Friday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
If Not Russia, Who Is 
liar-Hillary's 'Foreign Entity'?
by Joe Herring
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Mueller Has Offered Tony Podesta Immunity
To Testify In Manafort Case
M433r6mP6hgjrLhWsU5f2SRIq5deIM_1TK3azkZ0maqSEfoQ0zj_zfV0vNcQIEyGeqHu4rk9l5t4RnA7yzH0T6aR8qcnp7B3dcNGvhMVYVwhOhWqEWkfV0gxFawL7O2DxzMYyVvt7Q42KCm61GrC_nlLR9wScTkAnYx34tH-oRs046S-MeBRRUHSHnHb5g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Chuck Ross
{ dailycaller.com } ~ Special counsel Robert Mueller has offered liar-Clinton-connected superlobbyist Tony Podesta immunity... in order to testify against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, according to Fox News host Tucker Carlson. “Tonight we can report exclusively based on two separate sources we spoke to today that Tony Podesta has been offered immunity by Robert Mueller to testify against Paul Manafort,” reported Carlson. The Daily Caller News Foundation has not independently confirmed the report. Podesta, whose brother is liar-Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, worked with Manafort’s consulting firm in 2012 on a project to help a Ukrainian non-profit group that supported then-Ukraine President Viktor Yanukovych. Manafort has been indicted on numerous counts of conspiracy and fraud related to the work, which ended two years before the longtime Republican operative joined the Trump campaign...
.
scumbag-Whoopi Whooped by Judge Jeanine
{ rickwells.us } ~ Judge Jeanine Pirro’s appearance Thursday on The View to promote her new book, “Liars, Leakers and Liberals,” was fireworks waiting to happen... and that’s just what happened when she locked horns with perennial bully scumbag-Whoopi Golderg. The showdown was the equivalent of two alpha males going at it and scumbag-Whoopi got so flustered by Pirro’s defiance that she brought the segment to a screeching halt, “Say goodbye! I’m done!” The Fox News host showed incredible class as she sat there and smiled as “The View” hosts spewed their liberal garbage, but things really got heated when the left’s favorite Trump-bashing Republican, Anna Navarro, asked whether Trump “embraces and embodies conservative ideology.”...   https://rickwells.us/whoopi-whooped-judge-jeanine/
.
‘Deep Fake’ Technology Is a Threat to National Security,
Politics, and the Media, Marco Rubio Says
qwkFr-0I2e9aeY4pURpeEzh6g7zEvbiE_uUp3txUvUTA_w5FAjm-Xci9idO-gqir680dUR782vvwAay3H4-LlbspoNKHHiyE88V4kgmatGR43Z_vcQ1ommh-rs4HLvw0q8cqWLltBg4FnOE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Rachel del Guidice
{ dailysignal.com } ~ Sen. Marco Rubio says so-called “deep fakes”—the ability to use artificial intelligence video tools to swap a person’s face on another person’s body... with little indication of manipulation—is a threat to national security. “One of the ironies of the 21st century is that technology has made it cheaper than ever to do that … . In the old days, if you wanted to threaten the United States, you needed 10 aircraft carriers, and nuclear weapons, and long-range missiles,” the Florida Republican said in a speech Thursday at The Heritage Foundation about the danger of deep fakes, the ability to manipulate audio and video of real people to have them do or say things they never said or did. “Today, you just need access to our internet system, to our banking system, to our electrical grid and infrastructure, and increasingly, all you need is the ability to produce a very realistic fake video that could undermine our elections, that could throw our country into tremendous crisis internally and weaken us deeply,” Rubio said. The New York Times reported that “a community of hobbyists has begun experimenting with more powerful tools, including FakeApp—a program that was built by an anonymous developer using open-source software written by Google.”...  https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/07/19/deep-fake-technology-is-a-threat-to-national-security-politics-and-the-media-rubio-says/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWVRrME5qbG1ZMlJsWXpSaSIsInQiOiJDTkw2ZkdzeE9YMnl3MzdMSHRKYlFaTndaaW9cL3IrZktqNmIxVVZlcEpHeGtVRUV3NEVUeTdPU1pjTmVGWm9wWDNPYjRKRXhkTGdZNGR1OTBwdUREa2R5T3FhcFExbTFxdzh1U1wvOEs2cW5pRUdxSWwxSHhMNmMrUmxwbE0zaTJpIn0%3D 
.
It’s Time to Take Back the Kippah
UksKkK-XalwlgXJnW9Ae2J1x-RQ4KtrWpZ2Cwz1IEU1O7i8NtVG5tU_Lo_LyK4BQzf742YD1UlUFa7_kmyZy5ejrc0_elG4tawRyHDk4J8xqxWO2rCSgO1SSe4RfaWMVk6o5ZP2XKJC4IlM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by KAREN LEHRMAN BLOCH
{ jewishjournal.com } ~ The same day that The Jerusalem Post published a game-changing op-ed by Israeli writer Hen Mazzig under the headline “Reclaiming the Kippah,”... news reports circulated of a young man in Bonn, Germany, assaulting a 50-year-old Johns Hopkins University professor in a park, shouting: “No Jews in Germany!” Police respondng to the scene then mistook the professor as the assailant, tackling him and punching him  before putting him in handcuffs. How did the young man, later identified by police as having “Palestinian roots,” know the professor was Jewish? Because the professor was wearing a kippah. The incident could not have underlined Mazzig’s point more sharply: The kippah — signifying our identity as Jews — has been taken away from us. It’s well past time to take it back. “To wear a kippah is to publicly declare yourself as a member of a hated minority,” Mazzig wrote. “Our people were always told to be ashamed of something: who we are, our religion, our attire, even the fact that we have national aspirations. … For centuries, the kippah distinguished Jews from non-Jews, and at various points in history became one of the strongest symbols of Jewish courage and pride.” Mazzig is calling for that moment again, not as a provocation but rather as self-identification, when our identity again is being used against us...
.
scumbag-Keith Ellison Demands Amazon
Censor the David Horowitz Freedom Center
wKyX4uVXUInm6l3rK9SD9uajgOhMWbCBDMeRJNGucUyUi9Iw4Bw78s-mDVm9PE4XiiT7HKy9cu3UMuvhrYyipA8xcRGAALbvxwDZq4zQFjeIGon5eh_OzlboiTdhPZwKrc7icsFWLNc8YKB0IJfzZHr0mRyRdwz98HksAfjVRfE-j5eowvqg_uiOFfDT-ti5E3q9r8Yftvp_sF8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300by Daniel Greenfield
{ frontpagemag.com } ~ scumbag-Keith Ellison was formerly a member of the Nation of Islam, a racist black nationalist hate group... He has allegedly met with Farrakhan more recently and has worked with anti-Semitic and pro-terrorist Islamic organizations such as CAIR and ISNA. Despite that, as Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch reports, he's demanding that Amazon censor books and other materials produced by organizations listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups. As Spencer notes, "The far-Left Bezos likely also thinks that the SPLC is a reliable authority, and so it is entirely possible that he will comply with scumbag-Ellison’s demands and purge Amazon of all materials by people that the SPLC has smeared and defamed. Given Amazon’s dominance of the book market, that would be a serious blow to the freedom of speech, as the SPLC is making an all-out attempt to delegitimize the full spectrum of opinion that dissents from the Leftist agenda — on Islam, immigration, social issues and more. If Amazon drops SPLC-designated “hate” material, there should ensue a national discussion about whether the SPLC is really a reliable authority, and whether only one viewpoint should be allowed in the public square. If not, this will just be another nail in the coffin of the freedom of speech in the U.S."...scumbag-Ellison is worthless and needs to be banned .
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
If Not Russia, Who Is 
liar-Hillary's 'Foreign Entity'?
by Joe Herring

{ americanthinker.com } ~ I've long said liar-Hillary Clinton is insufficiently stupid to have believed she could operate an unsecured home server without compromising the security of any data transmitted through it or stored on it.

For just as long, it has been my contention that the server was the faucet through which she pumped information she was selling yes, selling to foreign entities, both public and private.

I.T. security protocols would've easily flagged attempts at intrusion if targeted toward the State Department's secure servers, through which then-secretary of state liar-Clinton ought to have conducted business. Likewise, the transfer or copying of said information from a secure server is a detectable act with access being tightly controlled and records kept of who looked at what and when.

"Convenience," the excuse proffered by liar-Clinton for not following even the most basic of security procedures, is, in a way, a rare instance of liar-Clinton telling the truth, just not in the way she would have us believe.

She claims that it was more convenient to utilize a home server, using linked devices to conduct business. More truthfully, it was more convenient to offload state secrets absent the prying eyes of government I.T. security staff.

In his now infamous "exoneration presser," fired FBI director James Comey admitted that liar-Clinton's server was "likely compromised" by foreign actors, but he also claimed there was "no evidence" of such an intrusion. During disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok's recent testimony, we discovered that this assertion was just another in a long line of brazen falsehoods tumbling out of Comey's mouth.

To drink a shot of liquor every time Comey says something that might be true might prove an entertaining parlor game for teetotalers. Beyond stating his name, there's precious little else he might say that is not suspect.

Rep. Louie Gohmert, (R-Texas) gave Strzok a moral shellacking over Strzok's extramarital affair with his co-worker and co-conspirator, Lisa Page, wondering aloud whether Strzok bore the same smirk he exhibited in that day's hearings when he looked his wife in the eye and lied to her about his fidelity.

A legitimate point, as the character of the smirking doyen was at issue, given that Strzok had spent the better part of that day swearing that his personal biases did not bear on his public duties, an assertion belied by both the evidence and common sense. 

The resulting furor from dummycrats-Democrat members of the committee overshadowed the point Gohmert was making – that from Strzok's own mouth came yet more confirmation that liar-Hillary Clinton's home server was compromised by a "foreign entity"; that there was indeed evidence of the intrusion and the theft of data; and that Comey had lied yet again, as he most certainly knew of this prior to his tortured-logic exoneration spectacle.

Representative Gohmert emphasized that the "foreign entity" responsible for placing the digital back door into liar-Clinton's server was not Russia. "And this is a foreign entity, not related to Russia in the least!"

Who is this unnamed foreign entity? Gohmert knows but isn't saying, as that information is likely still classified. This revelation causes numerous questions to spring to mind, not the least of which, the timing of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's splashy unsealing of indictments against Russian targets over "election meddling," coming within hours of Strzok's damning admission.

The difficulty in unraveling the perfidy of the liar-Clintons, the previous administration, and their overseas entanglements has always been the sheer scope of the corruption. When investigating one crime, ten more are discovered, leading to ten more for each of those. The high levels at which these crimes have been committed – President liar-nObama's Cabinet and the president himself – compound the problem as their ideological allies within the permanent bureaucracy continue to obstruct, misdirect, and cover up in the name of "resistance."

It strains credulity to believe that the vast investigative resources of the federal government have been brought to bear against the Trump administration simply to enable a twice failed presidential candidate to avoid accountability for carelessly handling classified information. 

While the liar-Clintons have made their careers by enmeshing in criminality nearly everyone with whom they come in contact, their lives, politically and physically, are nearing the end. Even the risk of liar-Clinton "bringing everyone down with me" is likely insufficient motivation for such herculean efforts to conceal and deceive both the public and the Trump administration.

It is my assertion that the dummycrats-Democratic Party, under the shadow leadership of President liar-nObama, is mounting such a vigorous defense to hide its own involvement in the criminality that characterizes all thingsliar-Clinton – most notably, the money-laundering operation known as the liar-Clinton Foundation.

President liar-nObama knew of liar-Hillary's illicit server. He communicated with her on it. Both surely knew that any electronic device with even a tangential connection to either of them would be targeted by every hacker on the globe with nefarious purpose. Logic then would dictate that any information passed through, or placed on that server, was placed there to be picked up – a digital dead drop, if you will. 

Politicians have made an art form out of evading accountability for bribery and financial malfeasance in office. It simply isn't conceivable that the unprecedented contortions of the Deep State displayed since the arrival of Trump would be triggered by a desire to conceal garden variety influence-peddling. However, as a reason sufficiently important to warrant committing hundreds of additional crimes to prevent its discovery, treason stands alone.

The same mindset that has no difficulty in short-circuiting the Constitution by enacting through judicial and executive fiat those policy aims they could never accomplish legislatively also has little problem with bypassing national security restrictions, if they believe that their purpose is sufficiently noble. We saw this in Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, selling nuclear secrets to the Soviets to maintain a "balance of power." Indeed, nearly every instance of domestic espionage in modern times has been rooted in this misshapen sense of moral imperative so fondly inculcated on the left.

Future investigations must answer these questions: who is the "foreign entity" of which Rep. Gohmert spoke? What information did they receive? Were they the end-user, or merely a conduit to another power? What connection did they and others in that time frame have to the liar-Clinton Foundation? Where does the money trail lead? Who benefits from the information and the policies stemming from it?

We learned that Russia was not the "foreign entity" that compromised liar-Clinton's server, a revelation quickly swept from the headlines by a blanket indictment charging Russians with hacking everything from our elections to the Colonel's secret recipe of herbs and spices.

How do we know that the timing of the indictment is more instructive than the content within? There is nothing in the indictment that hadn't already been alleged more than a year ago, and there is no new evidence provided to bolster the claims. In other words, this indictment has been sitting in Rosenstein's or Mueller's pocket, as cleanser for a damaging news cycle – prosecutorial "BleachBit" for an investigation tainted from its inception.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center