TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Analysis: The Mob Defeated, Justice Prevails
by Guy Benson  
.
Devin Nunes Discusses FISA Investigation, Rod Rosenstein,
Currently Corrupt DOJ/FBI, and dirty cop-Mueller
by sundance
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes appears with Maria Bartiromo to discuss the ongoing FISA abuse investigation... the use of Michael Sussmann to act as a go-between for the dummycrats-DNC and FBI; the status of Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, and his upcoming (10/11) testimony; current visible activity within the DOJ that points to their ongoing corruption; and how all of that relates to the dirty cop-Robert Mueller investigation. This is a very important interview segment because it dovetails with the much larger issue CTH outlined about: “How Deep Is This Swamp“?  Believe me, you’re going to want to watch this several times to absorb the bigger-big picture that Nunes is careful to explain. Working backwards from the interview content is perhaps the best way to discuss. Nunes cannot say it out loud, but when he outlines what the dirty cop-Mueller investigation *is not* doing, he is highlighting the purpose of Special Counsel placement. dirty cop-Robert Mueller the entire team was put into place, carefully selected by James Baker and Andrew McCabe, specifically to cover for the DOJ and FBI activity that preceded the firing of scumbag-James Comey.   dirty cop-Mueller’s role has two essential aspects...  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/07/very-important-in...
Lindsey Graham throws down the gauntlet, challenges
Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer in fiery interview
by Chris Enloe
{theblaze.com} ~ dummycrats-Democrats have already threatened to investigate — or even try to impeach — Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh... should they retake control of the House after November’s midterm elections. On Sunday, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham (R) responded to the news by throwing down a challenge to Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer (D-N.Y.). At first, when asked about the threat, made primarily by Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) who is the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, Graham vowed to campaign against his congressional colleagues in the run up to November’s elections, something he said he’s never done before. “I’ve never campaigned against a colleague in my life. That’s about to change. I’m gonna go throughout this country and let people in these, you know, purple states, red states where Trump won know what I think about this process,” Graham said on “Fox News Sunday.”...
.
American Bar Association to reopen
Kavanaugh evaluation, citing ‘temperament’
{conservativeinstitute.org} ~ Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s opponents continue to find new avenues of attack. The latest comes from the American Bar Association (ABA)... On Friday, the ABA sent a letter to leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee stating that it is going to reopen its evaluation of Judge Kavanaugh, citing his “temperament.”Addressing committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA) and ranking member Dianne Fein-stein (D-CA), the ABA wrote, “New information of a material nature regarding temperament during the September 27th hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee has prompted a reopening of the Standing Committee’s evaluation.” The referred to date, September 27th, is the day that both accuser Christine Blasey Ford and Judge Kavanaugh testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding Ford’s sexual misconduct allegations. During his testimony, Kavanaugh, with the justified indignance of a man whose reputation is being dragged through the mud, made an emotional plea that included expressions of grief and outrage. The latter is what opened up this new avenue of attack, as members of the left immediately began arguing that Kavanaugh lacks the temperament befitting a judge... The ABA board would act the same way. The FBI has investigated Kavanaugh 7 times and found nothing. What is wrong with you ABA.   https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/bar-associa...
.
FBI Smoking Gun: Redactions Protected
Political Embarrassement, Not National Security
by JOHN SOLOMON
{thehill.com} ~ To declassify or not to declassify? That is the question, when it comes to the FBI’s original evidence in the Russia collusion case... The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI have tried to thwart President Trump on releasing the evidence, suggesting it will harm national security, make allies less willing to cooperate, or even leave him vulnerable to accusations that he is trying to obstruct the end of the Russia probe. Before you judge the DOJ’s and FBI’s arguments — which are similar to those offered to stop the release of information in other major episodes of American history, from the Bay of Pigs to 9/11 — consider Footnote 43 on Page 57 of Chapter 3 of the House Intelligence Committee’s report earlier this year on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Until this past week, the footnote really had garnered no public intrigue, in part because the U.S. intelligence community blacked out the vast majority of its verbiage in the name of national security before the report was made public. From the heavy redactions, all one could tell is that FBI general counsel James Baker met with an unnamed person who provided some information in September 2016 about Russia, email hacking and a possible link to the Trump campaign. Not a reporter or policymaker would have batted an eyelash over such a revelation...  https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/410287-fbis-smoking-gun-red...
.
Hypocrite scumbag/liar-Eric Holder Laments Kavanaugh
Confirmation While Ignoring His Own Transgressions
by SUZANNE HAMNER
{freedomoutpost.com} ~ As predicted, dummycrays-Democrats were unsatisfied with the results of the FBI investigation conducted at the behest of Sen. rino-Jeff Flake (R-AZ)... but, Kavanaugh was confirmed after the "nothing burger" report was presented to the Senate.  The fake piety and righteousness exhibited by charlatan, corrupt, crooked, criminal, traitorous dummycrays-Democrats over the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court is worse than hypocrisy. It's a "pot meet kettle" type of mental illness. Of course, this surprised no one since the response of these anti-constitutionalists is "doubling down" on their agenda. The former AG, contemplating a 2020 bid for the presidency, remains in contempt of Congress for his refusal to turn over information and documents related to the Hussein Soetoro administration scandal "Fast and Furious". The gun running scheme resulted in the death of border agent Brian Terry, a Mexican beauty pageant winner, and numerous other innocent individuals. scumbag/liar-Holder became the first Attorney General to be held in both criminal and civil contempt. But, that didn't stop him from exhibiting pious and self-righteous behavior concerning the unsubstantiated, unfounded, uncorroborated allegations of sexual assault against Kavanaugh. When talking about trust, scumbag/liar-Holder could be called the least trustworthy AG of all time. The Conservative Firing Line reported that scumbag/liar-Holder filed lawsuits against several States, challenging their Voter ID laws, prosecuted military members like Clint Lorance for doing their job, and allowing true criminals to operate with impunity... It would be a very big mistake if he became President.
.
. 
Analysis: The Mob Defeated, Justice Prevails

by Guy Benson

{townhall.com} ~ Following a disgracefully hideous  confirmation brawl, Judge Brett Kavanaugh has been confirmed by the United States Senate, and will soon be sworn in as the next Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. All Republicans voted 'aye,' except for Alaska's rino-Lisa Murkowski, who cast a 'present vote' in order to effectively cancel out the absence of a Kavanaugh-supporting colleague who is attending his daughter's wedding. All dummycrats-Democrats voted nay, except for West Virginia's Joe Manchin, who respected the strong sentiments of his constituents and likely solidified his re-election in the process. A brutal, draining fight is over. Justice has prevailed.

I made my closing argument for Kavanaugh last Friday. If anything, the charges against him only grew weaker and more dubious over the course of the ensuing week. In my advocacy of a brief FBI probe into the less ludicrous accusations against him -- both of which remain uncorroborated and lacking any verifiable credibility -- I reasoned that such a course of action could help provide some added legitimacy and closure in the eyes of non-hardcore partisans, many of whom have been undecided or ambivalent on the Kavanaugh nomination. The goal was never to satisfy implacable hacks; it was to mitigate broader public bitterness and suspicion about the process. At the Weekly Standard, John McCormack makes a strong case that the resulting discrete, limited FBI foray achieved the outcome of helping Kavanaugh's confirmation.  

He argues that the probe (a) produced no new incriminating information against the nominee although it did apparently turn up questionable conduct by Dr. Ford's allies, (b) allowed additional time for the sensational 'gang rape ring' claim to collapse, (c) gave space for Ms. Ramirez's "corroborating" anonymous hearsay witness to be refuted, (d) bought time for Dr. Ford's inconsistencies to be thoroughly examined, and (e) let allies slap down various "perjury" attacks.Thanks to the Left's endless, media-aided smears and hyperventilation, there will always be something of a cloud over Kavanaugh in some Americans' minds.  But the FBI's involvement, and the slight prolonging of this process, assisted in dissipating that cloud for many fair-minded people. One of those people is Sen. Susan Collins, whose lengthy, careful Friday floor speech laid out the reasons why the evidence against Kavanaugh was extremely flimsy not coming close to meeting her 'preponderance of evidence' standard, and why the presumption of innocence is a bedrock American value:

VIDEO:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irJtD5nP554

She delivered her remarks while flanked by two other pro-Kavanaugh female Senators, clearly mindful of the optics. Her comments explicitly cited the extra Judiciary Committee hearing and FBI probe as steps she found valuable in coming to her ultimate conclusion to favor confirmation. Contrast Collin's logically-crafted reasoning with the non-sequitur, guilt-by-association emotionalism of Sen. rino-Murkowski, and the 'it doesn't matter what the truth is' cynicism of Democrats like Sen. Booker. Night and day.  In any case, without an extended period to allow for FBI intervention, I'm not sure Kavanaugh gets the key triumvirate of Collins, Flake and Manchin to cascade in his direction.  It was the right move, substantively and strategically.

Now that Kavanaugh has been approved, I do not feel happiness.  I'm still appalled by everything that just transpired. I'm fearful about the zero-sum, say-anything nature of our politics. I'm furious at an activist media that couldn't disguise its rooting interests, evidenced by repeated abandonments of core journalistic practices.  That said, I'm gratified that the Bad Faith Mob lost, that their disgusting tactics were not rewarded, and that reason and evidence carried the day -- albeit frighteningly narrowly. It's more relief than anything else.  Relief that a grave injustice has been averted. For those with lingering doubts about Kavanaugh's guilt, and the evidentiary standards applied during this melee, read this thorough, important piecefrom David French:

https://twitter.com/EliLake/status/1048346530229506054?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1048346530229506054&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fguybenson%2F2018%2F10%2F06%2Fjustice-gorsuch-justice-prevails-n2526063

His bottom line:

  • In reviewing the record, we see time and again the same pattern. Serious accusations are made, conventional wisdom sets in, and then the accusation unravels. The pattern holds with the claims of sexual assault, indecent exposure, and gang rape, and it holds with allegations of perjury. Simply put, the evidence does not support the sexual misconduct claims against Kavanaugh, nor does it support the claims that he lied to defend himself...Like it or not, we have reached the point where tens of millions of Americans simply do not care about the truth. They scorn civility. But we cannot reach the point where evidence no longer matters, only outcomes. We cannot sacrifice a man’s reputation on the altar of politics, no matter how consequential the political dispute. At the same time, however, we cannot simply assume that our political opponents are always, everywhere acting in bad faith. Even if elected  dummycrats-Democrats vote in near-lockstep, there are millions of Americans who will genuinely wonder, “Is a sex abuser and/or a perjurer about to ascend to the Supreme Court?”. The evidence is overwhelming that the answer is no. The evidence indicates that Brett Kavanaugh faced false or mistaken claims, responded to those claims with understandable and appropriate emotion, and contested them with truthful testimony.
French doesn't merely assert these things. He shows his work.  I'll leave you with two bitter grouses from Sen. Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer, who has occasionally allowed the mask to slip by invoking Merrick Garland.  If the Kavanaugh fight was truly about 'credible' allegations from women, referring back to an unrelated previous judicial skirmish seems like a strange non-sequitur. But if the Kavanaugh battle was really waged over revenge and ends-justify-the-means politics, the Garland fixation isn't strange at all. Here's scumbag/clown-Schumer:

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1048482993977716737?ref_src=twsr...

I'll remind scumbag/clown-Schumer that in the case of Garland, Mitch McConnell "brazenly" applied  scumbag/clown-Schumer's own standard, as advocated in 2007, echoing the loose lips-Biden Rule introduced years earlier. And it's downright laughable to suggest that dummycrats-Democrats have been remotely "cooperative" on this front over recent decades. Read this brief history lesson on how we got to this place, and you'll understand the breadth of scumbag/clown-Schumer's intellectual dishonesty. Relatedly, if  scumbag/clown-Schumer hadn't idiotically launched an unprecedented partisan filibuster against Justice Gorsuch, it's unlikely that McConnell would've mustered the votes to invoke the dinky-Reid Rule and nuke the filibuster for Kavanaugh, given the controversy.  For years, scumbag/clown-Schumer and his ilk have engaged in unilateral escalations and overreach. Now that they're reaping what they've sown, perhaps some of their fury can be best understood through the prism of impotent regret. They've lost, and they deserve to lose.   

Views: 123

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on October 9, 2018 at 7:29am

Bonnie

scumbag-holder is the scum of the world and he is worthless and needs to go away for good.

Comment by Bonnie Somer on October 9, 2018 at 4:42am

IF HOLDER WAS PRES MISTAKE IS NOT THE WORD I WOULD USE TSUNAMI OF DEVISTATION  OF THE ENTIRE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE AND OUR HISTORY BOY IF U THINK THEY ARE WIPING IT OUT NOW , SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO STOP FAST; OUR SCHOOLS HE ONCE SAID KIDS NEED TO BE BRAINWASHED TO HATE GUNS HE IS A HORROR AND STALIN WOULD BE A CLOSE SECOND TO WHAT HOLDER IS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by Steve Kelley

ALERT ALERT

States Propose Orwellian Law Mandating State Home Invasion On Home-School Families

(TeaParty.org) – Lawmakers in some US states have proposed legislation that would require home visits for families with homeschooled children, posing a terrifying threat to parental authority and freedom in general.

Iowa HF 272 requires homeschool families who do not report to their school district in conducting their home education to submit to “health and safety visits” quarterly by “the board of directors of a school district.”

If parents decline, the proposed law says, “the juvenile court or district court upon a showing of probable cause may authorize the person making the home visit to enter the home and interview or observe the child.”

The law doesn’t explain why a school district would conduct “health and safety visits,” nor is “probable cause” defined.

But the party performing the visit on behalf of the school district would be a mandatory reporter, and the district can collaborate on the mandated home visits with the Department of Human Services, which in turn can collaborate with the state’s Department of Education.

A similar bill calling for a home investigation of homeschool families was recently introduced in Illinois. The visits there would be performed by the Child Protective Service Unit of the Department of Children and Family Services.

Iowa state Rep. Mary Mascher, a Democrat, introduced the bill, which is one of two introduced thus far during this legislative session requiring home visits for homeschool families.

Public schools do not exist to determine the “health and safety” of a child, they exist to provide children with an education.

In fact, plenty of public schools pose serious risks to the “health and safety” of children, whether that be increased risk to seasonal and contagious illness or the incidents of violent crime that plague the nation’s inner city schools.

This law is eerily reminiscent of the socialist systems many lawmakers in Washington would like to mimic here at home. There is nothing more authoritative than the state forcing their way into the home.

Homeschooling is a way a rapidly growing number of parents have found to combat the state-sponsored ideological indoctrination taking place in the public school system, and these authoritarians can’t stand that parents are finding a way to fight back and take their children’s educations, and minds.

Truth About ISIS Bride

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service