The White House’s decision not to try Dzhokhar Tsarnaev as an enemy combatant is a slap in the face to every citizen they swore to protect; especially the victims and families of the Boston bombings. Understanding these two murderers hail from a region overflowing with radical Islam, were guided/trained by terrorist operatives, and potentially linked to a 12 member sleeper cell, leaves no doubt as to their affiliation and sole motive…to wage war on the American people. The only reason these two dregs entered this country, let alone allowed to apply for citizenship, was because they duped a broken and inept system of enablers. I'm all for affording naturalized citizens - not those by default, neglect or nefarious ruse - the unalienable rights of being a loyal American citizen. This is why I can say, without reservation, the Tsarnaev brothers were, by nature of their heritage, associations and actions, enemies of the state.

It’s painfully obvious Obama and his progressive goons will go to any length to preserve their “Muslims are peaceful, conservatives are evil” motif by refusing to tie any symptomatic meaning or malevolence to these undeniable terrorist acts. The fact liberals are even trying to capitalize on the discovery these men were in possession of illegal guns – to reignite Obama’s damaged gun control agenda instead of the addressing the cold reality these scum murdered and/or maimed nearly 200 people under the banner of Islam – is an abomination in itself. Once again, as with Benghazi, our citizens are given secondary status in favor of those who wish nothing more than to destroy our way of life by preying on the compassion and sympathies of delusional progressives. When will the people wake-up and demand justice? Against our President no less!



I'm for the Constitution, Bill of Rights, as much as any other American, I simply refuse to aid and abet those who were allowed in this country and/or granted citizenship by a lazy and incompetent system. The Tsarnaev brothers murdered Americans under the banner of Islam and had zero loyalties towards this country. They knowingly abused such progressive stupidity. Just recently their mother exclaimed she didn't care if the younger son died before yelling, "Allahu Akbar!" Shameful and a disgrace to every "American"; even the liberal ones. They deserve nothing. Dregs like these live to prey on society's so-called compassion and understanding. Last week we saw the result of such foolishness. Yes, Dzhokhar will tried and most likely convicted; but that's not my point for he deserves no such public podium or special privileges. Sorry, I will never agree with foreign born terrorists being tried in a civilian court or being recognized as anything close to citizens. For those who disagree...then we respectfully agree to disagree. That's what makes America great.

Views: 562


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by George on April 25, 2013 at 1:52pm

If George Washington captured Benedict Arnold (a US Citizen), would he have tried him in court, or just sent him to the firing squad?

Comment by AmericanWarrior (USMC) Ret. on April 25, 2013 at 12:42pm
One who declares war on the United States is the enemy of every true American and should therefore be tried as an enemy combatant. I don't care if he, or she, is in the white house or the dog house, they are enemy combatants period! These ragheads have declared war on every American who is not a muslim, therefore they are at war with the same, and therefore they are the enemy and should stand trial before a military tribunal. On this, there is no room for disagreeing!

Semper Fidelis
Comment by R.Timothy Ritchey on April 25, 2013 at 8:38am

BIG NEWS: Saudi Terror ‘Suspect’ Visited White House Four Times

This is a news article on the internet. It includes M Obama's visit to the Arab in the hospital. It also tells how the FBI all of a sudden backed off investigating him, Why? And why would this Arab visit the WH 4 times?

Maybe I'm nuts but to me it says BHObama is behind these terrorist attacks. He's trying to take over this country and do away with the constitution and all our rights. Just my opinion. IMPEACH HIM then ARREST HIM!!!

Comment by Ron Hardy on April 24, 2013 at 8:49pm


Comment by Gene Szymanski on April 24, 2013 at 8:39pm

No matter what the people want, Washington will do whatever they please.

Comment by Adolfo O. Perez on April 24, 2013 at 8:09pm

Don't forget Moochelle and O'crap visited the Saudi National who was a person of interest but may now get deported and has 5 relatives in Guantanomo.

Comment by Rebecca M. on April 24, 2013 at 8:03pm

Obama is sympathetic to the Muslims because his heritage and obligation is with them. He is only practicing what was pounded in his head since childhood, which is to hate all infidels. Every American (non-Muslem) is an infidel and that is why Obama hates America. Then take that upbringing and toss in the fuel of Communist teachings and you have a Marxist Muslim.

A point to recognize here is that Dzhokhar was a US citizen, If he was NOT a citizen he would qualify for interogation without representation. However, because he is a citizen (regardless if we like it or not) he is allowed due process because of our Constitution.

Yes, we want answers to this tragedy. If the FBI and CIA really wanted to get answers they should not have gunned down the eldest brother Tamerlan. He was not a citizen although he had a green card. He is the one who would NOT have been given citizen protected rights. They knew he was the main one they would need to question. And yet, he is the one they supposedly gunned down in the shoot out. 

Comment by David Beaufeaux on April 24, 2013 at 4:14pm

The last line of the first paragraph is exactly true Of Obamination, when are the people who work for us in Washington going to Impeach this fake president for Treason? 

Comment by InfoWarsTV1 on April 24, 2013 at 1:40pm

That would be the gut reaction. Unfotunately, they are using terrorism as a method to strip rights away from American citizens. Once presidence is set, they can apply it to anyone as with NDAA. Remember drones started out in the battlefield, now they are bringing them here.

This is a speech from Aldous Huxley, a self proclaimed elitist who's brother was the first director of the U.N.'s UNESCO. Keep in mind Agenda 21. It is all about global governance. In this speech called "The Ultimate Revolution" from 1962, he discusses how the elite using terrorism to sway public opinion and the transition more direct methods of control:

"Well now in regard to this problem of the ultimate revolution, this has been very well summed up by the moderator. In the past we can say that all revolutions have essentially aimed at changing the environment in order to change the individual. I mean there's been the political revolution, the economic revolution, in the time of the reformation, the religious revolution. All these aimed, not directly at the human being, but at his surroundings. So that by modifying the surroundings you did achieve, did one remove the effect of the human being.

Today we are faced, I think, with the approach of what may be called the ultimate revolution, the final revolution, where man can act directly on the mind-body of his fellows. Well needless to say some kind of direct action on human mind-bodies has been going on since the beginning of time. But this has generally been of a violent nature. The Techniques of terrorism have been known from time immemorial and people have employed them with more or less ingenuity sometimes with the utmost cruelty, sometimes with a good deal of skill acquired by a process of trial and error finding out what the best ways of using torture, imprisonment, constraints of various kinds.

But, as, I think it was (sounds like Mettenicht) said many years ago, you can do everything with them except sit on them. If you are going to control any population for any length of time, you must have some measure of consent, it's exceedingly difficult to see how pure terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly long time, but I think sooner or later you have to bring in an element of persuasion an element of getting people to consent to what is happening to them.

It seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: That we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude."

I didn't say it, he did. In 1962.

Comment by Kim Kubena on April 24, 2013 at 1:26pm

This is nothing new to me, radical Islam poses the greatest threat to world peace more then any other evil in the world.  It is not corporate greed as the liberals would have us believe so that the agenda of one world government can be promoted. 

The agenda is for an elite group to control everything.  Read Dr. Howard Garber's info below.



© 2015   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service