~ Featuring ~
    Leftists Inciting Violence Against 
Trump Supporters
Louis DeBroux
California has curriculum modeled more 
on marxism than on markets
By JONATHAN BUTCHE } ~ The California state seal declares “Eureka,” originally a Greek word that means “I found it,” and with good reason... After James Marshall discovered gold in the territory in 1848, the rush was on. By 1852, two years after California gained statehood, the population skyrocketed from 14,000 to 250,000. But times have changed, and people are now leaving. California is the second most expensive state to live in and has the second worst overall tax burden, according to the Tax Foundation. As if that is not enough, California lawmakers want the district schools to focus on progressive grandstanding instead of serving as a ladder of opportunity for children. The state is neglecting the responsibility of public schools to equip students with the knowledge and skills they need for the future. To wit, while 57 percent of black fourth grade students and half of hispanic fourth grade students cannot read at even a basic level, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a law in 2016 that required the state board of education to create a model ethnic studies curriculum, a project that is awash in ambiguous ideas and historical inaccuracies. Start with the definition. The draft materials define ethnic studies as “the disciplinary, loving, and critical praxis of holistic humanity.” Confused? There is a helpful footnote that says, “Throughout this model curriculum, language is used that deliberately offers an alternative to traditional wording that could have a particular context within the dominant culture. More information about these terms can be found in the glossary.” Parents will not know what their child is learning because the state is making up words, but at least there is a glossary. More harmful are the few intelligible ideas. As William Evers, a former member of the California Academic Content Standards Commission, recently pointed out in the Wall Street Journal, the model curriculum says capitalism is a “form of power and oppression” and such systems “dehumanize” people...
Seth Rich’s Family P.I. Confirms Our Worst Fears
By Tori McNabb } ~ Since DNC staffer Seth Rich was murder in Washington, no solid answers have been found. No motive, nothing… until perhaps now... Rich was shot and killed in Northwest D.C. and police labeled it as a botched robbery. However, the online conspiracy theorist would let it go and have continued to tie his death to his work at the DNC. Now we’ve gotten word that there’s new information which may, in fact, prove the conspiracy theorists right! Seth Rich’s family hired P.I. Rod Wheeler to start digging for answers into his death. And Wheeler believes there is tangible evidence on Rich’s own laptop. And this evidence confirms he was communicating with WikiLeaks prior to his death! With this newfound discover, many questions are being asked. Among them, why did the D.C. police insist that it was a robbery gone bad when there was no evidence of that? Wheeler, a former police homicide detective, is running his own parallel investigation at the families request. Wheeler believes there’s a cover-up and the local police were told to back down…“The police department nor the FBI have been forthcoming,” said Wheeler. “They haven’t been cooperating at all. I believe that the answer to solving his death lies on that computer, which I believe is either at the police department or either at the FBI. I have been told both.”When asked if his sources have told him there is information that links Rich to Wikileaks, he said, “Absolutely. Yeah. That’s confirmed.” Wheeler also told the Fox affiliate in D.C., “I have a source inside the police department that has looked at me straight in the eye and said, ‘Rod, we were told to stand down on this case and I can’t share any information with you.’ Now, that is highly unusual for a murder investigation, especially from a police department. Again, I don’t think it comes from the chief’s office, but I do believe there is a correlation between the mayor’s office and the DNC and that is the information that will come out Tuesday.
Trey Gowdy Takes On The Clintons: 
“Trust Me When I Tell You This”
By Tori McNabb
{} ~ Trey Gowdy was on Fox News last night and said, on the scumbag/liar-Clintons, “entanglements” with the Dept. of Justice run much deeper than the average viewer knows... A little cryptic, he told Martha McCallum that “history will be much kinder to scumbag-Jim Comey than the July press conference than the Dems. were”.  “I think he had access to information that, because he is a stand-up guy he’s not gonna disseminate classified information though God knows everybody else is…so all your viewers see is this meeting on the tarmac,” he explained. “scumbag-Jim Comey had access to additional information that I am convinced left him with no other choice but to make the decision he made in July,” Gowdy said. Host McCallum then asked if Gowdy was implying if scumbag-Comey was pressured into clearing scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing. “No…he wanted to safeguard the integrity of the investigation, the integrity of the process, and I probably ought to just leave it right there,” Gowdy replied.“Trust me when I tell you this, Martha — I know what it was and I have been a critic of scumbag-James Comey in the past. But he made the only decision he could have made with respect to appropriating that decision away from the Department of Justice and making the decision himself.” “I only take away from that that you are suggesting that there were more entanglements between the scumbag/liar-Clintons and perhaps the Justice Department than everyone understands,” McCallum guessed. “You’re very perceptive,” Gowdy confirmed. I hate that Gowdy doesn’t plan to run again… he’s a force of nature that’s much needed on the hill these days.
scumbag/liar-nObama National Security adviser comes under heightened scrutiny for the 2017 unmasking’ of Trump officials
by Jerry McCormick } ~ In the final days of Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s presidency, numerous Trump campaign officials were “unmasked” by then-National Security adviser liar-Susan Rice... Now, it seems quite clear that the move was both unprecedented and politically motivated, according to One America News Network (OAN). Typically, during investigations as elaborate and secretive as the one into alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign team and Russia, the identities of individuals being probed are protected. This is done to protect the individual from being scrutinized prior to the investigation being completed, and to prevent them from being falsely accused, particularly if no indictment ever materializes. Generally speaking, the number of people who can “unmask” a protected individual is kept to a minimum. However, during the latter part of the scumbag/liar-nObama administration, all of those protocols seemed to change. Not only were more officials given the authority to “unmask” the subjects of federal probes, but Trump officials were also unmasked for what seemed to be political reasons, according to OAN. At the time of the unmasking by liar-Rice, the scumbag/liar-Obama administration was investigating back-channel communications between the Trump campaign and the United Arab Emirates. Suspicions had started to arise when Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan came to New York in December 2016. Since UAE diplomats did not notify the United States of his travel, as is customary, everyone’s ears went up. So in early 2017, liar-Rice requested that Americans in a related classified report be unmasked. The overall concern was that the UAE was setting up back-channel communications between Russia and the Trump campaign. But based on the reports of UAE officials, who stated the meeting was nothing more than getting the president-elect’s “view of the region and what the U.S. role should be,” liar-Rice’s unmasking seems completely inappropriate. Now the question remains: What else did the scumbag/liar-nObama administration do wrong?  
scumbag/liar-Hillary’s 30,000 
deleted ‘yoga’ emails found
by ~ Copies of nearly all of the emails scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton sent and received while she was secretary of state – including the infamous missing 30,000 messages... were stored at a cryptically named Gmail address, according to a new Senate report. The Daily Caller News Foundation reported the newly disclosed finding means that copies of classified and deleted emails likely existed on Google’s U.S.-based servers. The FBI, according to the Senate report, was aware of that fact and the suspicious explanation for it but did not alert other intelligence agencies or the public. The suspicious Gmail address was set up by an IT aide, Paul Combetta, who worked for a company that managed scumbag/liar-Clinton’s unauthorized server, Platte River Networks, according to the FBI. It was Combetta who used the software program BleachBit to permanently erase copies of scumbag/liar-Clinton’s emails after they were subpoenaed by the House. Combetta misled the FBI about his actions and was given immunity from prosecution, the Daily Caller noted. He refused to cooperate with the Justice Department Inspector General and with the authors of the Senate report about his use of the Gmail address. He previously pleaded the Fifth before Congress in September 2016 about his deletion of emails. The investigative team of Charles McCullough, the intelligence community inspector general, found that every one of scumbag/liar-Clinton’s emails except four were secretly copied to the the Gmail address,, according to the report. McCullough investigator Frank Rucker told Senate investigators that when he brought the findings to Peter Strzok, the anti-Trump FBI agent seemed uninterested and did not ask any follow-up questions. A redacted and paraphrased version of the interview transcript was released Wednesday...
Leftists Inciting Violence Against 
Trump Supporters
Louis DeBroux:  Democrat politicians are going to get people killed, and they don’t seem to care.

In the aftermath of mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton, anyone standing between a Democrat politician and a TV camera would have been trampled to death in the stampede to publicly blame the shootings on President Trump.

One after another, they blamed the shootings on Trump’s “rhetoric” and his supposed racism, despite the fact that the Dayton shooter was a hard-core Elizabeth dinky-Warren supporter, and the El Paso shooter’s manifesto was comprised of a litany of left-wing grievances.

If Democrats are to be believed, Trump’s insisting that our borders be secured incites violence from the Right (which never seems to appear). But when will Democrats take responsibility for their coarsening of the public discourse, which has led to actual violence?

In the last few weeks, we have seen Democrat activists swarm Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s house screaming death threats, Democrat Rep. worthless-Ilhan Omar celebrating a violent attack on Sen. Rand Paul, and ads for a movie in which liberal elites hunt down and kill Trump supporters for sport. We’ve also seen Democrat Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez refer to ICE detention centers as “concent..., shortly after which an antifa activist firebombed an ICE detention center in Tacoma, Washington.

Not to mention the violent physical assaults against Trump supporters that have been occurring with increasing regularity around the country, as you can see herehereherehere, and here.

In light of these escalating tensions, it is unconscionable that a sitting Democrat congressman would intentionally incite violence against fellow Americans over political differences. Yet that is exactly what occurred last week.

Democrat Rep. Joaquin Castro (TX), brother of Democratic presidential candidate Julián Castro, posted on Twitter the names and employers of 44 San Antonio residents who donated the maximum allowable amount ($5,600) to President Trump’s reelection campaign, claiming, “Their contributions are fueling a campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as ‘invaders.’” Among these donors were not only local business owners but retirees and homemakers.

Ironically, of the 44 doxxed donors, six had donated to the political campaigns of Juan and Julio Castro. One of those donors, William Greehey, a philanthropist who spent $100 million to fund a homeless campus project that serves mainly Hispanics, was furious, saying “he’s calling me a racist because I’m supporting Trump. I mean, this is just ridiculous… There’s a lot of things you don’t like about the president and his tweeting, but here Castro is doing the same thing with his tweeting.”

San Antonio real-estate developer Donald Kuyrkendall, who also previously donated to Julian Castro’s mayoral campaign, expressed concern for the safety of his wife and children and wondered what Castro’s goal is in outing Trump donors. He asked, “Were his intentions to incite people to picket Bill Miller’s barbecue or to come to Don Kuyrkendall’s house, you know, assault my wife, make nasty comments?” He continued, “This kind of silliness is not good for anybody, especially with the climate we have right now with two mass shootings in a weekend. There’s just no reason to highlight individuals and their companies… I don’t even know what he thinks we are — bad guys, because we support Republicans?”

Following the backlash over his despicable act, Castro disingenuously claimed he wasn’t trying to stoke harassment or violence against the outed donors. What, then, was the goal of the tweet? What did he want his supporters to do with that information?

As Trump campaign director Tim Murtaugh asked “How low have Dems sunk? This is Joaquin Castro, Congressman & chair of his brother’s campaign. Naming private citizens & their employers, targeting them for political views and exercising 1st Amendment rights,” and correctly noting, “At the very least, @Castro4Congress is inviting harassment of these private citizens. At worst, he’s encouraging violence.”

USA Today editor David Mastio called this a “dangerous escalation,” and political commentator Stephen Miller asked “What the [expletive] is this? Democrat candidates are openly targeting private businesses on social media now? … Would love the logic of telling people to give up their guns squared with these same people inciting a mob to attack a private business.”

One wonders if Castro would think this type of doxxing is still benign if the NRA posted a list of Castro’s donors with the caption, “Their contributions are fueling a campaign to strip you of your 2nd Amendment rights, leaving you defenseless!” Or if the National Right to Life doxxed donors to pro-abortion Democrats with the message, “Their contributions are fueling a campaign of death, paying for the murder of a MILLION babies last year!”

The political Left uses doxxing as a tool to intimidate, threaten, and destroy their political enemies. In 1958, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, upheld the right of the NAACP to keep its membership records (i.e., its donors) private, despite a subpoena from the state of Alabama. The reason should be obvious to any intelligent person.

We must now extend those same privacy protections to political donations and strip these disgusting thugs of a tool that is used to suppress free speech, facilitate political extortion, and threaten public safety.  ~The Patriot Post  

Views: 7


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson


Joe Biden Talks To The Dead: – He Worked On Paris Climate Deal With Long-Dead Chinese Leader

Former Vice President Joe Biden mistakenly claimed on Monday that he worked on the Paris Climate Accord with former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping — who died more than 20 years before its signing.

Zach Parkinson  

Joe Biden claimed tonight that he worked with Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping on the Paris Climate Accord.

Except the current Chinese President is Xi Jinping.

Deng Xiapoing left office in 1992 and has been dead for 23 years.

Biden made the gaffe while citing his accomplishments in President Barack Obama’s administration.

“One of the things I’m proudest of is getting passed, getting moved, getting in control of the Paris Climate Accord,” Biden said in a speech at the College of Charleston. “I’m the guy who came back after meeting with Deng Xiaoping and making the case that I believe China will join if we put pressure on them. We got almost 200 nations to join.”

Xiaoping served as the leader of China from 1978 until his retirement in 1992, and passed away in 1997. Xi Jinping, China’s current president, came to power 2013 and signed the country onto the 2016 agreement.

In June 2017, President Trump announced that the U.S. would withdraw from the agreement, stating that accord will “undermine the economy” and “puts [the United States] at a permanent disadvantage.”

In addition to the Xiaoping gaffe, Biden bizarrely declared in a campaign speech that he is a “candidate for the United States Senate” and that people could “vote for the other Biden” if they prefer one of his rivals.

“My name is Joe Biden. I’m a Democratic candidate for the United States Senate. Look me over, if you like what you see, help out. If not, vote for the other Biden,” the 77-year-old said at the First in the South Dinner.

Biden’s confusing comments come as Democrat primary candidates are scheduled to debate in Charleston Tuesday evening. The former vice president faces increasing pressure to give a standout performance as his “firewall” in the Palmetto State crumbles in the face of a surging Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). The Vermont senator is fresh off a decisive victory in Nevada caucuses on Saturday. Earlier this month, he placed first the New Hampshire primary and won the popular vote in Iowa. In a survey released Monday, the Public Policy Polling outfit said Biden leads South Carolina with 36 percent of support and Sanders is in second at 21 percent.

Hannity: Bernie's beyond gross article

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service