~ Featuring ~
Democratic Trumpsteria Continues 
by David Limbaugh  
A Sleeping Son Of A B**** – Trump 
Hammers Chuck Todd In PA Speech 
{ } ~ President Trump entertained the folks at a rally in Pennsylvania as only he can... and taking advantage of the opportunity to take a few shots at the dishonest propaganda media, Chuck Todd in particular. Trump as describing a video he saw from 1999 in which he was being interviewed on Meet the Press. Trump said, “It’s 1999, I’m on Meet the Press, a show now headed by sleepy eyes Chuck Todd, he’s a sleeping son of a bitch, I’ll tell ya. Trump notes that he was saying back then, before it became en vogue, “you’ve got to take them out now.” He notes the video then showed President liar-Clinton, who he impersonates saying, “We are pleased to announce we have made a deal with North Korea.” Trump says, “You know how that deal turned out, right? We gave billions and billions of dollars and lots of other things and we got nothing.”...
MORE Despicable Behavior Unearthed 
in Broward Sheriff’s Motley Crew
by Andrew West
{ } ~ The seemingly unending saga of incompetence at the Broward County Sheriff’s Department enters its third week in earnest today... as even more evidence of complete and utter failure has been uncovered. For those of you still catching up, the Broward County Sheriff’s Department has been engaged in a debacle of the highest order following the Valentine’s Day Massacre carried out by former Stoneman Douglas High School student Nikolas Cruz. The obviously mentally ill teen, who heard demonic voices directing him while he slay 17 of his former classmates two weeks ago, had been reported to police and the FBI nearly four dozen times before his rampage, with callers informing authorities in no uncertain terms that Cruz was a threat to the school. He was “going to explode” and “shoot someplace up”, according to those who attempted, in vain, to stop him. Media SHOCKED to Learn Who’s Behind the Real Scandal of the Douglas High School Shooting... 
Devin Nunes Dropped The Shocking 
Scoop On Who Colluded With Russia 
{ } ~ “Republican California Rep. Devin Nunes made a stunning claim on Fox News Monday... “Democrats were trying to get information from Russians to use against the Trump campaign.” “We know exactly who was getting information from the Russians. It was the liar-Hillary Clinton campaign — they were getting information from the Russians, dirt on Trump to use in a campaign. That’s the very thing that for a year and a half we’ve been trying to investigate whether the Trump campaign was getting dirt against liar-Hillary Clinton from the Russians. We have no evidence of that.” “But yet here we have another example, even if the story is not, you know, completely accurate, we know that the Democrats were trying to get information from Russians to use against the Trump campaign.” ... And what on earth, can't Mueller see that. 
Activists Demand Justice After Border 
Agents Arrest Illegal… Then They Learn 
What She Did for a Living
by Will Racke
{ } ~ An arrest by the U.S. Border Patrol has stirred up outrage in the activist community as a purported example... of how President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement policies are unjustly tearing immigrant families apart. Viral videos posted to Facebook and YouTube on Thursday show Border Patrol agents — some in uniform and some in plain clothes — seizing Perla Morales-Luna as she was walking with her daughters in National City, California, last week. “Perla Morales-Luna was identified as an organizer for a transnational criminal smuggling organization operating in East County, San Diego,” the agency’s San Diego field division said in a statement...
After Grand Jury Testimony, Sam Nunberg 
Says He Doubts Mueller Probe Leads To Trump
{ } ~ A former Trump aide who testified before special counsel Robert Mueller’s grand jury on Friday says... he does not view the Russia probe as a “witch hunt,” though he also does not believe the investigation leads to President Donald Trump. Sam Nunberg offered the assessment in an interview with ABC News following his six-hour testimony before the grand jury, which convened in Washington, D.C.  The interview was much tamer than a series of media appearances that Nunberg made earlier this week in which he threatened to defy Mueller’s subpoena by skipping the grand jury testimony... 
Democratic Trumpsteria Continues 

by David Limbaugh 
{ } ~ If liberals would quit acting so crazy, maybe they would have a chance of making significant gains in Congress in the upcoming midterm elections and achieve their goal of eroding support for President Donald Trump. But it's not gonna happen.

Liberals' extremism and outrageousness and conservatives' failure to stop them created the conditions leading to Trump's election. Now the left's unrepentant persistence is sustaining and even increasing Trump's support. Please let liberals' learning disability continue.

They freak out over everything Trump does, apparently not realizing that their over-the-top reactions are way more unreasonable than anything Trump is doing. At a party fundraiser this past weekend, Trump quipped that Chinese President Xi Jinping is "now president for life. President for life. No, he's great. And look, he was able to do that. I think it's great. Maybe we'll have to give that a shot someday."

You can imagine the monolithic liberal media beta males congregating at their watercoolers and whispering, "I know he's joking, but he does have authoritarian tendencies. Creepy."

Some even raced to their bullhorns and made fools of themselves publicly with the specious claim. CNN's Chris Cillizza penned an opinion piece under the title "This may be the scariest thing Donald Trump has said as president."

Wow. Do you think Cillizza seriously believes that this is scarier than Trump's promise to cut taxes, which has already led to an economic boom that jeopardizes the beleaguered Democrats' upcoming electoral prospects? What about his promise to appoint judges who genuinely care about the Constitution and the rule of law? Those things are indeed frightening for Cillizza's ilk, so he must have agonized over giving the nod to Trump's dictator joke.

In his quasi-hysterical piece, Cillizza wrote: "It's not totally clear to me whether Trump was half-joking or not. Trump's speech was behind closed doors." Well, it's not clear to me whether Cillizza is in possession of a humor molecule. His memory is also apparently on the blink, for he didn't mention former President Barack liar-nObama's reported lament that it would be so much easier to be the president of China. liar-nObama was complaining about the constitutional restraints that kept him from just dictating policy on certain issues. But his statement would have been much easier to take seriously than Trump's because he actually did trample the Constitution every time he could get away with it. Yet his liberal media enablers stood silent.

Liberals' hyperventilation over Trump's tongue-in-cheek throwaways is a mild example of their venom and fruitcakery. When columnist Bethany Mandel published an op-ed in The New York Times relating her experience in buying a gun to protect her family, gun control activist Shannon Watts accused her on Twitter of having fear, paranoia and white privilege. Watts tweeted that Mandel's white skin makes her less likely to be at risk as a gun owner, regardless of her hardscrabble background. "I guess you don't believe in racism," Watts tweeted to Mandel.

Leave it to an identity politics-obsessed leftist to invoke racism to attack a white Jewish wife and mother of three for purchasing a weapon to defend herself and her family in the face of actual threats made against her. I would say you can't make this stuff up, but it's better to say you don't have to make this stuff up, because leftist nastiness and nuttiness are a gift that keeps on giving.

Speaking of which, when Attorney General Jeff Sessions strongly criticized Libby Schaaf -- the mayor of Oakland, California -- for warning immigrants who are here illegally about upcoming raids, she fired back that Sessions has racist motives. "How dare you distort the reality about declining violent crime in a diverse sanctuary city like Oakland, California, to advance your racist agenda?" she said. California Gov. Jerry Brown accused the federal government of launching a "reign of terror." "This is basically going to war against the state of California," Brown said.

It's hard for me to understand how even leftists have the audacity to publicly admit that they think there is nothing illegal or immoral about a city official's giving a heads-up to law violators that federal law enforcement officers are on the way.

OK, it's not really that hard. Last year, California state Sen. Kevin de Leon claimed that the Trump administration's law enforcement policies were based on principles of white supremacy rather than American values. And only about a month ago, House Minority Leader Nancy Pulosi shrieked that the Republicans' immigration plan was designed to "make America white again."

For all the Democrats' stated concerns over Trump's alleged excesses, he doesn't hold a candle to their daily behavior even on his worst day. Recent polls show that Trump's re-election prospects are looking pretty good. The game of politics is fluid and unpredictable, so these polls say little about what will happen in 2020. But they do tell us how these tired Democratic tactics are going over today.

As a Republican, I can only hope they continue.

Views: 12


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Reporter Kicked Out Of Michelle Obama
Conference For Violating ‘Black Girl Code’

The Black Entertainment Television channel recently hosted a conference in south Florida for black women known as “Leading Women Defined,” which featured a casual conversation between former first lady Michelle Obama and former senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

But according to the New York Post’s Page Six, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who was in attendance was booted from the remainder of the conference after she wrote an article about some of the comments Obama had made during the discussion.

Robin Givhan, a fashion critic and staff writer for The Washington Post, documented the highlights of the friendly chat between Obama and Jarrett.

Some of the highlights of the conversation included the former first lady’s thoughts on President Donald Trump’s inauguration as the Obamas prepared to leave the White House, the role she played during the 2008 election, her difficulty settling in as “the spouse” to the president, how she described her White House garden as a “subversive act” to garner trust with the public and her upcoming memoir. Of course Givhan also wrote about what Obama was wearing … after all, she is a fashion critic.

But following the publication of the article, according to Page Six, BET demanded Givhan leave the conference early amid claims that she had violated a “sacred space” by publishing the content of the conversation.

They also canceled a panel discussion that Givhan initially had been asked to moderate.

However, Page Six noted that BET’s claim that Obama’s discussion was “private” and not intended to be shared with anyone else outside the small gathering in attendance didn’t hold up to scrutiny given the fact that BET itself posted clips from the discussion on its site.

Furthermore, Jarrett also posted those clips on social media and told everyone to “tune in” to the network so they could hear what Obama had to say.

Shortly thereafter, the dispute descended into a sharp back-and-forth on social media between Givhan and others who were irked at what she had done, as can be seen on Givhan’s Twitter feed.

Several of her critics asserted that the conversation had been “off-the-record” — an assertion Givhan flatly denied — and one user claimed the reporter had “violated a sacred trust” between black women.

Another said what she had done was a “complete violation of journalistic ethics and Black girl code, all at once,” while still another asserted through a hashtag that Givhan was “#notoneofus,” as if she were being banished from the exclusive realm of accepted professional black women.

For their part, a BET representative told Page Six that Givhan had been “invited as a guest (not working press) to moderate a fashion panel,” and noted that her travel and lodging expenses had been paid for by the network.

“She was made aware that it was an intimate conversation in a sacred space of sisterhood and fellowship,” the rep added.

Neither Givhan nor representatives for Obama responded to requests for comment on the report from Page Six.

If the WaPo reporter really was instructed ahead of time that the conversation between Obama and Jarrett was “off the record” and a private affair, but published anyway, then BET was justified in booting her from the remainder of the conference — though the mean-spirited commentary she received on social media still crossed the line.

But if Givhan received no prior warning on the matter — and given the fact that BET itself published the conversation later — then this is just a major display of hypocrisy and unnecessary infighting.

What do you think?


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service