Dr. Gina Loudon in Alabama Sends ‘Message to the Swamp: We Don’t Take Orders from You!

Dr. Gina Loudon in Alabama Sends ‘Message to the Swamp: We Don’t Take Orders from You!’




Dr. Gina Loudon harkened back to the first days of the Tea Party in Alabama as she rallied supporters of Alabama candidate for U.S. Senate Judge Roy Moore and told the Washington, DC, swamp that Alabamans don’t take orders from them.

From a barn in Fairhope, Alabama, Loudon spoke of the serious decision that Alabamans have to make in the next week, a decision that she said she knows they don’t take for granted. “I’ve heard your serious thoughts on this matter,” said Loudon. “I know that you want to do right by God, by Alabama, and by your country because that’s what you do here in Alabama.”

Loudon recalled her many years in Alabama, a place she considers home.

She told the crowd that she knew they had thought hard, listened, assessed, evaluated, and “have rejected the lies of the swamp that have lied to you for all these years.” She declared that they all would stand and elect Roy Moore on December 12.

advertisement

Loudon spoke of her days as a media surrogate for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. She called on the crowd’s memory of that time, the polls, the accusations — “doesn’t this feel just a little bit like that?”

Dr. Loudon continued:

We were asked to care more about the interests of the elite than we were to care about our own families, our own loved ones, our own states, and our own countries, but we rejected them then. We reject them now, and we will keep rejecting them until they finally understand that we don’t answer to them — we never have and we never will, and December 12 will show them.

“Mitch [McConnell], we’re talkin’ to you,” she said.

She commented on the $32 million spent against Moore in the primary election and the four decades that he has spent in public service. She remarked at the oddity that it was hearing criticisms come up against him in these final days after all those years of silence.

Loudon then turned to the hard-working, business-owning, some struggling, “strong women of Alabama.” She asked rhetorically, “Why in the world would you listen to the party of abortion-on-demand about how much they care about women?” In the reference to the Democratic Party, she added, why would they listen to the party that defended letting Kate Steinle’s killer back into the U.S. five times, the “party of [Sen. John] Conyers, [former Congressman Anthony] Weiner, [former President Bill] Clinton, right? [Sen. Al] Franken…”

“Why would you listen to them about your own decision in this election,” said Loudon. “I know the women of Alabama are just plain smarter than that.”

She recalled for the Alabama crowd being introduced to Steve Bannon by Andrew Breitbart “at the very birth of our Tea Party. In those days, and many of you were there, we birthed a movement.”

“Who would have thought that eight years later we would have the House, the Senate, and one doggone fine president?” said Loudon.

She closed with a quick look back, then looked forward:

[Bannon] was there with Judge Moore from day one, he was there with our president from day one. He never faltered, and he was there with us from day one of this movement, and it is up to us to deliver this victory, to continue this legacy that we started all those years ago, knowing that days like this would come, but knowing that we could keep winning because we’re going to make America great again together. You’re going to elect Judge Moore on December 12, and I am going to be really proud of my sweet home Alabama.

Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2990&v=z1AT1W

Follow Michelle Moons on Twitter @MichelleDiana

Views: 33

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service