Friday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
  A Recycled Smear Campaign
AX7E-R2UbdvckzDHiXztJ0PrsBebykPkX60JtYcR_I4608MD076l3V9DM56LXG126QqiqyjwJU4uLeHIHNWELSuFmJDr00xxfT1wi2BFE5pmvYMjSPdiSp0pm81qJSNJCuQoXzac3cPEsCeA3dLfufo3Acxlxes=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Gary Bauer  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
loose lips liar-Joe Biden worked with
whistleblower when he was vice
president, officials reveal
L27s8GqOUb8gHYLlWPkjDmxm8hCfsb6PXuAdz9p91aOYN-Rkb1x2K4a4oNwFHT_8zejQgCN65Ceb2emQqOZAtvtryQ1zyDMfL2r8HsFOB6lttaW__t9w0knD0vfqFGzc0lkjIx6at5fxbX6hqMjcSUhjssDNwTOLiE7JrNLDsIQGYV7fmsrgjAdB_89XCZVI2MJSu29hrQ4XjZmKori_mimSZ1IiLsXd5B6qDlMRuMb-RUH7GSBqpF5MOU3YZBmOQCK2Zf7K8s4YHDZ8eXpIqIrwB02IKdJrCD-SjKKOCfn7aGbOwV6wpRDONi9HjkIVDGNadli0uaYH661s9XC2RS5HlXJrfLoT5d3OosSZxA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Rob Crilly, Steven Nelson, & David M. Drucker
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ The 2020 Democratic candidate with whom the CIA whistleblower had a "professional" tie is loose lips liar-Joe Biden... according to intelligence officers and former White House officials. Lawyers for the whistleblower said he had worked only "in the executive branch." The Washington Examiner has established that he is a career CIA analyst who was detailed to the National Security Council at the White House and has since left. On Sept. 26, the New York Times reported that he was a CIA officer. On Oct. 4, the newspaper added that he "was detailed to the National Security Council at one point." Michael Atkinson, the Intelligence Community's inspector general, told members of Congress that the whistleblower had a "professional tie" to a 2020 Democratic candidate. He had written earlier that while the whistleblower's complaint was credible, he had shown "some indicia of an arguable political bias ... in favor of a rival political candidate." A retired CIA officer told the Washington Examiner, “From everything we know about the whistleblower and his work in the executive branch then, there is absolutely no doubt he would have been working with loose lips liar-Biden when he was vice president." As an experienced CIA official on the NSC with the deep knowledge of Ukraine that he demonstrated in his complaint, it is probable that the whistleblower briefed loosw lips liar-Biden and likely that he accompanied him on Air Force Two during at least one of the six visits the 2020 candidate made to the country. A former Trump administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters, said loose lips liar-Biden’s work on foreign affairs brought him into close proximity with the whistleblower either at the CIA or when he was detailed to the White House. “This person, after working with loose lips liar-Biden, may feel defensive towards him because he feels loose lips liar-Biden is being falsely attacked. Maybe he is even talking to loose lips liar-Biden’s staff,” the former official said. “Maybe it is innocent, maybe not.”...
.
Pump Price Over $4 a Gallon 
Gives Californians Gas Pains
ArhD5en3lLzKtIqhSQ-IdKXtu54RcIk1OmDLKhV4W4IH1zaMY0_JQkQRF2gS5BR_wjV-ysru7wfyUQs8sc07s2qPxog8cQxr5Dw8BS08js1k-K16SeUE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jackson Elliott
{ dailysignal.com } ~ A dollar won’t take you very far in California these days. Today, the state has an average gas price of $4.18 per gallon, more than $1.50 higher than the $2.64 per gallon average from every other state... according to the American Automobile Association. California has the highest gas taxes in the nation at an average of 57.8 cents a gallon—more than one-eighth of the total price of the gas, the AAA says. The tax was raised most recently by 5.6 cents per gallon July 1. California imposed a 12 cents-a-gallon tax increase in November 2017. The last time gasoline cost more than $4 a gallon nationwide was in 2008, during the Great Recession, according to AAA’s statistics. The California price increase comes even as prices fall across the rest of the country in anticipation of lower fuel use in fall and winter. Every fall, refineries switch to gasoline formulas better suited to winter and retrofit their infrastructure, AAA spokesman Devin Gladden said. In the past few weeks, seven of California’s 25 refineries experienced outages in production at the same time. “The challenge is that there’s a special formula of blended gasoline needed in particular places in California, and when there’s a supply problem, it can be difficult to import the special formula into those places,” Gladden said. “That can cause prices to spike.” According to the Los Angeles Times, California gasoline costs extra primarily because of state government regulations. The state demands that companies create a fuel mix that reduces pollution, and that formula costs more money and effort to make than normal gasoline...  https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/10/09/pump-price-over-4-a-gallon-gives-californians-gas-pains/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pump-price-over-4-a-gallon-gives-californians-gas-pains&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWkRnd01qRTROamt4WVRKbCIsInQiOiJDNGJvUU1PMUZwVWdhTUtCNXZUXC92TTgrVkdmNlBjZE1VUzRxTE1mbk8yelNhb2pKV2hrckFaRWoyek1EN0NWN0p0RjJWYWZiWG5kNXZ3SFQ3Mk1FNzhOTWdmSkdxUGVTNkJkNTFtWUg4WHpNU0hGdzBqSDdvOXVwM2tcL0VCU2MyIn0%3D 
Report Shows Dems’ Plan to Provide Insurance
to Illegal Immigrants Could Cost Taxpayers 
as Much as $23 Billion
DFmF553dHkx1p3fwLlwUVrKN3jrbeV8a0kSZcN6HLq6oxHO4PB7_Gw4hE-U7551FQJSimo_AEZE0RaVkeOt-ZTdV9YCOGTb4YcEvw2GldzU3UJ7E773W6vyQ8E9QM9sMlz-tPHipvpVqGBLbynSbECiQlcYn7e_smeg5Y7LzMFxRTtkweRqhj09HiWo9Kf9qeA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Madison Dibble
{ ijr.com } ~ When the 2020 Democrats all raised their hands agreeing to provide illegal immigrants with health care, they may not have realized they just saddled the taxpayer with a huge check... During the first round of Democratic presidential primary debates earlier this year, every single candidate raised their hand when asked if their health care proposals would cover illegal immigrants. Every single candidate raised their hand to signal their support for the policy, but a new study from the Center for Immigration Studies found that this move could be costly. Estimates for the total bill sent to taxpayers to fund illegal immigrant health care ranges from $10 billion to $23 billion per year. The total cost varies as the exact number of illegal immigrants is unknown, as is the percentage of illegal immigrants who fall below the income threshold to qualify for such health care programs. This study used an estimate of 4.9 million illegal immigrants qualifying for the program, resulting in a bill of $10 billion per year, rising to $23 billion if that number includes all illegal immigrants. Broken down, each Affordable Care Act subsidy would average $4,600 per undocumented person per year to fulfill the Democrat’s promise of health care coverage for illegal immigrants. Beyond the hypothetical costs of funding the Affordable Care Act stipends for all illegal immigrants, the Center for Immigration Studies also looked into the costs associated with Medicaid  today for both legal and illegal immigrants to better understand the total costs Americans are facing today — without paying for all illegal immigrants as Democrats suggested. Under the current Medicaid system, the average immigrant family added $2,796 to the taxpayer’s tab on Medicaid. In comparison, the average family of native citizens only added $1,983 to the total tab. The vast majority of this funding is going to immigrant families that are legal citizens, but the data used by the center does include some illegal immigrants, as certain states allow illegal immigrant children and pregnant women to use the program. This Dems plan is not going to fly.  https://ijr.com/report-costs-dem-plan-provide-illegal-immigrants-insurance/?utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=77921582&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8nb5s2alSYWqm5rm33b5-5dGiD3y6TBPNO9GNNL3F3BVXRNLwVY-Il9RPbbcB1OucGwir61rcV6FsCH8ZUgI-sQsi44w&_hsmi=77921582   
Clarion Special Report: NY’s Sharia Patrol
rQ1N1tZlFqjez6F8_-ufwHnMatQbnC_WB9yKDRrGBiHfgQZBj8nYwJpBgVR7PpBcqfoTQn-y6EweUuKcFNv--ovcGlV0doSrVwexkOhgsfnx59Kjqkjvrb13d36-4K2A_wIjelUsxolf6JwMY1bLI_F63k_QLs6zfvimLkPuMJLUKG4xsnJ4zwYKY5wcIKVrQrLYcrM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Ryan Mauro and Martin Mawyer
{ clarionproject.org } ~ Not surprisingly, the sight of official-looking cars – made to look like police New York City cars — emblazoned with the words “Muslim Community Patrol” cruising the avenues of Brooklyn and Staten Island... in the United States of America—was quick to generate news coverage, commentary and alarm. Most of the mainstream American media reacted in typical fashion. Ever fearful of offending radicalized Muslim communities or digging too deeply into unsavory truths, they gushed in glowing news reports about the new patrol cars and portrayed them as a “neighborhood watch” for Muslim-dominated areas. Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams said the Muslim patrol units would help keep the city safe and vowed that his administration would help organizers acquire more police-style cars and equipment. “We believe we need to do more to assist them,” he told NY1 News. Yet, a little digging shows that the Muslim Community Patrol has an underlying agenda: to enforce Islamic sharia law first in the Muslim community and then in American community at large. Community-based safety patrols are in fact not unusual in the Big Apple. From crime-prevention groups like the Guardian Angels to the Brooklyn South Safety Patrol a Jewish civilian patrol, New York City has seen its share of neighborhood watch groups. Some of those patrols have even become embroiled in controversy of their own, with the Jewish patrol once being described as “bullies” and criticized as acting like “judge, jury and executioner.” Unlike other New York City safety patrols, however, MCP&S attracted suspicion, alarm and consternation from the very start. But the backlash from concerned citizens, political groups and conservative news organizations has been to no avail. The liberal Brooklyn news organization Bklyner declared: “Muslim Community Patrol & Services is here to stay.”... They are making a big mistake.
.
US Takes Custody of Notorious ISIS Beheaders
sKPXpblWOWZvLFR5SzlpMUQ4FxpR1TxVM_mRpDQxoV_KOoKX9J65-5RHzFm5GPaMf_11y01FSCYxG-GSHp9cd3Dm4ROWBiXp3rUmh1tOFdX4Yd1ZRu_yQoFPiY2h5zbtKr_4YfUpUX8tOrYXxfLyBOMGczOCQtLbQKdixYFKL22HGnz7Yw--coCzUssPQw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by clarionproject.org ~ Before turning the guardianship of ISIS prisoners over to Turkey, the U.S. gained custody of some of the most notorious ISIS beheaders... suspected of torturing and murdering American and other Western hostages. U.S. officials announced that two of the four members of the British cell responsible for the imprisonment and beheading of American journalist James Foley as well as at least 27 other prisoners, including Americans Steven Scotloff  and Peter Kassig. Foley’s murder was choreographed, videoed and broadcast to the world in 2014 in what would become the first of many gruesome propaganda videos put out by the terror group. The cell members in U.S. custody include El Shafee Elsheikh, 31, and Alexanda Kotey, 35. Another famous member of the cell, Mohammed Emwazi, believed to be the executioner on the videos, was killed in a drone strike in 2015. The four-man cell was dubbed the “Beatles” by their Western hostages because of their British accents. Elsheikh and Kotey were captured by the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in 2018. SDF forces include America’s Kurdish allies, who proved to be the most effective force in combating ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Last week, President Trump made the shocking decision to pull out American troops in Northeast Syria, making way for a Turkish invasion and almost certain slaughter of the Kurds by Turkey forces. Fighting for their lives, the Kurds no longer have the capacity to guard the ISIS prisoners. Before the U.S. retreat from northeast Syria, it appears the U.S. military took custody of 40 high-value prisoners, moving them to Iraq...  https://clarionproject.org/us-takes-custody-of-notorious-isis-beheaders/?utm_source=Clarion+Project+Newsletter&utm_campaign=668da7e9fc-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_10_10_12_55&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_60abb35148-668da7e9fc-6442509&mc_cid=668da7e9fc&mc_eid=b83b13a9b5  
.
Why Fox's '51% want impeachment' 
poll is probably wrong
by wnd.com ~ Remember the 2016 presidential election polls just before the vote? The American Association for Public Opinion Research concluded scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton's "likelihood of winning the presidency was about 90 percent... with estimates ranging from 71 to over 99 percent." Now, President Trump is recalling that failed forecast in his response to a Fox News poll that finds a new high of 51 percent wants Trump impeached and removed from office. "From the day I announced I was running for President, I have NEVER had a good @FoxNews Poll," he wrote Thursday on Twitter. "Whoever their Pollster is, they suck. But @FoxNews is also much different than it used to be in the good old days." Fox News said that "since July, support for impeachment increased among voters of all stripes: up 11 points among Democrats, 5 points among Republicans and 3 among independents." "Support also went up among some of Trump's key constituencies, including white evangelical Christians (+5 points), white men without a college degree (+8), and rural whites (+10). "The report, which was the top headline on the popular Drudge Report, said that "among voters in swing counties where scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton and Trump were within 10 points in 2016, support for impeachment increased to 52 percent, up from 42 percent in July." Fox pointed out that "a lot has happened" on impeachment, with House Democrats ramping up their "impeachment inquiry." But just a day earlier, a Zogby poll found that in most of the nation's demographic groups, a plurality expects President Trump to be re-elected in 2020. "Nearly half of voters (47%) think President Trump will win re-election in 2020, while 41% say no, and it's not just his base!" the report said. Men by a 55% to 29% percent margin say so. So do young Millennials by 43% to 38%. And Gen X by 49% to 30%. And older voters 47% to 32%. Independents by 36% to 29%. Suburban voters, 42% to 34%. Large city voters, 51% to 32%. Union voters, 58% to 23%. Middle income, 56% to 32%. Upper income voters, 59% to 26%...   https://www.wnd.com/2019/10/dem-drumbeat-impeach-hits-polling/   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
A Recycled Smear Campaign
AX7E-R2UbdvckzDHiXztJ0PrsBebykPkX60JtYcR_I4608MD076l3V9DM56LXG126QqiqyjwJU4uLeHIHNWELSuFmJDr00xxfT1wi2BFE5pmvYMjSPdiSp0pm81qJSNJCuQoXzac3cPEsCeA3dLfufo3Acxlxes=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Gary Bauer
 

Sunday marked the anniversary of the Senate vote confirming Brett Kavanaugh as a justice of the Supreme Court. The left still hasn’t gotten over that loss. There were protests at the Supreme Court Sunday.

I was thinking about how terrible the Kavanaugh confirmation process was. It was clear then that the left’s strategy was to produce one accuser after another. And then it hit me: The left is recycling its strategy in the Ukraine hoax.

As you may recall, Brett Kavanaugh breezed through his confirmation hearing, answering all the left’s questions without breaking a sweat. They just couldn’t trip him up.

President Trump fully cooperated in the Russia investigation. Robert Mueller couldn’t find evidence of collusion. The left failed to trip Trump up.

Then, all of a sudden, a senator says she has in her possession a letter from a “whistleblower” — a woman claiming Kavanaugh did something terrible.

Fast-forward to today. The president was rising in the polls and headed to the UN to deliver a historic speech on religious liberty. All of a sudden, a member of Congress says there’s a complaint from a Deep State operative, an intelligence community “whistleblower,” that could take the president down.

Kavanaugh’s friends and supporters were indignant. “How dare you! He’s never done anything like this,” they said.  "No anonymous smears. The accuser must testify,“ they insisted. The left replied, "Well, we’re talking to her. She’s afraid for her life.”

Fast-forward to now. The president and his supporters demand to know who the Deep State leaker is. “Well, he’s afraid for his life. He must remain anonymous,” the left says.

Eventually, Christine Blasey Ford did testify. She had no evidence and no corroboration, and there were inconsistencies in her story. But wait… another accuser has come forward! And another! The left insists there’s a disturbing pattern about Kavanaugh’s behavior.

Back to Trump. The CIA leaker’s complaint turns out to be based on hearsay, and there are inconsistencies in the complaint. The transcript proves the central premise of the complaint is false.

So what happened this weekend? Another so-called “whistleblower” came forward, and this one supposedly has firsthand experience of the president’s phone call. I guarantee you, my friends, there will be additional “whistleblowers,” just like Kavanaugh’s accusers.

In both battles, the real target is the Republican Party. In the Kavanaugh controversy, the left believed that if it could turn the heat up high enough, it could peel off three or four GOP senators. Women are supposed to be believed in all cases, right? They got rino-Murkowski and almost got rino-Flake and Collins.

In case of the Ukraine call hoax, they’ve got Romney, Collins, and maybe Sasse. The left is also trying to confuse the public and convince them that there is something wrong with this president. Intelligence agents are good people who we’re supposed to believe protect us, right?

Of course, there’s another obvious link: The courts. The left can’t stand Trump’s success in restoring balance to the federal courts, and it can’t stand the fact that every day he remains in office is another day that he could nominate another justice of the caliber of Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.

The Cover-Up Continues

Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, refuses to release the 10 hours of testimony from Kurt Volker, the former envoy to Ukraine. As we reported last week, Volker’s testimony supports President Trump and undermines the complaint filed by a disgruntled Deep State operative.

Rep. Jim Jordan, the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is so confident that he is daring Rep. scumbag-Schiff to release Volker’s testimony.

Yet all weekend long, all we got from the media was breathless reporting of a second “whistleblower,” supposedly with direct knowledge of the president’s phone call.

This is absurd! We already have direct knowledge of the call. We have the transcript. The president voluntarily released it.

This is like someone saying, “I have direct knowledge of the score of the Washington Redskins/New England Patriots game!” I should hope so — we all watched it Sunday. How can this be news?

Meanwhile, it is being reported that the Deep State operative who filed the complaint is a registered Democrat who “had a prior working relationship with a prominent Democratic politician.” And we know that the law firm representing him has deep ties to far-left activists.

dinky-liar-Warren’s Truth Troubles

Sen. Elizabeth dinky-liar-Warren seems to have trouble telling the truth. Everyone is familiar with her claim of indigenous heritage. But now we’re learning of yet another bogus claim.

In telling her biography, dinky-liar-Warren has suggested multiple times that she was the victim of sex discrimination. She claims that she was fired from a special education teaching position because she was pregnant. She said this last week in Nevada and during her closing statement in last month’s Democrat debate.

But in a 2008 interview, dinky-liar-Warren tells a very different story. She acknowledges not having all the necessary credits for the job, so she went back to graduate school. dinky-liar-Warren said:

I went back to graduate school and took a couple of courses in education and said, “I don’t think this is going to work out for me.” I was pregnant with my first baby, so I had a baby and stayed home for a couple of years…

There’s nothing in this 11-year-old interview that remotely suggests she was fired. But dinky-liar-Warren seems so eager to claim the mantle of victimhood, whether as a Native American or a fired pregnant woman.

And here’s another example that has fallen through the memory hole: dinky-liar-Warren has also claimed to have been the victim of sexual harassment, claiming that an older male colleague once “lunged at her” in his office and then chased her around his desk.

But in telling this story, she neglected to mention that the man had polio, which limited his mobility, and that she later spoke at his funeral!

Craven Appeasement

Friday night, Houston Rockets general manager Daryl Morey expressed his support for the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong. Morey tweeted, “Fight for Freedom. Stand with Hong Kong.” Within hours, the roof caved in on him.

The Chinese consulate in Houston expressed its “strong dissatisfaction.” The team’s owner rebuffed Morey, making it clear that Morey did not speak for the team. The NBA issued a statement calling Morey’s tweet “deeply offensive” and “regrettable.” And yesterday, Morey was tweeting his apologies.

Morey did the right thing, but the NBA is scrambling because of its big investment in China. Just the latest example of how trade with China has changed us more than it has changed China.

Better Late Than Never

Last week, news broke that four people were stabbed to death inside the Paris police headquarters. Initially, French authorities treated the attack as just a workplace dispute involving a disgruntled employee who had been reprimanded by his supervisor.

It took them a while, but French authorities have finally acknowledged what we all knew days ago — Michael Harpon was a radicalized Muslim. The alleged “workplace dispute” involved his refusal to work with women.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/65950?mailing_id=4575&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4575&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center