In the year I was born, 1925, in possible violation of the Fourth Amendment, like a lot of other acts of Congress in disregard of our rights, Congress gave the IRS the authority to examine our personal records for income tax purposes. I mean really folks, don’t you know who Congress is for?
The Supreme Court had sanctioned federal income tax. So what? As a matter of record, the Supreme Court, while sanctioning federal income tax, wrote: “Under the seeming exercise of the taxing power, the taxing statute is so arbitrary as to compel the conclusion that it was not the exertion of taxation, but the confiscation of property, or is so wanting in basis for classification as to produce such a gross and patent inequity as inevitably to lead to the same conclusion,” it is not tax. It is confiscation of property. That’s not talk. It is the law. I was born to deal with it. While I still can, I’m going to advise you.
You are letting government regulate you out of existence, and to learn every move you make, while the government is secretly screwing you blind. Why you people have allowed this is beyond me. I’m from another world.
Unprepared for what was to come, on September 6, 1974, Director of Internal Revenue Ervin B. Osborn wrote me. I had had the audacity to inform Attorney General William B. Saxbe that federal income tax was unconstitutional. In his letter, Mr. Osborn informed me that the Sixteenth Amendment, “which was passed by Congress in 1909 and finally ratified by three-fourths of the states in 1913, provides….I assume that Congress has the power to tax total income at a given level.” Really! Mr. Osborne thereby indicated that I had nothing to say about the amount of tax on my income. For no particular reason, Mr. Osborne informed me that he was going to audit me. He spent a week in my home going through my records and left claiming that I failed to report $5,000 in income. That should have told me I made a mistake in expressing my idea of the law to the attorney general. But no, Mr. Osborne could say anything he wanted to say. Making me pay was quite another matter. As it turned out Mr. Osborne paid. He was forced to admit to the world that he was wrong on the front page of The Palm Beach Post.
Who was I? I want you to know that I was a nobody with the ability to write a letter to the nation’s top cop, and the money to buy a postage stamp. I talk to the people who enforce the law. They don’t tell me the law. I tell them the law, including the Attorney General of the United States.
Questionably, Congress can’t get a straight answer out of the IRS. What does that tell you? They are playing games and you are the victim. You’ve got to personally know the law. Don’t take anyone’s word for it! You could be in big trouble.
You need to know the government’s position and go from there. The government’s holds that the constitutional scheme of separation of powers, and the deference owed by the federal judiciary to the other two branches of government within that scheme, present an absolute bar to taxpayer suits challenging the validity of federal spending programs. The government views such suits as involving no more than the mere disagreement by the taxpayer “with the uses to which tax money is put.” Really! In Flast v. Cohen, said the court, “An analysis of the function served by standing limitations compels a rejection of the government’s position.”
“The fundamental aspect of standing is that it focuses on the party seeking to get his complaint before a federal court and not on the issues he wishes to have adjudicated.”
However, unless you happen to be someone who does not affect the scheme of unlimitedly taxing the masses, the courts wave you off.
Here’s one case of someone who didn’t affect the masses, the Missouri, Kansas &Texas Ry. Co. The Supreme Court, regarding the tax affecting this corporation: “A tortured construction of the Constitution is not to be justified by recourse to extreme examples of reckless congressional spending which might occur it courts could not prevent expenditures which, even if they could be thought to effect any national purpose, would be possible only by action of a legislature lost to all sense of public responsibility.” Why wouldn’t the Court take the same position in my case? The MKT had no rights. Remember that the Supreme Court sanctioned black slavery. Really folks, do you want another civil war? You are witness to the fact that as one of the mass of taxpayers you don’t get anywhere in the scheme of things. You’ve allowed government to paint itself into a corner. Your government is out of control. Only we the people can take control and save our nation. The law is the right answer. If I could force the law on the IRS so can you.
Enough of ancient wisdom has survived to suggest a basis on which to build new methods of analyzing our current situation, keeping in mind that the old guard is desperate. I’ve good news. A new paradigm is in the making for you. The ancients, due to my birth date and place I was born, gave me the ability to understand the subtle workings of the universe. I could be the person to bring back ancient wisdom. I psychically separate the true from the false and can bring new ideas to a waiting world. All my dreams have come true, but in spite of all that I know what I offer is a hard sell. I feel for you Mike, but what can I do?
Comments