The Front Page Cover
2016 The truth will set you free
Featuring:
They Take Your Assets, Then Let
You Beg to Get Them Back
by Debra J. Saunders
~~~
.
liar-Hillary's Generous Donation to Herself
In a typical Friday afternoon news dump, liar-Hillary Clinton released her 2015 tax return. As for income, liar-Hillary herself hauled in $1,475,000 in speaking fees, while Bill netted $5,250,000. There was much fanfare in the Leftmedia over the fact that she gave over $1 million of her income to charity. But what about the details of that charitable giving? As usual with the Leftmedia, those details simply don't matter when it comes to liar-Clinton — it's that fact that she gave so much to "charity" that counts. What charity? Well, virtually all of it went to the liar-Clinton Foundation. Yes, liar-Clinton donated to her own foundation, a foundation that exists solely for the purpose of propping up the liar-Clinton political brand. In other words, liar-Clinton has been paying Bill's salary and buying political capital through her foundation.
Couple her "charitable" giving with the recent emails released from Judicial Watch, which strongly indicate that liar-Hillary moonlighted for her foundation while she was secretary of state, and the picture becomes clearer of a woman who has for years been actively organizing and manipulating the system for her own political aims.
Not only have the liar-Clintons donated to their own foundation, but companies that already paid lucrative speaking fees to the liar-Clintons also donated to the foundation. Douglas Becker is CEO of Laureate Education, a for-profit university, which is a major donor to the liar-Clinton Foundation. This past year Laureate paid Bill over $1 million in speaking fees, and that's just the latest in an annual haul for Bill from Laureate. This same Douglas Becker also heads a non-profit called the International Youth Foundation, which received millions from USAID in 2010. USAID is a wing of the State Department. And Americans are expected to believe that liar-Hillary Clinton had no connection to the liar-Clinton Foundation while she served as secretary of state. Yeah, right. ~The Patriot Post
.
Milwaukee Mayhem: 'Is They White?'
Some of Milwaukee's finest Demo urban poverty plantation inhabitants, in the wake of a justified police shooting of an armed thug, spent the weekend finding cars with white motorists to assault. In a video of one such attack, a rioter yells, "Is they white?" Another responds, "Yeah, they white, get they a—!" Another yells, "Hey, they beating up every white person!" Still another rioter shouts, "He white! Beat his s—, bi—!"
They were further incited by Demo plantation manager and city Alderman Russell Stamper, who justified the protests, saying, "Our people are hurting."
He then quoted a text from one of his cohorts: "I don't know WTF we are going to do, but we gotta do something ... when the people start setting s— on fire, that's because they feel like they can't do anything else. ... They don't give a f— about politics."
Another alderman, Khalif Rainey, protested that the anarchy was a "warning cry" for a city he apparently hates: "The black people of Milwaukee are tired — they are tired of living under this oppression."
Prior to the festivities, Milwaukee PD was already dealing with five murders Friday night.
However, unlike with the Black Lives Matter folks in Baltimore, who were paid off by Mayor Stephanie "Glossy Lips" Rawlings-Blake, Milwaukee's Sheriff David Clarke is not going to put up with their anti-social crap.
Oh, and by the way, did we mention that the black armed thug with a long rap sheet was killed by a black police officer? ~The Patriot Post
.
The Trickle-Down Erosion of Honesty
in nObama's White House
by LT. COLONEL JAMES G. ZUMWALT, USMC
by LT. COLONEL JAMES G. ZUMWALT, USMC
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) conducts fraud prevention training for U.S. businesses. Training focus is both internal and external-preventing fraud against the business as well as fraud by company employees against others... An important standard taught is the tone set for ethical integrity leadership: An organization's leadership creates the tone at the top - an ethical or unethical atmosphere in the workplace. Management's tone has a trickle-down effect on employees. If top managers uphold ethics and integrity so will employees. But if upper management appears unconcerned with ethics and focuses solely on the bottom line, employees will be more prone to commit fraud and feel that ethical conduct isn't a priority. In short, employees will follow the examples of their bosses. Obviously, the larger an organization, the more difficult to hold all within it accountable to this standard. However, when numerous examples of a lapse in an organization's ethical conduct exist, the tone set at the top comes into question... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-trickle-down-erosion-of-honesty-in-obamas-white-house?f=must_reads
.
nObama’s No First Use Proposal
by HERBERT LONDON
by HERBERT LONDON
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ When President nObama received his Nobel Prize, he argued that he would regard nuclear proliferation as his primary challenge. This is hardly surprising since even as a Columbia College student he advocated a nuclear free world... a position consistent with the idealism of a student who knew very little about the ambitions of U.S. adversaries. Yet now after eight years in office, the president retains this same arms control illusion. Since he assumed the oath of office in 2009 the president has pressed for the shrinking and weakening of the U.S. nuclear arsenal armed as evidence by this signing of the New Start Treaty with Russia and avoiding modernization of the aging nuclear platforms. Japan, Taiwan, among others, reliant on the U.S. nuclear umbrella for security are increasingly uncomfortable with the direction in America policy and are dubious about the reliability of our pledge for nuclear assistance...
.
Woodward Calls Out liar-Clinton on Email
{truthrevolt.org} ~ Liberal icon and journalist Bob Woodward came out saying that liar-Hillary Clinton has not come fully clean on her email controversy and that there could be a big issue there... Appearing on CBS This Morning, the Watergate legend and Washington Post Associate Editor said that this could be a "very serious issue." "So many unanswered questions. You know, let’s face it, liar-Hillary Clinton just has not come totally clean on this. And she would serve herself well if she would do that," Woodward said. Asked by host Charlie Rose why liar-Clinton has not come clean, Woodward was blunt:... http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/woodward-calls-out-clinton-email
.
nObama Decree Targets Gunsmiths and
Online Firearm Information
by Alex Newman
{thenewamerican.com} ~ When nObama vowed to use his “pen and phone” to circumvent Congress and impose his will on America, he was actually telling the truth for once. In the latest example of lawless decrees coming from the executive branch, the nObama administration is taking aim at gunsmiths and free speech... Basically, if a recent “regulation” disguised as "guidance" is not stopped, gunsmithing — an American tradition stretching back centuries that was crucial in the War for Independence — will be effectively made illegal, experts say. Another controversial element of the decree would purport to unconstitutionally criminalize many forms of gun-related speech on the Internet. If not withdrawn, the illegal nObama decree would purport to shred the rights protected by the Constitution's First and Second Amendments by making it illegal to post any “how-to” information about guns online. It would also effectively make all gun-related information on the Internet a crime because it could be accessed by foreigners...
.
The Noose Is Tightening Around
liar-Clinton, Comey and Lynch
by Dave Hodges
{thecommonsenseshow.com} ~ As the saying goes, if her lips are moving, she is lying. Two key members of the House Oversight Committee and Judiciary Committee are revealing evidence taken directly from sworn testimony, from liar-Hillary Clinton... which may lead to perjury charges against the presidential candidate. There is a modern day, XYZ Affair brewing. If any of the big three is implicated in criminal activity related to the liar-Clinton Foundation, the other two will be headed to prison as well. XYZ are liar-Hillary Clinton, James Comey, and Loretta Lynch. Late yesterday afternoon, Fox News confirmed that a congressional source confirmed that the House Government Oversight Committee had received a heavily redacted FBI summary of liar-Hillary Clinton’s session last month with FBI agents who interviewed her about her use of a private server for government business. Heavily redacted? What right does Comey have to thumb his nose to a Congressional Inquiry by redacting evidence requested by Congress? Why would Comey do such a thing? The answer to that question can best be summed up as “Birds of a feather, flock together”. Or, perhaps, Ben Franklin put it more accurately:... http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/08/17/the-noose-is-tightening-around-clinton-comey-and-lynch/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-noose-is-tightening-around-clinton-comey-and-lynch
.
'Pro-Palestinian' Thugs Attack
Jews on U.S. Campuses
by P. David Hornik
.
While We Were All Focused On The Olympics, nObama Quietly Pulled This Off
by Clyde
{gopthedailydose.com} ~ Americans everywhere are focused on the Olympics right now, so Barack Hussein nObama decided it was the perfect opportunity to quietly do something that could put all of us in major danger... According to Daily Caller, around half a million Palestinians are currently able to take advantage of the temporary amnesty the Department of Homeland Security has extended to Syrian refugees. DHS secretary Jeh Johnson recently announced that Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is being extended for Syrians until March 31, 2018. TPS makes it possible for people in the U.S. who are here legally or illegally to be free of risk from deportation, receive welfare, work permits, drivers licenses and social security. TPS isn’t only given to Syrians, it’s also extended to “persons without nationality who last habitually resided in Syria.” The United Nations estimates that around 430,000 Palestinians, who are considered stateless, currently reside in Syria as of June 2016... http://gopthedailydose.com/2016/08/18/focused-olympics-obama-quietly-pulled-off/
.
Kaine Squirms Under Questioning About
liar-Clinton’s Lies
by Keith Koffler
{whitehousedossier.com} ~ Democratic Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine probably thought an appearance on the Today show would be an easy swim in the lake, but Savannah Guthrie was creating lots of waves instead... Here, Guthrie, who fortunately has a hard news background and used to ask some tough questions around the White House briefing room when she was there covering President nObama, wanted to know, in effect, why liar-Hillary Clinton hadn’t apologized for lying. She didn’t say “lying,” because you don’t do that in Washington. Nobody gets accused of lying. The worst one is allowed to say is that someone didn’t tell the truth, which is how Guthrie phrases it... http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2016/08/17/video-kaine-squirms-questioning-clinton-lies/
.
Dr. Drew: 'Gravely Concerned' About
liar-Hillary's Health and Healthcare
by Tiffany Gabbay
{truthrevolt.org} ~ Dr. Drew Pinsky, the popular on-air medical professional who was recently begged by CNN's Don Lemon to diagnose Donald Trump with a mental health disorder, may not have been able to oblige Lemon concerning Trump's mental health... but he has a great deal to say about liar-Hillary Clinton's physical health. During an appearance Wednesday on KABC's McIntyre in the Morning, Dr. Drew said that he and his colleague Dr. Robert Huizenga reviewed medical records liar-Hillary Clinton had released some time ago, and found both her health, and the health care she is receiving, more than bizarre. In no uncertain terms the popular doctor concluded: "Based on the information that she has provided and her doctors have provided, we were gravely concerned not just about her health, but her health care."... http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/dr-drew-gravely-concerned-about-hillarys-health-and-healthcare
.
Major Scandal Hits U.S. Military –
This is nObama’s America
{thepoliticalinsider.com} ~ Barack n Obama is no friend of our brave men and women in our Armed Forces. He has spent his lame duck years gutting our Navy and Army, while the Islamic State (ISIS) and China grow stronger and more aggressive... Now, a new scandal proves just how little concern nObama has for the safety of our brave troops who risk their lives for us. This is despicable! Federal inmates made thousands of defective combat helmets for the U.S. military at a prison facility that was rife with problems, including the use of degraded armor and the submission of preselected helmets for inspection to make sure they would get approved, according to a newly released investigative report... http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/major-scandal-hits-u-s-military-obamas-america/?utm_source=SailThru%26utm_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=TPI%20Newsletter%2008-18-16%20Curated/Horizon%20Tier%201&utm_term=Tier%201%20Real
.
They Take Your Assets, Then Let
You Beg to Get Them Back
by Debra J. Saunders
{townhall.com} ~ Republican political consultant Mike Madrid isn't used to getting calls from the ACLU, and yet he has found himself working with the civil liberties group because some practices are so egregious that Republicans and Democrats should have no trouble finding common cause. The issue is civil asset forfeiture -- also known as "policing for profit." The federal government can seize your property, and the only way you can get it back is to prove you are not guilty of a crime. California law prohibits local authorities from permanently seizing most property without a conviction, but there's a loophole in the law -- called "equitable sharing." Local police can seize your property, hand jurisdiction over the feds, and get rewarded with up to 80 percent of the goodies even if prosecutors fail to convict -- or even charge -- an offender.
"There are very few things in Sacramento that are this cut and dry," quoth Madrid. Americans fought the British in the Revolutionary War in order to guarantee due process and the presumption of innocence. "If you were not convicted," Madrid noted, "people shouldn't be taking your stuff."
With that reasoning in mind, Madrid began working for the passage of Senate Bill 443, introduced by state Sen. Holly Mitchell, D-California, to curb "equitable sharing" abuses. She was spurred by a Drug Policy Alliance report on the civil asset forfeiture abuses. While supporters talk about the practice as a tool to defund drug cartels, the report found that on average, the seizures were small change. San Diego attorney Loan T. Shillinger told me many of her clients are small-business owners who drive with cash in the car. Mitchell recalls a food-truck driver who had $10,000 when police asked to search his car. He had nothing to hide. Next thing he knew, he had to hire a lawyer if he wanted his money back. Many people in his situation are shocked to discover the government can treat law-abiding people under the assumption that they are guilty.
SB443 was a good cause, and so it sailed even through the dysfunctional swamp known as the Legislature. It sped through state Senate committees and passed the Senate with an overwhelming 38 out of 40 votes last year.
Then came "the badges," as Madrid put it. Mitchell put it another way, "It was as if I put my hand in their entitled cookie jar." California law enforcement came down hard on lawmakers from both parties. The California District Attorneys Association opposed SB443, director of legislation Sean Hoffman told me, because it was "overly broad" and "would have really crippled asset forfeiture in California" and hampered prosecutors ability to go after "large drug operations." Support melted away. By the time SB443 reached the Assembly floor, only 24 members voted "aye" and 44 opposed it. Like cockroaches, 12 members skittered away from voting entirely.
Law enforcement soon learned that it had won the kind of legislative victory that leaves a public relations stain on the victors. The mere consideration of the measure aired stories of high-profile abuses -- such as when prosecutors have used asset forfeiture to seize buildings from landlords of a medical marijuana dispensary.
Both sides had an incentive to work together. On Thursday, the Assembly voted to amend SB443. Absent a guilty verdict, locals can only get a cut when more than $40,000 in cash has been seized. Locals still will get no percentage of property seizures without a guilty verdict. The district attorneys now are neutral on the measure. Expect SB443 to pass in the Assembly soon.
Until then, consider the words of Daisy Vieyra of the American Civil Liberties Union: "It can happen to anyone, that's the frightening part."
Mitchell told me that, as she listened to public comments about her bill, she realized "it could have been me." Her late mother had a fondness for casino gambling. Every year Mitchell would drive her mother to Las Vegas for a weekend with one-armed bandits. The two would drive home with cash -- two African-American women in a "high-profile" automobile with smiles on their faces. They didn't do anything wrong, but under the current system, their holdings would be presumed guilty.
"There are very few things in Sacramento that are this cut and dry," quoth Madrid. Americans fought the British in the Revolutionary War in order to guarantee due process and the presumption of innocence. "If you were not convicted," Madrid noted, "people shouldn't be taking your stuff."
With that reasoning in mind, Madrid began working for the passage of Senate Bill 443, introduced by state Sen. Holly Mitchell, D-California, to curb "equitable sharing" abuses. She was spurred by a Drug Policy Alliance report on the civil asset forfeiture abuses. While supporters talk about the practice as a tool to defund drug cartels, the report found that on average, the seizures were small change. San Diego attorney Loan T. Shillinger told me many of her clients are small-business owners who drive with cash in the car. Mitchell recalls a food-truck driver who had $10,000 when police asked to search his car. He had nothing to hide. Next thing he knew, he had to hire a lawyer if he wanted his money back. Many people in his situation are shocked to discover the government can treat law-abiding people under the assumption that they are guilty.
SB443 was a good cause, and so it sailed even through the dysfunctional swamp known as the Legislature. It sped through state Senate committees and passed the Senate with an overwhelming 38 out of 40 votes last year.
Then came "the badges," as Madrid put it. Mitchell put it another way, "It was as if I put my hand in their entitled cookie jar." California law enforcement came down hard on lawmakers from both parties. The California District Attorneys Association opposed SB443, director of legislation Sean Hoffman told me, because it was "overly broad" and "would have really crippled asset forfeiture in California" and hampered prosecutors ability to go after "large drug operations." Support melted away. By the time SB443 reached the Assembly floor, only 24 members voted "aye" and 44 opposed it. Like cockroaches, 12 members skittered away from voting entirely.
Law enforcement soon learned that it had won the kind of legislative victory that leaves a public relations stain on the victors. The mere consideration of the measure aired stories of high-profile abuses -- such as when prosecutors have used asset forfeiture to seize buildings from landlords of a medical marijuana dispensary.
Both sides had an incentive to work together. On Thursday, the Assembly voted to amend SB443. Absent a guilty verdict, locals can only get a cut when more than $40,000 in cash has been seized. Locals still will get no percentage of property seizures without a guilty verdict. The district attorneys now are neutral on the measure. Expect SB443 to pass in the Assembly soon.
Until then, consider the words of Daisy Vieyra of the American Civil Liberties Union: "It can happen to anyone, that's the frightening part."
Mitchell told me that, as she listened to public comments about her bill, she realized "it could have been me." Her late mother had a fondness for casino gambling. Every year Mitchell would drive her mother to Las Vegas for a weekend with one-armed bandits. The two would drive home with cash -- two African-American women in a "high-profile" automobile with smiles on their faces. They didn't do anything wrong, but under the current system, their holdings would be presumed guilty.
Comments