Democrats Responsible for Black Culture of Anger

Black twenty-year-old male Danielle Simpson with two black associates were interrupted by 84 year old Geraldine Davidson while in the process of burglarizing her home. They duct taped her mouth, bound her hands and legs and threw the white former school teacher and church organist into the trunk of her own car. Ms Davidson was severely brutalized before the trio eventually tied a rope attached to a cinder block around her legs and threw her, still alive, into the river.

Brutal crimes are not unique.

But, here is what makes this case remarkable. For seven hours, Simpson rode around in Ms Davidson's car stopping for fast food and opening the truck to show off his victim to his black friends. Due to fingerprints left on the car, detectives estimate that around ten people viewed Ms Davidson in the trunk.

Incredibly, not one person called the police or lobbied to set the poor elderly woman free. What could possibly harden these black youths to such an extent?

Perhaps one of the detective investigating the case nailed it when he described the black criminals and their friends as part of a “culture of anger”.

For the murder of Ms Davidson, in 2009, Danielle Simpson was executed by Lethal injection in Texas.

Fast forward to the democrat led Trayvon Martin rallies across America. If justice was their true motivation, they would allow the case to unfold. To demand Zimmerman be arrested without knowing the facts is absurd and irresponsible. The democrat's obvious purpose for their race rallies is to fuel the eternal flames of their well-nurtured “culture of anger”.

Sadly, democrat efforts to cultivate black anger is bearing much fruit. Before the Trayvon Martin incident, black flash mobs were attacking white strangers across America.

The horrific rape/murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom received scant publicity because it was seen as politically incorrect to publicize a beautiful white couple being brutalized by five black thugs.

Exploiting Trayvon Martin to fuel the Democrat's culture of anger, Democrat US Rep. Bobby Rush spoke to the House wearing a “hoodie”. Rush assumed Martin was racially profiled and said, "just because someone wears a hoodie does not make them a hoodlum." Yet another example of a Democrat jumping the gun to further their storyline before all the facts are in.

Sixties radical, Angela Davis faithfully contributed to the Democrat's culture of anger. Davis said Trayvon's story is not unique. According to Davis, blacks are physically attacked by whites all the time. Davis also accused white America of systematic racism against blacks. Will someone please inform Ms Davis that a black man is leader of the free world solely because millions of white Americans voted for him. At only 12% of the US population, black votes alone could not have put the Obama's in the White House.

The Trayvon Martin incident has afforded the Democrats a golden opportunity to build upon their culture of anger. Al Sharpton said “Enough is enough!” Jessie Jackson said, “Blacks are under attack!”

So, according to US Rep. Bobby Rush, Angela Davis, Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, the majority of Democrat leaders, pundits and the democrat supportive mainstream media, black Americans are routinely physically attacked by whites. Is there any wonder why millions of black Americans are fuming in a culture of anger?

Well, allow me to crush the Democrat's perfect liberal paradigm with the truth/facts. F.B.I and U.S. Justice Dept. statistics confirm blacks are 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites than white violence against blacks.

Ninety percent of the victims of race crimes are white.

What are the consequences of the Democratic Party keeping black America stewing in their well-crafted culture of anger? Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery. Blacks are three times more likely to use a hand gun, and twice more likely to use a knife. Forty-five percent of black crime is against whites, 43 percent against other blacks, and 10 percent against Hispanics. Who can deny, black criminals are angry at whites and fellow blacks. Blacks are seven times more likely to end up in prison.

Folks, I am not one for frivolous lawsuits. Still, I can not help contemplating a lawsuit all the same: We The People vs the Democratic Party for severe damages resulting from them creating and years of fueling a culture of anger in Black America.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Chairman –

Views: 1108


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Robert L. Miller on April 8, 2012 at 11:01pm

jackson, sharpton,boxer,jackson-lee all have one thing in common. they profit from fomenting racial tension. they profit at the ballot box or at the non-profit organizations such as Rainbow Coalition or by increasing their own demand as commentators on TV and radio.

Comment by Dennis Bartlett on April 8, 2012 at 5:13pm

Antone , They've been led forever so why would you think otherwise ?

Comment by Joseph DeLuna on April 8, 2012 at 8:18am

Got That Right!

Comment by Tana W. Bernard on April 7, 2012 at 11:26pm

I think large cities breed this hatred as they are cesspools and drug use has not helped. When you add in people like Jesse jackson (Chicago) and Al Sharpton (New York) preaching hatred you get more interracial crimes. I grew up in a small midwestern town  where "blacks" lived and worked peacefully. They were friends and neighbors and were welcomed into our home. People need to wake up as the way communists will defeat us is by dividing us. We are the HUMAN race!

Comment by Virginia Torres on April 7, 2012 at 6:21am

Mr. Bushong Jr.,

I am well aware of this fact.  My point is that it causes any statistical analysis to be skewed.   As it stands:

"• Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.  If the Hispanic population was removed from this analysis, the 15 percent would be reduced to almost half.
• Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
• Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
• Blacks are 2.25 times more"

So, now I will stay out of your conversation.  Pity that not all of us are as educated you would like us to sound.  I personally found that MANY if not MOST of the postings regarding this issue were as intelligently written, if not more so than your Ms. Schweigert. 

Comment by Charles Edward Bushong Junior on April 7, 2012 at 4:52am

This comment is for Virginia Torres, Before Caesar Chavez all hispanics were considered white.  I know 2 older Mexicans who's birth certificate says, Race: White.

Comment by Charles Edward Bushong Junior on April 7, 2012 at 4:23am

After reading 25 to 30 posts on the subject, I finally came across Kathy Schweigert's which made alot of sense to me.  Blacks do have the same opportunity as whites if not more, all commericals have to have a black in them and other such things have taken place to give them a better chance.  God made us all and we should respect one another but the races are different is why it has been noted your race from your birth certificate on,drivers license,job applications etc.  In the 1980's I went to the post office to get a job application, figured I would get it being a Viet Nam veteran.  I was told when I asked the man that gave out them, that he was saving me and him trouble, that he'd been told he couldn't hire anyone but women and minorities.  I said you're Sh*ting me, he said nope.  I didn't go to the newspaper office and holler racism, they would have had me locked up.

Comment by Virginia Torres on April 6, 2012 at 8:44pm

There is a very interesting study and paper entitled "The Color of Crime Report."  This paper is unbiased and is based on information from the FBI.  Did you know that in most information kept by the government does not adequately distinguish between Hispanic and White?  This causes most data to be somewhat inaccurate, it tends to inflate the number of white on black crime.  Did you also know that blacks are more unlikely to be arrested/convicted of crime that non black? 

Comment by Historian on April 6, 2012 at 7:52pm

Race is a reality, Lysenko, Ignatiev, and the whole concept of race denial is void of logic or scientific evidence.  The Communists need the racial animosity to keep the conflict growing. It reminds me of the words from their song the "Inernationale". "With the conflict comes power let each one stand his place. The Internationale shall unite the human race". But the reality is that the Communists idea of uniting the human race is the creation of the Lysenkoists's world man. The final result of this implementation of their dialectic is nothing less than murder. If you do not believe this, read some of the works of of Noel Ignatiev. "Race Traitor, and the new Abolition". 

People of different races can live in peace if each party will respect the independence of the other. It has been said that the essence of slavery is dependence on the will of another.  Each of our peoples must be allowed to be what nature and nature's God made us to be. Polical correctness makes this virtually impossible. The right to live, the right to respect the heritage of one's ancestors, the right to preserve and perpetuate one's people, is heaven ordained.  Honor thy father and thy mother, that your days may be long in the land which the Lord your God gives you.  To expect any people to deny their birthright of their ancestors is to force a people to commit the sin of Esau. " Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated". The bottom line is that it is about respect. That respect meaning mutual respect.

Comment by Jim Bourland on April 6, 2012 at 7:42pm

The ignorance in the black culture is unprecedented in almost any othe race. An honest black will acknowlegde how difficult it is living in the hood. We as the white ruling class have not given attention to the 40 plus years of government sponsored illitgitamacy. The prisons are full- neighborhoods have turned into ghettos and the great white flight from public schools are all the tell tell signs. A puppy grows up in the wild it grows up to be a wild dog-Humans are no different.


The cartoonist's homepage,


Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service