvantage when arguing with conservatives. That’s because we can’t avoid knowing all their talking points because their opinions permeate the very toxic air we breathe; whereas unless they’re the very few on the Left who ever listen to talk radio, watch Fox News or read a conservative pundit, all they know about us is that we’re gay-bashing, gun-toting, fascistic, racist, Bible-thumping, Neanderthals.

Something else I neglected to mention to Frank is that when I attack some cherished belief of the Left, I first make the strongest case for the lunacy in my own mind, and, believe me, I do a better job of it than people like Chris Matthews, Juan Williams and George Stephanopoulos.

● Having been among the hair-challenged since my early 30s, I understand the urge that moves certain men to don toupees. In the old days, when hats were still in vogue, bald men could easily cover up their deficiency in public. But once John F. Kennedy went topless on his inauguration day, the hat industry collapsed.

The problem is that most wigs look like wigs, and accentuate male baldness more than they conceal it. But when I see someone like Ken Burns, the renowned propagandist/documentary filmmaker, I can’t help wondering what he sees when he looks in the mirror. I suppose he thinks the rug makes him look youthful, but he’s 64 years old, for god’s sake. Is there nobody in the poor man’s life who is willing to let him know it makes him look like the 4th Stooge, Schmucky?

● Speaking of nicknames, someone -- not I, unfortunately -- came up with the perfect one for the disgraced former head of Miramax, Harvey Swinestein.

While on that particularly unsavory topic, something I haven’t heard anything about is how it went for 19-year-old Malia liar-nObama, who was in the process of spending her gap year before entering Harvard as one of Mr. Weinstein’s lucky interns.

Politics do make for strange and very embarrassing bed fellows.

● In related news, the Motion Picture Academy has canceled Weinstein’s membership. Needless to say, every actor, producer and director, in Hollywood is now perched on pins and needles waiting for the other four thousand shoes to drop.
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. BurtPrelutsky@aol.com

Views: 18

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

The cartoonist's homepage, indystar.com/opinion/varvel

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service