“ Who Else Is Sleeping In Bed With Your Spouse ? “

“ Who Else Is Sleeping In Bed With Your Spouse ? “


“ Who Else Is Sleeping In Bed With Your Spouse ? “
This weeks article takes us to part 2 in a series of commentary and a discussion regarding the need to share and in helping all Americans understanding as well as fully implementing the return of our nation to common sense and Biblical principles. This particular article raises the following questions; Are you married or wish to be in the future ? Then, who else is or will be sleeping in bed with you and your spouse ? Interesting questions perhaps? If are interested thus far, then please read on and pay close attention to the information given in this article.
If you were like me up until some years ago, I was not fully aware of how truly ingrained the U.S Federal and State's governments were involved in our personal lives. I mean, I was aware that to some extent there was an increase or a creeping in of our Federal and State laws purposely forcing and enabling evil things such as abortion, homosexuality, and other areas like it in our personal lives, but to the degree of evidence and facts arising against our very own government in purposely subverting our God given, natural and Constitutional rights, I really was not that aware. Since that time however, I have found that there is no area of our lives that our nations leaders have not left untouched in violating Godly and Biblical precepts including that of the sanctity of marriage. As an increasing number of states pass laws such as allowing homosexual marriages and or unions, anyone with open spiritual eyes and that understands common sense can see that there is a furthering in our nation's moral decline and Biblical thinking and in turn, we have now lost our favor with God. Of course, most evil people do not recognize this, for wicked minded people care not what God thinks or even that they believe in the God of the Bible so why should they care right? Well, to answer my own question here; yes and no..... It is true most evil people care not about God or believe in God for that matter but the bottom line is they should care. Even a Roman Catholic like Rick Santorum(I'm not saying I endorse the man for President) has a very good understanding that violating Godly and Biblical precepts invites God's wrath and that means in the end, good as well as evil people will also sufferhttp://www.the33tv.com/news/la-pn-santorum-satan20120222,0,6346449.... . We should all come to an understanding that all people suffer at the hands of God for ignoring evil and refusing to apply practical precepts of Biblical good rather than the acceptance of evil. Every Christian's responsibility for removing all evil is a Biblically sound New Testament as well as an Old Testament idea. It seems the only “Christians” that may disagree and argue with me here about this idea are those of a(theologically wrong) American “feel good and itchy ear christian” belief system.
We who can clearly see where allowing such evil and anti-biblical acts such as allowing government sanctioned gay marriage or homosexuality to be propagated, endorsed or even encouraged in America(or anywhere for that matter) is quite dangerous for our nation's health. We true believers need to continue in raising our voices in warning our fellow American Citizens of the dangers of allowing such unnatural, perverted and anti-biblical acts such as homosexuality and “gay” marriage or even instituting government over God. There is something else we need to do to get our nation back on track, and that is to separate ourselves from this and other acts of evil in it's entirety. As our nations elected and non-elected officials in all three branches of government take actions that offends God and His people, Biblical action is required on our part in returning our nation back to God. What I mean by this specifically in regards to homosexuality and marriage as well as forced government evil mandates is that the “institution of marriage” needs to be returned back to the church as outlined in the Bible. The American and state's governments have placed itself as god in the institution of marriage and this is where the problem needs to be addressed. Get government out of the business of marriage and return marriage and other areas of our society back to the Bible believing churches and America will in part, begin to be restored.
To really understand the issue as well as the severity of unbiblical and immoral government involvement in our lives, we should understand that marriage as well as many other areas of government made regulations forced upon us takes root in contract law. American and state's government being full of lawyers, have taken upon themselves(many years ago) to make marriage part of government control and their contract law. This is why a person will “sue” for divorce in a government courts(The Bible teaches against this in 1Corinthians 6:1-11). Rejected by the American Government and courts even for Christians is 1Corinthians 6:4 which states “If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church. “ No government should be allowed to interfere in a Christian's life or where the Bible clearly states for men or government not interfere, allowing homosexual marriages included. There is a built in financial incentive however for the government to be involved in every area of every American's life and family, Christian or not. In the USA, a couple cannot get legally married without signing a government contract for marriage. When you, I or anyone else signs a contract, of course we are legally bound to it. Perhaps you are, or were, like I had believed in the past that a marriage contract signed, was only between myself and our spouse(male and female), how wrong that belief is ! When anyone signs any government contract, whether a marriage “license”, tax return, driver's license, social security application, pet license, any government ID and so on, we are bound to the government and agree to them as part of that area of our life whether we want the government there or not. A government marriage contract in America today means that a government official figuratively lays in bed between you and your spouse. This also means 24 hours per day, seven days-per week, 365 days per year, there is a government official overseeing your marriage and ready to intervene in every aspect of your marriage and family life. There is no escaping forceful government intervention including on behalf of the anti-God homosexual agenda. The sad fact is, once you have signed that government marriage “license”, Family Courts, Child and Adult Protective Services, Domestic Violence Program workers, social workers, teachers, school officials, judges, police officers, lawyers and many other “agents” of Federal, State, County and Local Governments can invite themselves into your marriage and or family uninvited anytime they wish and tell you what is or is not acceptable behavior or what is a healthy belief system according to their man made ideas-again, whether you want them there or not !
Yes, it's time for marriages and families to be governed by the Biblical churches once again, as God says so. I believe as well that we need to institute Jesus Christ back in the marriage as the “third strand” as declared from Ecclesiastes 4:12 and take the government out. There is a real war of the heart and soul of all Americans. The US, States and other Government officials would like to convince you that evil is good, just ask “judge”Tonya Parker of Texas who would love for you to reject God and follow her evil belief system to accept gay marriages; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2105958/Openly-gay-Judge-re.... The American Government never should have been allowed to been involved in Godly and Biblical mandates to begin with so taking government out of marriage in it's entirety will help our nation in being restored to Godly blessings. Rejecting the government from any and all marriage and rejecting all evil precepts such as homosexuality or “gay marriage” may take some hard work on our part such as instituting marriage certificates and holding our own records rather than the government doing so, but what ever is done, that in the end, I believe all the work to remove government and evil mandates from our lives is well worth the blood, sweat and tears we may shed in the process.
Don't be afraid, I have already had a death threat from the Batavia, NY police, had my children, house and property illegally confiscated by corrupted US and New York State government officials for my siding with Jesus and the Bible, but that does not dissuade me nor should any threats from evilists also deter you from doing what is right in the eyes of God as well.
Acts 5:29 “But Peter and the other apostles answered and said: “We ought to obey God rather than men “
Pastor Paul Waldmiller~Black Robe Regiment Pastor
PS...GREAT NEWS AND PRAISE THE LORD, MY BLOG ARTICLES CAN ALSO BE READ WEEKLY ON THE AMERICAN PATRIOT PRESS WEBSITE; http://65.175.108.34/#

Views: 55

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rev. Paul P Waldmiller on May 20, 2012 at 5:25am

You are correct, there is so much evil in our nation and so few who stand up to confront that evil.

Comment by Rev. Paul P Waldmiller on February 25, 2012 at 3:32pm

I appreciate all positive feedback on my blog articles. Thanks for the comments.

Comment by Rev. Paul P Waldmiller on February 25, 2012 at 3:30pm

 Dr B Leland Baker, if you read the Christian Bible, you will indeed read that each individual is responsible for their salvation through Jesus Christ but every nation as well has a responsibility to elect and promote Biblical ideals if that nation ever wants to see and receive God' blessings. No nation on it's own can stand. Every man, every nation needs Jesus Christ of the Bible. History proves my point I believe.

Comment by Rev. Paul P Waldmiller on February 25, 2012 at 3:27pm

van nolan price , we are all in great danger only in part because of the "lip service." It is that we ignore evil and allow it to grow without being checked is the issue.


Comment by Dr B Leland Baker on February 25, 2012 at 12:29pm

Good point about "strayed" - that was not my intent.

Some may have strayed intentionally and with full knowledge and others may have strayed without devious intent, but the result is the same.

In addition, Ministers and Priests that advocate Socialism and Progressive agendas in my opinion have "strayed" from teaching free will (individualism) and have shifted to support of collectivism ...  which is not a biblical principle.

Free will is implicit in tithing or donations for instance, versus the collectivists' forced redistribution of wealth as per our ever increasing federal taxation.

Leland

 

Comment by van nolan price on February 25, 2012 at 10:00am

Dr. B.

The word "strayed" makes it sound unintentually.

Comment by Dr B Leland Baker on February 25, 2012 at 8:45am

I concur that US Government has strayed from Biblical principles ... and our politicians have not adhered to their oaths of office. In addition, many church leaders have fallen as well, by supporting a progressive government that is no longer centered on Christian values and/or Constitutional compliance.

Comment by van nolan price on February 24, 2012 at 11:03pm

I believe you are trying to say that most people are only giving lip service to God.

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

ALERT ALERT

FBI Text Should Alarm Every American

Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, the reported FBI lovebirds, are the poster children for the next “Don’t Text and Investigate” public service ads airing soon at an FBI office near you.

Their extraordinary texting affair on their government phones has given the FBI a black eye, laying bare a raw political bias brought into the workplace that agents are supposed to check at the door when they strap on their guns and badges.

It is no longer in dispute that they held animus for Donald Trump, who was a subject of their Russia probe, or that they openly discussed using the powers of their office to “stop” Trumpfrom becoming president. The only question is whether any official acts they took in the Russia collusion probe were driven by those sentiments.

The Justice Department’s inspector general is endeavoring to answer that question.

For any American who wants an answer sooner, there are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read.

That passage was transmitted on May 19, 2017. “There’s no big there there,” Strzok texted.

The date of the text long has intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia campaign.

Since the text was turned over to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against the Trump campaign.

This month, they finally got the chance to ask. Strzok declined to say — but Page, during a closed-door interview with lawmakers, confirmed in the most pained and contorted way that the message in fact referred to the quality of the Russia case, according to multiple eyewitnesses.

The admission is deeply consequential. It means Rosenstein unleashed the most awesome powers of a special counsel to investigate an allegation that the key FBI officials, driving the investigation for 10 months beforehand, did not think was “there.”

By the time of the text and Mueller’s appointment, the FBI’s best counterintelligence agents had had plenty of time to dig. They knowingly used a dossier funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — which contained uncorroborated allegations — to persuade the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to issue a warrant to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page (no relation to Lisa Page).

They sat on Carter Page’s phones and emails for nearly six months without getting evidence that would warrant prosecuting him. The evidence they had gathered was deemed so weak that their boss, then-FBI Director James Comey, was forced to admit to Congress after being fired by Trump that the core allegation remained substantially uncorroborated.

In other words, they had a big nothing burger. And, based on that empty-calorie dish, Rosenstein authorized the buffet menu of a special prosecutor that has cost America millions of dollars and months of political strife.

The work product Strzok created to justify the collusion probe now has been shown to be inferior: A Clinton-hired contractor produced multiple documents accusing Trump of wrongdoing during the election; each was routed to the FBI through a different source or was used to seed news articles with similar allegations that further built an uncorroborated public narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. Most troubling, the FBI relied on at least one of those news stories to justify the FISA warrant against Carter Page.

That sort of multifaceted allegation machine, which can be traced back to a single source, is known in spy craft as “circular intelligence reporting,” and it’s the sort of bad product that professional spooks are trained to spot and reject.

But Team Strzok kept pushing it through the system, causing a major escalation of a probe for which, by his own words, he knew had “no big there there.”

The answer as to why a pro such as Strzok would take such action has become clearer, at least to congressional investigators. That clarity comes from the context of the other emails and text messages that surrounded the May 19, 2017, declaration.

It turns out that what Strzok and Lisa Page were really doing that day was debating whether they should stay with the FBI and try to rise through the ranks to the level of an assistant director (AD) or join Mueller’s special counsel team.

“Who gives a f*ck, one more AD like [redacted] or whoever?” Strzok wrote, weighing the merits of promotion, before apparently suggesting what would be a more attractive role: “An investigation leading to impeachment?”

Lisa Page apparently realized the conversation had gone too far and tried to reel it in. “We should stop having this conversation here,” she texted back, adding later it was important to examine “the different realistic outcomes of this case.”

A few minutes later Strzok texted his own handicap of the Russia evidence: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.”

So the FBI agents who helped drive the Russia collusion narrative — as well as Rosenstein’s decision to appoint Mueller — apparently knew all along that the evidence was going to lead to “nothing” and, yet, they proceeded because they thought there was still a possibility of impeachment.

Impeachment is a political outcome. The only logical conclusion, then, that congressional investigators can make is that political bias led these agents to press an investigation forward to achieve the political outcome of impeachment, even though their professional training told them it had “no big there there.”

And that, by definition, is political bias in action.

How concerned you are by this conduct is almost certainly affected by your love or hatred for Trump. But put yourself for a second in the hot seat of an investigation by the same FBI cast of characters: You are under investigation for a crime the agents don’t think occurred, but the investigation still advances because the desired outcome is to get you fired from your job.

TEA PARTY TARGET

 Trump Poised To Take
 Control Of The Federal Reserve 

  • The Fed doesn’t stabilize markets and money — it does the opposite
  • President Trump sharply criticized the Federal Reserve this week, saying interest rate increases are hurting the economy.
  • Trump will have the opportunity to fashion the central bank in the image he would like as he has four vacancies to fill on the board of governors.
  • The result could be a more politicized Fed.

President Donald Trump has multiple reasons as to why he should take control of the Federal Reserve. He will do so both because he can and because his broader policies argue that he should do so. The president is anti-overregulating American industry. The Fed is a leader in pushing stringent regulation on the nation. By raising interest rates and stopping the growth in the money supply it stands in the way of further growth in the American economy.

First, He Can

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve is required to have seven members. It has three. Two of the current governors were put into their position by President Trump. Two more have been nominated by the president and are awaiting confirmation by the Senate. After these two are put on the Fed’s board, the president will then nominate two more to follow them. In essence, it is possible that six of the seven Board members will be put in place by Trump.

The Federal Open Market Committee has 12 members and sets the nation’s monetary policy. Seven of the 12 are the members of the Board of Governors. Five additional are Federal Reserve district bank presidents. Other than the head of the Fed bank in New York, who was nominated by the president, the other four can only take their positions as district bank presidents if the board in Washington agrees to their hiring. One of these, the Fed Bank president in Minneapolis, Neel Kashkari, is already arguing for no further rate increases.

Second, Regulation

Following the passage of the Dodd Frank Act in July 2010, the Fed was given enormous power to regulate the banking industry. It moved quickly to implement a number of new rules. The Fed set up a system that would penalize banks that failed to obey its new rules. These rules included setting limits as to how big an individual bank could be; how much money the banks had to invest in fed funds and Treasurys as a percent of their assets; which loans were desirable and which were not; where the banks had to obtain their funding and many, many, more up to and including how much a bank could pay its investors in dividends.

These rules have meaningfully slowed bank investments in the economy (the Volcker Rule) and they have had a crippling effect on bank lending in the housing markets (other agencies have had an impact here also).

Thus, of all of the government agencies the Fed has been possibly the most restrictive. The president has already moved to correct these excesses by putting in place a new Fed Governor (Randal Quarles) to regulate the banking industry.

Three, Killing Economic Growth

In the second quarter of 2018, the growth in non-seasonally adjusted money supply (M2) has been zero. That’s right, the money supply did not grow at all. This is because the Fed is shrinking its balance sheet ultimately by $50 billion per month. In addition, the Fed has raised interest rates seven times since Q4 2015. Supposedly there are five more rate increases coming.

This is the tightest monetary policy since Paul Volcker headed the institution in the mid-1980s. It will be recalled his policies led to back-to-back recessions. Current Fed monetary policy is directly in conflict with the president’s economic goals.

Moreover, the Treasury is estimating it will pay $415 billion in interest on the federal debt in this fiscal year. A better estimate might be $450 billion if rates keep going up. There are a lot of bridges and tunnels and jobs that could be created with this money.

Then there is inflation. It is likely to rise if the Fed eases its policies. If that happens paying down the federal debt becomes easier. On a less desirable note, higher interest rates lower real estate values. Lower rates that stimulate inflation increase real estate values.

Bottom Line

The president can and will take control of the Fed. It may be recalled when the law was written creating the Federal Reserve the secretary of the Treasury was designated as the head of the Federal Reserve. We are going to return to that era. Like it or not the Fed is about to be politicized.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service