The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The Treachery of RINO-Murkowski,
RINO-Collins and RINO-McCain
by Bruce Bialosky
 Mueller's Grand Jury Is Significant 
Special Counsel Robert Mueller has impaneled a grand jury in Washington, a significant move in his investigation into Russia's election interference. As Andrew McCarthy of National Review writes, "The most significant conclusion we can draw ... is that the so-called Russia investigation, officially, is a criminal investigation." So, what does and doesn't this mean? Well, McCarthy explains, "That makes it categorically different from a counterintelligence investigation," which is how Mueller's probe began. We warned it would expand. It has.
          Impaneling a grand jury doesn't necessarily mean that a crime has been committed, nor does it mean that the filing of criminal charges is imminent. It does, however, imply that the investigation is growing in both scope and scale, and it indicates that Mueller has determined there is enough cause to warrant access to subpoena powers afforded by a grand jury. As The Wall Street Journal describes it, "Grand juries are investigative tools that allow prosecutors to subpoena documents, put witnesses under oath and seek indictments, if there is evidence of a crime. Legal experts said Mr. Mueller's decision suggests he believes he will need to subpoena records and take testimony from witnesses."
          The public knows neither which individual or individuals are the target(s) of this now-criminal investigation, nor the alleged crime. But in any case, none of this bodes well for Donald Trump. As we've noted before, the fact that at least eight members of Mueller's investigative team have contributed to the presidential campaigns of both Barack liar-nObama and liar-Hillary Clinton makes it look all the more like an anti-Trump crusade.
          The American public deserves to know who is now under criminal investigation and for what alleged criminal wrongdoing. Otherwise this will only continue to look like a witch-hunt. Mueller needs to name names and name the crime.  ~The Patriot Post
Secret Behind RINO-Murkowski’s
liar-nObamacare Flip-Flop
by Greg Corombos
{} ~ Sen. John RINO-McCain is getting most of the blame from the right and praise from the left for his vote to scuttle Senate legislation to repeal parts of liar-nObamacare... but another GOP member is coming under fire for reneging on her vow to repeal the law and offering a weak explanation for her reversal. Sen. Lisa RINO-Murkowski, R-Alaska, campaigned twice on ditching liar-nObamacare and even voted for the straight repeal in 2015, when the bill was vetoed by President liar-nObama. This year, RINO-Murkowski opposed the motion to proceed on the health-care debate and then consistently rejected a wide variety of GOP amendments, including the “skinny repeal,” which RINO-McCain famously opposed. Sen. Susan RINO-Collins, R-Maine, was the other no vote. Of the three, only RINO-Collins opposed the 2015 repeal as well....
Handwritten liar-nObama Note Found –
Exposes MASSIVE liar-Hillary Email Lie
by David Miller
{} ~ A series of handwritten FBI notes that were recently released have confirmed that Barack liar-nObama’s administration’s White House counsel was directly involved in deliberations over the release of liar-Hillary Clinton emails as early as spring of 2015... These notes lay the case out from the perspective of the FBI agents investigating it. The reference to “Counsel,” seems to be the earliest confirmation of White House involvement. This came after liar-nObama’s White House tried to put as much distance between itself and the liar-Clinton email scandal as possible. In a March 7, 2015 interview, liar-nObama claimed that he had only learned that liar-Clinton was using a private email server to conduct official government business from the media.... That's a lie.
Trump Lets Sessions
Know He’s Out Of The Dog House
by Peter Hasson
{} ~ Attorney General Jeff Sessions appears to be out of the dog house. After weeks of speculation regarding Sessions’ job security, President Trump took to Twitter... his preferred method of communication — to praise the attorney general on Saturday for cracking down on illegal leaks of classified information. “After many years of LEAKS going on in Washington, it is great to see the A.G. taking action!” Trump wrote. “For National Security, the tougher the better!”... Now go after liar-Hillary and liar-nObama.
Lawmakers And White House Officials Would
Be Prosecuted For Leaking Classified Info
by Chuck Ross
{} ~ Members of Congress and White House officials could potentially be prosecuted for leaking classified information, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said on Sunday... Rosenstein appeared on “Fox News Sunday” with Chris Wallace to discuss the Justice Department’s new initiative to combat classified leaks. Rosenstein will lead a task force to root out the leaks, which Attorney General Jeff Sessions said earlier this week have tripled in number since President Trump took office. “If you find any White House officials and members of Congress, have committed these leaks, have disclosed classified information, will you prosecute?” Wallace asked Rosenstein...
Jeff Sessions Orders Look into
‘DOJ Slush Fund’ Payments to Leftists
by Ian Mason
{} ~ The memo asks all components of the DOJ to recount the last ten years of payments made to non-governmental organizations as third parties in settlements and provide that information to Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand, the number three Justice official... These “cy pres” payments were a long-standing policy of having mostly corporate defendants, for example in a civil rights suit, agree to pay into charities as part of their settlement with the government to avoid further prosecution. In recent years, especially during the liar-nObama administration, the practice increasingly funneled funds to left-wing “community organizing” groups such as the now renamed National Council of La Raza, or “The Race,” a Latino racial advocacy group that supports mass illegal immigration...
The Treachery of RINO-Murkowski,
RINO-Collins and RINO-McCain
by Bruce Bialosky
{} ~ Previously, we have written how important it is to restructure our health insurance system after the dishonest, unnecessary and destructive law passed by a fully-partisan vote known as liar-nObamacare. We have defined the fact that this is a team effort by Republicans which would orient the insurance market back toward consumer choice and save us from a downward spiral toward government control over the entirety of our healthcare system, handing over the future of our individual health to faceless know-it-all bureaucrats. Yet despite that, three senators -- RINO-Murkowski, RIN)-Collins and RINO-McCain -- vainly thought they were wiser than everyone else and sentenced us to destruction of choice in the health insurance market.

RINO-Murkowski’s rationale seems similar to the statements by the other two. She told an Alaskan newspaper "I have said pretty consistently that process really does matter, particularly when you're dealing with something that is as direct and personal as health care, something that has an impact on one-sixth of the nation's economy."

But RINO-Murkowski opposed every proposal by the Republicans.  She offered no statements of how to accomplish her goals or a health insurance plan of her own.  She did not offer the fact that she, through the Democrats in committee, would responsibly cooperate to move a revision of liar-nObamacare forward. Her office did offer a series of changes in a 2015 press release to liar-nObamacare that she publicly supported.  

It seems bewildering that RINO-Murkowski would publicly attack liar-nObamacare to shore up her political support for her 2016 re-election; but, given the opportunity, would be a pivotal vote to maintain the existence of this plan. It became public that the Trump Administration pressured RINO-Murkowski with potential withdrawal of benefits to her Alaskan constituents. We don’t believe she was so small as to vote against the repeal to spite President Trump because of his political pressure. She failed her fellow senators, her constituents, and the American people thinking that she knew better than everyone else except for her co-conspirators.

RINO-Collins stated as her defense for her no vote "The ACA is flawed and in portions of the country is near collapse. Rather than engaging in partisan exercises, Republicans and Democrats should work together to address these very serious problems."  But she too offered no evidence that she could even get her fellow Maine Senator, Angus King, who bills himself as an independent while showing in every way he is a Democrat, to agree with and work with her. RINO-Collins offered no means for her statement to ever become reality.  

During the entire process, RINO-Collins expressed her wiser-than-thee attitude. The thing RINO-Collins tied herself to was Planned Parenthood. Thus, she thought the salvation of one health care provider is more important than cost-effective health insurance provided in a free market for all Americans.  

Then there is Senator RINO-McCain. First let us say RINO-McCain is an American hero and everyone wishes him well in his fight against a deadly cancer. That being said, health issues do not excuse his abhorrent behavior in voting against the bill the rest of his fellow Republicans supported and saw as a means toward a route to eventually overhaul of the health insurance market.

In 2016 during his reelection campaign, RINO-McCain made the failure of liar-nObamacare a central point of the rationale for supporting him. From his campaign ad: “liar-nObamacare is failing Arizonans. First, a massive rate hike more than twice the national average. Then, America's largest health insurer abandoned Arizona's failing liar-nObamacare exchange. That's devastating -- especially to rural counties. Congresswoman Ann Kirkpatrick bragged about her liar-nObamacare vote, saying ‘it's also the one I'm most proud about.’ While Kirkpatrick's ‘proud’ of putting us at risk, John RINO-McCain is leading the fight to stop liar-nObamacare.”  

Certainly one can be against liar-nObamacare and unhappy about the plan for replacement. There is a humongous difference between being unhappy with the current proposal that everyone understood was not the final product, and being the person responsible for putting a stake in the heart of the effort to save us all from a government-controlled health system.

RINO-McCain, being a veteran and a senator from the state that was ground zero for the crisis in the VA medical system, should have complete understanding of how inept government-run health care is for just a small portion of the population. He must understand the concept of extrapolating that failure out to the remainder of the population would be catastrophic for America. Yet, he single-handedly decided to maintain failing liar-nObamacare as the means for Americans to get their health insurance.  

Some have asked the logical question of why did RINO-McCain even return to D.C. to extend the process only to kill it. He could have stayed in Arizona recovering from his recent procedure. Did he crave the limelight that much? Or did he really just not understand where the process was heading and had a last minute epiphany?

RINO-McCain stated "We must now return to the correct way of legislating and send the bill back to committee, hold hearings, receive input from both sides of aisle, heed the recommendations of nation's governors, and produce a bill that finally delivers affordable health care for the American people. We must do the hard work our citizens expect of us and deserve." Maybe he sees a path to that accommodation by the Democrats others do not see (including Democrats).  

RINO-McCain has had plenty of time to work the crowd before his vote to accomplish some of his goal, but to no avail. His political capital from his potentially deadly cancer did not convince one Democrat to cooperate in a process allowing them to amend the bill. When does he think that will occur?

In the imaginary world of these three senators, the matter will go back to committee and there will be more discussion. The Democrats will cooperate. Of course, that is under the following conditions: more federal dollars are funneled into a Medicaid system that offers the promise of health insurance without health care from an ever-shrinking pool of providers, young Americans will buy the insurance which they, to this point, have decided they would rather pay a fine for no insurance because the policies they are offered are too comprehensive thus too expensive for their needs,  and money will be shuttled out the back door of the U.S. Treasury to the insurance companies to subsidize the underpriced policies of other Americans because the real costs are far too burdensome. That will end with more threats and penalties and mandates administered by the IRS to force people to comply with government dictated comprehensive policies to shift costs to others. How do we know this?  Because Ezekiel Emanuel and Jonathan Gruber, the original designers of this disastrous program, tell us if we only did these things liar-nObamacare would work.  

In fact, the first proposal by Democrats, after the treacherous act, is to lower the age for Medicare eligibility to 50 years old. Medicare which is required for anyone that is age qualified. That proposal would do wonders for soaring the out-of-control budget. Instead because of the three wisest people in America, we will be harnessed with this dysfunctional system waiting for an imaginary cooperative moment between two political parties with two distinctly different agendas and two distinctly different end games.  

It did not happen eight years ago and will not happen now. Instead because of the actions of these three senators who are wiser than all of us, we have moved ever so much closer to the Democrats end game of a single-payer, government-controlled health system.

That is the treachery of RINO-Murkowski, RINO_Collins and RINO-McCain.

Views: 13


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center


Facebook & Twitter


BREAKING: Hillary Admits She Was Wrong About ‘Deplorables,’
White Nationalists Only ‘0.15%’ Of U.S. Population

( – Hillary Clinton, the failed liberal presidential candidate who sealed her fate by slamming half of U.S. voters as a load of racist, sexist, xenophobic “deplorables,” just came out and admitted she was wrong, Breitbart reports.

Speaking with Hugh Hewitt on his radio show about her book “What Happened,” he asked her if she actually believes that half of the American population are white nationalists and racists.

“Of the 62.9 million people who voted for President Trump, do you have a number in your mind that you think are actually white nationalist racists of that 62.9 million, a real number?” he asked.

“No, I don’t,” she said.

Still have any doubts? Later in the conversation, Hewitt asked the same question again. “Do you think there are more than a half million, you know, honest-to-God white nationalists running around the United States?”

Clinton: “Probably not, no.”

A white nationalist would like to establish a sovereign country for people of white European heritage, an idea everyone across the political spectrum finds unspeakably intolerable and offensive. Now, the woman who declared that this was the desire of more than half of Americans is saying that virtually nobody wants it. On both counts, she’s completely wrong.

There’s no doubt that Clinton is probably going to try running again for president in 2020 – if she’s even alive that long – and might be trying to absolve her guilt and pander to all those “undecideds” who instantly went MAGA the second she blasted them as no-good racist deplorables for not voting Democrat.

However, Clinton did later admit that there were more white nationalists in America than she had thought. Expressing her worries that the internet and the presidency of Trump is giving them a voice and a platform, she hinted that under her iron scepter, she will attempt to silence them.

“Unfortunately, their views, which used to be quite beyond the mainstream, you know, have a much broader audience now, because you know, of being online and having outlets and media presence that can promote those attitudes,” she said.

How many white nationalists are there in the United States? That’s a question with troublingly few answers, since for some mysterious reason the liberal mainstream media – even though it claims all the time that white supremacy is on the rise – hasn’t actually bothered to take polls and just ask people whether they are white nationalists.

Actually, there’s a simple answer to that. If such a poll were to be taken, our bet is that liberals would be very disappointed to discover that almost nobody is actually a white nationalist, and so there would be no way they could continue scaring people with those fears. A tactic Clinton has apparently given up on.

Left-wingers are entirely convinced that some vague but large majority of people who say they aren’t racists or white nationalists, actually share a lot of views with them – which is why Nazi and white supremacist have become interchangeable with Republican and libertarian.

An article by Newsweek, which polled around 5,000 in order address this very question, came up with this response:

About 70 percent of respondents strongly agreed that people of different races should be “free to live wherever they choose” and that “all races are equal,” and 89 percent agreed that all races should be treated equally. At the same time, 31 percent of respondents said they strongly or somewhat agreed that the country needs to “protect and preserve its White European heritage,” while 34 percent strongly or somewhat disagreed and 29 percent said they neither agreed nor disagreed.

Reality is, it’s a little true that some Americans do have overlapping views with white nationalists, but the overwhelming majority of respondents STRONGLY believe that the races should be free, are equal, and should be treated equally. Sounds like none of these respondents would be joining a lynch mob or waging a second Holocaust any time soon – trying to equate the preservation of white heritage with support for slavery and genocide is obviously one of the Left’s biggest lies, and the very reason why 39 percent of people in this same survey believe white people are under attack.

So Clinton changes her mind, and now says she believes less than one percent of the American population are white nationalists – did she believe there were even LESS than that during the campaign trail? Either way, she’s either just lying or plain stupid.


© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service