~ Featuring ~
by Arnold Ahlert  
American citizens vs. Uneducated Mob
by Dustin Koellhoffer
{} ~ Nasty Trump, Lyin’ Ted, Nazi Republicans, white supremacists, white nationalists, racists, xenophobes... these are just a few of the epithets used by dummycrats-Democrats to slander Republicans.  The left always dismisses their own bigotry that is their history and believes they are without sin as they condemn the innocent as guilty even if proven innocent like Kavanaugh. They ignore the crimes and sins of their leaders like liar-Clinton and scumbag/liar-nObama declaring that Trump is nasty and too “undignified” to be president. Because he calls a nasty woman who falsely attacked him “horseface” they say he is not as dignified a president as Barack scumbag/liar-nHussein “You can put lipstick on a pig” scumbag/liar-nObama. dummycrats-Democrats on CNN slander all who vote for Trump as being beneath contempt and advocate for their destruction. One said, “Until white evangelical men have the fortitude to speak out against this behavior then nothing’s going to change.” Until minorities speak out and vote against  dummycrats-Democrat lies and bigotry their lives will never improve. The only problem in this nation over the last fifty years has been white evangelical men submitting to leftist instruction on how they should deal with the evils of the left. That’s like obeying atheist’s instructions to Christians about what Jesus would do. dummycrats-Democrats of the #MeTwoFaced movement are at home with the nastiness, perversions, sins, and crimes of their own, but let a Republican reveal they are human and they are smeared as “satanic.” dummycrats-Democrats created the KKK and Nazism, but now deceitfully brand Republicans as their home. They can only do this by mis-teaching the history of socialism. This is the way of Alinsky’s teachings that were codified from how dummycrats-Democrats have behaved throughout their history. This is why the leftist socialists wanted control of education and entertainment, so they could indoctrinate the young into their false histories and propagandize them through innuendo and false accusations...
Did sick-Nancy Pulosi Endorse 
Liberal Violence As ‘Collateral Damage’?
by Jeff Dunetz
{} ~ Liberal big shots such as Rep. scumbag/mad-Maxine Waters, Sen. Sparticus scumbag-Booker, Loser liar-Hillary Clinton, and even the former attorney general scumbag-Eric Holder... have incited rank and file liberals to commit actual acts of violence. And each day it seems like another conservative if being attacked in a bar, restaurant, elevator, or another GOP headquarters is vandalized or burned down. One would expect the liberal leadership to join the big shot conservatives to call for an end to the violence, but sick-Nancy Pulosi may have endorsed the mayhem. Interviewed by NY Times Paul Krugman, at the 92nd Street Y in NYC, sick-Nancy Pulosi said: “We owe the American people to be there for them, for their financial security, respecting the dignity and worth of every person in our country, and if there is some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it, but it shouldn’t be our original purpose,”...
Gory Details of Khashoggi Murder Complicate US Response
{} ~ As gory details emerge about the alleged murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the hand of the Saudis in the kingdom’s consulate in Istanbul... political and financial matters complicate any response America may be contemplating. At present, confirmation of the murder is all but a given. Politically, Saudi Arabia is an essential part of President Donald Trump’s strategy to isolate Iran and bring its mullahs to their knees. The kingdom is also a major player in the Saudi-Israel-U.S. alliance to increase American influence in the Middle East and sideline not only Iran, but its allies Russia and Turkey. Any response that weakens that alliance will necessarily give strength to Iran, Russia and Turkey and their dangerous union. It is doubtful the United States would be willing for that to happen. On the home front, Saudi Arabia wields enormous power over the U.S. economy, with the ability to wreak havoc on Trump’s thus far successful economic  program. This is another risk Trump would not be willing to take when deciding how to respond to the charges against the Saudis. There are obviously details we don’t know and most likely never will concerning this story. One thing that seems clear is that Khashoggi was not the simply “dissident journalist” the mainstream media is painting him to be. We know a number of things about why Khashoggi came to be in the crosshairs of the Saudi political elite. Khashoggi was an outspoken critic of the regime. He was an adamant supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood and its Islamist political agenda for Saudi Arabia which would mean an overthrow of the current government. He was virulently anti-Israel and fomented Palestinian intransigence...
Mainstream media joins the Honduran 'caravan'
by Jennifer Harper 
{} ~ The countdown is on for the arrival of what has come to be known as the “Honduran caravan” — an estimated 4,000 men, women, children and infants... who left the troubled Honduran city of Pedro Sula last weekend on foot and by truck. Saturday will mark a week on the march for the throng of hopefuls who plan to assemble on the U.S.-Mexico border and demand entry. The caravan itself has become a complex political symbol that some observers say is yet another ploy by rival dummycrats-Democrats and a hostile news media to portray the president in a negative light as the midterm elections approach. That media now has its own caravan. Coverage is intense, plentiful and dramatic. “Republicans are fear-mongering about a migrant caravan to boost midterm turnout” said a Salon headline, while CNN noted, “Mother in caravan: Trump has to receive us.” Vox declared that “Trump’s ‘caravan’ tantrum could put migrants in danger.” But President Trump is having none of it...
Are Turkey's Spies Operating in America?
by Uzay Bulut
{} ~ According to Turkish media reports, the Turkish government's Directorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet) gathered intelligence via its imams and other employees in 38 countries... on the activities of Turks suspected of supporting the US-based Turkish Islamic cleric Fethullah Gülen, whom Turkey's government accuses of organizing a failed coup attempt in July 2016. Diyanet reportedly requested from its branches abroad to submit their findings in time for the 9th Eurasia Islamic Council, which took place in October 2016. These findings were then reportedly submitted to the "Coup Commission" of the Turkish parliament (TBMM). The findings included photos of the people who were being spied on by mosque employees hired by Diyanet and detailed information on the schools, companies, associations, foundations and media outlets allegedly linked to the Gülen movement, which the Turkish government has since labeled the "Fethullahist Terrorist Organization" (FETO). "The Diyanet said it gathered intelligence and prepared reports on Gülenists in Abkhazia, Germany three reports from Dusseldorf, Cologne and Munich, Albania, Australia two reports from Melbourne and Sydney, Austria two reports from Salzburg and Vienna, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria two reports from Plovdiv and Sofia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Switzerland, Italy, Japan, Montenegro, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Kosovo, Lithuania, Macedonia, Mongolia, Mauritania, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Turkmenistan and Ukraine." During a recent three-day state visit to Germany to discuss ways to "develop trade and economic investments... and how to effectively struggle against racism, xenophobia, and Islamophobia," Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan  attended the inauguration ceremony of the Cologne Central Mosque, established by the Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs (DiTiB)...
by Arnold Ahlert:  Feminist icon Camille Paglia believes the modern-day feminism recreated by Betty Friedan in the ‘60s hit “a wall of closed minds,” and thus represents the collapse of Western Civilization. She’s right on the mark.

             Speaking at the Battle of Ideas festival in London in October 2016, Paglia made it clear how far feminism has fallen from its high-water mark almost a hundred years ago:
               “The period of the 1920s, 1930s: that to me is my favorite period in feminism because these women admired what men had done. There was no male bashing as became systemic to Second Wave feminism. It’s an absolute poison that has spread worldwide.”
               “A feminism based on denigrating men, trivializing what men have done, defining men as oppressors and tyrants through history it is an absolute lie.”
               To be fair, the reemergence of this video is no coincidence: Paglia has released a new book, Provocations: Collected Essays, and the video will help draw attention to it. Yet it is hard to dispute her assertions, especially when she refers to the original feminist movement that won women the right to vote and saw iconic women such as Katharine Hepburn, Amelia Earhart, Dorothy Parker, and Anne Morrow Lindbergh as “great achievers.”
               Today’s feminists? Paglia believes the current generation of women has been tainted by an education system that “tried to make everyone feel good,” and social media “where people feel they have so many 'friends’ and they want a sense that reality is comforting them and cushioning them and so on.” She notes that when she went to college in the mid ‘60s she and her fellow feminists were willing to “risk rape” rather than maintain a system whereby college administrators acted “in loco parentis” for women, while male students were treated as adults.
               By contrast, today’s women are “easily upset,” even as they remain unaware of the “barbarities of human history,” and she contends this lack of historical perspective gives them “no sense of the special privileges they enjoy.
               It’s worse than that. Like so much of the progressive  ideology that forms the backbone of modern-day feminism, a virulent combination of infantilism and hateful hysteria has taken over the movement. Today’s feminists parade themselves around in vagina costumes, and pussy hatsinsist women can have penises, and advocate for witchcraft therapy to “process trauma, anger, and grief” — all while expecting to be taken seriously.
               When it comes to the Rule of Law and the Constitution, they believe men should “shut up,” due process should be tossed on the ash heap of history, and women who make accusations of sexual assault should be deemed “survivors.”
               Survivors whose accusations require unquestioning belief, irrespective of evidence or credibility.
               If not? A Washington Post op-ed entitled “Thanks for not raping us, all you 'good men.’ But it’s not enough,” written by Victoria Bissell Brown epitomizes the collective male-bashing that is precisely the “absolute poison” to which Paglia refers. “In the centuries of feminist movements that have washed up and away, good men have not once organized their own mass movement to change themselves and their sons or to attack the mean-spirited, teasing, punching thing that passes for male culture,” Brown asserts. “Not once. Bastards.”
               And aside from her anger, Brown, who is “almost 70 years old,” embraces another attribute that defines modern-day feminism: self-pity. “The gender war that has broken out in this country is flooding all our houses,” she declares. “It’s rising on the torrent of memories that every woman has. … Not just memories of sexual abuse. Memories of being dismissed, disdained, distrusted. Memories of having to endure put-downs at the office, catcalls in the parking lot, barked orders at a dinner party. And, for some reason, the most chilling memory of all, the one Christine Blasey Ford called up and that we all recognized: the laughter. The laughter of men who are bonding with each other by mocking us.”
               In a 2017 interview, American Enterprise Institute scholar Christina Hoff Sommers coined the most apt description of women like Brown and their fatuous assumptions that all women are fragile and easily traumatized: “fainting couch feminism.”
               As for mockery, no one wields that club more forcefully than feminists themselves — against other women. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s wife, Ashley, was attacked for standing in “ignorance, loyalty, & whiteness by her predator man.” Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), who refused to allow unsubstantiated allegations stand in the way of Kavanaugh’s ascension to the Court, was referred to by other women as a “betrayer,” “the face of the generation I can’t wait to die,” and someone who should never “have a moment of peace in public again.” As always, some women are “more equal” than others.
               That kind of rank hypocrisy is driven by ideology with conservative women invariably getting the short end of the stick. Nonetheless, the dividers remain unsatisfied: race is now part of the equation as well, and white women per se are the target. White women who “put their racial privilege ahead of their second-class gender status in 2016 by voting to uphold a system that values only their whiteness, just as they have for decades,” asserted NY Times columnist Alexis Grenell. White women who “have often played the protagonists in the history of sexual violence,” while “black women have been relegated to the supporting cast,” as Allyson Hobbs, director of African and African-American studies at Stanford University put it. White women who “use strategic tears to silence women of colour,” as the Guardian stated.
               Unsurprisingly, much of this animus was engendered by the same thing that has driven the entire American Left into paroxysms of uncontrollable hysteria: the election of Donald Trump. “Exit polls showed 52 percent of white women backed Donald Trump, and much sorrowful tsk-tsking ensued,” writes  Kyle Smith. “Sorrow turned to disbelief. Disbelief turned to rage.
               Why would white women vote for Trump? Maybe it’s because liar-Hillary Clinton was just as contemptuous of them as her fellow racial arsonists. “They will be under tremendous pressure — and I’m talking principally about white women,” she said in 2016. “They will be under tremendous pressure from fathers and husbands and boyfriends and male employers not to vote for ‘the girl.’”
               That would be “the girl” who dismissed credible (and ultimately proven) allegations by women against her own husband as a “vast right-wing conspiracy.
               Thus, feminists might consider that Clinton’s rank hypocrisy and contemptible double standards were more important to voters than her gender. They might also note those character traits remain unchanging: despite liar-Clinton’s insistence that Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser “deserves the benefit of the doubt,” she remains convinced that liar-Bill shouldn’t have resigned, and that his relationship with then-22-year-old intern Monica Lewinsky was not an abuse of power.
               Paglia believes the bankruptcy of modern-day feminism stems from “getting rid of the orthodox religions because they were too conservative” and replacing them with “the new religion of political correctness.” Thus, she concludes Second Wave feminists resemble the “Spanish Inquisition” where “any form of dissent is treated as heresy, and they actually try to destroy you.” Actually, modern-day feminism is destroying itself.

~The Patriot Post  

Views: 19


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on October 19, 2018 at 1:20pm


The way immigrates are acting at the Mex border is one why they will never enter the USA. They have no rights at all. I feel sorry for the little ones who don't know whats going on.

Comment by Bonnie Somer on October 19, 2018 at 12:52pm






Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


SICK: Leprosy On The Rise In Los Angeles 

Ahh, the joys of open borders and Democrat leadership.

California is not just a public toilet but now there is evidence that leprosy is on the rise in Los Angeles County.

Barack Obama changed US law in 2016 and allowed immigrants with blistering STDs and leprosy to migrate to the US.

Medscape reported:

Leprosy, also known as Hansen’s disease, is rarely seen in the United States, but cases continue to emerge in Los Angeles County, a new report says.

“Hansen’s disease still exists, and we need to educate medical students and physicians,” coauthor Dr. Maria Teresa Ochoa from Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, told Reuters Health by email.

Dr. Ochoa and colleagues identified 187 patients with the disease in a review of medical records from their leprosy clinic spanning 1973 to 2018. Most patients were Latino, originating from Mexico, and they experienced a median delay in diagnosis of more than three years, the team reports JAMA Dermatology, online August 7.

Multibacillary leprosy (MB) cases outnumbered paucibacillary leprosy (PB) cases by nearly eight to one (88.6% vs. 11.4%, respectively), and Latino patients were more likely than non-Latino patients to have MB, as were patients from Central or South America (versus other regions).

Most patients (80.7%) received multidrug therapy, and most (92.6%) received antibiotics for more than two years, especially if they had MB.

Only about half of patients (56.7%) had World Health Organization (WHO) grade 0 disability (no signs or symptoms suggestive of leprosy or disability) at the one-year follow-up, whereas 16.0% had grade 1 disability (loss of protective sensation) and 26.2% had grade 2 disability (visible deformity) at the last follow-up.

Among the patients who lost protective sensation, 87.7% (50/57) did not regain it following therapy.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service