For that?!

The Biden speech reminded me of Justice John Roberts opinion on Obamacare back in 2012 - where it was intended and drafted to mean one thing only to be editted at the last moment to portray a totally different conclusion.   

Biden's could have announced that he wasn't going to run on a Tweet. Which could've been followed up at the news networks.  

His speech read like an acceptance speech where the "I will be running" was scratched over and replaced with "I will not be running".  The question is "Why"?  Is Hillary really doing as well as the (liberal) media has been hyping up since that first CNN socialist Debate?  If we compare her book signings / sales to Dr Ben Carson's book signings w/ his new release there are MAJOR differences there alone.  Hillary's book flopped.  Where Carson meets w thousands who want their copies signed.

So what that Hillary raises more campaign funds.  Nothing new there. Quite the contrary.  We've seen from The Clinton Global Initiative that it's all about BIG corporations and key nations around the world, friend and BIG-foes alike, are paying for favors and, judging by the emails that are dripping through, the BIG-donors expect access (to classfied documents?) as well.

What I found so clever about Biden haying said that the repubs are not an "enemy", but merely an opponent, was, imo, a hit on Hillary - as she did call the repubs her enemy. And she is proud of it.  No, he didn't endorse her. But he also didn't take comrad Bernie Sanders position where Sanders feigned outrage over the whole Hillary email protocol breach either.  

But, the redistribution / fair share / poor vs wealthy message is very much the democrats platform - as it's been since 2008.  Only stronger.

Where the GOPers continue drinking the 80s "New Coke" w/ theor "We do too!" platform, the left entrench themselves ever deeper w/ their agenda.

And good ole Paul Ryan wants everyone in the House to love him; and change standards set forth by Thomas Jefferson himself.  I've been saying that 2016 is for the GOP to LOSE.  They are DEFINITELY going in that direction.  Don'tcha think?

Luis ,

Views: 16

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service