Friday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 2016             The truth will set you free 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Featuring:
Lipstick on Democratic pigs
by Burt Prelutsky
~~~
.
 Regulation Nation: nObama Hits Major Rule #600 
Jk-MSOBiS6rdTTICqNDlmXEHFOvT_oDhMbzjil8TQgPRIP5OXYF2_7LvYi6L0_rgkcrrlZEsQoPGqzlUBMZNAkgE8KS1KTeb4ePQSh0PrcktS2Gq-7MIM-6ZMCdaZg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
We noted last week that if Barack nObama's fantastic economic recovery had been even average, the U.S. would have another $2.2 trillion in GDP. The reason for that is his regulatory bonanza. What do we mean by that? Well, The Wall Street Journal reports, "nObama's regulators have completed their 600th major rule. A major rule imposes costs of more than $100 million. For those keeping score, that's an average of 81 big ones a year, or roughly one every three days the government is open. Who says our bureaucracies are inefficient?" Team nObama has issued 100 major rules in the last year, and the regulator in chief still has nearly six months left with his phone and pen.
          What are some of these rules? For example, The Washington Examiner provides a list of the seven most expensive climate regulations. Among them: $156 billion for lower vehicle emissions, $27.3 billion for refrigerator efficiency and $13 billion for florescent lights.
          As is implied by the cost to GDP, regulations are a form of taxation. These 600 rules have cost $743 billion, or nearly $2,300 for every American. As the Journal notes, "This eventually shows up in higher prices, or fewer jobs created, or reduced profits and wages."
          nObama promised to "fundamentally transform" our nation, and his regulations are a big part of doing that. The end result is economic growth of a paltry 1-2%.  -The Patriot Post
.
 Ransom or Not, nObama Still Funds Iranian Terror 
A03izQHDyKdgRKIZjwruKifscg2HcDhPZKnpBUbucPDQb2ys3Y4_HlAKExPLMPZ0Gbl3AoArqwx-pTvAIMVGfy_vlrTdXieBA90tDCtwOCTa73qqrT69h2578bxFiA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Arnold Ahlert: The nObama administration is funding Iranian-fueled Islamic terrorism.
          Forget all the double-talk and the dissembling by perhaps the most arrogant individual to ever occupy the Oval Office. Despite Barack nObama's insistence that the latest revelations about the $1.7 billion accord reached with the world's foremost state sponsor of terrorism amount to the "manufacturing of outrage," the stench of a heinous quid pro quo, at best — and the outright payment of a ransom for hostages at worst — cannot be avoided.
          The agreement, which closed the books on a failed weapons deal reached just prior to the overthrow of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi during the 1979 Iranian revolution, was originally announced in January, and even then it was criticized as a ransom payment in exchange for five Americans held by Iran. nObama also asserted it was not part of the nuclear accord. "With the nuclear deal done, prisoners released, the time was right to resolve this dispute as well," he said at the White House on Jan. 17 — without mentioning the deal included $400 million in cash denominated in euros, Swiss francs and other currencies procured from the central banks of the Netherlands and Switzerland.
          And not released prisoners. Exchanged prisoners, as in the release, or pre-trial pardon, of seven people of Iranian descent, three of whom had been imprisoned for attempting to provide Iran with advanced technology, along with the dismissal of arrest warrants against 14 others.
          And along with the prisoners, the bundles of cash, courtesy of a secret airlift in unmarked cargo plane. Cash White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest insisted was necessary because "we all know there is no banking relationship between the U.S. and Iran," and only a story now because of "political attacks that are being made by people who are trying to justify their opposition to the deal."
          nObama was equally dismissive. "It is not at all clear to me why cash as opposed to a wire transfer has made this into a new story," he stated. "Maybe because it feels like some spy novel or some crime novel because cash was exchanged."
          Or maybe, as former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey revealed, sanctions that prevent engaging in dollar transactions with Iran remain in place, making it necessary to use other currencies. And why cash? "There is principally one entity within the Iranian government that has need of untraceable funds," Mukasey explains. "That entity is the Quds Force — the branch of Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps focused particularly on furthering the regime's goals world-wide by supporting and conducting terrorism."
          It gets worse. America has a money laundering statute, but it only applies to transfers to or from U.S. territory. Mukasey notes, "This transfer occurred entirely abroad."
          Nonetheless, the resolution of a 37-year-old dispute with a nation that has maintained a war footing against American interests throughout that entire period, and the simultaneous implementation of a nuclear accord, is being framed as strictly coincidental. "As we've made clear, the negotiations over the settlement of an outstanding claim ... were completely separate from the discussions about returning our American citizens home," State Department spokesman John Kirby insisted. This despite U.S. officials admitting the Iranian prisoner negotiators wanted cash to show they had gotten something "tangible" for their efforts.
          And make no mistake: Even officials in the nObama administration's corrupt Justice Department objected to the cash transfer, but they were overruled by an equally corrupt State Department. "People knew what it was going to look like," stated one of the objectors, "and there was concern the Iranians probably did consider it a ransom payment."
          That's because they did. "This money was returned for the freedom of the U.S. spy and it was not related to the [nuclear] negotiations," declared Mohammad Reza Naqdi, Brigadier General of Iran's volunteer Basij Force. That assessment was echoed by released hostage Saeed Abedini, who stated he was told by police "we are waiting for another plane and until that plane doesn't come, we never let you go."
          The State Department could have confirmed or denied Abedini's allegation. Instead they chose to stonewall, with State Department deputy spokesperson Mark C. Toner telling AP diplomatic reporter Mike Lee he hasn't "gotten clarity" on whether the plane loaded with cash landed before or after the hostage plane took off, but the agency is "still looking into it."
          Those familiar with the nObama administration's modus operandi should expect State to be "looking into it" long after the media's increasing disinterest diminishes to zero.
          The administration's reflexive stonewalling, and Leftmedia efforts to bury it, continue. "White House officials have declined to say whether the rest of the $1.7 billion payment ... was also made in cash," The New York Times reported Friday — buried in the 13th paragraph of its article.
          That's an astounding revelation, but Times will undoubtedly be joined by the rest of the calculatingly disinterested Leftmedia, eager to reduce this story to one of semantical distinctions, or "old news," as liar-Hillary Clinton called it.
          So what's not old news? "In sum, the nObama administration has provided Iran with $400 million under circumstances in which it well knows that at least some of this cash will be used for terrorism," writes former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. Thus columnist Mark Steyn's searing assessment of nObama remains germane: "If he were working for the other side, what exactly would he be doing differently?"   -The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 
 
.
nObama Former Top Intel Official:
ISIS Is Already in America
by Adam Kredo
Michael-Flynn.jpg
{freebeacon.com} ~ Affiliates of the Islamic State terror organization are already residing in the United States, though exact numbers are unclear due to the nObama administration’s efforts to downplay and hide information about this threat from the American public... the former director of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency told the Washington Free Beacon in a wide-ranging interview. Gen. Michael Flynn, an adviser to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump who served as a top intelligence official under the nObama administration, warned that “they are here” when asked by the Free Beacon to characterize the threat posed to Americans by undercover ISIS adherents. “They are here,” Flynn said, disclosing that he is aware of roughly 1,000 instances in which ISIS members have been caught plotting in the United States...  http://freebeacon.com/national-security/obamas-top-intel-general-isis-already-america/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=8a2f870534-WFB_Morning_Beacon_8_10_168_9_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-8a2f870534-45611665
.
More than incompetence in Benghazi
by Adm. James A. Lyons
8_8_2016_b1lyonslgbenghazi18201_c0-0-1656-965_s885x516-868x506.jpg
{aim.org} ~ Trey Gowdy’s recently released Special Committee on Benghazi report, followed by the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi report, provide new insights into the tragedy that cost the lives of four Americans... including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. This catastrophe goes much deeper than our failure to respond to multiple, well-coordinated attacks on our Benghazi facilities on the night of Sept. 11, 2012. The genesis for the attack was actually the “Outreach to Muslims” speech by President nObama on June 4, 2009, in Cairo with the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood leadership prominently seated in the front row. When he declared that it was part of his responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam, wherever they appear — that said it all. Therefore, when al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood-controlled militias launched their revolt against the Moammar Gadhafi regime in February 2011, the nObama administration showed where its true sympathies lay. It switched sides in the global war on terror and allied with the Islamic jihadists. This dramatic change in U.S. policy can most likely be attributed to the fact that Mr. nObama made an ideological commitment to support the expansion of Muslim Brotherhood power throughout the Middle East and North Africa...  http://www.aim.org/guest-column/more-than-incompetence-in-benghazi/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email081016&utm_medium=email
.
"It's Dangerous to Believe": The Growing
Persecution of U.S. Christians
by Steve Byas
1189084cabede9b5aa65e58464f67808_M.jpg
{thenewamerican.com} ~ The late Cardinal Francis George of Chicago predicted almost 10 years ago, “I expect to die in bed, my successor will die in prison and his successor will die a martyr in the public square.”... Such a grim prophecy of the fate of Christian leaders in the United States, long noted for its Christian culture, would have been met with derision by most believers just 20 years ago. But as author Mary Eberstadt says in her relatively short volume full of examples that tend to support the cardinal’s expectations of coming Christian persecution, “By 2016, in many influential cultural, political, and intellectual precincts, C for Christian has become the new scarlet letter.” When young Alexis de Tocqueville traveled throughout America in the 1830s, he was struck by the pervasiveness of the Christian influence upon the culture. He attributed the greatness of the country — at which Europeans marveled — mostly to the churches, and predicted that as long as America remained a good country, it would remain a great country...
.
U.S. court rejects Muslim's demand to use Shariah
by Bob Unruh
gavel-american-flag-600.jpg
{wnd.com} ~ A state court in Minnesota, which already is heavily influenced by a large population of Muslim immigrants and has one district represented in Congress by a Muslim, has decided that in America, it’s American inheritance law that applies... The recent ruling from the Court of Appeals affirmed a Hennepin County District Court decision that the widow, Nariman Sirag Elsayed Khalil, of a taxi driver who died in an accident should be the one to benefit from a $183,000 settlement over her husband’s death. It was the cab driver’s brother who argued in court that Islamic law should apply, so that the widow of Nadir Ibrahim Ombabi would only get 25 percent of the wrongful death settlement, 16.7 percent should go to his mother’s estate and the rest to Ombabi’s siblings, “with the males to receive ‘twice the share of the female.'”...  http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/u-s-court-rejects-muslims-demand-to-use-shariah/
.
Fraud, Waste, and Sabotage
by CYNTHIA E AYERS
4x354CYvGcSr43u8EiiT-DVgW_cT8WT0YtFzt_oUlGg8thLpCDvZQfZuWdcfFNWCa6Tc1dXXr_by9zEhK5nnNpaXaZh-iyFmhhgnLLFhQ9Lo2Cn--QdAVQB2G2q9nGxPmn2pAw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ George Orwell, in his 1942 essay entitled "The Meaning of Sabotage," discussed the ability of a few within Europe to significantly inhibit the workings of Hitler's military industrial base... His discription of active, physical sabotage was instructive; but he also explained the concept of "passive sabotage" - a form of willful demolition that is much less recognizable as such. This type of vandalism can be accomplished by slowing processes; encouraging confusion, complexity and chaos; and otherwise "preventing it e.g. the system, organization, etc. from working smoothly." If Orwell were alive to analyze the current status of U.S. federal bureaucracies, what would his findings be? Can fraud and waste be categorized as vandalism? Do our federal systems work "smoothly?" If not - why? The extent to which governmental mega systems have become bogged down in red tape, regulatory obstacles, remunerative favoritism, and politically biased tendencies should be obvious, at this point, to even the casual observer. Extensive scandals associated with the VA, IRS, GSA, EPA, OPM, DOJ, and other "alphabet soup" organizations that would have been unimaginable 15 or 20 years ago seem almost as if ripped from the pages of an Orwellian novel. Confusion, complexity and chaos?  Yes!  Sabotage? Perhaps. Intent may be hard to prove, yet it appears that there is plenty of circumstantial evidence...  http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/fraud-waste-and-sabotage?f=must_reads
.
Immigration 'Trojan Horse': Center Exposes
Hostiles' Exploitation Of 'Pay-For-Citizenship'
Visa As A National Security Threat
by CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
0bfgFRLyiwU1IL8KDNYFQg48iiV5hDWoK5N3U7kwV2novXazNhEc0ii7iOVhSKIEIncKfCu70xXn8lqLqU1xvDsuc2MjXzGsj2QlVHQN6D2aZCxkjO36FZ7vV5qf=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ Investigations into the checkered personal story of Islamic supremacist Khyzr Khan following his speaking appearance at the Democratic National Convention in July 2016 have called attention to the focus of his legal practice... As an immigration lawyer, he has specialized in the little-known "EB-5 Visa Program" - a visa that permits would-be immigrants effectively to purchase U.S. legal residency status and puts them on an accelerated path to citizenship. The Center for Security Policy is pleased to publish as the latest in its Occasional Papers series a detailed critique of the EB-5 Program by another experienced immigration attorney, Shae Armstrong. Entitled, EB-5 Trojan Horse: How an American Pay-for-Citizenship Immigration Program Poses a National Security Threat, Mr. Armstrong's case study examines the ominous use being made of this vehicle by Communist China in order to insinuate its nationals and strategic investments into the United States... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/immigration-trojan-horse-center-exposes-hostiles-exploitation-of-pay-for-citizenship-visa-as-a-national-security-threat?f=must_reads
.
Risking Armageddon for $1 Billion a Year
SprDB0OTjfgfI-sal__dPMTjOBOpXsPAHYtg7Irs9QbDPKtOAksSO7oEHfgSuAV_Ngo0KFckoMRbymJQbVpOB53tkfWf4qsKxriwyl9qns2FbJ-qC8I=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by PETER HUESSY
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ Everybody is looking for defense dollars. The latest sleuth is Luke O'Brien, an Army "Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Fellow" at the National Defense University... He thinks he has found a $62 billion pot of cash if we just got rid of our land based ICBMs. The money could then be spent on more important conventional military needs. It is true nuclear modernization of the USA deterrent force will cost $700 billion over the next 25 years according to a study done by the Center for Security and International Studies. At first glance that is a great deal of money. But it averages $28 billion a year for nearly 500 missiles, submarines and bombers, 5-12 types of warheads, the command and control associated with the force, and the nuclear laboratories and facilities supporting warhead production, safety and refurbishment. This comes to 4.6% of the current defense budget and a projected ½ of 1% of the Federal budget in 2025 at the initial peak of modernization spending...   http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/risking-armageddon-for-1-billion-a-year?f=must_reads
.
The Truth Behind The Video liar-Hillary
Claimed Caused The Benghazi Attack
by Jeff Dunetz
18qkvq.jpg
{lidblog.com} ~ It’s been proven many times over that the YouTube video about the life of Mohammed had absolutely nothing to do with the Benghazi attack that killed four American heroes... It has also been proven that liar-Hillary Clinton and Barack nObama knew from the start the story they were telling America about the video was a lie. But the true story of the video that went viral thanks to liar-Clinton and nObama has never been told until now. That was the jumping off point for my discussion with Kenneth Timmerman on the Lid Radio show on Wednesday (embedded below). An investigative reporter, war correspondent, and author, Kenneth Timmerman’s reporting has revealed untold narratives about recent major international events including the Benghazi terror attack, Iran’s weapons program, 9/11, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the persecution of Christians in Iraq just to mention a very few...  http://lidblog.com/the-truth-behind-the-video-hillary-claimed-caused-the-benghazi-attack/
.
liar-Hillary Wants Abortions Funded
With Federal Tax Dollars
by Onan Coca and Jeff Dunetz
plat.jpeg
{lidblog.com} ~ The abortion plank in the 2016 Democratic platform calls for the repeal of the Hyde and Helms amendments, effectively marginalizing the voices millions of pro-life Democrats... These amendments prevent federal taxpayer funds from being used to pay for abortions. Thus if liar-Hillary Clinton gets her way, those who believe that abortion is taking a human life will be force to contribute to the mass-murder. As described by the Democratic Party: The platform also vows to oppose, and seek to overturn, all federal and state laws that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde Amendment.  It also strongly supports the repeal of harmful restrictions that obstruct women’s access to healthcare around the world, including the Global Gag Rule and the Helms Amendment, which bars US assistance to other countries that provide safe, legal, abortion...  http://lidblog.com/hillary-wants-abortion-to-be-funded-with-federal-tax-dollars/
.
Turkey, Europe's Little Problem
by Burak Bekdil
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Nations do not have the luxury, as people often do, of choosing their neighbors. Turkey, under the 14-year rule of Recep Tayyip Erdogan's Islamist governments, and neighboring both Europe and the Middle East, was once praised as a "bridge" between Western and Islamic civilizations... Its accession into the European Union (EU) was encouraged by most EU and American leaders. Nearly three decades after its official bid to join the European club, Turkey is not yet European but has become one of Europe's problems. Europe's "Turkish problem" is not only about the fact that in a fortnight a bomb attack wrecked a terminal of the country's biggest airport and a coup attempt killed nearly 250 people; nor is it about who rules the country. It is about the undeniable democratic deficit both in governance and popular culture. In only the past couple of weeks, Turkey was in the headlines with jaw-dropping news. In Istanbul, a secretary at a daily newspaper was attacked by a group of people who accused her of "wearing revealing clothes and supporting the July 15 failed coup." She was six months pregnant...  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8669/turkey-europe-problem
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

.
Lipstick on Democratic pigs
by Burt Prelutsky
{wnd.com} ~ The Democrats would have us believe that these are the best of times and that we are on the verge of seeing Barack nObama’s head added to the four already immortalized on Mount Rushmore. The question is whether in November the majority of Americans will actually ignore all of the disheartening facts concerning our economy, race relations, terrorist activity here and abroad and the fissures growing between us and our traditional allies, and vote for eight more years of the same or worse.
 
If liar-Hillary Clinton is able to rally the forces responsible for re-electing the tyrannical wannabe in 2012, she will be able to combine the worst ideas of Barack nObama and Bernie Sanders going forward. Worse yet, she will be able to leave, as her legacy, a majority of leftist loons in complete control of the Supreme Court.
 
I wish that every last Never Trump holdout would pause and consider how much permanent damage a court consisting of seven or eight justices cut from the same cloth as Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor could do.
 
It amazes me when I consider such matters as the Second Amendment, religious rights and the criminal justice system that anyone could despise Donald Trump for his rudeness and occasional oafishness so much that they would even consider staying home on Election Day and allowing the liar-Clintons to return to the scene of their earlier crimes.
 
When Chris Wallace had Trump’s campaign manager Paul Manafort on his show, Wallace, an acorn who didn’t fall far enough away from Mike Wallace’s uber-liberal oak, insisted that Barack nObama is carefully vetting Syrian refugees and that the process is taking between 18 and 24 months to complete. What Wallace didn’t bother explaining is how it is in that case that nObama’s open-door policy has already let in nearly 7,000 of them since last October, especially as it was less than 12 months ago that the ISIS-inspired vermin first began swarming out of the Middle East.
 
Frankly, I was surprised that even after we got proof that he was right about the DNC rigging the primaries that Bernie Sanders rolled over like a puppy dog. What did it gain him besides the opportunity to address the convention and have his erstwhile followers boo him off the stage? He went from being the leader of a children’s crusade to his former role as an inconsequential senator from an inconsequential state.
 
As I see it, the DNC can apologize all it wants and can continue to claim that Mrs. liar-Clinton would have emerged victorious in any case. However, what they can’t deny is that Debbie Wasserman Schultz scheduled the half dozen debates – down from the 20-odd in 2008 – when they were sure to draw the smallest possible audience, thus denying the formerly unknown Vermont senator a decent chance to make his wacky case to the greatest possible number of pinheads.
 
When you combine that with the 600-odd party bigwigs who have the power to out-vote millions of Democrats, the DNC didn’t just have a finger on the scales, they had their entire fist on it.
 
Old Bernie was so totally emasculated by the liar-Clinton machine that he didn’t even dare squeak when liar-Hillary then turned around and named Mrs. Wasserman Schultz the honorary chairwoman of her presidential campaign, proving that if there’s one thing the woman appreciates, it’s dirty tricks performed on her behalf.
 
Understand that I hold no sympathy for Sen. Sanders, an alleged Jew who sides with Israel’s enemies and who invited Paul Bustinduy to be his personal guest in Philadelphia. Senor Bustinduy is the secretary of Spain’s far-left/anti-Semitic political party known as Podemos. The only surprise is that he wasn’t allowed to address the crowd. With his credentials, he would have brought down the house.
 
Speaking of leftists, I made a mistake in a recent column, “The Wretched Refuse,” when, in referencing the words inscribed on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty, I credited them to Emma Goldman instead of Emma Lazarus. I wouldn’t want to be responsible if you found yourself on “Jeopardy!” and my mistake wound up costing you money. All I can say in my own defense is that in a certain light, all those old Jewish lefties look alike.

I trust that somewhere between now and Election Day, Donald Trump will ask Americans if they are better off than they were eight years ago. If enough voters answer the question honestly, he should win in a cakewalk.
 
Their politics aside, I can’t picture a bigger bunch of ignoramuses than the 40-odd members of the Congressional Black Caucus. Still, some are dumber than others. I’m sure you all remember that CBC member Hank Johnson, D-Ga., once garnered his 15 minutes of fame after confessing to his fear that Guam might tip over if too many Navy families were allowed to join their husbands and fathers on the Pacific island.
 
Well, the big news is that the congressman hasn’t gotten any smarter in the intervening six years. While addressing the anti-Semitic scumbags who constitute the group calling itself the “U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation,” he garnered a standing ovation by referring to Israelis as “termites.” But, to be fair, he may just be following the lead of his glorious leader, Barack Hussein nObama, who also favors the Islamists over the Jews.
In addressing the DNC convention, Bill liar-Clinton wanted us all to believe that he and liar-Hillary are the most loving couple since Romeo and Juliet, and that theirs is truly a match made in Heaven. Ha!
 
Having read the accounts of Ron Kessler and Dick Morris, I know that the origin of this particular union was cobbled together in a much different place. It’s a place where a serial adulterer and a harridan given to profanity-laced tirades directed at Secret Service agents, uniformed military personnel and the aforementioned sexual predator will eventually spend eternity – unless, of course, Satan is merely an unfounded rumor.
 
Instead of Shakespeare’s doomed lovers, the couple the liar-Clintons most closely resemble are Josef Stalin and Adolf Hitler in 1939, when the two slimiest creatures in the world signed a mutual non-aggression pact.
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center