by Jim Babka
for The Zero Aggression Project

I'm not liberal, conservative, green, libertarian, or socialist. I prefer
being called [LINK: http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/blog/our-lexicon-poststatist]
"Post-Statist."Â That means, I envision a day when political domination is held in low regard, like communism and monarchy presently are. For many years, I believed that the size and scope of the government was the problem. I worked to [LINK: http://www.DownsizeDC.org/] "Downsize DC."Â Directionally, that was correct, but it avoids the BACkbone problems, which is that [LINK:
http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/blog/our-lexicon-the-state] The State is a...
· Bullying
· Abusive
· Cartel
The State has one power -- coercion. It either bribes or threatens human beings, compelling them to do things that they would not otherwise choose to do on their own. Statists imagine all the wonderful things that could happen if the coercion was intensified. They never calculate the costs.

*What if what passes for dialogue in this country was focused not on
self-serving, partisan bickering points, but was, instead, an evaluation of all the real costs of statist schemes, both hidden and evident?*


People turn to The State because they think it's an effective short-cut to social progress and security. Indeed, The State has two powers that attract reformers.

First, politicians have tons of money with which to bribe the behaviors
that are politically preferred, and that's because they're very good at
stealing it. They are further supported by cronies who want their share of the loot.

Second, bureaucrats back those threats with real violence. Ignore their
edicts at your peril. Armed men and women will show up to take your
property or your liberty. Resist and they'll take your life! Â


The State is a [LINK:
"Violent Monopoly." Who else can require you to "patronize" their business?

Imagine, you don't like the hamburger you just received. Maybe you ordered it without onions, but it came with them. You can complain. In business, the customer is right. Maybe they apologize and replace the order. Perhaps they discount your bill. Even then, you have the choice to never darken the door of the establishment ever again.Â

On the other hand, how many IRS agents or FDA regulators say, "The citizen is always right?"

As Perry Willis has observed...
/You have more power as a customer than you do as a citizen./

Therefore, the size of The State is the smaller problem by comparison with the BACkbone problems. And if "governments" are supposed to protect and enhance rights, then...
*The bullying, abusive, cartel-like behavior disqualifies The State from
being an actual government.*
None of us would voluntarily sign all of our rights and reservations away, especially to someone who might be working against our interests. Even the masochist would want the control of a "safe word." Such control eludes the citizen. What's your safe word -- your escape -- when politicians or bureaucrats bully you?

All the democratic version of The State can offer you is, "Elect better
people." Suggesting that you have to convince 50%, plus one of your
neighbors to "give" you relief is hardly an outlet. The problem is
compounded when we see how rigged the system is in favor of the very power that oppresses your rights of conscience and happiness. So instead...

SIMPLY imagine an END to the Bullying, the Abuse, and the Cartel. Imagine instead that government is a service, accountable to the consumer. That's what the Post-Statist does.

If you found this article valuable please share it. /You can follow Jim
Babka on Twitter @JimBabka/

[LINK: https://secure.downsizedcfoundation.org/contribute/] If you like what you've read here, please support the Zero Aggression Project with a donation via the Downsize DC Foundation.



Copyright (c) 2013 by Jim Babka. Permission to distribute this blog post for educational purposes is granted, if done with attribution to the author and the Downsize DC Foundation. Permission to use for commercial purposes is denied.

This message is an educational service of the Downsize DC Foundation.Please share it with others. Please tell your friends that they can receive similar material in the future by subscribing to our free email newsletter, [LINK: https://secure.downsizedcfoundation.org/newsletter/]

This offering by Rev. Jerry L. Robertson

Views: 16


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Democrat Sen. Chris Murphy: ‘The Real Second Amendment Isn’t Absolute

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) tweeted Saturday there is a “real” Second Amendment and an “imaginary” one and he believes the real one is “not absolute.”

Murphy, “I support the real 2nd Amendment, not the imaginary 2nd Amendment. And the real 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute.”

The statement was a precursor to his call for banning “assault rifles” in the wake of the Santa Fe High School shooting, even though “assault rifles” were not used in the attack.

Murphy said the “real 2nd Amendment…allows Congress to wake up to reality and ban these assault rifles that are designed for one purpose only – to kill as many people as fast as possible.”

Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) said the Santa Fe High School attackers used a .38 revolver and a shotgun to carry out his heinous acts. Therefore, a ban on “assault rifles” would have done nothing to prevent the attack from occurring or the tragic loss of life from taking place.

It should be noted that Saturday was not the first time Sen. Murphy called the essence of the Second Amendment into question. On August 6, 2013, Breitbart News reported that Murphy told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that “The Second Amendment is not an absolute right, not a God-given right. It has always had conditions upon it like the First Amendment has.”

Murphy did not grapple with the words, “Shall not be infringed.”


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service