TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
SCOTUS Narrowly Upholds Constitution 
by Thomas Gallatin
.
clown-Schumer Urges Trump to Wait 
'til He's Majority Leader to Replace Kennedy
{ rickwells.us } ~ There’s no telling what Chuck clown-Schumer was thinking as he tried a more measured tone in his political rhetoric... a ridiculous attempt to shame and persuade President Trump to wait until after the midterm elections to appoint a replacement for retiring Supreme Court Justice Kennedy. It’s as if clown-Schumer is secretly aware that President Trump has chronic Stockholm syndrome and that he would welcome even more obstructionism than he’s facing at every turn in every form dummycrats-Democrats can throw at him. clown- Schumer argued that President Trump should wait until there might be more than the current 49 dummycrats- Democrat Senators, following the midterms and even perhaps, in his wildest nightmares, a Majority Leader clown-Schumer.  Calling it the “most important Supreme Court vacancy for this country in at least a generation,” clown-Schumer illustrated, in the typical dummycrats- Democrat double-speak, that the liberal sky might well be falling. He said that “the fate of our healthcare system sealed when the dummycrats-Dems passed a bill nobody could read as a stealth wealth redistribution mechanism, reproductive rights for women infanticide on demand and countless other protections giveaways of other people’s stuff for middle class parasitic Americans are at stake.”...Like Trump is going to listen to clown-Schumer and when was the time clown-Schumer listen to Trump.   https://rickwells.us/schumer-trump-wait-kennedy/
.
ICE Protesters Demand To Enter Agency Headquarters, Fail
by Julia Cohen
{ dailycaller.com } ~ Protesters calling for the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)... demanded to be let into the federal building Wednesday, while security ignored their shouting. Multiple armed policemen guarding ICE headquarters did not flinch or acknowledge the protesters as they chanted “no borders no walls” and “fuck ICE.”  The protesters did not make any serious attempts to enter, despite the demands. The protesters also shouted “quit your jobs” at the guards in front of the building. One protester said ICE participated in “ethnic cleansing.” When asked by The Daily Caller News Foundation if he knew of anyone actually killed by ICE, he did not respond, saying the journalists asking were “complicit.”...
.
Iran’s Islamist Gov’t Faces Collapse After 
US Replaces liar-nObama Policy with Trump’s
by REBEKAH BAKER
{ westernjournal.com } ~ When President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear deal in May... he called it a “horrible one-sided deal that should never, ever have been made.” In response, furious Iranian lawmakers set fire to the American flag and a piece of paper representing the nuclear deal, and vowed to increase spending on the country’s ballistic missile program. “With a national consensus, we will give the U.S. and Zionists a response that they will regret,” said parliament speaker Ali Larijani according to the Mehr news agency. For the time being, however, it seems as though no one is regretting the loss of the deal more than Iran. It also seems like Trump’s way of dealing with the world’s lead sponsor of terror has been quite effective so far...   https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/irans-islamist-govt-faces-collaps...
.
GRILLED: Strzok Questioned by Lawmakers
by Sara Carter

{ saraacarter.com } ~ House Judiciary and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee members grilled embattled, anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok... behind closed doors on Capitol Hill Wednesday, as he attempted to explain his vehement bias against President Donald Trump, his senior role in the alleged Trump-Russia collusion investigation, and the exoneration of liar-Hillary Clinton for her use of a private server while she was Secretary of State. Strzok, who evaded a subpoena from House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), voluntarily appeared at the hearing. Thousands of Strzok’s anti-Trump text messages, which he exchanged with former FBI lawyer and his paramour, Lisa Page, sparked anger from Republicans and criticism from some dummycrats-Democrats who contend that senior members of the FBI utilized their power and political leanings to target Trump both before and after the 2016 election. Freedom Caucus & Judiciary Committee member, Matt Gaetz (R-FL) attended today’s deposition and reacted to Strzok’s testimony, telling the Sean Hannity Radio Show, “… I am shocked at the lack of curiosity with Robert Mueller. I mean Sean, if you were in Mueller’s shoes, and you had found these text messages, I would think that you would want to ask whether or not they impacted the investigative decisions that were made, whether there was bias, whether there was contact with other members of the FBI regarding the investigation and where it was going and who was making the critical judgment calls,” the Florida Congressman said. “I just cannot believe the lack of curiosity on the part of Robert Mueller. It was the strongest reaction I had today from Peter Strzok’s testimony.”...
.
Chairman Goodlatte: “FBI Lawyers instructed 
Peter Strzok not to answer many, many questions”
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Suffice to say it’s not a good look when lawyers representing the FBI are telling the central witness within a political conspiracy involving the FBI... not to answer questions from congressional oversight. House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte tells Martha MacCallum that FBI lawyers are instructing FBI Agent Peter Strzok not to answer questions from congress about the nature of his involvement within a DOJ/FBI conspiracy to stop a political candidate; and later to overthrow a presidency. Additionally Chairman Goodlatte states the answers agent Strzok did give about his text messages was “not believable”...
.
.

SCOTUS Narrowly Upholds Constitution 

by Thomas Gallatin:  On Tuesday, the Supreme Court handed down two significant rulings that both upheld clear, constitutionally and statutorily defined powers and rights. On Wednesday, it issued a ruling on another First Amendment case. However, the disturbing fact was that all three decisions were determined by the narrowest of margins, the 5-4 split. This demonstrates just how fundamentally divided the highest court in the land is when it comes to viewing Rule of Law and the Constitution. And how important election results can be.

             In Trump v. Hawaii, the Court upheld President Donald Trump’s statutory authority under 8 U.S.C. §1182(f) to enforce his “travel ban” on immigrants from certain countries. That this explicitly delineated authority was even in question, and that it rose all the way up to the Supreme Court to enforce, speaks volumes as to the state of the nation’s judiciary. It was obvious that Trump had the statutory authority, irrespective of the merits of his decision. But judicial despots at every level insisted that they could divine Trump’s supposedly racist and anti-Muslim intent, ruling on that basis instead of what the law actually says.
               Likewise, in NIFLA v. Becerra, the Court ruled in favor of free speech protections and against state-compelled speech by striking down California’s Reproductive FACT Act, which mandated that any women’s health clinic — including those dedicated to pro-life services — provide information on abortion services. Clearly, the law targeted pro-life organizations, compelling them to advise in favor of the very issue they exist to oppose. Justice Clarence Thomas noted that the Constitution recognizes no such dubious category of “professional speech” that supposedly “[gives] the States unfettered power to reduce a group’s First Amendment rights by simply imposing a licensing requirement.” And Justice Anthony Kennedy pointedly observed that the FACT Act was inherently discriminatory and “a paradigmatic example of the serious threat presented when government seeks to impose its own message in place of individual speech, thought, and expression.
               The third case likewise involved compelled speech — that of public employees subject to forced union dues, or “fair share” fees to support collective bargaining and other union activities. “This procedure violates the First Amendment and cannot continue,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority. “Neither an agency fee nor any other payment to the union may be deducted from a nonmember’s wages, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.” The ruling is a big loss for Big Labor.
               Collectively, the most concerning aspect of these rulings is the Court’s 5-4 split. All three decisions would have gone the other way if Merrick Garland rather than Neil Gorsuch had been sitting on the bench. As for Kennedy, still no word on his rumored retirement, but now — with Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell still at the helm — would be a great time.   ~The Patriot Pos
t
https://patriotpost.us/articles/56814?mailing_id=3573&utm_mediu...

Views: 80

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on June 29, 2018 at 8:52am

Bonnie

he knew he was not going to expose his masters no matter what. Rosenstein also knew he was not

Comment by Bonnie Somer on June 29, 2018 at 8:42am

strzok was never going to implicate himself.  he knows what he did mueller does not care

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

 Kavanaugh Accuser Donated   To Hillary Clinton  10 Times,  60+ Liberal Groups 

Reportedly attempted to conceal political activity by scrubbing social media accounts

Over the weekend, a name and face were added to the previously anonymous sexual assault allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, which is now threatening to derail his nomination. Those looking to obstruct Kavanaugh’s confirmation certainly saved their best for last, as the prior attempts included pathetic stunts such as:

– Claiming to file perjury charges against Kavanaugh, which only Jeff Sessions would have the ability to file.

– Packing the hearings with hysterical protesters, resulting in hundreds of arrests.

– Threatening female Republicans with extortion.

– Cory Booker comparing himself to Spartacus, the escaped slave who led a revolt against the Romans.

The identity of the accuser was revealed as Christine Blasey Ford, who has agreed testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Ford reportedly made the allegations back in July in a letter to Senator Dianne Feinstein, and Feinstein waited until it was close to the vote to confirm Kavanaugh before making the accusations public.

There’s a record of Ford making the accusation in a 2012 therapy session, though Kavanaugh isn’t named in the session notes that Ford gave to the press. Ford alleges that in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh entered a room drunk, pinned her to a bed, and groped her over her clothing. Kavanaugh “categorically denied” the allegations.View image on Twitter

Fin Gomez @finnygo   NEW: Statement from Judge Brett Kavanaugh:

There is a slight discrepancy in the account Ford provided in her letter to Feinstein and in her therapist’s notes, but that could simply be due to an error on her therapists part.

There are however some other questions that need to be answered which call into question Ford’s motives.

As Grabien reported, they include:

1. Why Ford deleted her public social media accounts before revealing herself.

Ford deleted all of her public social media before she came forward, making it difficult to see the advocacy and partisanship she was engaged in the time leading up to her making her allegation public. Of course, Ford may simply value her privacy, but the act of deleting her public postings will inevitably make some wonder what she didn’t want seen.

2. That Ford may have an unrelated grudge against Kavanaugh, as his mother, once a circuit court judge, ruled against Ford’s parents.

In August 1996, Christine Blasey Ford’s parents, Paula and Ralph Blasey, were foreclosed upon. Kavanaugh’s mom, Martha, was then serving as a judge on the Montgomery Country Circuit Court, and she ruled against Christine Ford’s parents.

3. That Ford is a Democrat who donates to left-wing causes, attended the anti-Trump March for Science, and previously signed an open letter challenging Trump’s border policy.

Ford is a political activist who has made dozens of donations to left-wing causes. According to OpenSecrets, she has made more than 60 donations to liberal causes, with almost four dozen to the pro-abortion group, Emily’s List, alone. Ford also donated to the DNC, Hillary Clinton (more than 10 times), Bernie Sanders, and the progressive organizing group ActBlue.

Ford likewise attended the anti-Trump March for Science, where she wore a hat knitted like a human brain, but inspired by the feminist “pussy hats” worn at the Women’s Marches. Ford also added her name to an open letter from health professionals who argued the U.S. border policy resulting in temporary separation of some families was harmful to children’s development.

There’s no statute of limitations on sexual assault in Maryland, where she claims that the assault happened. Rather than go to the police, Ford went to Dianne Feinstein. If her accusations are true, she should immediately file a police report against Kavanaugh and take him to trial. If she doesn’t, perhaps that’s because she knows the consequences of filing a false police report.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service