It's Time for DC Patriots to Rally

So Obama wants to use the federal infrastructure of the DC Metropolitan government to infringe upon the 2nd Amendment right of U.S. citizens living there to keep and bear arms.  He grudgingly finds that since he can’t presently impose his imperial will on Virginia, Maryland, or any of the other States, he can dictatorially repress the rights of the people of the federal district, which, he hopes, will embolden the anti-patriots around the Republic favoring identification of those Americans who own and have the ability to bear firearms.  Anyone who thinks that the idea of mandating the re-registering firearms purchased in the District of Columbia came from the DC Metropolitan government is pretty naive in political thinking.  It’s pretty obvious to me that a federal Executive branch cabal, or conspiracy, is exuding from Obama and his cohorts to negate the 2nd Amendment, and the Executive branch has people in their enforcement agencies willing to do anything they are told to do by their tyrannical boss.  Let me again declare that I firmly believe that these enforcement agencies have had the opportunity, the means, and the motive to deliberately orchestrate what has been represented by mainstream media propaganda as random mass shootings around the nation by crazed individuals possessing automatic and semiautomatic weapons.  I have good reason to believe that, since the Patriot Act was passed, these agencies (Homeland Security, the NSA, the CIA, the FBI, and the DIA) have worked closely together to covertly plan and orchestrate every mass shooting and bombing that have occurred around the nation, and they have done it with a “Manchurian Candidate style” motif.  When all of the correct facts surrounding these killings are closely examined, the explanations provided by the federal government, through the mainstream media, just don’t add-up.  Moreover, the frequency of the, supposedly, random occurrences of mass shootings is not statistically viable, based upon the frequency and number of pre-9/11 mass shootings.  Accurate statistics don’t lie, and the clustering of these mass shootings after 9/11 indicate anything but randomness. But why on God’s green earth would the federal government perpetuate such deliberate horror?   

 

As millions of other rational Americans currently believe, the federal government wouldn’t mind killing a few hundred or, even, a few thousand American citizens in order to perpetuate the illusion throughout the nation that the constitutional right to keep and bear firearms should be abolished.  In order to execute this plan to abrogate the 2nd Amendment, the federal government first needed a majority of the American people to support an austere law that would serve to severely restrict civil liberties.  The Patriot Act was such a legislation that had actually been written as a bill a number of years earlier for a very sinister, though unnamed, purpose.  As that sinister purpose has been fully realized, the effect of the Patriot Act is very similar to the effect of the Nazi Enabling Act of 1933 (supported by a majority of the German people), in that with it came the creation of a centralized police/spy organization to enforce it, Homeland Security, a federal agency closely resembling the Nazi German Gestapo.  On 9/11, the federal government succeeded in staging a horrible debacle that caused 90 percent of the American public to falsely believe that Islamic terrorists were responsible for the deaths of over 3,000 innocent human beings.  Currently, however, around 80 percent of the American electorate (the voting-age American citizens) suspects that the federal government was, in some way, responsible for what happened at the WTC and the Pentagon on 9/11.  As a result, the federal Executive branch enforcement agencies are presently working overtime to keep the truthful reality about the Pentagon bombing, and the collapse of the WTC Tower and WTC Building 7, from fully dawning on the minds of the American public.  You see, the great many salient facts about the WTC and Pentagon bombings were deliberately omitted from the “Report of the 9/11 Commission,” which directly suggested federal conspiracy, and the subsequent disclosure of those startling facts to the public since 9/11, through the work of dedicated investigative reporters, has loudly shouted the reality of federal conspiracy.  And it was all perpetrated to delude the American people into giving up their unalienable rights contained in the Bill of Rights for an illusion of security.  And to embellish this illusion, the federal government continues to clandestinely orchestrate shootings and bombings in order to engender fear among the masses, so that fundamental freedoms may be more greatly curtailed in the name of national security.  I mean, what can you say when it has been revealed, beyond a reasonable doubt, that those super-structure skyscrapers were not totally collapsed by the jet aircraft that crashed into Towers 1 and 2, and the two controlled fires on two floors of the 47-story Building 7.  Such was scientifically impossible.  Those three buildings totally collapsed because of controlled demolition.  That was the only way it could have happened, according to over 2,000 eminent architects, engineers, and physicists who have gone on-record with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in order to get this information out to the American public.  So, if carefully planned and executed controlled demolition was how the 9/11 WTC debacle was orchestrated, who but the federal government had the opportunity, the means, and the motive for doing it?

Getting back to the federally mandated re-registration of firearms in the District of Columbia, this is, but, a means of knowing where the citizens owning and possessing guns are located.  It is the first step to eventual gun confiscation by the conspiring federal government.  The Honorable James Madison wrote Federalist 46 in 1788 to allay the fears of the States about the possibility of the federal government using the federal army to impose tyranny on the People.  In that essay he said,

 Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops.”

 In Federalist 46, James Madison clearly stated that, with an armed citizenry, the States would greatly outnumber the federal army if the federal government would try to impose tyranny on the People.  Madison called tyranny “danger” when he said that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel that danger.  Madison did not refer to the militia as an organized army of soldiers, but, instead, the total armed citizenry of the 13 original States, which numbered, in 1788, to half a million citizens.  Those citizens were the men, women, and children who could fire muskets, pistols, and cannon in order to fight for their common liberties while united under their State governments for which they had affection and confidence.

 There is certainly a difference between the danger of tyranny that existed then, in 1788, and the greater danger of tyranny that exists now in 2013.  We, the people, should fear much more greatly the power possessed by a federal army, navy, marine corps, and air force numbering over a million armed soldiers, and the paramilitary forces comprised by the federal enforcement agencies (CIA, NSA, FBI, DIA, Homeland Security) numbering more than 100,000 armed cadre.  In 1788, the weaponry possessed by the federal army was basically the same as the weaponry possessed by the citizens.  Now, the federal military and paramilitary forces greatly out-gun the citizens.  That question posed by the very arrogant U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein about the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, “Do you need a bazooka?” may be answered in the affirmative.  For the citizens to oppose the tyranny that may be imposed by a federal army in 2013, much more than a bazooka will be needed.

 So, what is there to do?  The tyranny imposed by Obama on the District of Columbia, to either re-register your firearms or go to jail, cannot be tolerated by patriots.  In the District, there are obviously many more anti-patriots than patriots.  What are the DC patriots to do?  I suggest that all those patriots in the District who believe that their God-given 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms is being trampled by the tyrannical federal government, should sell their property, leave the District, and relocate to Virginia, Texas, Arizona, South Carolina, or any other state where the right to keep and bear arms is held sacred.  A mass exodus from the District, by patriots, would show Obama that he can’t force patriotic red-blooded Americans to yield to tyranny.                       

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center