Monday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

CatQ-QY3I6NRR7Q4FQRVR8ujQHTL7ikk6tPRwtH6AYoYciXRvpwd0s8qOg8W7koJkviOdlgW8PsHjSfQbMOoMLYvY2uMFiYi3eWyF8vCux9cAMd-Khk3VP2Dn-qIj5y_Fo88czRGZaRGnrAwh13syW5QnL75gbrALW9o7xw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Filed: Department of Justice Criminal Complaint
Against Rep. liar-Nancy Pelosi
z23_GTLoLmHhv61XCwg6KR2vRjWnSytBlteDzVJWJ_eVH5r0sxi3kFdwjETEYCxwMhiVV1UrOHAr9aWcy6zTHH3v7hbjwIf17ooBW89XGLlYgyOK4OkGLgwKAMxWFtsk3EFcUBNgooD5FRRrFij7AXuHtl2iUs5feMjhkp4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Dark-money lobbyists attack Convention 
of States grassroots in key state
BIxVrtfhCTSloSCxMfUt-WaKFgY0C6glF1kMJdnL_BuwgvI3Q0fFMAwx9bxrAAcKY4L6js1E3xkzB8FWsJAO3I3MZbbmLWErzkxpEIr56FCcC_eRnx24fxCUCLeUPxZ91NNV6l5MuqkNi02mhatB=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by conventionofstates.com ~ Dark-money leftist groups are at it again. Billionaire influence-peddlers like scumbag-George Soros can't stomach the idea of We the People using a Convention of States to take control of our own country... By working outside the D.C. beltway, grassroots Article V activists are cutting out scumbag-Soros' money, and he's not giving up without a fight. We learned recently that a new paid lobbyist has shown up in Idaho to oppose the Convention of States effort. After further investigation, our team discovered that the individual in question is registered as a lobbyist for The Hopewell Fund. This organization is managed by the notorious Arabella Advisors — a billion dollar dark money ATM for the Left. But here’s where it gets eerie. Arabella oversees four left-of-center non-profits. Under the guise of these non-profits, they’ve launched over 300 different “pop-up” organizations to address a wide range of subjects, from scumbag/liar-nObamacare to President Donald Trump’s judicial nominees. These “pop-up” organizations, however, are little more than a website shell and bank account. Think about it. This gives them control over 300 fake organizations which they can leverage to muster the “appearance” of a substantial grassroots movement…Imagine the damage they could do if they used those front-groups to lobby legislators, creating the false illuse of a massive network of nonprofits against COS. So far, the opposition has been mostly quiet. But with the recent news of an Arabella lobbyist polluting the water in Idaho, it may only be a matter of time before these scumbag-Soros-funded political operatives appear in other key states.  https://conventionofstates.com/news/dark-money-lobbyists-attack-convention-of-states-grassroots-in-key-state?utm_source=Convention+of+States+Project&utm_campaign=24db3e4bf7-&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_45196125c1-24db3e4bf7-214976545  
.
Sen. Mike Lee: Make Federal 
Architecture Great Again
9fOtp3rHQ3r0NWFDM1qyWw-_zjbujAyful97TVHh6DJOKN4_R3ymesUC8Va5TWu_vBGl4ibCSWzBAn405eilgAziVP7OG3M5ifMFyaC8vG-FVyl8MKx9nKgF54HXCGmteQdHQrID68V9gohgTqoz4nCg3TcUNCm4cUv1vN9J23DdVv4zMgZDBi6xY3i2Za59y1jwZw8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Mike Lee
{ thefederalist.com } ~ The second best news out of Washington this week is that the Trump administration is crafting an executive order to rewrite the General Services Administration’s architectural and design guidelines for federal buildings... The proposed rule, “Making Federal Buildings Beautiful Again,” would finally drain the Swamp of its embarrassing fetish for eyesores. As the draft rule says, “For more than a century and a half America’s Federal architecture produced beautiful and beloved buildings. Typically, though not exclusively, classical in design, buildings such as the White House, the Capitol Building, the Supreme Court, the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, the Treasury Department, and the Lincoln Memorial have become international symbols of democratic self-government.”Classical architecture – based on the design principles of ancient Greece and Rome – has always been Americans’ favorite style. Classical public buildings are not just piles of stone and glass. They give life to America’s democratic values and republican virtues. Their balanced proportions echo Americans’ moral and constitutional commitment to universal equality. Their stability embodies the strength and durability of America’s unique form of government. Their ornamental details speak to the moral dignity and political primacy of the individual citizen. Taken together, these principles spur us to be our best civic selves, to step up to Benjamin Franklin’s famous challenge describing our new system of government in 1787: “A republic… if you can keep it.” The longstanding, wildly popular project of affirming and projecting America’s constitutional values in our federal buildings began to change in the 1950s and 1960s, when Washington’s political class began deferring to the anti-classical modernists then taking over the the architecture industry. In 1962, the Kennedy administration established new federal guidelines, including the infamous sentence: “Design must flow from the architectural profession to the Government, and not vice versa.” We didn’t know it then, but this is when Washington surrendered its triumphant architectural heritage to ugly, elitist dysfunction. As Winston Churchill put it, “We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us.”... https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/07/sen-mike-lee-make-federal-architecture-great-again/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWlRNMllUZ3lNRFJoT1RneiIsInQiOiJLTFpxeHVPVjJtakVFN3RGZU9QOWg4UGRwZUQ1aXdsbjFzdEZ3RFpqVTFuYXdWWU5VVjNFZG5iTndOOFArZTlLWEo5eVRidGZsdkw3ZnE4OFNVZERXQWNIZG1xN3F5S2JNXC9seVhFc3hCT1BoUmpiYkFsMUsrXC9GcGV4UjN4NTFOIn0%3D 

Virginia Democrats Want to Hike Gas Tax, 
Spend Revenue on Public Transit
Do-za6lcFUa0ZAOWM1W6sLc0QXdxH4BdubDMvLAwx1i6oVKl_UovLYKvYUaWEcYRNswLtL7h44gX-ma5qm13pYuvIgisvnZADuLj41x4nngwcgXDD_20RYdJeONBjJE616rR_fE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by David Ditch
{ dailysignal.com } ~ Just two months after Democrats gained full control of Virginia’s government, Gov. Ralph Northam and the General Assembly have proposed sweeping changes to the state’s transportation system... At the top of the list: Increasing the gas tax from 16 cents to 28 cents per gallon over the next three years, a 75% increase. The main justification: Hundreds of thousands of Virginians experience daily headaches from traffic congestion. Whether it’s clogged roads in Northern Virginia or jams on I-95, few debate that there is a serious problem. However, massive tax increases don’t, by themselves, fix problems. In this case, the legislative proposal would direct over 30% of transportation funding away from roads, far in excess of the actual usage of nonroad travel. A new transportation funding formula would give 22 cents of every dollar to mass transit. This money would, of course, flow primarily to the state’s urban areas: Norfolk, Richmond, and Northern Virginia. Yet even in these parts of the state, cars accommodate the overwhelming majority of travel in terms of both mileage and number of trips. It’s not for lack of trying. Continued subsidies for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority have failed to prevent ridership declines down 16% from 2012 to 2018. These subsidies have, however, effectively transferred huge sums of money from working-class families in western Virginia to upscale professionals commuting to Washington...
.
Seattle’s Liberal Reckoning
OccEEI9a4aOcsOPB_ZSTZfRHEeM9_vDgDriT4c-LYjCcIzq1uZteuD2_Mu1f4x4VgjVKjZZym7nORmkGnT85Q0WNrzRZVVN1pVLxT7RzgZzV-iITCoJnTaGknn4jFiLphE_gnvwZk1_8ETBdHY1roo6b333XQcc-J0DcLJRWY6JRV8HNF7hEc8tDJQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Robert W. Merry
{ theamericanconservative.com } ~ Seattle is in the grip of a far-left mindset. That became all the more evident, as if evidence were needed, during last year’s city council elections... Many foresaw these as likely to bring to leadership a new breed of business-backed politicians bent on repudiating the council’s progressive-socialist leanings. Finally, it was predicted, a sane brand of political moderation would emerge in Seattle government. It didn’t happen. In the campaign’s final days, the top issue became the intent of Amazon and its leader Jeff Bezos to “buy” the election with a $1.5 million cash infusion into the coffers of the city’s business coalition. “Within days,” wrote Christopher Rufo of City Journal, “the referendum on a failed city council had been transformed into a referendum on corporate power.” There could be no question as to who would win that contest. The result, said Rufo, was “the most liberal city council in history,” one that seems to be “out for revenge” against business interests and their moderate supporters. The stated agenda of many city council members now includes rent control, drug-consumption sites, the decriminalization of prostitution, the legalization of homeless encampments, the defunding of significant police programs, free public transit, and big new taxes on the rich, with particular emphasis, not surprisingly, on Amazon and its top executives. A question that has haunted this city in recent weeks is to what extent this potent liberal sensibility contributed to the ghastly downtown event that occurred January 22. That was when three men, apparently street gang members, got embroiled in a rush-hour gunfight at the crowded intersection of Pine Street and Third Avenue. A 50-year-old female, described by the Seattle Times as a “joyful woman who lived a rich life,” was killed, and seven others were wounded, including one of the shooters. After the melee, police found some 20 shell casings at the scene. While the local paper’s extensive coverage of the event and its aftermath didn’t explicitly raise the question of liberalism’s culpability, it nevertheless seemed to be on the minds of some Seattleites interviewed by the Times. A main focus for many was why these men were on the street in the first place and why city officials can’t find effective ways to combat such violence. Those who initiated the gun battle had extensive criminal records that reflected a certain persistent laxity in the application of the law. One Times headline read: “Tragic violence, unsurprising story.” The subhead: “Seattle’s long-running effort to address crime and sporadic violence downtown falls short.” Attention turned inevitably to the three suspects. One of them, Jamel Jackson, 21, had previously been involved in a violent incident at the same downtown intersection, when he allegedly punched and kicked a victim who got embroiled with a female gang member in the middle of a large crowd. He had in his possession a loaded 9-mm handgun. He avoided prosecution for the assault by pleading guilty to illegal firearm possession, for which he was sentenced to four months of home detention. According to the Times, he had been told by at least four superior court judges that he was not to possess firearms, a proscription that he apparently ignored with impunity...   https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/seattles-liberal-reckoning/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWlRNMllUZ3lNRFJoT1RneiIsInQiOiJLTFpxeHVPVjJtakVFN3RGZU9QOWg4UGRwZUQ1aXdsbjFzdEZ3RFpqVTFuYXdWWU5VVjNFZG5iTndOOFArZTlLWEo5eVRidGZsdkw3ZnE4OFNVZERXQWNIZG1xN3F5S2JNXC9seVhFc3hCT1BoUmpiYkFsMUsrXC9GcGV4UjN4NTFOIn0%3D 
James Woods Returns to Twitter with
Guns Blazing, Takes Aim at CNN,
commie-Ocasio-Cortez, scumbag/liar-Clintons
bKLcehQnSJPzKKTkTQij4Hl6sysEcwGVFsk80DQHpx4Oxp6uPrmP0YzGr5wB3KOA-m_uRDQhtkAdBhLfAMTWzyl1A_9BNzDtVbYgWT1-kVrlTAzH4X2cHa26-qukiFiZG6XiqQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Andrew J. Sciascia
{ westernjournal.com } ~ Conservative actor James Woods took no prisoners this week in his long-awaited return to Twitter... Returning unannounced to the platform after an April 2019 account suspension and a lengthy self-enforced hiatus, the known antagonist made up for lost time Thursday night with wisecracks and one-liners for seemingly every left-wing institution and political figure of note — beginning with upstart New York Democratic Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Attached to the actor’s first tweet in nearly 10 months was a viral video clip of commie-Ocasio-Cortez, a post-graduate bartender-turned-U.S. representative, belittling the American notion of “lifting oneself up by the bootstraps” as unrealistic, if not mythical. “I’ve tried so hard this past year to live without the wealth of knowledge available on Twitter,” Woods quipped, “but this kind of blazing insight can be found nowhere else, so … I’m back!” “I was on vacation awhile, avoiding the news,” Woods wrote shortly after. “How’d the #Mueller thing work out? The #impeachment scam? Who won the #Iowa caucuses? Is #Michael Avenatti still a contender for the Democratic nomination for President? How’s #Jeffrey Epstein doing?” According to The Daily Wire, the 72-year-old actor ran into a spot of trouble with Twitter’s policy enforcement officials last spring, posting rather cryptically with regard to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into President Donald Trump, “‘If you try to kill the King, you better not miss.’ #HangThemAll.” The quote was paraphrased from American essayist Ralph Waldo Emerson’s classic line, “When you strike at a king, you must kill him” — an allusion to the potential consequences and backlash faced throughout history by those who seek to unseat those in power. That did not, however, stop the social media giant from labeling the tweet as threatening, and indefinitely suspending Woods’ account for an alleged violation of site policy regarding “abusive behavior.”Only serving to prolong Woods’ exile from the  closing political frontier of Twitter was an unwillingness to budge regarding the platform’s request that allegedly “abusive” content be scrubbed from his account, which the actor felt represented an abandonment of free speech by the social media giant. “Twitter demanded that I rescind my tweet paraphrasing Emerson,” Woods later said in a statement to The Daily Wire. “It now seems they have chosen to delete that tweet from my account without my permission.”...   https://www.westernjournal.com/james-woods-returns-twitter-guns-blazing-takes-aim-cnn-ocasio-cortez-clintons/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=libertyalliance&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=libertyalliance   

Calculating the Californication
by Steven Malanga
{ city-journal.org } ~ Beset by high housing costs, crippling taxes, astronomical gas prices, wildfires, and rolling blackouts, Californians are heading for the exits... That’s sparking anxiety in places where these Golden State migrants are relocating. A mayoral candidate in Boise, Idaho, recently suggested building a wall to keep out Californians, who account for 60 percent of domestic migration into the growing state. The election of increasingly progressive candidates in Colorado sparked talk there of the “Californication” of the Centennial State. Early last year, the Dallas News described the “California-ing” of North Texas, citing a study showing that 8,300 Californians move to the area yearly. Texas governor Greg Abbott launched a petition titled “Don’t California My Texas.” Much of this anxiety revolves around fears that the migrants will transform the politics and culture of the places that they’re moving to—bringing an appetite for big, intrusive government. But a new survey suggests that, while plenty of people are looking to leave California, many are fleeing the state’s high costs and politics and may not be interested in voting for the same things in their new homes. The poll, by the Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies, found that 52 percent of California residents are considering migrating. As these polls go, that’s exceptionally high, putting California in the same category as some other states with very unhappy residents. A recent poll in New Jersey, for instance, found that about 44 percent of its people are looking to depart, while 50 percent of Connecticut residents indicated a desire to leave the state in a 2014 Gallup poll, the highest figure among any state at that time.Politicians in high-tax states claim that taxes don’t drive people out, but their constituents disagree: in the Berkeley poll, 58 percent of those considering leaving California said that high taxes were one reason—second only to the 71 percent pointing to the state’s astronomical housing costs. Also high on the list of reasons to go was the state’s political culture, which nearly half of those thinking of getting out cited as a consideration. Though the poll didn’t define “political culture,” Gallup ranks California—where the state legislature and elected officials in many of the state’s cities have turned increasingly progressive—as among the most liberal of states... https://www.city-journal.org/california-migration-politics?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWlRNMllUZ3lNRFJoT1RneiIsInQiOiJLTFpxeHVPVjJtakVFN3RGZU9QOWg4UGRwZUQ1aXdsbjFzdEZ3RFpqVTFuYXdWWU5VVjNFZG5iTndOOFArZTlLWEo5eVRidGZsdkw3ZnE4OFNVZERXQWNIZG1xN3F5S2JNXC9seVhFc3hCT1BoUmpiYkFsMUsrXC9GcGV4UjN4NTFOIn0%3D   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Filed: Department of Justice Criminal Complaint Against Rep. liar-Nancy Pelosi
z23_GTLoLmHhv61XCwg6KR2vRjWnSytBlteDzVJWJ_eVH5r0sxi3kFdwjETEYCxwMhiVV1UrOHAr9aWcy6zTHH3v7hbjwIf17ooBW89XGLlYgyOK4OkGLgwKAMxWFtsk3EFcUBNgooD5FRRrFij7AXuHtl2iUs5feMjhkp4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander:  To the Honorable William Pelham Barr, United States Attorney General, and to the Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice:

At approximately 2218 hours on Tuesday, 04 February 2020, I witnessed clear and indisputable evidence of Rep. liar-Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), liar-Speaker of the House, committing an act that I believe brazenly and feloniously violates federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 2071. In fact, her actions were witnessed by federal law-enforcement officials and she may have colluded with members of her political caucus who were also witness to this act, in premeditation for the commission of this offense. Please see this video evidence in support of this complaint that Rep. liar-Pelosi violated 18 U.S.C. 2071 and the Presidential Records Act of 1978.

For background:

President Donald Trump clearly outlined, prior to liar-Pelosi’s criminal actions, that the State of the Union is strong. The success of this administration deeply concerns Rep. liar-Pelosi and her U.S. Senate counterpart, Charles scumbag-Schumer (D-NY), leaders of the Democrat Party, because the success of the Trump administration on behalf of the American people threatens the liar-Pelosi/scumbag-Schumer political dynasty.

As evidence of her malicious intent, Rep. liar-Pelosi bookended the President’s speech with insults, deliberately omitting the traditional words of introduction, “Members of Congress, I have the high privilege and distinct honor of presenting to you the President of the United States,” and opting instead to state, “Members of Congress, the President of the United States.”

Once at the podium, President Trump personally delivered to Rep. liar-Pelosi the official signed State of the Union transcript as prepared for the Congress.

During the President’s remarks, Rep. liar-Pelosi scored cuts in the official transcript of the State of the Union, demonstrating premeditation in preparation for destroying it at the conclusion of the speech. After the President completed his remarks, Rep. liar-Pelosi committed an act that starkly demonstrated her cadre’s hatred of Mr. Trump and his grassroots American supporters, whom these partisans loathe.

Rep. liar-Pelosi took the official State of the Union transcript and, page-by-page, willfully mutilated and destroyed that document. Rep. liar-Pelosi maliciously obliterated what she called the “dirty” speech, later confessing: “I tore it up. I was trying to find one page with truth on it. I couldn’t.” Notably, Rep. liar-Pelosi also shredded the names of the great Americans listed on those pages, living and deceased, and the names of Americans in the gallery. In doing so, she libelously denigrated each of them personally by suggesting there was no truth to their life stories.

The actions of Rep. liar-Pelosi constitute a violation of 18 U.S.C. 2071, actions that were premeditated in collusion with co-conspirators within her caucus. The signed official State of the Union Address that Rep. liar-Pelosi destroyed was property of the United States of America. Rep. liar-Pelosi had no records-disposition order providing her with the specific authority to destroy that official government record.

Further, the White House media director confirmed, “The speech she ripped up was a one-of-a-kind record, signed by POTUS… It belonged to the American people, not to liar-Pelosi.” That assessment was affirmed by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA). Thus, this official signed transcript of the State of the Union speech falls under the Presidential Records Act of 1978.

According to 18 U.S.C. 2071: “Whoever, having the custody of any such record … willfully and unlawfully … mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his or her office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

Concurring with this assessment that Rep. liar-Pelosi violated 18 U.S.C. 2071, House Judiciary Committee member Matt Gaetz (R-FL) has filed an official complaint with the House Committee on Ethics, noting: “There is no question that Speaker liar-Pelosi ‘mutilated, obliterated, or destroyed’ the copy of the President’s address provided to her. The law does not allow the liar-Speaker of the House to destroy the records of the House…”

I respectfully request a prompt reply from the Department of Justice concerning this criminal complaint and the legality of Rep. liar-Pelosi’s actions, as well as of those who had prior knowledge of this criminal act.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/68391?mailing_id=4848&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4848&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • Bonnie

    They have not really left and gone away. They have been involved behind the shadows giving directions to the idiots who still believe them to be right.

  • THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN MY MAIN CONCERN W/CONV OF THE STATES THAT SOROS OR BLOOMBERG OR ZUCKERBERG OR CLINTON OR OBAMA WOULD FIND A WAY TO INFILTRATE THE PROCESS .  THEY CANNOT STAND WE THE PEOPLE THE REAL GOV'T DOING ANYTHING FOR FREEDOM.  I KNEW IT . 

This reply was deleted.