EPA Steals Land From Wyoming, Changes State Boundary, Gives It To Indian Tribes?

Flag of the Eastern Shoshone Tribe
Wyoming State Boundary Changed By EPA

Michael Bastasch at the Daily Caller News Foundation reported Wednesday the story of the residents of Riverton, Wyoming:

"...One day they were Wyomingans, the next they were members of the Wind River tribes — after the Environmental Protection Agency declared the town part of the Wind River Indian Reservation, undoing a 1905 law passed by Congress and angering state officials..."

Bastasch reports that, while the federal Environmental Protection Agency has "unilaterally" changed the boundaries of the state of Wyoming, Wyoming Governor Matt Mead has informed the EPA that he will not honor its decision related to the boundary of the state and the Wind River Reservation.

According to a statement issued by the Wyoming Governor's office:

"...Three days after signing the decision the regional administrator of the EPA told Wyoming the EPA was granting the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone Tribes application for Treatment as a State. Treatment as a State gives Tribes access to grant funding for air quality monitoring, but the EPA decision also purports to re-interpret a 1905 Congressional Act and in doing so expand the boundaries of the Wind River Reservation..."

Last month the EPA effectively changed the boundaries of the reserv... by using as reference a 2011 finding by the Interior Department that a law passed in 1905, which in effect opened the Riverton area and "one million more acres to homesteading" by "non-Indians," did not diminish the reservation.

That means, essentially that land that has been considered since 1905, specifically  an area referenced as Fremont County and the city of Riverton, Wyoming, to be under local jurisdiction, is instead, Indian Country.  Among other things, because the ruling makes the area part of the Wind River Indian Reservation, the city and its surrounding areas are subject now, not to local laws, but to federal law, including law enforcement (police) and other laws.

On January 6 of this year the Wyoming Attorney General, Peter K. Michael, petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for "...Reconsideration and Stay of Approval of Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapho Tribes' Application for Treatment as a State..." stating that the "...legal opinion offered in support of EPA's decision depends on a shost of faulty factual and legal conclusions..."

It said further that:

"...The legal opinion offered in support of EPA's decision presents a selective history of the Wind River Reservation more akin to advocacy for a predetermined outcome than to the objective analysis required for this complicated issue.  The plan language of the 1905 Act of Congress, the 1891 and 1904 treaties, the legislative history and other contemporaneous historical evidence, decisions of the United States Supreme Court in analogous cases, and he State's pervasive exercise of civil and criminal jurisdiction over the territory in dispute for more than one hundred years--especially when coupled with the disavowal of federal jurisdiction and the absence of tribal jurisdiction--demonstrate conclusively that EPA's reservation boundary determination is wrong..."
"...EPA not only reached the wrong conclusion, but the agency also employed a fundamentally unfair and skewed process, to the detriment of the State and its citizens, in pursuit of its predetermined objective..."

Governor Mead said in a statement:

"...I understand that the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone Tribes have a different opinion about the Wind River Reservation Boundary. My deep concern is about an administrative agency of the federal government altering a state’s boundary and going against over 100 years of history and law. This should be a concern to all citizens because, if the EPA can unilaterally take land away from a state, where will it stop...?"

Bastasch reports that "State courts have heard at least two cases on the boundary in the last three decades — one 1980s Wyoming Supreme Court case found that Riverton was part of the reservation, and another state high court case in 2008, which found that the town was in Wyoming...The only problem is that the state court decisions don’t set a solid precedent, since neither case involves both tribes living on the reservation, nor the state and the federal government all at once, Howell... [lobbyist for the Northern Arapaho tribe] ... told the Star-Tribune."  See Bastasch's Report HERE... 

Once again, an agency of the Obama Administration over-extends its reach, and takes actions that are Unconstitutional, bypassing Congress and the Courts, while using as pawns U.S. Citizens of two factions to create a conflict in order to advance its political agenda.

Vanguard of Freedom Perspectives

Enhanced by Zemanta

Views: 2074


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Jan on January 10, 2014 at 12:09pm




Comment by Christine Puliselic on January 10, 2014 at 11:52am

Since when does the EPA have the authority to do this?   They all need to be arrested along with their communist mentor.

Comment by TNSteve on January 10, 2014 at 11:27am

Exceeding their authority again. There will be no limit to the abuse until Congress steps up and cuts their funding and /or best of all eliminates the EPA. How about pre EPA and let the States control their State.

Comment by Frank W Brown on January 10, 2014 at 10:17am

When will we be SMART enough to ABOLISH the EPA, IRS, NDAA, patriot act, DHS and a host of alphabet agencies that have now overrun our country to OUR detriment!

Comment by Thomas Laman on January 10, 2014 at 10:17am

   The EPA has more power than Bonzo they are running wild with their power and nobody is curbing them. Bohner is useless since he's seemingly been compromised by the Bonzo regime.

Comment by Steven G. Elliott 1SG USA (RET) on January 10, 2014 at 10:16am

When is enough, enough?

Comment by JC Lincoln on January 10, 2014 at 10:12am

Who the heck is the EPA, a second U.S. Government.  It's an "agency"...........and it needs to be abolished before it becomes another Fascist Arm of Obama's Federal Government.

Oops, too late - it already has.

Comment by John Thomas Dunlap on January 10, 2014 at 9:04am

 All these  Illegal Federal Agencies have gotten so big ,that they litteraly right and make up , and enforce their own rules and Illegal rulesand Illegal Laws.  To  push Obamas Agenda,we really need to push Congress to Get a Backbone and do away with 50% of All these Illegal and Daming Agencies ABOLISH them ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by Lindar on January 10, 2014 at 9:01am

This is UN-Agenda 21...in full force.

Comment by doodledandy on January 10, 2014 at 8:18am

I remember, sometime this summer, when oVomit made these deals with the TRIBES and the EPA while No one was watching. Or, if they were, they were only watching HIS Back. I couldn't believe they, the Tribes, would make such a deal with the devil, unless they were tricked, AND They were! Now lets all watch and see who elses land they will steal.Amerika gets uglier by the second, and we are all just watching.



Democrat Sen. Chris Murphy: ‘The Real Second Amendment Isn’t Absolute

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) tweeted Saturday there is a “real” Second Amendment and an “imaginary” one and he believes the real one is “not absolute.”

Murphy, “I support the real 2nd Amendment, not the imaginary 2nd Amendment. And the real 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute.”

The statement was a precursor to his call for banning “assault rifles” in the wake of the Santa Fe High School shooting, even though “assault rifles” were not used in the attack.

Murphy said the “real 2nd Amendment…allows Congress to wake up to reality and ban these assault rifles that are designed for one purpose only – to kill as many people as fast as possible.”

Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) said the Santa Fe High School attackers used a .38 revolver and a shotgun to carry out his heinous acts. Therefore, a ban on “assault rifles” would have done nothing to prevent the attack from occurring or the tragic loss of life from taking place.

It should be noted that Saturday was not the first time Sen. Murphy called the essence of the Second Amendment into question. On August 6, 2013, Breitbart News reported that Murphy told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that “The Second Amendment is not an absolute right, not a God-given right. It has always had conditions upon it like the First Amendment has.”

Murphy did not grapple with the words, “Shall not be infringed.”


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service