The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Actually, It’s the Religious Left That’s Dying
by Minister Michael Brown
.
Just Get Rid of the Debt Ceiling?
by Thomas Gallatin: One of the results from Donald Trump’s decision to side with Democrats on connecting the Hurricane Harvey relief package with raising the debt ceiling was an agreement that the debt ceiling should be eliminated altogether. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee expressed Trump’s position on the issue, stating, “The president encouraged congressional leaders to find a more permanent solution to the debt ceiling so the vote is not so frequently politicized.” House Majority Leader Paul Ryan (R-WI) argued against the idea, saying, “I think the debt limit should be used to try to bring reform in Congress. I think the debt limit is a good vote to have.”
Trump’s plan isn’t good news for fiscal conservatives, but it’s not surprising news either. From an ideological perspective, Trump isn’t a fiscal conservative, and thus his stance on the debt ceiling doesn’t look good. Concerns over too much government spending and a ballooning national debt leading to an eventual crisis are real. Hence the logic behind the debt ceiling. However, practically speaking, the debt ceiling has proven to be little more than a minor speed bump, good only for providing regularly repeated moments of political grandstanding and partisan bickering threatening government shutdowns, all the while the spending continues and the debt grows. Political theater vs. actual solutions.
Trump is clearly not an ideologue, and his frustration with Republicans over their inability to repeal liar-nObamaCare has given him license to seek solutions across the political aisle. Practically speaking, this consideration by Trump makes sense, and it removes an obstacle for Republicans in the future. The growing debt problem most certainly needs to be addressed, but the debt ceiling has proven inadequate for the task. ~The Patriot Post
.
.
PULOSI Lays Off Trump, Into SESSIONS
and BANNON as White Supremacist DACA Haters
by rickwells.us
{rickwells.us} ~ Babbling dunderhead Pulosi starts her comments a few different ways before lining her thoughts up into a complete sentence, albeit a contorted one... She didn’t want to attack President Trump in her customary manner, the reason she had to restart, because he just gave her everything she and “clown-Chuck” wanted and she expects more to come. She’ll be civil towards him until the gifts stop flowing. Instead she attacked Attorney General Sessions. It’s not because he’s letting Lois Lerner, liar-Clinton, Comey or any of the many other criminal Democrats walk free, or interfering through obstructions, redactions and delays with every investigative effort... http://rickwells.us/pelosi-sessions-bannon-white-supremacist/
.
{greatamericandaily.com} ~ RINO-Jeff Flake continues to fight Donald Trump’s agenda. He gave one interview where he made jaw dropping comments about Trump’s proposed border wall... And he uttered seven words that were the final nail in the coffin for his political career. Arizona’s RINO-Jeff Flake continues to play to the cheers of the liberal media. He gave an interview on CNN where he sold out the GOP by flatly stating that if Trump meant a wall would secure the border “then no, nobody ought to support that.”... http://greatamericandaily.com/anti-trump-rino-ended-his-career-with-these-seven-words/
Anti-Trump RINO Ended His
Career With These Seven Words
.
DACA Is Unconstitutional, as liar-nObama Admitted
by Hans A. von Spakovsky
{heritage.org} ~ President Donald Trump has caught a lot of heat for rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program with a six-month wind-down... Few people seem aware that he's ending an administrative amnesty for illegal aliens that President Barack liar-nObama lacked the constitutional and legal authority to implement. How do we know? Because even liar-nObama admitted it – repeatedly. Responding in October 2010 to demands that he implement immigration reforms unilaterally, liar=-nObama declared, "I am not king. I can't do these things just by myself." In March 2011, he said that with "respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that's just not the case." In May 2011, he acknowledged that he couldn't "just bypass Congress and change the immigration law myself. That's not how a democracy works." Yet in 2012, he did it anyway... http://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/daca-unconstitutional-obama-admitted?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=theinsider&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTkdKa01tTmtNamhtT0dGaiIsInQiOiJlZmdlYVQ5Qm5ldEpJM2swaGpIVGNXMHV0bXRMcXBLcnpDWE9Tc1hRZ1UwekZPRHFSMEpYblNPeTE0V2ZcLzNWRkxIejNNaTlLbHNNWk42Nk1IRExndXh4ZytTMU9UeHhyZnM2UDNFc2grZ01rWUlHYUFVbFVaUDZkaGUyMkhHY0gifQ.
Terrorists in Germany's Parliament?
Terrorists of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in Jordan
by Bruce Bawer
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ In a remarkable decision taken at the end of August, Germany's Interior Ministry declined to bar the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) -- listed as a terrorist organization by the US, Canada, the European Union, and Australia... "from campaigning as a political party in the September general election to the Bundestag." Yes, the PFLP -- on a joint list with the Marxist-Leninist Party -- plans to field candidates in this month's elections in Germany and run for Parliament. What is the PFLP? Formed shortly after Israel's Six-Day War through the merger of three militant groups -- The Young Avengers Palestinian nationalists, The Heroes of the Return based in Lebanon, and the Palestinian Liberation Front which operated largely out of Syria and the West Bank -- it is today, after Fatah, the second largest faction in the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10957/germany-election-pflp-terroristsTerrorists of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in Jordan
by Bruce Bawer
.
VIDEOS
VIDEOSBlack Trump Supporter Rips Maxine Waters Outside of Her DC Office!
.
Mexico Hit By Largest Earthquake In A Century 8.5 on Richter Scale
.
Law Prof. Alan Dershowitz: Menendez Saying Trial Is Anti-Hispanic Is A “Mistake”
.
ISIS Invading Afghanistan: They Set My Husband On Fire
.
.
by Minister Michael Brown
{townhall.com} ~ No sooner had the Nashville Statement on biblical sexuality been issued then we began to hear a common refrain from the left. “This is another sign that the religious right is dying! This statement represents the last gasp of the old, antiquated guard! It’s time to say good bye and good riddance! Let’s welcome the new thing the Spirit is doing!”
In reality, it is the religious left that is dying, while those who uphold Scripture are seeing blessing and increase around the globe. Before I back up this statement, here’s what some “progressive” Christian leaders are saying.
Writing for the Huffington Post, seminary professor Greg Lancaster scornfully claims, “Their public audience shrinking, their public presence waning, and their credibility shot to hell, the Christian right needs attention.”
His article is titled, “The Nashville Statement and the Decline of the Religious Right,” and he concludes with this salvo: “In the end we’re stuck with a meaningless document. It adds nothing to the conversation that hasn’t been said. If anything, its fake compassion increases the agony of LGBT Christians. All that’s accomplished by this document is a little press for the religious leaders who signed it, a whiff of air time for the disenfranchised. The Statement underscores the obvious: in the age of Trump, the Christian Right has lost its moral authority. These guys — they’re almost all men – may be have a spiffy website, but nobody’s listening.”
Pastor John Pavlovitz, a frequent critic of conservative evangelicals, recasts the Nashville Statement in his own words. He claims that the framers of the Nashville Statement are really saying, “We've chosen to wage cheap war on innocent and vulnerable people homosexuals in order to feel mighty again.” Quick note to Pastor Pavlovitz: I appreciate your rhetorical flourish, but do you really believe this?
This is how he rewrites the statement’s Preamble: “Evangelical Christians are at the precipice of extinction—and we know it. We are a profoundly endangered species coming to grips with the urgency of the moment, of our impending disappearance, of the whole thing going sideways here in the Bible Belt—and we’re in a bit of a panic.
“We are leaking people from our churches, watching multitudes walk away in disgust, and losing market share in the religious landscape, as well as the vice-like stranglehold we’ve had on American politics for the past 241 years—and we are rightly terrified.”
So much for the Pavlovitz paraphrase. Shall we return to reality?
It is certainly true that many evangelicals, me included, are deeply concerned about the moral and spiritual condition of our nation. And it is certainly true that we are heavily burdened for the many young people who have dropped out of church and consider themselves “nones” – having no religious affiliation.
But, as has been demonstrated time and time again, it is the so-called progressive churches that are “leaking” and the liberal denominations that are fading. This is true in America as well as around the world. And since the so-called progressive Christians have pointed to numbers, let’s take a more careful look.
Out of the 100 largest churches in America, how many are conservative? The vast majority, at the least. The same with the fastest growing churches and the fastest growing denominations. Almost all of them hold to conservative biblical values, even if they are “progressive” and chic and cutting-edge in other ways. Almost all of them would affirm the basic tenets of the Nashville Statement, at least in private.
Out of the most rapidly shrinking denominations, how many are liberal? Almost all of them? Which seminaries are bleeding the most, conservative or liberal? Take a guess. And how about major youth gatherings – yes, youth gatherings – for prayer and worship and teaching? Which events draw the biggest crowds? If you said “conservative” you’d be right again.
In recent years, I’ve been invited to speak on the subject of “Can You Be Gay and Christian?” at: 1) the most financially generous church in America, which gives more than one million dollars to world missions every month; 2) the largest megachurch in Europe, with a membership of more than 70,000; and 3) the largest evangelical church in the Philippines, with a sanctuary that seats 10,000 and a much larger membership than that.
And this represents a much larger pattern: The most thriving, growing churches in the world hold to conservative sexual ethics.
In contrast, churches like the once influential GracePointe in Franklin, Tennessee have seen a massive decline in numbers after embracing same-sex “marriage,” losing as much as 80 percent of its membership in the last few years.
As for having a national influence, isn’t it interesting that, this same, vilified “religious right” that was deemed almost dead and buried just a few years back is the key spiritual group seeking to provide godly counsel to the president? And didn’t some of these religious “has-beens” help defeat pro-abortion candidate liar-Hillary Clinton? And should I mention that a good number of the signers to the Nashville Statement can hardly be categorized as politically-affiliated members of “the religious right”?
Putting things into a larger perspective, Mark Tooley notes that, “Critics of the Nashville Statement should realize that about 95 percent of the world’s approximately 2.5 billion professed Christians are associated with branches of Christianity that share the Nashville Statement’s perspective. Of course not all are compliant with those teachings, and nobody complies completely, everyone relying on grace. But these teachings are the constant shelter under which the universal church rests.”
And, he states, “Dissenting Christian institutions are almost entirely confined to declining Western liberal Protestant denominations. If the Nashville Statement’s critics were correct, these dying churches should be flourishing by their embrace of the spirit of the age. But in almost every culture and time, spiritual seekers are more drawn to religion that challenges, not that accommodates.”
Of course, numbers alone prove nothing, but since progressives keep pointing to numbers, we should respond with truth. And where other signs of spiritual vitality are measured – prayer and study of Scripture and wining the lost and caring for the needy and investing in family – it will be seen that, around the globe, those who hold to the authority of the Word are reproducing in a far healthier way.
I have no problem with leaders wishing that the Nashville Statement made reference to the many sins in our own camp, such as rampant divorce and pornography, or that it confessed our past failings to reach out compassionately to those who identify as LGBT.
But the reality is that, to the extent the religious left departs from the clear testimony of Scripture, to that extent it will lack the blessing of God. And to that extent it will fail to do the very thing it wants to do: namely, reach a hurting and dying world with the message of forgiveness and transformation.
Grace and truth cannot be separated without doing immeasurable harm to one or the other.
Actually, It’s the Religious Left That’s Dying
{townhall.com} ~ No sooner had the Nashville Statement on biblical sexuality been issued then we began to hear a common refrain from the left. “This is another sign that the religious right is dying! This statement represents the last gasp of the old, antiquated guard! It’s time to say good bye and good riddance! Let’s welcome the new thing the Spirit is doing!”
In reality, it is the religious left that is dying, while those who uphold Scripture are seeing blessing and increase around the globe. Before I back up this statement, here’s what some “progressive” Christian leaders are saying.
Writing for the Huffington Post, seminary professor Greg Lancaster scornfully claims, “Their public audience shrinking, their public presence waning, and their credibility shot to hell, the Christian right needs attention.”
His article is titled, “The Nashville Statement and the Decline of the Religious Right,” and he concludes with this salvo: “In the end we’re stuck with a meaningless document. It adds nothing to the conversation that hasn’t been said. If anything, its fake compassion increases the agony of LGBT Christians. All that’s accomplished by this document is a little press for the religious leaders who signed it, a whiff of air time for the disenfranchised. The Statement underscores the obvious: in the age of Trump, the Christian Right has lost its moral authority. These guys — they’re almost all men – may be have a spiffy website, but nobody’s listening.”
Pastor John Pavlovitz, a frequent critic of conservative evangelicals, recasts the Nashville Statement in his own words. He claims that the framers of the Nashville Statement are really saying, “We've chosen to wage cheap war on innocent and vulnerable people homosexuals in order to feel mighty again.” Quick note to Pastor Pavlovitz: I appreciate your rhetorical flourish, but do you really believe this?
This is how he rewrites the statement’s Preamble: “Evangelical Christians are at the precipice of extinction—and we know it. We are a profoundly endangered species coming to grips with the urgency of the moment, of our impending disappearance, of the whole thing going sideways here in the Bible Belt—and we’re in a bit of a panic.
“We are leaking people from our churches, watching multitudes walk away in disgust, and losing market share in the religious landscape, as well as the vice-like stranglehold we’ve had on American politics for the past 241 years—and we are rightly terrified.”
So much for the Pavlovitz paraphrase. Shall we return to reality?
It is certainly true that many evangelicals, me included, are deeply concerned about the moral and spiritual condition of our nation. And it is certainly true that we are heavily burdened for the many young people who have dropped out of church and consider themselves “nones” – having no religious affiliation.
But, as has been demonstrated time and time again, it is the so-called progressive churches that are “leaking” and the liberal denominations that are fading. This is true in America as well as around the world. And since the so-called progressive Christians have pointed to numbers, let’s take a more careful look.
Out of the 100 largest churches in America, how many are conservative? The vast majority, at the least. The same with the fastest growing churches and the fastest growing denominations. Almost all of them hold to conservative biblical values, even if they are “progressive” and chic and cutting-edge in other ways. Almost all of them would affirm the basic tenets of the Nashville Statement, at least in private.
Out of the most rapidly shrinking denominations, how many are liberal? Almost all of them? Which seminaries are bleeding the most, conservative or liberal? Take a guess. And how about major youth gatherings – yes, youth gatherings – for prayer and worship and teaching? Which events draw the biggest crowds? If you said “conservative” you’d be right again.
In recent years, I’ve been invited to speak on the subject of “Can You Be Gay and Christian?” at: 1) the most financially generous church in America, which gives more than one million dollars to world missions every month; 2) the largest megachurch in Europe, with a membership of more than 70,000; and 3) the largest evangelical church in the Philippines, with a sanctuary that seats 10,000 and a much larger membership than that.
And this represents a much larger pattern: The most thriving, growing churches in the world hold to conservative sexual ethics.
In contrast, churches like the once influential GracePointe in Franklin, Tennessee have seen a massive decline in numbers after embracing same-sex “marriage,” losing as much as 80 percent of its membership in the last few years.
As for having a national influence, isn’t it interesting that, this same, vilified “religious right” that was deemed almost dead and buried just a few years back is the key spiritual group seeking to provide godly counsel to the president? And didn’t some of these religious “has-beens” help defeat pro-abortion candidate liar-Hillary Clinton? And should I mention that a good number of the signers to the Nashville Statement can hardly be categorized as politically-affiliated members of “the religious right”?
Putting things into a larger perspective, Mark Tooley notes that, “Critics of the Nashville Statement should realize that about 95 percent of the world’s approximately 2.5 billion professed Christians are associated with branches of Christianity that share the Nashville Statement’s perspective. Of course not all are compliant with those teachings, and nobody complies completely, everyone relying on grace. But these teachings are the constant shelter under which the universal church rests.”
And, he states, “Dissenting Christian institutions are almost entirely confined to declining Western liberal Protestant denominations. If the Nashville Statement’s critics were correct, these dying churches should be flourishing by their embrace of the spirit of the age. But in almost every culture and time, spiritual seekers are more drawn to religion that challenges, not that accommodates.”
Of course, numbers alone prove nothing, but since progressives keep pointing to numbers, we should respond with truth. And where other signs of spiritual vitality are measured – prayer and study of Scripture and wining the lost and caring for the needy and investing in family – it will be seen that, around the globe, those who hold to the authority of the Word are reproducing in a far healthier way.
I have no problem with leaders wishing that the Nashville Statement made reference to the many sins in our own camp, such as rampant divorce and pornography, or that it confessed our past failings to reach out compassionately to those who identify as LGBT.
But the reality is that, to the extent the religious left departs from the clear testimony of Scripture, to that extent it will lack the blessing of God. And to that extent it will fail to do the very thing it wants to do: namely, reach a hurting and dying world with the message of forgiveness and transformation.
Grace and truth cannot be separated without doing immeasurable harm to one or the other.
Comments