Monday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Defending Trump Against Excessive
Charges Is Not Selling Out
by David Limbaugh
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Trump Sanctions Iran and Embarks to the 
 Middle East 
-0oOwKzbIoK2KdvtR8_0u86pxzAM5adPOgSTTztrOgxOnLW4DhEOkdlT33cDrgiKXnRjBNwSP9951IvmWtWn9p-Oy0XHLr2kJmKEYjSvEvqe3yoyLE7oJ9Ox8-UEpg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
It should come as a shock to no one that Iran's leadership, despite because of Barack liar-nObama's highly touted but foolish and deceitful nuclear deal, has continued in its nefarious ways. On Wednesday, the Trump administration levied new sanctions on Iran after learning that the mullahs have continued to push forward on developing a ballistic missile program and for their continued support of Syria's Bashar al-Assad in the way of providing explosives.
          A senior Trump administration official stated, "President Trump is determined to hold Tehran accountable for its dangerous and aggressive behavior that is destabilizing the Middle East, while making it clear to the Iranian people that he stands with them — not with the regime that has oppressed them for so long."
          Trump has yet to pull the U.S. out of the liar-nObama-Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, that lifted severely restrictive sanctions from the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism. But Trump's State Department continues to conduct its review of the deal.
          While Trump heads off on his first foreign trip, he is looking to set a distinctly different tone from that of his predecessor. His first stop will be in Saudi Arabia, where he will look to firm up America's commitment to standing by our allies in the Middle East in resisting Iran's aggression. It's no coincidence that the Iran announcement was followed two days later by a trip to Riyadh. Those new sanctions give more weight to Trump's words, and spending time with Iran's greatest Islamic regional opponent sends a strong message to Tehran.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump-ordered tactics have
left ISIS 'no escape,' Jim Mattis says
n9epq3eVKdrhT911vs9rtz2MYSmAgUA8bEuyn86pJzSt7mA9JG7cfGWL1xAgxZ96fQ9KmtbFn-fyhzxsGDCCdKw2TBDLNaq2JgObsF2PilfAZxpz9u8O9Z_7RlKQlqCthNjbkW5tiNW_9Qc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Jamie McIntyre
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ Defense Secretary Jim Mattis is crediting changes in tactics ordered by President Trump for increasing the pressure on the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, and leaving the beleaguered fighters with no avenue of escape... "He directed a tactical shift from shoving ISIS out of safe locations in an attrition fight to surrounding the enemy in their strongholds so we can annihilate ISIS," Mattis said Friday during a Pentagon briefing on the counter-ISIS campaign. Mattis said that by making sure foreign fighters can't get away, or return to their home countries, "We don't simply transplant this problem from one place to another."... http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-ordered-tactics-have-left-isis-no-escape-jim-mattis-says/article/2623628
.
Testified Week Before Firing NEVER Pressured
To BACK OFF ANY Investigation
llw_BEbTEG0G-CqT2NyrYEcyIt2cEplpluEv6lY0Cj2xoho-ACbnxNpw_uflGKBzk1XQVPZc8gZ1gN7r6jr7omiQkO2U1E-dycP8sou9eMPUlspx_LBB0ytmxi-I5kg76nmC3tfm=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
The question asked of Congressman Peter King is phrased quite diplomatically by Martha MacCallum, in regarding what appears to be a contradiction in the public Senate testimony of then-FBI Director Comey... under oath and his leaked secret supposed memo. She points out that the way Comey answered in early May “Raises some doubts as to whether or not the President was putting any pressure on him about the investigation into him.” She points out that the question was asked regarding the liar-Clinton “investigation” specifically but is answered in a general way that is relevant. Comey is asked, “So, if the Attorney General or senior officials at the Department of Justice opposes a specific investigation, can they halt that FBI investigation?” He replied, “In theory, yes.” Asked “has it happened,” Comey responded, under oath, “Not in my experience, because it would be a big deal, to tell the FBI to stop doing something without appropriate purpose.”... http://rickwells.us/comey-busted-testified-week-firing-never-pressured-back-off-investigation/
.
Who Will Stand up for Civil Liberties?
by Alan M. Dershowitz
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ At a moment in history when the ACLU is quickly becoming a partisan left wing advocacy group that cares more about getting President Trump than protecting due process who is standing up for civil liberties?... The short answer is no one. Not the Democrats, who see an opportunity to reap partisan benefit from the appointment of a special counsel to investigate any ties between the Trump campaign/ administration and Russia. Not Republican elected officials who view the appointment as giving them cover. Certainly not the media who are revelling in 24/7 "bombshells." Not even the White House, which is too busy denying everything to focus on "legal technicalities" that may sound like "guilty man arguments." Legal technicalities are of course the difference between the rule of law and the iron fist of tyranny. Civil liberties protect us all... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10386/who-will-stand-up-for-civil-liberties
.
Washington watchdog
challenges Mueller's judgment
aNawBtMDYqns6hJSAOtZTKLTv4maqxZpgxR6wV8ipA3BToe2IW_ayogkeAdoyJlZvHwyIjWa0WPd2TvO3bw_nxFg19SNOf-PcA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Bob Unruh
{wnd.com} ~ The Washington watchdog Judicial Watch is challenging the judgment of Robert Mueller, the former FBI chief who just this week was picked to head up a special investigation into alleged collusion by the Trump campaign with the Russian government in the 2016 presidential race... Judicial Watch says Mueller was the FBI director who “caved” to the demands of radical Islamic groups and removed critical training materials from the government’s library of available resources. He had no sooner been appointed to investigate Russia collusion and “related matters” when he faced a call for his resignation. It was Gregg Jarrett in a commentary at Fox News who said that since Mueller worked closely with now-fired FBI chief James Comey, there’s a clear conflict of interest...Have to agree with JW. http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/washington-watchdog-challenges-muellers-judgment/
.
James Comey agrees to testify in public hearing
ak1TVFm5ab5bDl4KWLDV63-rBX6bj1GrVWAvZG3j4MDTfIlFMQ6VqPKFffGvD2h8TPaT8RY_YGojSMWWgr7B7Bu7nuHI5M-HEgcGoQZc2ZJkTvR5zvXhsyMSvyY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Todd Shepherd
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ Former FBI Director James Comey has agreed to testify in an open hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Chairman Richard Burr announced Friday... "The committee looks forward to receiving testimony from the former director on his role in the development of the Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian interference in the 2016 US elections, and I am hopeful that he will clarify for the American people recent events that have been broadly reported in the media," Burr said in a statement. No specific date has been set yet, but the statement said the committee expects the testimony to happen sometime after Memorial Day... http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/james-comey-agrees-to-testify-in-public-hearing/article/2623680
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Defending Trump Against Excessive
Charges Is Not Selling Out
2nFp4c9cyQyGQOo7ZV8UMQEYEmszM8A1dfZetkbzAJ_lVbkHWol3VtIjoLF67hjrZQLXLAdAASZxpoNeoGlmk8NxukVBYg6pDw5t-qgkd1wh0Fq_JysJ1bUQpbUV7YPeVPD-Vr9OrNGM6oMSNuH0Oq4rIfBDorF7KlvDwVkcrONtJwzMapkW=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

by David Limbaugh
{
wnd.com} ~ One thing should be clear, at least to Republicans: The left has had the long knives out for President Donald Trump since before he was inaugurated. It intended to destroy him regardless of his conduct in office.

Liberals and even some conservatives contend that Trump's defenders on the right are tainted, partisan, idolatrous cheerleaders who have sold their souls and principles to defend him against troublesome charges. Some argue that even if former Presidents Barack liar-nObama and Bill liar-Clinton engaged in similar activities, two wrongs don't make a right.

Trump supporters, they say, have always insisted they are strict adherents of the rule of law but are showing their true colors in defending Trump. But are they? Why is defending Trump against these excessive charges a betrayal of the rule of law? Just because he's handled some things disappointingly doesn't mean he's committed a crime or an impeachable offense. The rule of law requires that we be discriminating about these matters and not jump on the bandwagon to condemn Trump just because we don't approve of some of his actions or statements.

Without question, the rule of law and all other principles must be given the highest priority, and the Trump presidency doesn't change that. But there's something more involved here than mere Democratic hypocrisy.

We are talking about Democratic and liberal media wrongdoing. liar-nObama, when injecting himself into the investigation concerning liar-Hillary Clinton's emails and saying that no criminal activity had occurred, actually engaged in the very conduct of which Trump is being sloppily accused. The left had no objection. But at this point, it sure doesn't appear that Trump's comments to then-FBI Director James Comey about then-national security adviser Michael Flynn rose to the level of interfering with a proceeding, much less obstruction of justice.

Liberals are also engaged in wrongdoing by conducting this ceaseless witch hunt against Trump for alleged collusion with Russia to interfere with the presidential election when they know there is no evidence of any collusion. It is reprehensible that they are perpetuating this slander to delegitimize Trump and undermine the will of the American people.

So no, two wrongs don't make a right, but there aren't two equal "wrongs" here, and attempts to attribute moral equivalence to these separate sets of conduct are deceitful and scurrilous.

Of course, Trump supporters should not compromise their principles to defend him against legitimate charges, but we shouldn't throw him to the leftist wolves when the Democrats make false, excessive and otherwise unwarranted charges against him. There are a number of things I will criticize Trump for, but I am not going to accede to the Democrats' outrageously over-the-top characterization of these actions as criminal or impeachable just to appear fairer or nonpartisan.

I'm also not about to quit pointing out the monumentally worse behavior of the leftist media and Democratic Party just to avoid the undiscriminating claim that I am a Trump cheerleader.

We have to analyze whether Trump is culpable of those things of which he has been accused, but in no event should such accusations intimidate or deter us from condemning the left for making false charges and trying to wrongfully undermine Trump's presidency.

Put another way, I am not defending Trump because he is being attacked by the left. I am not attacking the left because I am trying to change the subject from legitimate allegations against Trump. If I defend Trump, it is because I believe he deserves defending, and if I criticize the left, it is because I believe it deserves criticism. I am not compromising my principles to attack the left for trying to smear Trump and destroy this country. I am acting in accordance with my principles.

Sure, Trump shoots from the hip on Twitter and in some interviews, but he did this long before the election. The question isn't whether he says things we wish he wouldn't or commits gaffes. The issue that is before us -- and will remain before us for as long as he's in office because the Democrats will see to it, irrespective of Trump's actions -- is whether Trump engaged in serious misconduct on any of these things. So far, it appears he has not -- from the firing of Comey to alleged collusion with Russia to the Comey memo to the alleged sharing of classified information with Russia. So why are some conservatives suggesting Trump just resign? It is neither prudent nor fair to rush to judgment. Let's be guided by the evidence rather than innuendo or some anti-Trump hysteria.

I admit I'm concerned about Trump's apparent flip-flop on Jerusalem, his seeming ambivalence about certain health care issues, the recent budget fiasco, the wall and confusion around tax reform. I just wish Trump would return forthwith to the agenda on which he was elected and the commitments he made to seeing it through.

I believe that if he would redouble his efforts to clarify his legislative priorities and present strong, viable proposals on all these issues and exercise leadership to advance them, he would unite a majority around him sufficient to pass them. As long as he rededicates himself to his campaign promises, his base will not abandon him, even with his occasional gaffes.

In the meantime, let's recognize that the left is at war with us and is relentless in pursuing it. We must fight back as hard as the left is attacking if we expect our ideas to prevail. And we can do that without compromising our principles, so let's get to work. 

http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/defending-trump-is-not-selling-out/
 
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center