TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
SCOTUS Narrowly Upholds Constitution 
by Thomas Gallatin
.
clown-Schumer Urges Trump to Wait 
'til He's Majority Leader to Replace Kennedy
{ rickwells.us } ~ There’s no telling what Chuck clown-Schumer was thinking as he tried a more measured tone in his political rhetoric... a ridiculous attempt to shame and persuade President Trump to wait until after the midterm elections to appoint a replacement for retiring Supreme Court Justice Kennedy. It’s as if clown-Schumer is secretly aware that President Trump has chronic Stockholm syndrome and that he would welcome even more obstructionism than he’s facing at every turn in every form dummycrats-Democrats can throw at him. clown- Schumer argued that President Trump should wait until there might be more than the current 49 dummycrats- Democrat Senators, following the midterms and even perhaps, in his wildest nightmares, a Majority Leader clown-Schumer.  Calling it the “most important Supreme Court vacancy for this country in at least a generation,” clown-Schumer illustrated, in the typical dummycrats- Democrat double-speak, that the liberal sky might well be falling. He said that “the fate of our healthcare system sealed when the dummycrats-Dems passed a bill nobody could read as a stealth wealth redistribution mechanism, reproductive rights for women infanticide on demand and countless other protections giveaways of other people’s stuff for middle class parasitic Americans are at stake.”...Like Trump is going to listen to clown-Schumer and when was the time clown-Schumer listen to Trump.   https://rickwells.us/schumer-trump-wait-kennedy/
.
ICE Protesters Demand To Enter Agency Headquarters, Fail
by Julia Cohen
{ dailycaller.com } ~ Protesters calling for the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)... demanded to be let into the federal building Wednesday, while security ignored their shouting. Multiple armed policemen guarding ICE headquarters did not flinch or acknowledge the protesters as they chanted “no borders no walls” and “fuck ICE.”  The protesters did not make any serious attempts to enter, despite the demands. The protesters also shouted “quit your jobs” at the guards in front of the building. One protester said ICE participated in “ethnic cleansing.” When asked by The Daily Caller News Foundation if he knew of anyone actually killed by ICE, he did not respond, saying the journalists asking were “complicit.”...
.
Iran’s Islamist Gov’t Faces Collapse After 
US Replaces liar-nObama Policy with Trump’s
by REBEKAH BAKER
{ westernjournal.com } ~ When President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear deal in May... he called it a “horrible one-sided deal that should never, ever have been made.” In response, furious Iranian lawmakers set fire to the American flag and a piece of paper representing the nuclear deal, and vowed to increase spending on the country’s ballistic missile program. “With a national consensus, we will give the U.S. and Zionists a response that they will regret,” said parliament speaker Ali Larijani according to the Mehr news agency. For the time being, however, it seems as though no one is regretting the loss of the deal more than Iran. It also seems like Trump’s way of dealing with the world’s lead sponsor of terror has been quite effective so far...   https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/irans-islamist-govt-faces-collaps...
.
GRILLED: Strzok Questioned by Lawmakers
by Sara Carter

{ saraacarter.com } ~ House Judiciary and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee members grilled embattled, anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok... behind closed doors on Capitol Hill Wednesday, as he attempted to explain his vehement bias against President Donald Trump, his senior role in the alleged Trump-Russia collusion investigation, and the exoneration of liar-Hillary Clinton for her use of a private server while she was Secretary of State. Strzok, who evaded a subpoena from House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), voluntarily appeared at the hearing. Thousands of Strzok’s anti-Trump text messages, which he exchanged with former FBI lawyer and his paramour, Lisa Page, sparked anger from Republicans and criticism from some dummycrats-Democrats who contend that senior members of the FBI utilized their power and political leanings to target Trump both before and after the 2016 election. Freedom Caucus & Judiciary Committee member, Matt Gaetz (R-FL) attended today’s deposition and reacted to Strzok’s testimony, telling the Sean Hannity Radio Show, “… I am shocked at the lack of curiosity with Robert Mueller. I mean Sean, if you were in Mueller’s shoes, and you had found these text messages, I would think that you would want to ask whether or not they impacted the investigative decisions that were made, whether there was bias, whether there was contact with other members of the FBI regarding the investigation and where it was going and who was making the critical judgment calls,” the Florida Congressman said. “I just cannot believe the lack of curiosity on the part of Robert Mueller. It was the strongest reaction I had today from Peter Strzok’s testimony.”...
.
Chairman Goodlatte: “FBI Lawyers instructed 
Peter Strzok not to answer many, many questions”
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Suffice to say it’s not a good look when lawyers representing the FBI are telling the central witness within a political conspiracy involving the FBI... not to answer questions from congressional oversight. House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte tells Martha MacCallum that FBI lawyers are instructing FBI Agent Peter Strzok not to answer questions from congress about the nature of his involvement within a DOJ/FBI conspiracy to stop a political candidate; and later to overthrow a presidency. Additionally Chairman Goodlatte states the answers agent Strzok did give about his text messages was “not believable”...
.
.

SCOTUS Narrowly Upholds Constitution 

by Thomas Gallatin:  On Tuesday, the Supreme Court handed down two significant rulings that both upheld clear, constitutionally and statutorily defined powers and rights. On Wednesday, it issued a ruling on another First Amendment case. However, the disturbing fact was that all three decisions were determined by the narrowest of margins, the 5-4 split. This demonstrates just how fundamentally divided the highest court in the land is when it comes to viewing Rule of Law and the Constitution. And how important election results can be.

             In Trump v. Hawaii, the Court upheld President Donald Trump’s statutory authority under 8 U.S.C. §1182(f) to enforce his “travel ban” on immigrants from certain countries. That this explicitly delineated authority was even in question, and that it rose all the way up to the Supreme Court to enforce, speaks volumes as to the state of the nation’s judiciary. It was obvious that Trump had the statutory authority, irrespective of the merits of his decision. But judicial despots at every level insisted that they could divine Trump’s supposedly racist and anti-Muslim intent, ruling on that basis instead of what the law actually says.
               Likewise, in NIFLA v. Becerra, the Court ruled in favor of free speech protections and against state-compelled speech by striking down California’s Reproductive FACT Act, which mandated that any women’s health clinic — including those dedicated to pro-life services — provide information on abortion services. Clearly, the law targeted pro-life organizations, compelling them to advise in favor of the very issue they exist to oppose. Justice Clarence Thomas noted that the Constitution recognizes no such dubious category of “professional speech” that supposedly “[gives] the States unfettered power to reduce a group’s First Amendment rights by simply imposing a licensing requirement.” And Justice Anthony Kennedy pointedly observed that the FACT Act was inherently discriminatory and “a paradigmatic example of the serious threat presented when government seeks to impose its own message in place of individual speech, thought, and expression.
               The third case likewise involved compelled speech — that of public employees subject to forced union dues, or “fair share” fees to support collective bargaining and other union activities. “This procedure violates the First Amendment and cannot continue,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority. “Neither an agency fee nor any other payment to the union may be deducted from a nonmember’s wages, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.” The ruling is a big loss for Big Labor.
               Collectively, the most concerning aspect of these rulings is the Court’s 5-4 split. All three decisions would have gone the other way if Merrick Garland rather than Neil Gorsuch had been sitting on the bench. As for Kennedy, still no word on his rumored retirement, but now — with Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell still at the helm — would be a great time.   ~The Patriot Pos
t
https://patriotpost.us/articles/56814?mailing_id=3573&utm_mediu...

Views: 98

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on June 29, 2018 at 8:52am

Bonnie

he knew he was not going to expose his masters no matter what. Rosenstein also knew he was not

Comment by Bonnie Somer on June 29, 2018 at 8:42am

strzok was never going to implicate himself.  he knows what he did mueller does not care

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

YIKES!!! Chelsea Clinton Emphatically States A Person With A Beard And A Penis Can ‘Absolutely’ Identify As A Woman

  • The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification
  • In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons about transgender self-identification
  • Chelsea Clinton replied ‘yes’ emphatically when asked if someone with a beard and penis can ever be a woman
  • ‘It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently,’ Hillary said
  • Aitkenhead said Hillary became ‘uneasy’ when the question was asked while Chelsea shot a ‘furious stare’ at the journalist as her mother answered
  • Hillary added: ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw’

(Daily Mail) – It may appear Hillary and Chelsea Clinton always see eye-to-eye, but in a recent interview one topic cracked the facade of the like-minded mother-daughter power duo.

The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons if someone with a beard and a penis can ever be a woman, to which Chelsea replied emphatically, ‘Yes.’

However, as Aitkenhead describes it, Hillary looked ‘uneasy’, and blamed generational gaps for being less accepting.

‘Errr. I’m just learning about this,’ Hillary responded. ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw. It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently.’

The Clintons sat sown with Aitkenhead to promote the book they co-authored, The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience.

The book features Danica Roem, the first trans woman elected to a U.S. state legislature.

According Aitkenhead’s account, she tells Hillary during the interview that many British feminists of Hillary’s generation have a problem with the idea that a ‘lesbian who doesn’t want to sleep with someone who has a penis is transphobic.’

Hillary nods in agreement, while Chelsea ‘stiffens and stares at me’, according to Aitkenhead.

The journalist then adds that many women of Hillary’s generation are uncomfortable with biological males sharing women’s bathrooms.

‘I would say that, absolutely,’ Hillary nods firmly. ‘Absolutely. Yes.’

That’s when Chelsea begins shooting a ‘furious stare’ at Aitkenhead, who points it out to her.

‘I’m a terrible actor’, Chelsea laughs.

Chelsea then says she is thrilled with the National Health Service’s decision to assign patients to single-sex wards according to the gender they identify as, instead of their biological make up.

‘How can you treat someone if you don’t recognize who they feel and know in their core they are?’ Chelsea says.

‘And I strongly support children being able to play on the sports teams that match their own gender identity,’ she adds. ‘I think we need to be doing everything we can to support kids in being whoever they know themselves to be and discovering who they are.’

At this point Hillary looks conflicted.

‘I think you’ve got to be sensitive to how difficult this is,’ Hillary says. ‘There are women who’d say [to a trans woman], ”You know what, you’ve never had the kind of life experiences that I’ve had. So I respect who you are, but don’t tell me you’re the same as me.” I hear that conversation all the time.’

Despite the clear tension in the room, the pair say they don’t argue about this topic.

But according to Aitkenhead, ‘I get the impression they don’t like to present anything less than a united front to the world.’

BONUS VIDEO

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service