TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~

The Second Class Second Amendment?

by Brian Mark Weber

.
Appellate court plans closed session in mystery
plaintiff's suit against dirty cop-Mueller
by Bill Mears  
{foxnews.com} ~ A federal appeals court announced Friday that it would hold a closed oral argument session on Dec. 14... to address a lawsuit apparently filed against Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller by an unidentified grand jury witness. Much of the detail in the case remains under seal, and there has been intense speculation in the legal and political communities over the identity of the mystery appellant. Speculation in some media was that President Trump himself had filed the lawsuit back in August, but his attorney denied it. The suit could be related to a possible subpoena for the witness to appear before the federal grand jury empaneled by dirty cop-Mueller, who is looking into a range of issues, including the extent of Russia interference in the 2016 election...
.
Dershowitz Rips dirty cop-Mueller for ‘False Statement
Prosecutions’ — ‘They’re Crimes That Were
Committed as the Result of His Appointment’
by Trent Baker
{breitbart.com} ~ Thursday, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz called into Fox News Channel to react to the breaking news of Donald Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen... reaching a plea agreement with FBI special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller to plead guilty for lying to congressional committees as part of the investigation into Russian collusion in the 2016 election. Dershowitz slammed the special counsel for having to “resort to false statement prosecutions,” arguing it shows dirty cop-Mueller “didn’t start with very much” to begin his investigation.”I think the weakness of dirty cop-Mueller’s substantive findings are suggested by the fact that he has to resort to false statement prosecutions, which really shows that he didn’t start with very much, and that the very fact that he’s conducting an investigation has created these crimes,” Dershowitz told Bill Hemmer. “These are not crimes that had been committed prior to his appointment, they’re crimes that were committed as the result of his appointment, and that raises some questions about the role of special prosecutors in creating crimes, or creating opportunities for crimes to be committed.” “In the end, I don’t think dirty cop-Mueller’s going to come up with very much, in terms of criminal conduct, that existed before he was appointed, and that’s pretty shocking,” added Dershowitz.
.
‘The Media Are Cheering for dirty cop-Mueller; 
They Want the President Destroyed’
by Emily Ward
{cnsnews.com} ~ On his nationally syndicated radio talk show, “The Mark Levin Show,” on Thursday night, host and American lawyer Mark Levin said... the American media are “cheering” for special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller, and want to see U.S. President Donald Trump “destroyed.” “The media are cheering for dirty cop-Mueller; they want the president destroyed,” Mark Levin said. “Any leak, any little piece of information involving anybody – incredible.” Levin’s comments came after President Donald Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty on Thursday to lying to Congress about his business dealings in Moscow on behalf of Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign. Cohen’s admission came in the midst of dirty cop-Mueller’s ongoing investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and Russia during the campaign. The president has repeatedly denied that any collusion took place...
.
Senate Intel Committee Has Made 
Criminal Referrals To Mueller, Chairman Reveals  
by Chuck Ross
{dailycaller.com} ~ The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has made criminal referrals to the special counsel’s office... including regarding former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, the chairman of the panel revealed Friday. “We have made referrals to the special prosecutor,” North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr said at a forum held at the University of Texas in Austin. “One instance just highlighted of late, is that the special prosecutor is using the transcripts of interviews that we have used in our committee to indict somebody for lying to Congress.” “It’s a loud message to everybody who’s interviewed by our committee … if you lie to us we’re going to go after you,” the Republican added. Burr was referring to Cohen, who pleaded guilty Thursday to lying to the Senate panel and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in 2017 regarding his work on a deal to build a Trump Tower in Moscow...
.
JW Videos of the Week
How the State Dept. Outsources YOUR Tax Dollars to scumbag-George Soros Front Groups
.
Tom Fitton’s Video Weekly Update – November 30, 2018
.
DOJ & dirty cop-Mueller 'Are All About Getting Trump...Not for Constitutional Govt.'
.
. 

The Second Class Second Amendment?

by Brian Mark Weber:  The Left has, over time, perpetuated the idea that the Bill of Rights, whose 10 amendments were designed to protect individual citizens from government tyranny, somehow includes a Second Amendment that empowers the government to determine when and where those citizens can carry weapons. But why would the Founders go to the trouble of ensuring such rights while allowing the government to snatch them away from an undefended population?

             Still, in 2008 the Supreme Court held 5-4 in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment was an individual right, a decision that former Justice John Paul Stevens called the worst of his tenure. The Federalist’s David Harsanyi  writes, “Earlier this year, in fact, Stevens implored Americans to do what he couldn’t while on the court, and repeal the Second Amendment.”
               The fact that the Heller decision was even necessary reveals just how far we’ve fallen since our founding. The ruling came far too late to push back against decades of leftist propaganda and activism designed to convince millions of Americans that the Second Amendment was far different from the other nine rights — that it was neither individual nor narrowly limited but collective and extremely limited.
               Since then, lower courts have had a field day misinterpreting the Constitution and upholding laws making it harder for citizens to acquire guns. For example, in 2016 the infamous Ninth Circuit Court determined in Peruta v. California  that one must show “good cause” in order to carry a concealed weapon. Sadly, these kinds of outrageous decisions are free to stand as long as the Supreme Court refuses to hear key cases rather than establishing strong precedents that would put the issue to rest.
               As John Yoo and James C. Phillips write at National Review, “Despite the text of the Second Amendment, supporters of a right to bear arms have rooted their arguments in a murky pre-constitutional right to self-defense. As a result, the Supreme Court has shied away from halting the spread of federal and state schemes for gun control, for which the cries will only rise higher after the recent mass shootings. Unless the new conservative majority on the Court, solidified by Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s arrival, places the right to bear arms on a par with the rest of the Bill of Rights, the coming blue wave of gun-control proposals may swamp what the Framers considered a core constitutional right.
               Justice Clarence Thomas made this clear when he recently wrote, “The Framers made a clear choice: They reserved to all Americans the right to bear arms for self-defense. I do not think we should stand by idly while a State denies its citizens that right, particularly when their very lives may depend on it.”
               In order to clarify the intent of the framers, Second Amendment proponents cannot merely fall back onto the amendment itself, but must go back farther to understand its history. We must arm ourselves with centuries of natural law and English common law principles in order to smash the collective-right theory of the 1960s. For now, conservatives are losing the public relations battle that works against the Second Amendment every time there’s a new mass shooting.
               And we had better act swiftly. sick-Nancy Pulosi and company aren’t about to sit back when they take the reins from House Republicans in January.
               Mark Walters writes that, with Democrats in power, “We will see a renewed push for expanded background checks and a ban on so-called high capacity magazines. And I expect we will see some form of ‘assault weapons’ ban as well as a push for federal Extreme Risk Protection Orders and red flag laws. These red flag laws disarm American citizens by violating their due process rights based simply on an allegation that someone may be a danger to themselves or others.
               All this would be of less concern if the Supreme Court and its new, more conservative majority would simply take up more Second Amendment cases and decisively reestablish the self-evident right of American citizens to defend themselves. Indeed, the High Court may be the last best hope for securing this right against a leftist obsession to take it away ~The Patriot Post  

https://patriotpost.us/articles/59767?mailing_id=3908&utm_mediu...

Views: 11

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on December 3, 2018 at 9:23am

Bonnie

Yes I did watch Levin's show last night. It's really shocking what she said about our kids being taught not only in HS but in colleges around this country. Its ashame that we as a country have gone to this length to destroy the USA. Our leaders must wake up and act.

Comment by Bonnie Somer on December 3, 2018 at 9:10am

musket shumusket who cares guns are guns period.  the left deliberately does this they pick

and choose words like Orewell said the words used it is just that way like w/illegal immigrants

or aliens or whatever this is what the left does purposely.   the constitution / the truth be damned

make no mistake we are at war and OUR KIDS ARE THEIR TARGETS TO DO AWAY

W.AMERICA.  THEY DO NOT TEACH HISTORY OR THE CONSTITUTION OR WHAT AND WHY

AMERICA EXISTS THIS IS WHAT WE MUST DO TEACH OUR KIDS NOW.   THE LEFT

MEANS TO END THIS NATION WE CANNOT EVER ALLOW IT.

DID U SEE MARK LEVINS SHOW LAST NIGHT WOW IT WAS ABUT WHAT THEY ARE 

DOING TO OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM   VERY GOOD.  

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

CRIME!! -> Clinton Nightmare! Chief Financial Officer Of Clinton Foundation Turns Government Informant On Crime Family

Donations to the Clinton Foundation plummeted by 90% over a three-year period since Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to President Donald Trump.

But that may be the least of the her worries.

John Solomon from The Hill dropped another bombshell that will keep the Clintons up at night.

The former Chief Financial Officer of the Clinton Foundation has turned on the crime family and is now working as a government informant.

This could spell doom for the Clinton Crime Family.

American Thinker reported:

John Solomon of The Hill reveals the story that has been percolating for a long time but kept tightly under wraps – because that is what serious prosecutors do, especially when grand juries are poring over evidence and issuing indictments that remain sealed until the right moment comes. The trigger for the story coming out now probably is a House subcommittee hearing scheduled next week by Mark Meadows, chair of the House Freedom Caucus, while the GOP still can set the agenda of House hearings.

[A] GOP-led congressional subcommittee, led by Rep. Mark Meadows (N.C.), is planning to hold a hearing next week to review the work of John Huber, the special U.S attorney named a year ago to investigate all things Clinton.

It turns out that whistleblowers inside and outside the Clinton Foundation have amassed “6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI.” Among that evidence can be found:

Those reviews flagged serious concerns about legal compliance, improper commingling of personal and charity business and “quid pro quo” promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.

The submission also cites an interview its investigators conducted with Andrew Kessel that quotes the foundation’s longtime chief financial officer as saying he was unable to stop former President Clinton from “commingling” personal business and charitable activities inside the foundation and that he “knows where all the bodies are buried.”

Their own investigation! That’s hard to put down as politically motivated.

Having the chief financial officer of the Clinton Foundation turn informant is a nightmare for the Clintons. The CFO has to process all the cash, and because that person usually is on the hook for any criminal violations, there is ample incentive to turn state’s evidence.

That evidence was assembled by a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, run by accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators, who alleged the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties.

In addition to the IRS, the firm’s partners have had contact with prosecutors in the main Justice Department in Washington and FBI agents in Little Rock, Ark.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service