How Senator Cruz needs to answer question about his eligibility

 After the question he should respond:

With his usual response, then: (really stick it back to them with)

 ..... but more importantly, why are you asking me this question when you haven't taken question and gotten to the truth with our present President?  Tell me?  And also, why can't we have a single day in court about his social security number and why haven't you asked about that .... and who was his mentor Frank Marshall Davis and tell me when did he flip back?  I think you need to do your job first before you get to me, so will you do it?


(then wait .... don't say another word .... wait!)

Then after a good long wait, 'I'll tell you what, you do that, you get to the bottom of these items and we'll talk more then, agreed?'  And I want to see you asking those questions and after you do, you get back to me and I'll be more than happy to go from there; agreed?

Views: 43


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Dave Janes on July 31, 2013 at 4:19pm

My God I said the exact thing today about no one listening to me. I wrote a page long introduction to a link the other day and got not even one like. Nobody is doing much outside the senate and the House either. I don't know if the NSA stuff got to them or what' My wife says she is tired of hearing it because it is the same stuff but we are getting close to having a select committee' They have subpoena power and can appoint a special prosecutor. Stockton of MI wrote it and its number is H.R. 36 and he wrote a demand that it be voted on I think its number is H.R. 106 there are 162 co sponsors of that H.R.36 You can weigh in on it free at POP VOX I cant find a link right now but another site that is useful to see how someone or everyone voted on a bill you can even get a RSS feed Project Vote Smart

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on July 22, 2013 at 11:00am

"It is called, FEAR, they are afraid, of what he will do" So they do nothing.

Comment by M16ark58 on July 22, 2013 at 4:42am

Ho hum, another day with the illegal puppet dictatta in cheef running their bananna republic take over. No one is stopping this, the people who can reach out and throw them out are doing nothing. Figure that out, why no one is listening to us!

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on July 21, 2013 at 11:32pm

From what was on Dr. James David Manning,, if you go onto his site, and search eligibilty, he states, in great detail, why Sen Cruz is not eligible, as BHO is not eligible. The slipped him thru.

Its sort of a tricky question, and is explained in detail. Because they allowed Mr. Obama thru, they will now try this with anyone.



Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service